instead of using partial fractions you couldve used the integration method take 1/s to the side and obtain the inv laplace of 1/(s^2+1) which is sin(t), then integrate it from 0 to t and you get -cos(t)+1, much faster than the partial fractions
At the end of each chapter, I feel so happy that the only logical decision is to go back to the start of the chapter and like each video. :D These video lectures are better than Netflix
Just a quick question. Sometimes problems ask you to write the solution y(t) without step functions. In this case, does it mean that we simply write y(t) as a piecewise function using the piecewise definition of u(t-3)?
instead of partial fraction couldn't you just integrate; int(sin(x))_0, ^t because you have 1/s in the last term? ) 1/(s(s^2+1^2)) (the factor of 1/s is the same as takeing an integral of the rest from 0 to t.)
hi,sir.. act I really love ur vid,it makes me more understanding.. I hope sir,u could do more example about initial value problem of laplace transform maybe about exponent? Btw,sir your video is sooo good👍👍
Instead of my university paying my messed up prof who doesn't want to teach "tedious details" I would rather they pay you as you are more important to me then Jesus himself.
Could you put the link for the partial fractions in the description like you mentioned? edit: Found it! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-2WINGvc0FtY.html