Siege of Damascus 634 - Arab - Byzantine Wars DOCUMENTARY 

I hope you guys didn't forget to make a video about Ali pasha tepelena king of Egypt???

Is this a rerun to this series (early Muslim conquest)?

What I don't understand, is that, you went from stating that Muslim accounts regarding Roman numbers were vastly exaggerated to than asserting that the Romans were outnumbered. I found that a bit odd. And also the first engagement Khalid bin Waleed had with Roman forces was in the battle of muta'ah almost a decade before this battle.

You keep saying that Byzantine was devastated by the war, but what you fail to realize is that they had more than 5 years after the end of the war to restore stability and replenish their resources, on the other hand the Arabs lived almost all their lives as quarrelling tribes and knew no meaning of unity, when Muhammad united them almost 80% of them rebelled and Abu-Bakr had to fight many internal wars in order to restore stability, in the very same year of the rebellion's end he launched his forces not to the Persians only but to Rome as well at the same time, not to mention that their warfare equipment would not be even compared to that of the mighty Sassanids and Byzantines. So when you bring up the fact that Byzantine was exhausted because of the war it gives absolutely no sense to the outcome of conflict with the Arabs, because the Arabs' situation was much worse than Byzantine's, at least Byzantine had more than five years of stability while the Arabs had almost two months before their campaign was launched, and Byzantine had a huge expert of organized government and management while their counterparts had literally zero expert in the manner due to the fact that they used to be divided tribes hating each other and wage war on each other for the stupidest reasons!! In short; the Arabs were the actual side in this conflict to have been truly exhausted by war not Byzantium!!

NOTE: The nickname sword of Allah was granted to Khalid ibn Al-walid after the battle of Mo'ta(مؤتة) as his charge in dawn against the larger byzantine army at dawn was too risky yet paid off, delaying the byzantines temporarily for the muslim army to retreat in good order. This is the libk in arabic for those who can read it ar.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D8%AE%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%AF_%D8%A8%D9%86_%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%88%D9%84%D9%8A%D8%AF And this is in english en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khalid_ibn_al-Walid And also on the battle of Ajnadin, some sources mention that a few days before the battle the byzantines were reinforced by contingents of the Ghassinds, but I am not fully sure, can you confirm whether it is true or not? And btw thanks for the great video hope you will soon cover the Umayyad history and their great battles like the battle of Balinjar.

I am not sure, but it is probably a later name, as in "the gate Thomas used to attack".

@@KingsandGenerals it is a later name but it was a good meme

@@KingsandGenerals Like Luigi Codorna's mountain? (((((((7433456th battle of the Isonzo river)))))))

Like Stalin did at Stalingrad

😂😂 By the way the gate of Thomas is still preserved as it is here in Damascus and is referred to as bab toma

It is wisdom of a person who see all of battlefiedl form space... It is actually pretty scary, how a line of infantry can obstruct line of sight of a commander, even when he is on some high vantage point. I mean i saw once people playing at medieval battle- two lines of skrimishers clollided- when another group emerged from behind first one, everyone were surprised, because nobody even saw them coming, until it was too late...

Everyone can speak but few of them could have acted .. الواقع غير التنظير يا عم الكميتي 😂

@@heretyk_1337 We're not talking about drills here We're talking about a well trained, well provisioned armies The Sassanid and Byzantine armies had centuries of army tradition that such thing as "vision obstruction" is taken into account by the generals

لمذا اسمها مصر و ليس بلاد القبط ؟

@@Omegaeon1 لأن ده اسم البلد في اللغات السامية زي العربية والأشورية الخ.. ثانيا اسم الدولة في اللغة المصرية سواء في اللغة القديمة او الحديثة (القبطية) فهو "كمت" او "kemet"

MrMigraine and then he attacked them and the refuges 3 days later. Not so Honorable to me.

Tyler Ellis truce was over, also he went up to conquer antioch, and damn i would do my best to get that dangerous one eyed general or ....siege of malta

The_Guy he attacked Civilians the truce being over matters not.

