I am torn between this and the new 14-24mm zoom from Sigma. I really like prime lenses, but the wide angle is one area where I wouldn’t mind a little versatility.. but I really like the 1.4 and don’t know if I need wider. Tough choices I have a 35mm 1.4 and I love it, but looking for something a little bit wider
got the 24mm. its sharp, but could be a tad sharper. ( for example: the sharpness of the sigma art 105 f2.8 macro and the sony 35 1.8 is better ) but i prefer the look on the 24mm compared to the 20mm. even thou it doesnt sound much of a difference.
I can't imagine Sigma 24mm being any sharper than it really is. Sony 35mm is the least sharp one from all those you have mentioned but still very sharp
Thanks for the great videos. You also reviewed the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G not too long ago. You loved this lens as well. Which one would you keep and why?
This lens seems awesome ! I'm wondering if you get some vignetting on the edges while using some filters like variable nd filter + Cpl filter wide open between f1,4 to f,2.8 ? Very nice review tho !
You said "There is no other f/1.4 20mm lens available for Sony...that's not true. This is Sigma 2nd 20mm Art lens. The first one has a Sony mount and is 1.4. I use the first one for RU-vid videos. Other than that, great video!
maybe. It's a different lens. It is smaller and lighter. It is a prime with wider aperture and standard front screw on filter thread .... 14-24 is a zoom, more versatile but heavy and you need special rear filters for it
Thank you for your response, I was wondering if I really need the 14mm or not. Low aperture isn't a priority because I would be shooting landscape type photography.
I have made lots and I mean lots of money with the two cheapest lenses that I could have for nearly 12 years. I don't believe in dissing a lens just because it is not perfect. I always highlight what I have issues with but I strongly believe that if that's what you have and that's all you can afford, you can make it work well
@@PavSZ Fair enough! I agree with you honestly, you can make it work with any gear if you're creative and open minded enough :D Cheers mate, keep it up
@@Donbros I can't agree with that. Good photographer or film maker can make a cheap and inferior lens work well - a lot of people have very small budgets, what's the difference to those people that G Master is better than chinese $300 lens - if they only have $300, they will make that lens work for them
@@PavSZ OK so you need to correct the incorrect information and confirm with Sigma the info about specifications and details like this. I understand you are under a NDA and have to release the review in a hurry but wrong is wrong. If I had believed you that the lens was not fully weather sealed, I'd have moved on and not looked twice at it again. It's an Art lens, they are ALWAYS weather sealed to a high standard.
