@@CodysdabAgree. The commies been waiting 14 years. They'll do anything to cling onto power. I know now why the cult never answered a question properly during the run in to the GE. He couldn't lie straight in bed. Kept his mouth shut ,kept his cards to his chest. He's been in a month, makes tories being in seems years ago already.
Two tier Kier Two tier government Two tier policing Two tier court system Two tier media The woke tyranny is coming for the millions of British people who are concerned about forced mass immigration policy.
It is time people woke up, the election was neither lost nor won, the baton was simply handed over. Both doing the same job, holding an election is simply giving the illusion of change. Different teams, same old game.
Worse than May, and Truss and Boris and Fishy all counted together, feel like I missed someone, but there were that many in such a short time it's hard to remember now. But Starmer eclipses them all for vileness and incompetence and backstabbing working class
If Boris had said something like that, it would have been picked up immediately as one of his 'buffoon' moments... Starmer says it & the MSM just report it without comment.
Honestly,you couldn't make it up. He is a complete clown. Two diametrically opposite sentences, One straight after the other. Does this plonker think that we are as thick as mince. Obviously!!!!
@@richymenezes1524 I appreciate your point, but if we are a rules based country, where the rule of law is NOT tiered but the same for all. Here is my response. Someone with money and a righteous attitude or similarly a collective of many people putting money into a legal action i.e. a lawful process seeking the Highest Courts response would be my way and answer to your question. In my view, Starmer broke the law. I believe a great Public Office is not a personal fiefdom there solely for (in this case) his personal or political views. The law is that the public office cannot be abused by “targeted malice, bad faith, recklessness etc”. The public office must be used for the good of the public, not for some political axe wielding and abuse such that Starmer engaged in, then doubled down on again. I’m an engineer not a lawyer, but even I can see that Starmer is and should be in legal trouble over both his speeches. They fanned the flames. I accept the courts can be seen as tiered as the police, BUT there are good and decent legal people out there as well as Judges who are independent (by constitutional right) of Starmer and these types of person might just be interested to look at this route. I can tell you if I had money, I would certainly look into this. Even Mr Musk might decide this is the right thing to do. Violence, on the other hand, must not be encouraged. We must have the rule of law and Starmer comes under the law exactly the same as you or I.
He is wanting us to riot ... then he can call us 'domestic terrorists' and call for marshall law to unleash the hidden UN troops hiding in hotels all over the country, locking us up in 15 minute cities and rolling out digital I.d ... we are on the verge of being inside wartime Germany under an SS stase police state
The dozy Slynews 'reporter' with a plastic tin on her head talking about 'far right' while a gang of clearly armed muslims liotered behind her yesterday was laughable.
Yeah, thought that was hilarious, did you see the clip of the bloke trying to slash the tyres of the sky reporters vehicle? Obvious what clan he was from, so sky deleated it…
@@DILLJones-t6s tool maker innit. Rofl. Sorry cannot stop laughing about it. I thought I'd got beyond it last time. But I forgot about it and this has reinvigorated my lolz.
Starmer: "Let me be clear, the meeting this afternoon was not about pointing the finger of blame, that is not how this government of service conducts it's business, because it doesn't work." Also Starmer: "Rather this was a meeting to pull together our response, response both to the immediate challenge, which is clearly driven by far right hatred." Make it make sense, for fuck sakes.
We need to take our country back. I came here 30 years ago and embraced the culture and its values. I have paid taxes , never asked for benefits while unemployed during COVID.. love this country and these scumbags don't even integrate nor respect.
I feel sorry for guys like you who come here legally, integrate with the people and culture and then the media try to lump you in with the illegals. We don't have an issue with immigrants who do it the right way your welcome and needed
The whole labour parliament look like stand in teachers without the qualifications just clueless. I bet there is a lot of people regretting their vote.
14 years in "opposition"? New Labour opposed nothing, if anything, they doubled down. New Labour would still have us wearing cotton over our faces and back in the EU, as some sub-division of a committee..... What a joke. FSKS.
6 weeks ago we were saying Sunak would go down in history as the worst Prime Minister. Not any more, Starmer will go down in history as the worst communist, or best depending how you look at it.
"It's not about pointing the finger of blame" he says. Yeah, not pointing the finger of blame at the people unaliving young children or worse. It's about pointing the finger of blame at honest, moral people who are beyond fed up with the forced diversity and rampant crime. Two Tier Kier. If Starmer wants to live in a Muslim country, he knows where can go.
Next step will be to push Blairs ID cards and demand anyone posting on social media has to use their real ID. (Speculation the latter is on the way in Aus?)
His use of the term "thuggery" is so out of touch with so called Labour roots. It's something I'd laugh if Lord Snooty Mogg came out with. Maybe he likes that term because it rhymes with buggery.
I did some research. Starmer is a verifiable far-left extrmst. He was part of the editorial collective of 'Socialist Alternatives' in 1986 which was of the Paris based International Revolutionary Marxist Tendency (IRMT). It is a Pabloite Trotskyist publication (that Trotsky - who with Lenin created the Judaic Blshevik Party and would commit geno side against 10 million Russian Christians). He wrote in "Wapping: End Of The Street April 1987' about whether police are needed, if prisons should be abolished, the article had great sympathies for Palestine and for Bolshevism, Marx and Communism (though critiqued Gorbachev a bit). Starmer also wrote about being against productivism (a despise for capitalism and new industry that would create jobs). The article also had a red Socialist fist symbol. This group branded other left groups that weren't hard left enough as 'ideological enemies' and they needed to be defeated globally such as neoliberals and the like. Why is a verifiable far-left extrmst the UK PM? What connotations does this have for UK democracy and British citizen's safety and freedoms? Extremely disturbing to find out.
Yeah....like Tony Bliar.....aka the unflushable. These people have their fingers in every pie and are shameless. We vote them out but they are never gone.
Why can't this man string a sentence together without looking at a bit of paper someone has written for him he must be the worst tool his father ever made
Adenoidal Dalek with Lego haircut and 2 B’s and a C at A-Level in a spat with Elon Musk, genuine genius and richest bloke on the planet. Shall we take bets on who will win?