@@tylerellis9097 Thomas and his troops are civilians?

@@tylerellis9097 sure it matters they are good us loot you can sell them or add them in your manpower

Bab Touma in Arabic means Thomas Gate in English 😂

If you aren't syrian, and you visited Damascus last year, I have to admit that have the balls ...

@@omarjedidi8958 yeah im not syrian. Its still pretty dangerous. Would not recommend going there without someone that knows english and knows the place well.

👏🏻

@@LuisAldamiz 100%. But you need a local person always. A history buff could spend a whole month just in Syria and Lebanon and he would still need more time to visit everything.

it really be like that sometimes. edit: Apparently he swore never to take another wife after she died. Feelsbadman.

Hoes before bros

@@imperator7828 It really shouldn't. Lol.

@@imperator7828 he became muslim so what you believe in doesn't apply on him ...

@@imperator7828 It is not very Christian to find happiness in the distress of others

What do u guys use for the tactical view

@@mugheessuhaib4644 i think it's just After Effect or other animation software

Odysseus Odysseus You wont see it if you play as ERE and WRE. That reskin is from theme of Sicily (AoC faction).

Takkan hilang melayu di youtube

Eh ada jugak orang melayu tengok video macamni? Ingat aku sorang je haha. Terbaik bang

I am A syrian...when i get married in 2014 there were clashes and bombardment between ISIS and free syrian army just 4 km from my marriage room in my village north of syria....

@@DDKKAY I'm really sorry man. Either way, i do not think you would betray your whole village and free Syrians to ISIS due to that

Knowledge Realm what do you mean isis?

LoL.

Gotta check more about this story, i don’t think he betrayed the Romans just because of a marriage, it’s none sense, he probably was an important officer who was a secret convert...

KebReet and he never loses

Before Khalid Ibn al walid became Muslim he lost a battle vs the muslims but he killed many Muslims and then 5 yrs later he became Muslim

Osaid Fudly before converting to islam he never lost as a (Leader of the army) he only became leader once before converting to islam and he won against muslims

When he lost he was never a leader just a respected knight

Plus the funny onion hat the muslims always wear XD

No The Rashidun Army was shattered because of the fitnah War Khalif Ali vs Muawiyah

@@luisromanlegionaire This is the stupidest shit ive ever heard

Luis what?! Lol

Luis the Arabs converted Turks to Islam after defeating then in central Asian, so everything Turks have done was because of the Arabs, ever the ottomans were speaking Arabic and dress like Arab kings, even they stole the name “caliphe” from the Arabs, so technically without the Arabs Turks wouldn’t live in Anatolia which was gifted from the Arab Abassyed caliph to the turk tripe

The Tiger The Oguz Turks migrated to Anotalia for two reasons Drought in their native homeland(Central Asia ) Mongol threat

Noor Haider Yes "borrowed" Lol, you people are surely delusional

z a قبل عام 634م كان الروم يحكمون دمشق، وكل سكانها مسيحيون. وعندما هاجمها العرب اقتحموها بقيادة خالد بن الوليد من جهة الشرق.. قاوم الروم دفاعًا عن مدينتهم، لكن خالد هاجم المدينة ذابحًا الأطفال والنساء والرجال ومدمّرًا كل شيء، ونقلت مراجع المسلمين قوله :"لن أرفع السيف عن رقابهم، حتى أفنيهم عن آخرهم". (المرجع👈 الواقدي، فتوح الشام، ص 41) (والواقدي هو من حفاظ الحديث، وهو أقدم وأشهر مؤرخي الإسلام) وقد حاول روم المدينة التفاوض مع المسلمين طالبين إليهم وقف المذبحة وعودة العرب "إلى بلادهم" (أيّ شبه الجزيرة العربية) مقابل إعطائهم مالًا وطعامًا، إلا أن خالد بن الوليد رفض وقال: "ما أَخْرَجَنا إليكم الجهدُ والجوعُ، وإنما نحن قوم نشرب الدماء، وبَلَغَنا أنه لا دم أطيب من دم الروم، فجئنا لذلك". (المرجع👈 ابن كثير، البداية والنهاية، ج 7، سنة 13هجريًا، موقعة اليرموك) وهكذا استمرت المذبحة، وخالد وجيشه يقتلون من روم دمشق حتى فاق عدد القتلى الأبرياء ال 40 ألفًا من مسيحيي المدينة. وكانت المدينة من جهة الغرب قد استسلمت لأبي عبيدة بن الجراح، فأتمّ أبو عبيدة الاحتلال استسلامًا من جهة الغرب، وخالد "قتلاً وذبحاً" من جهة الشرق.

