I have a Volvo XC40, what I dislike about XC40 is the suspension, which is tuned to sporty mode, very uncomfortable especially with the bad road surface condition in Penang. In comparison to Smart #1, would you say it is better if I am not an aggressive driver and prefer a smooth ride?
Smart#1 premium same price as long range model3. Tesla bigger more speaker more range but lower. Smart is a small car with big space its like a ora good cat but built proper 2levels higher. for that price i saw an ev6 for sale pre owned demo car. The only reason im considering smart is because 22kw charging i stay the area no dc charging i just drive as a 1st car plug in 3 hours can full. Every other car aside from zoe and expensive premium cars is 7 or 11 need 6-9 hours
People should care less about how many seconds it takes to go from 0 to 100. I believe people buy a EV car for everyday commuting and safe driving, not for racing. Since EV car has instant torque, you can takeover other car easily, i think EV car makers should lower the motor power (kW), but then increase battery capacity, and increase the charging speed.
LOL, why not have both? Since e motor is good at providing instant power. Will you ever argue when mobile phone must low the screen res when watching youtube videos? Since a phone is a device for phone calls, not for watching videos.
@@willqin4628If you want a smartphone just for calling and social use but not for gaming, should you lower the screen resolution or reduce the CPU performance to save battery? In fact, smartphones can be used to watch videos. What are you talking about? My suggestion is to lower the motor kW, which means lower horsepower (HP). Lower HP results in cheaper road tax, making it cost-friendly for buyers who don't need excessive power.