Single Bullet: An Exhibition in Brief 

These hard working students were led astray by their professor. The jacket comment is intriguing until you look at the drawing made by the Parkland doctor as well as the autopsy photos which show the back wound was 4 to 5 inches below the neckline. So the entire exhibit is flawed from the beginning. But it had to support Allen Specter's theory because it is in the Allen Specter Building at Philadelphia University!

As the man says the positions are most important....the bullet wound was moved by Gerald Ford to the neck from the back. The back wound was 6 inches below the shoulder not in the neck. The presidents surgeon set it at the third thoracic vertebrae and it was confirmed at the autopsy before they knew there was an entrance wound in front. They didn't find out till the day after the autopsy the wound in front was done where the trach was done. That's when Humes burned his notes and wrote a new autopsy report to fit this wound. The doctors at Parkland said an entrance wound to the throat and first they tried to say JFK turned toward the TSBD and was shot in the throat. Then the Zapruder film proved he never turned so they had to come up with a new story to fit. Connely was sitting in a jump seat in front of JFK, he wasn't seated in the center of the car as they want you to believe. The jump seat is only 2 inches inside of the door not in the center like they show it. The wound from back to front is 11 degree upward angle not downward as it would be from a shot 60ft up.. Numerous people seen a bullet hole through the windshield at the hospital. A shot from the front through the windshield hitting the throat and exiting the back could leave a 11 degree downward angle but not a shot fired from 60ft up. Another thing when you feel pain you grab where it hurts first. The President grabbed his throat not toward his back. The government just as today lies all the time to the people. Think about it before you just believe what they say happened.

I applaud these students on their hard work. However, they focused on Allen Specter's 'Single Bullet Theory', while ignoring the missed shot, the windshield evidence, and the head shot(s) and the timing of the shots. In another video of this project, one hears a student describing the many 'conspiracy theories', not realizing that some of those crazy theories have been put out there in order to make those who disagree with the Warren Report appear as fools. Let's just assume for a moment that one bullet actually did inflict the wounds as described. That alone would not preclude a conspiracy. These creative, industrious students were led by their professors to believe that the Warren Report is true if the single bullet theory can be proven true. All of this was done in the Allen Specter building at Philadelphia University, of all places! Could there be a bias here? I would like to know where the components of this exhibit are today?

The 3 red strings are incorrect, but i understand you are using the WC report claiming the first shot happen after the limo came out from behind the tree. That was when the 2nd shot occurred. The first shop happen earlier just after the limo turned onto elm. Bullet most likely hit the street light post and deflected. Even ear witness testimony says there was a PAUSE between the first and second shot. If you look at the three red strings...the first and second shot would be quick,,,,then a pause then the last shot. which contradicts earwitness testimony.

Really neat exhibit- and I believe in the single bullet theory - but im shocked that the display shows the bullet striking Connallys left wrist.

I don't believe it. You can make evidence look the way you want. Nice try.

Cool modern art project. LoL'd at "The Warren commission emotionless" I can buy the flight trajectory. The pristine bullet and the differing fragments are a different story.

They mis represent the facts. The autopsy picture shows the bullet penetrated the back not the back of the neck. So the entire exhibit is a waste. So why not adhere to the facts?

Yikes!!! Turning this on, I thought it might--possibly--represent an unbiased, rational examination of the evidence in this case...yet only a couple of minutes in...we hear the host claim that we know that there were three shots from LHO...and the last shot ended the life of President Kennedy. OH? ; ( This is SERIOUS baloney "from the word go!!!!" Anyone familiar with the case knows that Oswald played no role in the assassination...save his serving as the "fall-guy" (or "patsy")...and that there were several shooters in Dealey Plaza...shooting in a "triangulation pattern"... producing a flurry/volley/salvo of bullets, which--in no way--was possible for one shooter to produce. As it happens, Gov. Connolly opined that it had sounded as though the shots were from a semi-automatic weapon. And, he and his wife ALWAYS insisted that he'd been hit by a separate bullet from the one which ended Kennedy's life. We also know that there were shots to the front of JFK's body (OBVIOUSLY from shooters positioned in FRONT), which destroys the ABSURD SBT...an EXTREMELY erroneous and silly proposition!!! FAIL!!!!

Where is this exhibit located ?

Thomas Jefferson University is wildly incompetent for omitting critical details of this case. Disgrace to journalism.

He makes a point with the jacket " bunched up" as to the location of the wound. But fails the look at his shirt. The under shirt etc. The back wound lication matter is a moras. Gerald Ford changed the actual location. It was later changed again. An actual look at the wound shows it to be at the location described in the original notes of Humes and Boswell. The notion this conclution was accepted over the opinioms of military and law enforcement. Rather the opinions and speculations of an Arlen Spector. That it's self pretty much says it all.

This is sponsored by Arlen Specter Center. Total BS.

Barjon is the next Pacino

The HSCA said that the main factor in influencing its conclusion that the bullet that struck Connally had first struck and passed through Kennedy, was the ovoid shape of the wound in the Governor’s back, indicating that the bullet had begun to tumble or yaw before entering. An “ovoid” wound is characteristic of one caused by a bullet that has passed through or glanced off an intervening object. Additional confirmation of SBT can be had by the fact that the shape of the hole in Connally’s suitcoat matched the shape of the wound in his back.

This is hilarious… It all adds up to the magic bullet theory….😂😂

Gov sponsored WC cover up theory. The single bullet hosx

The propaganda machine still hard at work even now.....

single bs theory

Total crap !!!!

“I am convinced that Oswald would have been found ‘not guilty’. Beyond a reasonable doubt, to me there is no question, he is not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” - Jeremy Gunn, Chief Council for the Assassination Records Review Board

I agree with the single bullet theory but a much better explanation will be found in Vincent Bugliosi's book. The explanations offered here are hard to follow especially the part about bullet weight. Also the background music in this video is an unnecessary distraction and frankly just bad.

Wrong wrist, it was Connally's right wrist.

Former president GeraldFord, who was a member of the Warren Commission at the time, wanted a change to show that the bullet entered Kennedy ''at the back of his neck'' rather than in his uppermost back, as the commission originally wrote. Mr. Ford said in a telephone interview that the change was intended to 'clarify meaning', not alter history. ''My changes had nothing to do with a conspiracy theory,'' he said. But his editing was seized upon by conspiracy theorists who reject the commission's conclusion that Mr. Oswald had acted alone. ''This is the most significant lie in the whole Warren Commission report,'' said Robert D. Morningstar, a computer systems specialist in New York City who said he has studied the assassination and written an Internet book about it.