@Sam Rogers ما هو مصدرك؟ هذا صحيح ليس لديك اي مصدر ههههههههههه معروف ان السكان لم يكونوا عربا و المصدر : www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC379148/

Paladin Christian اذهب واكذب في مكان اخر Lying pos

@ITS FACTZ wrong claim!! Those claims are in hadiths and in we'll known Islamic history.

Yeah she probably didn't want to marry a man who is willing to betray his city,country and people for just delaying his marriage.

@@jadenk1409 I dunno man, that shows some dedication to the marriage right there.

@@jadenk1409 I don't think that is why because this showed her that he cared about her more than anything. If it affected her, it was most likely in a good way since any women would be thrilled by this kind of devotion to their lover

@@jadenk1409 but most of the city converted to Islam few years later by their own choise and became a main part of the islamic community and army 😂

@Cegesh Well it is technically wrong, Syria and Egypt stayed majority christian territories for a few centuries after that. But yes, the conversions were of their own choices

Or maybe simply postpone your fucking religious ceremony until your city is no longer under siege perhaps??

Imagine if a state enslaved their kids, that would probably make them really mad.

@@mhsmhs2217 They always have an Excuse for losing against Arabians

@@mhsmhs2217 Or a euphemism for a glaucous: It soud realy fishy i think the man want the girl and was not at all fiancé. It basicaly he sell his town to fuck a girl and even maybe the girl doe not know it or even maybe be maried to a nother man.

jaden k there was no way the city could survive from that siege..the Muslims would probably conquer that city even without the betrayal of that guy. There’s nothing to blame him

Word ^^ I have final exams tomorrow and made a short break

I have to write 20 page paper until tomorrow and took a break by watching this

unless this is your life

also 10 minutes to look at the comments

Your life is not important

Khalid never lost a battle as far as I know but did Subutai?

@@GGitten Yes, he also never lost a battle.

@@GGitten Subotai also never lost a battle.

@@GGitten Subutai was a beast, he is the only known general I guess, that was successful in the invasion of russian lands ...

Omar Jedidi Poland succesfully invaded russia in the 1600. A polish army reached and occupied Moscow so Subutai was not the only one successfull in a russian invasion

arfaoui sami Yes but the army was all arabs

arfaoui sami Pakistans have nothing to do with the these wars

@@arfaouisami2955 nice man! Fateh is a Sikh word as well such as Deg Teg Fateh (food safety and protection for the world)

@@goldenmemes51 considering how there were Muslims in India long before the founding of Sikhism, you could say that the word Fateh may have come from Arabic or some sort of Islamic influence. That and the way Sikhism has some (not a lot but some) ties to Islam.

Arsalan Khan Yes so what no biggie Sufism has huge influence in India you for example were probably Indian and went to Islam ancestorial to escape caste and a lot of Sanskrit words and Arabic are there

Precisely it was after the battle of Mu'tah where he was given the nickname as he had broken 9 swords and turned a sure defeat into a strategic retreat that saved many of the men who he would lead at Yarmouk. The confusion comes from his declaration of faith where he said that his blade "would be the sword of Allah". However people just called him Khalid.

@@SantomPh thank you for the reply, but this is a controversial subject and let me correct one thing he didn't say that his blade would be the "sword of allah" but its the prophet mohammed who said that

Romans would never fo that. Once city decided to resist the residents were doomed.

