"So It's My Fault?!" Julia Hartley-Brewer’s RAGING Clash With Climate Adviser 

What do you mean ? Climate is not necessarily affected solely by fossil fuels and no one is saying that.

@@wakingfromslumber9555 agree. Climate is also effected by overpopulation.

Er it's also directly affected by the sun and it's cycles! Milankovich cycles! Etc etc.

​@@wakingfromslumber9555that's exactly what they are trying to say!😮

@@Frankie-c5x so what would you propose???? Culling the population???

Simple like you

Saw some footage showing quite clearly that the drains were blocked.

Bet the councils still charge for those basic services, that they don't do.

I've never seen so many unblocked drains as there are at present.

We have a flood in the road outside our house. It has been like that for a week now. The sewers are all blocked and Anglian Water don't want to know. Why is this happening? Well, it's not man-made climate change - that's a myth. We have large ditches along the roads, but they have not been cleaned out since we've been here - how long? 50 years.

Privatisation, they're owned by private companies

I'm not saying the abbey does get flooded but was it not surrounded by water a few years ago, and probably has since as well

@@andyaccount yes but remained dry whilst rest of town was flooded, wonder if they used climate scientists to work that out rather than just common sense

1962. then in the 1980s they felled all the trees in the road. Real common sense from the authorities eh.

Shareholders aren't complaining though.

Excellent spot well done👏🏻👏🏻🤣🤣

Hahahaha

😂😂😂

You hit the nail on the head, been saying this for years!

It is called "good husbandry"!

I got ridiculed on another YT vid. for saying the same thing.

Climate change is a massive excuse to do nothing. If anything happens, just blame it on the climate and not the hack politicians.

Simply put.. Farmers aren't allowed to fully dig and irrigate their fields by the bearded green ponces like this one speaking.. Thus leading to the floods.

Ever since Brexit companies don’t need to follow the EU rules anymore

@@run2cat4runGet a hobby

Must be if she is reading the wrong paper

@@jenniferparry8709 That thought ran through my mind as he said it. I also noted that the media are not necessarily noted for their sagacity where the empirical sciences are concerned.

they do proper research and journalism

​@@run2cat4runWho, the Guardian? Really? They're always printing apologies.

I was just going to put the same.

Spot on👍

Totally agree.

If they did that, they wouldn't be able to point to climate change😂

Is there realy someone who has an overall view of the water table and drainage ,or are we hoping what the Victoria's achieved will last for ever.

You’re bang on - I remember in the 70s when the conservatives ( yeh when they were actually conservative! ) promised that green fields around all cities were going to be forever protected- where I live recently people had to petition to save an ancient woodland part of blean a large woodland that’s mentioned in the Magna Carta ( is that not ancient enough?) to stop it being developed on - government and promises biggest oxymoron I can think of.

Bingo

@@TOM-TOM-TOM Which is it, "climate change brings more rain" or "climate change brings droughts" ?

@@TOM-TOM-TOM Ah! So it`s not a global thing, it`s more what you would call localised just like urban heat islands are local to a conurbation.

You think climate activists like David Attenborough etc are passionate about the earth because somehow they can make money? By the time these things take place they will all be dead , it’s because (like myself, I care about the planet )

Amd whats more thoe food plains have been here for hundreds and thousands of years. yet the Climate cult ignore those facts lol

Here's a clue ..Birds with long beaks live there...Duh !!

two parts of a road near me that regularly flood are outside takeaways!

Yes climate change should be epochal; which is why it rings alarm bells that it is happening on an almost generational scale. Also the term is anthropogenic, and I assume you threw in the word ‘putative’ so as to seem full of intellect. It’s fairly basic atmospheric science that if you burn billions to trillions of tons of co2eq while squeezing carbon sink potential with deforestation, peatland conversion, and ocean acidification, it’s going to have an effect. Even if we are in the midst of a termination event, human emissions would accelerate that process massively, causing far greater misery when half the world becomes uninhabitable in the span of decades. It’s not that difficult to understand that climate change is likely a product of both natural cycles and human impacts - only one of which we can make a difference to.

What is the source of your information? Because average global temps have never been 2-2.5 degrees hotter than today in the past 10k years. The last time average global temps were at this level was around 5 million years ago - before humans had even evolved. Also the past 5k years the Earth was experiencing a natural cooling phase, due to enter a new ice age in approx. 1.5k years. My sources are NASA, MET office, NOAA etc. You know, actual experts, not youtube channel presenters.

​@@darrenb3830Indeed, and the Human Race will die out anyway and be replaced by some other life form before the planet gets swallowed up by the Red Giant that is the ultimate fate of the Sun. Also, looking at historical statistics and trying to predict the future is a fools errand. You can't drive your car down the road by looking in the rear view mirror as you go forwards. 😂

Lol!

Didn't she notice that we had a Long Wet Summer.

When doesn't she?

I can guarantee the government only employ advisers that agree with their agenda.

No, they do it on GB news.

Yes be angry and loud

@@run2cat4run😆👍🏻

yip 1 .c in 50 years, we can adapt to that standing on our heads

You spelled, 'Don't' wrong.

