Тёмный

Solving an exponential equation with different bases 

bprp math basics
Подписаться 151 тыс.
Просмотров 1,1 млн
50% 1

Here we will solve an exponential equation with different bases. We will solve 2^x=5^(x+2) by using the rules of exponents, logarithm, and the change of base formula. This algebra tutorial is suitable for Algebra 2 students or precalculus students. Subscribe to ‪@bprpmathbasics‬ for more algebra and precalculus tutorials.
Get a 1.618 t-shirt 👉 bit.ly/1618shirt
Use "WELCOME10" for 10% off
Shop my math t-shirts & hoodies on Amazon: 👉 amzn.to/3qBeuw6
-----------------------------
I help students master the basics of math. You can show your support and help me create even better content by becoming a patron on Patreon 👉 / blackpenredpen . Every bit of support means the world to me and motivates me to keep bringing you the best math lessons out there! Thank you!
-----------------------------
#math #algebra #mathbasics

Опубликовано:

 

26 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 559   
@bprpmathbasics
@bprpmathbasics Месяц назад
1 divided by 0 (a 3rd grade teacher & principal both got it wrong), Reddit r/NoStupidQuestions ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-WI_qPBQhJSM.html
@cyan1153
@cyan1153 2 года назад
Interesting, I never knew you could do it that way. Here are my steps: 1. Take the natural log on both sides, & got: (x) (In2) = (x+2) (In 5) 2. Distribute: xIn2 = xIn5 + 2In5 3. Subtract xIn5 on both sides: xIn2 - xIn5 = 2In5 4. Factor the x out: x (In2 - In5) = 2In5 5. Divide: x = 2In5 / In2 - In5. This works everytime for exponential equations with difference bases.
@mirai3554
@mirai3554 2 года назад
I did the same thing, that's how I usually deal with exp equations with different bases
@createyourownfuture5410
@createyourownfuture5410 2 года назад
I did it in exactly the same way!
@dannyyeung8237
@dannyyeung8237 2 года назад
Yes that’s how I do too
@silver3.593
@silver3.593 2 года назад
Something doesn't make sense... how is 2ln5/ln2-ln5 equal to 2log5/log2-log5 ???
@cyan1153
@cyan1153 2 года назад
@@silver3.593 They are equal. Both is equal to -3.513
@rafaelivan1830
@rafaelivan1830 2 года назад
u can actually also just do log both side right away and have: x log 2= (x+2) log5 x log 2 = x log5 + 2log5 x log 2-x log5= 2log5 x(log2-log5)=2log5 x=2log5/(log2-log5)
@rygerety8384
@rygerety8384 2 года назад
First thought: 2 ^ any power is even and 5^any power is odd. Hmmm
@joaquinleon4114
@joaquinleon4114 2 года назад
Answer doesn’t have to be an integer
@rygerety8384
@rygerety8384 2 года назад
@@joaquinleon4114 yeh know that now 😥 Answer is -3.something I think
@luckygamer9197
@luckygamer9197 2 года назад
I got log base (5/e) of (2/25)
@youben3468
@youben3468 2 года назад
2power 0 is odd.
@handlebar4520
@handlebar4520 2 года назад
​@@youben3468 but 0 clearly isnt a solution to this question
@punteanu831
@punteanu831 2 года назад
I enjoy learning math from you early in the morning and late at night, you're cool
@lionelnelson2856
@lionelnelson2856 2 года назад
朝闻道夕死可矣
@pythondrink
@pythondrink 4 месяца назад
That's kind of hot
@JUSTREGULARSCREAMINGAAHH
@JUSTREGULARSCREAMINGAAHH 4 месяца назад
​@@lionelnelson2856WTF IS THAT SUPPOSED TO MEAN GOOGLE TRANSLATE???
@thodoriss3068
@thodoriss3068 2 года назад
An important point for students is to note that the reason we can divide by 2^x or 5^x, is that none of these can be equal to zero. Generally, however, when we divide by something that contains an unknown variable, we have to make sure to state it is different than zero and before we give our final answer, we check the case that it is zero.
@AZ-wc5ot
@AZ-wc5ot 7 месяцев назад
any number different than 0 raised to any power is not equal to zero
@RaspberryMalina190817
@RaspberryMalina190817 2 года назад
this has genuinely explained log rules better than my teachers in a few minutes so thank you so much
@almirandrade458
@almirandrade458 2 года назад
You are probably a genius who can understand a subject in a few minutes. The problem is and his teachers who don't know how to deal with your unusual intelligence. But the important thing is that now, in addition to understanding the log rules, you also won some cookies on youtube. Good job.