@chetnoMAN we defeated them haha

@@NorahAlkhalaf0**defeated half of them when they were at their weakest***

@@TheRatOnFire_ they were not at their weakest, we made them weak, we broke them

@@NorahAlkhalaf0 Actually, it was the 4th Crusade and lots of plague that crippled the Eastern Empire, you guys took it later

Yes

+12.000. And no offense but I doubt they would ever defeat fortified bizantine positions being outnumbered 6 to 1 according to arab sources

it is well documented by Coptic Church sources , Cyrus himself sided with Amr and Copts due to sympathy with Muslims and Friendship with Amr from the days he was a trader, refusing to continue the fight and paying Jizya. Amr knew Egypt very well , and with over 500k Romans and Greeks in Egypt , 150k of them able to fight according to the massege sent to Cyrus from Hercalius accusing him of not having the well to fight. even a 100k army is not enough to control Egypt without public sympathy with Muslims , hatered to Romans , and cooperation from Cyrus .

Cyrus was the head of Malkite Church in Egypt , and knew there would be a prophet after Jesus even Heraclius knew that , so sympathy from him had it's reasons.

@Joshua张志鸿 wow, what a nice "information"

@Badr -eddin Serb

read and search his seerah.

True.

Youre confused bro! Its not abt making Khaled look smart cse he undoubtly is, but to correct u it was his idea and Rafie was the only man among em who crossed this desert cse none dare! So Khaled told him to guide the army cse Khaled wanted to arrive to Syria as quick as possible.

Brother, Khalid asked his man about a shorter route towards the Muslim army in Syria cuz the other routes would take alot of time. Rafe told him about the route through the desert but cautioned him that not even small caravans dared to move through it due to the fear of getting lost or dying of thirst. Other seniors also cautioned Khalid to not move through the desert, but it was him alone that decided to move through it despite all the warnings. And it was his strategy to make twenty camels drink alot of water and tie their mouths. The camels were slaughtered during the march to extract the water from their bodies. So it was mainly his decision. What is interesting is that after the journey was completed Rafe told him that he had travelled through this route only once and that also in his childhood days some 30 years ago. Alhamdulilah that Allah helped them and guided them on the right path or things could've been different (na-uzu-billah).

@@Trending_Clips4U of course was Al walid decision ....but the idea of crossing the desert by (this way) was rafe idea...look to the source above if u can understand Arabic...

YES

They have a whole playlist covering military tactics from Philip of Macedon, through Alexander the Great and covering the evolution of the Roman army. They've recently started to doing videos covering Roman economy. I can link you to a video from History Marche covering the battle of Hattin. The fall of cordoba is somewhat covered on any videos related to the Reconquista. There are videos all over youtube covering that. I'll link you to a video by History Time covering many details of the Reconquista. Armies and Tactics- ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UIRS_PMeVVY.html The battle of Hattin - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ndXuRoJd6hQ.html Normans in Spain / The Reconquista - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-6cM59fQ8yhA.html Roman Economy Videos- ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BaCaFpAtm48.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eDTaOOVbxLs.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-iJGnnxPn7SU.html

@@SupremelyFly thanks i will check them out, much appreciated

How abt Arab Muslim emperor (Abbasid caliphate)vs romans

@@mohammedyassine9263 History Time released another amazing video. Nicephoros Phokas vs Sayf Al-Dawla | Byzantine vs Arab Wars ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8suw9kk6z4c.html

@blue heeler why would we hate if no one did any thing bad toward us , we are humans we hate and love like you do . Stop overthinking because you can't do anything.

@blue heeler He never said he hated everyone else, you just put your words in his mouth and played yourself.

@blue heeler So you got caught on your bullshit and decided to play it off? Haha. This is why hateful rats like you will always stay miserable.

blue heeler so if he didn’t mention his love to his Christians bros that means he hate them *LOGIC*

now they are just lazy people , who live in luxury , and oil ressources! we gotta admit that they're still cool !

