In this video we will learn how to find Number of Geometrical and Optical Isomers in simplest way. Follow me on Unacademy: unacademy.com/u... #Trick #Stereoisomers #CSIR
Sir, In Mabcd complex u said 3 G.I and 3 O.I all together 6 stereoisomers and in M AA3 no G.I & O.I 2 by considering d & l form similarly why haven't you considered in Mabcd 6 O.I with 3 pairs of d& l ?? Pls explain this doubt
@Amaira_sethi For any kind of square planar complex all the ligands lie in the same plane i.e y called square planar and hence there is always plane of symmetry. There can never be optical activity possible in square planar complexes.
Thank you sir and more over Ma2b2c2 give 5 g.l and in the last question optiona,b,c are correct and d is not correct.once again thank you so much sir 💐
U said that the same ligands on axial position they will have pos but u taken example at the 29.46secs it possessing no pos how is it possible the trick is not working out here
Thanks a lot for the video . I have lot of difficulty in solving the ques of dis topic bt now after watching your video i got the confident that if i practice the ques i will be able to solve the ques in exam . Thankyou for helping us 🙏🙏🙏🙏
Good afternoon sir I watch your video which help me a lot thank you sir One request sir please provide short notes on other important physical chemistry topics like you provide on thermodynamics and electrochemistry..
Thankyu so much sir..& sir ek question hey..ye ki Kya gate chemistry v esi sab topic ke vedios SE cover ho skta h means uske liye alag SE Kuch krna Hoga..Kya I mean it's sufficient for NET SET GATE..
@@AllBoutChemistry how many more wrong things are there in this video ????? Kindly pin in one comment it will be beneficial for all else ppl will find ur videos misleading sir please
Ans of last question : All have d3, so regardless of field strength of ligands, all have same spin, option (b) is correct. Since it has d3 conf., no J-T distortion. Coming to option (a), all should have 3 d-d transition, but as octahedral field strength of the ligands have changed, their absorption will definitely vary, not same. So, correct options are (b) and (c)
If number of isomers are asked in the question, then do we have to include the original structure as well? Like in example Mabcd there will be total 3 geometrical isomers or 2 geometrical isomers without including the original structure?
Thank you sir.Sir how to count stereoisomers ?is it sum of from+optical active+optical inactive isomers or only optical active+optical inactive isomers ?please clear doubt sir
That book is good to develop basic concept, but don't expects questions of that level in CSIR, try to buildup your basics from there and then switch to standard books
thank you sir. i hv downloaded Atkins- inorganic , Atkins-physical chemistry and Ajay kumar- organometallic and bio inorganic books.....is it sifficient sir..