@domingosantonio3688
@domingosantonio3688 2 года назад
I recommend this maths problem . This guy is crazy applied a method that I have seen before in RU-vid . ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-z2OyVIJznHw.html
@tennesseedarby5319
@tennesseedarby5319 2 года назад
For the last question, answer in the same format: Step 1: 3^2x = 6^(x - 2) Step 2: 9^x = (6^x) / 36 Step 3: 36 = (6^x) / (9^x) Step 4: 36 = (2/3)^x Step 5: x = logbase2/3(36) Step 6: x = log(36) / log(2/3) Step 7: x = 2log(6) / (log(2) - log(3)) Step 8: x = (2log(2) + 2log(3)) / (log(2) - log(3))
@mathematicsbyraunaksir9778
@mathematicsbyraunaksir9778 2 года назад
2log6/log2-log3 is it right ...
@Tileguy80
@Tileguy80 2 года назад
@@mathematicsbyraunaksir9778 👏👏
@geonalugala
@geonalugala 2 года назад
@@mathematicsbyraunaksir9778 No, it isn't. What you have written fails the BODMAS or PEMDAS test.
@Lyonog-
@Lyonog- 2 года назад
The answer from the post is incorrect. As the OP solved the bases using the exponents first and that is really not the way to do it, you must put every one of the exponents at the start of the operation where they are conceived, for example: 3^(2x) = 6^(x-2) is equal to (2x)Log(3) = (x-2)Log(6). From there you utilize distributive property, you group similar values and that's it, so, the correct answer is: 2ln(6) x = - ------------------- 2ln(3)−ln(6)
@Utkarsh_229
@Utkarsh_229 2 года назад
@@Lyonog- No, OP is correct.
@1abyrinth
@1abyrinth 2 года назад
For the question at the end I got 2(log6)/(log2-log3), which can interestingly be rewritten as 2*((log2+log3)/(log2-log3))
@williamhogrider4136
@williamhogrider4136 2 года назад
Okay.
@createyourownfuture5410
@createyourownfuture5410 2 года назад
Yeah, in more compact form you can write it as log_(6/9)(36).
@mynanstoenail6979
@mynanstoenail6979 2 года назад
@@williamhogrider4136 Okay.
@davidseed2939
@davidseed2939 2 года назад
2[log_3(2)+1]/[log_3(2)-1]
@jphin9981
@jphin9981 2 года назад
@@mynanstoenail6979 ok
@devinmurphy6575
@devinmurphy6575 2 года назад
What’s interesting about this is that when you get to (2/5)^x=25. Intuitively, whatever number you choose for x will affect the fraction of 2/5. But the larger the number x is, the faster the 5 will grow in comparison to the 2. And you will never be able to find a positive value for x where 2^x/5^x=25 because the denominator will always be bigger. Then if we use exponent rules, we can realize that our x value will have to be negative. A negative x will swap the numerator and denominator and allow for the fraction to be equivalent, for some negative x value, to 25
@astha_yadav
@astha_yadav 2 года назад
Great intuition !
@danielordonez412
@danielordonez412 2 года назад
That's the correct answer.
@emmanuelrufai6471
@emmanuelrufai6471 2 года назад
Lol that's exactly right
@pirsentheta
@pirsentheta 2 года назад
I thank you for proposing these math problems, the solution to the second problem was -2log(6)/(log3-log2)
@ilyass-dc8zv
@ilyass-dc8zv 2 года назад
X=-8.838045... I think that is the solution
@erm4ck448
@erm4ck448 2 года назад
Ok but why do he have a pokeball doe
@Swarthy.
@Swarthy. 5 месяцев назад
We don't ask that question here
@herissmon9878
@herissmon9878 5 месяцев назад
Mikerfone
@Muhabawajid
@Muhabawajid 5 месяцев назад
To keep the kids with a 5 second attention span engaged
@GeezSus
@GeezSus 4 месяца назад
He gotta catch em all
@AlideEricsonMwandila
@AlideEricsonMwandila Год назад
This is so amazingly that everyone shouldn't complain about solving exponential logarithm with diff bases,but to be thankful...Thank you sir for this assistance once again.
@nicolascalandruccio
@nicolascalandruccio 2 года назад
Equation: 3^(2*x)=6^(x-2) 1. ln both sides: 2*x*ln3=(x-2)*ln(2*3) 2. Develop and use ln properties: x*2*ln3=x*(ln2+ln3)-2*(ln2+ln3) 3. Isolate x on the left hand side: x*(2*ln3-ln2-ln3)=-2*(ln2+ln3) 4. Solve for x: x=2*(ln2+ln3)/(ln2-ln3) which can be written as x=2*ln(2*3)/ln(2/3), We see that x0 and the denominator is
@Zwain-f5b