@@ahmedst205 true but you gotta admit, the only thing they kept was war

@@ahmedst205 not all of us m9

@@ahmedst205 arabs got very lazy and innactive after sahabi died they had so much potential but didnt used it. Osman's saved muslim middle east. Sad to watch what is muslim world now

@@Jacobson47 ottpmans are the worst thing that happened to the middle east

No man can take my eye I am no man

They used to go with their husbands in wars, they stay in the back and they would shoot stones at the soldiers if they retreat

The women came along to protect the baggage train, and were trained to shoot arrows and use slings as well as spears. In this very campaign Khalwah Al Azar was known to have fought and even commanded troops at the front line. Even when captured and thrown into a women's prison she engineered a breakout and killed 9 men herself.

Women played an important role during early arab conquest In battle of uhud a woman called nussaiba defended the prophet from khalid who managed to defeat the muslim army

the battles of Khalid Ibn Al walid (when i read about them) i found them to be nothing less than what you read in stories. for example, Zerar or Derar in Ararbic (the champion the narrator talked about) was captured by the romans in a battle, his sister covered her face and wore armor and tried to fight her way through the romans in order to save her brother, and everyone admired her way of fighting. and since that Zerar was the favorite wing commander of Khalid, he made a rescue mission to save him from the Romans and bring him back alive, and they actually did in a completely cinematic scene

​@Khaye Ayubann Please extend your negative energy in the other direction & mind the gap. Thank you

@Khaye Ayubann sieging a city is no comfortable or an easy task

Only missing the battle of Heliopolis, and the siege of Cartage.

@@andrespolo2722 yeah,i hope he soon do that

@@andrespolo2722 and they should also do Battle of Nahavand Last big battle between Muslims and Sassanids After this total defeat, Sassanids were not able to muster another army to pose threat to Muslims, however some of Sadness generals still tried to resist with guerilla tactics but that was too late

@@umaransari9765 That is when persia came into muslim influence

muslim* Arabs were not the only ones helping to advance Islam

ALMUIZ FATIMI There’s a series about khalid (RA) which was aired on MBC, its in arabic though there is english subtitles.

Roy Riley his use if mobility and light units against heavier troops is just stunning.

He's the only general who defeated the Prophet Muhammad pre conversion. That's the power of Sword of Allah, nothing can stand in his way if Allah wills it, not even prophets. Please make Battle of Uhud documentary.

Prophets in Islam تاريخ الاسلام هو تاريخ المسلمين، ثم اني مغاربي و لم اطرق بابك و أسألك عن تاريخي أو أن تحزن علي...فما أتى بك ؟

