Shroud of Turin: Is it AUTHENTIC or a FORGERY?

Подписаться 243

50% 1

Discover the Shroud of Turin: Compelling Evidence for Jesus Christ's Burial Cloth | ‪@KailynJulianna‬
Join Kailyn Nickel in this engaging and laid-back presentation exploring the fascinating world of the Shroud of Turin. Believed by many to be the authentic burial shroud of Jesus Christ, this ancient artifact has captivated researchers and believers alike.
‪@nerdymarriedcouple‬

Кино

Опубликовано:

10 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 14

@jenniferlehman6191 18 дней назад

Based on other sources I’ve looked at, the face cloth was used while transporting the body from the cross to the tomb. It’s removed once the body is in the tomb before the body is covered/wrapped in the linen shroud, but the face cloth is left there because it has blood on it. Jews believed anything with the person’s blood on it needed to be buried with a person.

@kylerjnickel 18 дней назад

interesting point, thanks for sharing. that would potentially explain the lack of an image on the head cloth.

@UseByDate-Expired 17 дней назад

What "other"sources ? Internet know it alls like you always have some secret information, but never say where it came from. My sources say you are an idiot. Prove me wrong.

@Champfosho 18 дней назад

The Bible itself says "Strips of Linen" Not a single shroud. What are your thoughts on this? John 20:6-7 (NIV): "Then Simon Peter came along behind him and went straight into the tomb. He saw the strips of linen lying there, as well as the cloth that had been wrapped around Jesus' head. The cloth was still lying in its place, separate from the linen." John 19:40 (NIV): "Taking Jesus' body, the two of them wrapped it, with the spices, in strips of linen. This was in accordance with Jewish burial customs."

@kylerjnickel 18 дней назад

It appears that the words used for linen (ie ὀθόνιον) are not entirely specific, and can be used for several different types and sizes of cloth. Different translations render the word differently.

@Champfosho 17 дней назад

@@kylerjnickel Yeah I see I understand how the translations work. I actually should have checked the greek first. Thanks though : )

@Izzazzo 19 дней назад

holy sepulcer is highly debated, and for good reason. otherwise, good job

@kylerjnickel 19 дней назад

that's a whole other conversation haha. I personally believe it makes the most sense for the holy sepluchre to be the accurate location, but there are always alternate opinions or proposals. thanks for the comment!

@mtdouthit1291 19 дней назад

What about the coins on the eyes?

@kylerjnickel 19 дней назад

shorturl.at/XvwoS you can read through this article if you're interested. basically, the evidence isn't solid enough to support the shroud's authenticity. The image of a coin that people claim to see is not clear enough to be solid evidence.

@UseByDate-Expired 17 дней назад

The only fact you can ever be sure of , when it comes to the shroud, is that it doesn't matter one speck , if it is real. In fact, according to the teaching of the Jesus person, even pursuing studying this old trash, is idolatry. So, only sinners and non-believers even care if it is real.

@beverlyhurd8556 17 дней назад

What kind of warped brain does it take to make the idiot statement that anyone studying the Holy Shroud is guilty of idolatry?? 🤦‍♂

@jeffreyerwin3665 7 дней назад

The miraculous images of Jesus' dead body are a gift from God to the modern world which prove that Jesus was a real first century person who worked miracles, and who was executed by crucifixion. Why would anyone who is a believer insult this relic by calling it "old trash?"