He is a adviser how is he a activist? Big difference

😂😂😂😂😂Foolish comment. That's what they want you to believe. There's enough land for everyone, the issue is bad infrastructure, concentrated building, lack of investment and greedy corporations not wanting people to have businesses and property. Get out of your cognitive dissonance 😂😂😂

Ah now, that is where we have both gone wrong: we should be reading the *left* newspapers! 🙄

The BUNTY !!!!!! - which one had the four Mary's ? 😛🥰 So glad i had sisters !

Floods and droughts are increasing due to Climate Change. Rodell - Changing intensity of hydroclimatic extreme events - Nature Water.

@@jamesmorrow1646 There is no global trend in flood and drought, The ipcc 5th and 6th assesment reports confirm this.

NASA disagrees. But then they are only experts in planets so what do they know.

@@darrenb3830 And NASA engineers who have left disagree with NASA, there is a video on YT about this.

@@johnlawrence7386 RU-vid videos do not constitute scientific research. If they disagree with NASA, they should publish their works and prove it, with precise details and evidence of what they got wrong. A couple of employees out of thousands making general statements doesn't discredit the decades of research done by multiple scientific communities. The mountain of evidence is so overwhelmingly against your opinion on this.

@@darrenb3830 There was a professor at a University in Australia named Tidd, he's area of expertise was the corals of the Great Barrier Reef. When he disagreed with the University about their findings he was fired. The ex NASA engineers I mentioned said they could not tell that they disagreed with NASA otherwise they would have been fired, seeing the pattern yet? A woman at James Cook University, not sure of her position, put out ten papers about climate change, they were peer reviewed and dismissed as "nowhere near good enough", basically lies. There was a wildfire in Australia in the 1800's, one of the worst in their history and they had very high temperatures in that summer. You will not find that year on any records as they said "they could not trust the data" so they started the records the next year, obviously they trusted the data then because it suits their theory. Greta was not the first to say "we only have ten years to save the Planet" they were doing this in the 1940's, all have been proved wrong, especially Greta as she has now deleted those posts. I could go on but am now getting a bit bored, there are many video's I have seen by professors and writers who disagree that it is all "man's" fault, they take into account the "Malkovich cycle" which will bring about the next ice age and other cycle's of the Earth's orbit around the Sun. It is not all down to man.

@@johnlawrence7386 Of course you can just claim all the data is wrong and it's all a conspiracy and it just so happens this conspiracy conveniently involves the 'hiding' of the truth by not allowing certain things to be published (even though you can publish your own work freely). You are also conflating activist talking points (Greta, if she even did make that claim) with hard credible scientific data - they are not the same. What some activist or individual person said years ago, is not the same as published scientific research, with data freely available for anyone to verify. The Japanese space agency, the ESA, NASA, NOAA, MET office etc are all involved in some elaborate conspiracy for the past 100 years based on the words of a few individuals, despite the fact you can verify the basics of the theory with at home experiments. Despite the fact CO2 concentrations have doubled since the start of industrialisation and that it interacts with infrared radiation (verifiable facts). Despite the fact you talk of milankovitch cycles yet those cycles occur over thousands of years (shows how ignorant you are) and total solar irradiance declined since mid 20th century, even though global avg. temps increased (verifiable fact). Finally, would you not trust NASA about their understanding of the atmospheres of Mars? Jupiter? Pluto? No, because you would look like an idiot, But just so happens they are wrong about the Earth and have been involved in this conspiracy just so future governments could increase taxes.. it's completely laughable. If NASA told you there was a 1% chance of an asteriod hitting the earth in 20 years, you would expect our governments to do something about it not claim it as some giant conspiracy, because ultimately the fossil fuel industry and special interests don't stand to lose anything from it. But invest in future energy technologies that take money and power away from billion dollar corporations, now suddenly it's a conspiracy. Sure.

Climate models are quite accurate. Hausfather - Climate models - Geophysical Research Letters. Even the fossil fuel company’s scientists knew what would happen. That’s why their projections were hidden. Supran - Assessing ExxonMobil’s Global Warming projections - Science. In a natural world Milankovitch Cycles cause warming which releases CO2 which reinforces warming until a new equilibrium is reached. That’s why warming precedes CO2. Humans have cut out the middleman of Milankovitch Cycles and warming the planet with anthropogenic CO2. All climate reconstructions of the last two thousand years show rapid warming in the Industrial Era. PAGES 2k Consortium - Consistent multidecadal variability - Nature journal. Your cut and paste nonsense is a joke.

Someone who actually knows what he is talking about unlike these "experts" that the media keep dragging out

@@burgesspark685 It’s nonsense. Climate models are quite accurate. Hausfather - Climate models - Geophysical Research Letters. Even the fossil fuel company’s scientists got it right, that’s why their projections were hidden. Supran - Assessing ExxonMobil’s Global Warming projections - Science.

So that where all the tin foil went🙄🙄

Visitors ? What visitors ? They don’t go back, haven’t you noticed.

@@arnolddill wishful thinking plus too many RU-vid warnings......

You did. It was called Brexit. You took back control, remember?