I agree with you There is more in this man then just war He had a wonderful poetry when the Romans killed his son after being sent to them by the prophet for negotiates He sworn to take a thousand knights with him : جَرَى مدمعى فوق الْمَحَاجِرِ وانْهَمَلْ .. وحَرُّ الغَضَا قدْ زَادَ فى القَلْبِ واشْـتَعَلْ وهَدَّ فُؤَادِى يَوْمَ أُخْـبِرْتُ نَعْيَهُ .. وضَاقَتْ بِيَ الدُّنيا ودَمْعِيَ قد هَطَلْ وزَادَتْ بِيَ الأحْـزَانُ والْهَمُّ ضَرَّنِي .. وعَنْ قَـلْبِيَ الْمَحْزُونِ بِاللهِ لا تَسَـلْ سَـأَبْكِى عَلَيْهِ كُلَّمَا أَظْـلَمَ الدُّجَى .. وما ابْتَسَمَ الصُّبـْحُ الْمُنِيرُ وما أسْـتَهَلْ لقَدْ كانَ بَدْرًا زَائِدَ الْحُسْنِ طَـالِعًا .. فأَصْبَحَ بَعْدَ النُّورِ والزَّهْوِ قدْ أفَـلْ كانَ كَرِيمَ العَمِّ والْخَـالِ سَـيِّدًا .. إذًا قَامَ سوقُ الْحَرْبِ لَمْ يَعْرِفِ الْوَجَلْ أحَاطَتْ بِهِ خَيْلُ اللِّئَامِ بِأَسْـرِهِمْ .. وقَدْ مَكَّنـُـوا مِنْهُ الْمُهَنَّدَ والأسَـلْ فَوَا أسَفَا لَوْ أنَّـنِى كُنتُ حَاضِرًا .. بِأبْيَضَ مَاضٍ لِلْجَنَاحَيْنِ مُنتَصِـلْ تَرَكْـتُهُمُ وَسْطَ الْمَعَامِعِ جِيـفَةً .. عَلَيْهَا تُسَاقُ الطَّـيْرُ فى السَّـهْلِ والْجَبَلْ وحَقِّ الَّذِى حَجَّتْ قُرَيْشٌ لِبَيْتِهِ .. وأرْسَـلَ طَـهَ الْمُصْطَفَى غَايةَ الأمَلْ لأقْتُلَ مِنْـهُمْ فى الوَغَى ألفَ سَيِّدٍ .. إذَا سَـلَّمَ الرَّحـمنُ واتَّسَـعَ الأجَـلْ My tears have run over the orbits and flowed And the Heat of the coal has increased in the heart and burneds And Demolished my heart the day I received his news narrowed on me the life of this world And so my tears had falls increased are my sorrows and the grief harmed me and about my sad heart ..for Allah's sake don't ask I will weep for him whenever darkness darks .. hadn't the light of the morning smiles out of dawn yet and started he was a full moon over charmed rising .. so became after the lightness and Flowering already set noble was his uncles and his mother's trib as well .. If the market of war raises he did not know fear Surrounded him horses of the miscreant with their numbers .. They managed him with sword and spear Oh my sorrow If I were just present .. I would left them bodies like gathered slain deers By the right of He whom Quraish(the tribe of Makkah) pilgrim to His house .. and send the chosen one the hope of hopes I shall kill from among them a thousand master .. If The Merciful kept me and my age expands

Idk, but I'm pretty sure he's the only one who never had lost a battle. I'm not 100% sure tho. But i don't think there's a general in history who never had lost a battle but khalid. Check it out

@@user-xp1ib3tq2h there is like alexander the great and Scipio africanus

@@user-xp1ib3tq2h Timur too never loose a battle

@@user-xp1ib3tq2h No, there are many but the fact is no one fought more than 100+ battles & still stay undefeated. That what makes Khalid ibne Waleed R.A arguably the greatest Commander in the history of humanity.

Beside the notion that the arabs were some of the central military advisors of roman and persian armies in the area, I’d love to have some idea of how he came to his strategic and tactical skill. How much was study vs practice?

👀 who is watching me at the gym? Lol

Actually it was fully black

Prophet Mohammad peace be upon him had a flag called ( The Eagle ) راية العُقاب And is’s black and white with the Shahada and the Takbeer on it . But other flags were used as well green and white white and black many of them .

Thanks for watching!

@@wf7625 Because you have big overextension

Don't forget Quality and Offensive Idea

@@034_yoppyilhamramadhan8 oh boi 100% tradition & army professionalism

@@wf7625 1.25.1 > 1.28 Fact.

No "Mobile warfare" idea of desert warfare tree. Really because his strategy seems to mirror a lot of blitzkrieg than line battles of ancient warfare. This era is basically CK2 and Imperator Rome hybrid in scope.

Thanks, Dennis!

Haha this, watching this on sunday morning is the best ^^

Thanks! :-)

Thank you!

Byzantium archers:Oh my god just ran in.

Zarrar Ibn Al Azwar and his sister Khawla Bint Al Azwar. Look them up. They had fearsome reputations for performing many heroic deeds.

During that time the closes one was heracluis But by the Muslim invasion he was to old

winning every battle from small to large, like a true warrior he went to his grave undefeated. Only time could kill him

@@atilla4155 yeah Khalid was an excellent general

Love syria from morocco The heart of the arab culture ❤️❤️❤️

@@moulayismail1546 the real arabs living the peninsula syrians running the war so they can not be an arab

@Yung cash register A.K.A Lil Broomstick but the arabs won in the end i believe, it was during the battle of ain jalut or something like that

@Yung cash register A.K.A Lil Broomstick baghdad that time have no glory like past

Omg.....me too

Anime girl with south eastern name? Interesting

@@masayukitachibana2756 Eriq is a girl's name? That's funny

@@sozibrahman8504 Eriq is a boy's name, the anime girl is my profile picture. Get it done, bruv.

@@affandi99 Eid Mubarak

Its harder to market some arab crossing the dessert with camels whom he eats later then a legendry general who defeated the romans and crossed war elephants on a mountain.

Well, while he won some battles he ultimately lost the war and have you tried drinking water from a camel?

Hannibal crossing the Alps because that's something the Romans would not expect was practical and ingenious. Napoleon just did it for reputation. Khalid bin Waleed crossed the dessert because he was told to he some where ASAP. So just like Hannibal he done what the enemy didn't even consider doable and won the day.

I think all the major battles are now covered, but we'll see.

That detail is hilarious.

@@franglish9265 and the guy whose marriage was interrupted.these kinds of fake and stupid excuses as details are used by bazantine writers or christian writers has been used

@@the_kekromancer9779 i am sure about one thing that your historians try to made a very biased history to make them look glorious .dude that islam force defeated romanpersian army at the same time with inferior weapons and armours etc.so i am pretty sure they didnt needed a traitor .stop making excuses and accept the history .

@@the_kekromancer9779 you made a good point but at after defeating two empires wealth was no longer issue .they lost because it was way too away from home and christians had superiorty in sea also extreme cold weather which arabs were never uses too also 30 years khilafat was ended with ALI (R.A). and ummayad bastards took over and it became kingship just like byzantine and peraian empire .all that moral was gone and death of Hussan and Hussain(A.S) and their family .that was the most tragic moment in our islamic history . dude i like to know history without being biased thats the only way to learn from history

"yes... just take em. take whatever you want. we don't want no trouble..."

But the Muslims lost the battle of Mutah and had to make up some ridiculous claim that they had 3,000 warriors and fought 200,000 from sun up to sun down before withdrawing.

@@moonstarstarmoon8754 Muslims have not been defeated in his muttah Khalid ibn al-Walid put a terrible plan to return tactically became a tactical withdrawal does not consist of your head

@@darthcalanil5333 man compared to back in the day that was angelic as hell trust me 😂😂 the Mongols would've told them surrender accepted and then ripped their heads off just for a laugh, hell middle ages europeans would've at least hanged, drawn and quartered their asses for heresy or something or other (even of they're Christians but from another denomination 😰😄. Early Muslims were light years ahead when it comes to rules of war... You couldn't even a cut a tree on your way through a campaign or attack a religious place and only fighting soldiers and combatants was allowed no civilians something that one can't say about some modern armies in today's world 🤔

@@darthcalanil5333 All armies in that period used to kill innocents i think that the Muslims were much better in terms of pity and sparing the unwilling to fight !!

Thanks!

Are you honestly that stupid? If the Romans took Medina and Mecca I'm sure the Muslims would have done the same if they took those cities back.

Half facts galat hai isme..

@@Sam-AZ but overall end result is real

@@usmankayani805 :) yes. But video maker blasphemed ....

I think it was partly because both the Byzantine and Sassanid armies were thoroughly demoralized from their wars with one another, add unrest among the civilian populations and a highly motivated enemy and you have a recipe for disaster.

@@mysticonthehill no not True The muslims where always outnumbered and some of them didnt even have armor, but they where known as strong firm fighters, arab tradition was wrestling so allot of The muslims soldier where long and muscler soldiers they know how to fight thats why they won and ofcourse with God his help

​@@sultanselim8746 not true, they had several companies of invincible battle angel sent to help. Now that's next level of steering the outcome behind the stage, the ultimate schemer.

It's true that there's little information to go by. The whole thing is like a big jigsaw puzzle, which takes careful analysis but taking into account the Byzantine and Sassanid situation, in particular the 20 odd year war between them; the devastating effects of the plague which destroyed the taxation base and the early Muslim conquests between 623 and 632AD. It's not astonishing or even surprising to learn how the Arabs were so successful against the two "superpowers" at the time. They happened to be at the right place and at the right time. This Arab army was a highly sophisticated fighting force, as evidenced in early Muslim accounts where constant battles and expeditions within that 9 nine year period had enabled the Arabs to become battle-hardened veterans long before they faced either the Byzantines (with the exception of the Battle of Mutah) or the Sassanids and on top of that, having a competent commander. Of course they were poorly equiped to begin with but that would soon change with constant raids on enemy supply lines acquiring good quality armour and weapons. Also acquiring a multitude of wealth and arms from fighting and raiding against the Ghassanids, a client state to the Byzantines who formed a buffer zone between the Muslims and Byzantines. The last thing the Byzantines wanted was another war so were content to supply arms and funds to the Ghassanids but this was in vain.

@@mysticonthehill False

Thanks for watching!

@@KingsandGenerals no problem, but I think you should do episode about Khalid tactics in battles because he genius more than any commander in his age or even better than many others!:)

Thanks for watching!

Thanks, will consider!

That was a weird part...

Yes like it was nothing 💪💪💪💪 khalid the best general the world has ever seen

at night...probably led an ambush, with the extreme mobility of his troops, this man can become become a nightmare

@mr_ anheuser i dont understand what you are saying? ????

@mr_ anheuser 😂😂😂 thats what you are claiming they where great generals but not better than khalid, if you put The man you mentioned against khalid they Will get destroyed easily i swear to God, khalid is Just another level

@@mortezamohammadi505 actually although it is allowed to marry more than one woman .. it is highly recommended to marry only one .. marrying more other women is for their protection , as an example your 2nd wife should be a widow with orphan childeren so you marry her to look after her and her childern .. do you get the idea ??

What are you trying to say ? It's a wrong thing to say because it has been said alot ?

I read about the life of the prophet and his companions and that's what actually happened . And take in consideration that islam has limited 4 wives . Before islam it was allowed in arab traditions to marry any number of women you want for any desired purpose .

The poor window here Is due to poor interpretation of later muslims not because of religious teachings . And as a muslim the more I read the more I understand that true islam is a very strong religion and ideology that could bring solution to many of the worlds problems . Just read more about it and think .

Also the age isn't the major condition for marriage in islam . Maturity and capability is the most important condition .

Habessinia is a better spelling. Since we are Habesha.

HistorywithNathe I used Abyssinia because is in English that's how the foreigners say it , and I'm foreigner

False

@@feduntu Fuck off

@@jumjum151 yeah just like chirstian enslaved Africans,dayaks and native Americans and invaded east Europe and Scandinavia 😂😂😂

@@jumjum151 really why they forced those innocent people convert to chirstian

jumjum151 even the Protestants did

Conquering the new world and colonizing Eastern Asia.

yoshi lorak Conquering the new world following the annihilation of the Native population to disease and then wiping out the remnants with superior technology and brutality is NOT equal to crippling two superpowers. That is like Poland conquering the Soviets and USA after WW2.

@@yoshilorak5897 that's not comparable. Neither one of the conquered people were a world power at the time. Especially considering that Europeans had rifles by then against people still using swords. Nice try though.

@Mohammed Alkenani I can't see any pride in forcefully converting people to Islam or killing them but as you can see your whole history is based on that. So don't think Arabs have some kind of moral high ground

@mr_ anheuser you said midle east its depend on the era, there are babylonia, greek,egypt roman ,persian also khulafur rasydin,abasyd,umayah,ottomans may be until now the coalition of eourope still controlling midle east but who nows next? Nothing last forever as we came to the end very soon.

Thank you!