@Zwain-f5b 2 года назад
It would be easier if you make it (9/6)^x
@nicolascalandruccio
@nicolascalandruccio 2 года назад
Sure @@Zwain-f5b , there are a lot of way to do so.
@ameyatulpule5977
@ameyatulpule5977 2 года назад
Your passion and enthusiasm are contagious. I always loved mathematics and would have loved to study it in its purest form. However I ended up in its applications. Nevertheless, I thoroughly enjoy your videos. :-) Keep up the good work.
@domingosantonio3688
@domingosantonio3688 2 года назад
I recommend this maths problem . This guy is crazy applied a method that I have seen before in RU-vid . ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-z2OyVIJznHw.html
@madhura_rodrigues
@madhura_rodrigues 9 месяцев назад
Heyyy
@matheuslopes5287
@matheuslopes5287 2 года назад
The coolest part Is always the cute Little Pokéball in his hand. It's such a nice touch!
@peamutbubber
@peamutbubber 2 года назад
I thought of 2^x as e^xln2 and 5^x+2 as e^(x+2)ln5 and arrived to the same answer! Thanks to your previous teaching of course
@cliveanawana5289
@cliveanawana5289 2 года назад
To solve the problem you shared at the end 3^2x = 6^(x-2) Log both sides and transfer the power to the left 2xlog3 = (x-2)log6 Expand 2xlog3 = xlog6 - 2log6 Group like terms on the same side 2xlog3 - xlog6 = - 2log6 Extract the factor from the left side x(2log3 - log6) = - 2log6 Find x x = -2log6 / {2log3 - log6)
@vig7095
@vig7095 Год назад
I didnt get -2log6, instead I got it as positive.
@shouryatripathi7405
@shouryatripathi7405 3 месяца назад
Tell me if I am wrong with my solution: 2^x = 5^(x+2) log 2^x = log 5^(x+2) x.log2 = (x + 2).log5 x(log 2 - log 5) = 2.log5 x.log(2/5) = 25 And doing further calculation we can calculate x. Pls tell me if I am wrong here as it could help me develop my mathematical skills.🙂🙂
@atlasasylum
@atlasasylum 5 месяцев назад
Just log both sides immediately with either a natural or common log and save yourself the trouble of a weird base. Distribute x+2 so you get xlog(5)+2log(5)=xlog(2) Just get the xlog’s to one side, factor out the x X(log(2)-log(5))=2log(5) Then divide by everything other than X and that’s your answer without some weird base
@aofrog
@aofrog 2 года назад
3²ˣ = 6ˣ⁻² Expand the right side. 3²ˣ = 6ˣ(6⁻²) Divide both sides by 6ˣ. 3²ˣ/6ˣ = 6⁻² Simplify. (3²/6)ˣ = 1/36 (9/6)ˣ = 1/36 1.5ˣ = 1/36 Take the log base 1.5 of both sides. log₁.₅(1.5ˣ) = log₁.₅(1/36) x = log₁.₅(1/36) Use the change of base formula. x = (log 1.5)/(log 1/36) Expand the denominator (and numerator if you kept 1.5 as a fraction). x = (log 1.5)/(log 1 - log 36) Simplify. x = - log 1.5 / log 36
@RakeshKumar-rc4sj
@RakeshKumar-rc4sj 2 года назад
2xln3=(x-2)ln6>>>xln(3/2)=2ln(1/6)>>>>X=ln(1/36)/ln(1.5)=log to the base 1.5.(1/36) ...so simple no need to apply so many steps
@Uma-Bharat-India
@Uma-Bharat-India 2 года назад
@@RakeshKumar-rc4sj Still simplier is after taking log to base 10 both sides, convert it in to equation of 1 st degree and simplify it.
@geonalugala
@geonalugala 2 года назад
@@Uma-Bharat-India What does "equation of 1st degree" mean?
@adityatrivedi8799
@adityatrivedi8799 2 года назад
Thank you so much! I was just looking for it!
@ak-34
@ak-34 2 года назад
answer for the next question : 3^2x = 6^(x-2) taking log on both sides : log(3^2x) = log(6^(x-2)) 2xlog(3) = (x-2)log(6) 2xlog(3) = xlog(6) - 2log(6) 2xlog(3) = xlog(3) + xlog(2) - 2log(6) x(log(3) - log(2)) = -2(log(6)) x(log(3) - log(2)) = -2(log(3) + log(2)) x =-2(log(3) + log(2))/(log(3) - log(2)) here log can be replaced with natural log. Hope its correct.
@changwilee8121
@changwilee8121 2 года назад
He is actually a good teacher
@abrahammekonnen
@abrahammekonnen 2 года назад
Interesting way of doing it.
@JakeMarley-k6g
@JakeMarley-k6g Месяц назад
I just use a general formula for problems in the form, a^gx+c = b^fx+d, where a doesn't equal b. The formula is x = log ([b^d]/[a^c]). (a^g)/(b^f) (a^g)/(b^f) is the base if the way I wrote it was confusing.
@suvobairagi6952
@suvobairagi6952 2 года назад
I found a formula which states ..log base 1/n of a = n log (a) ...is it correct ?
@emexgalax
@emexgalax 2 года назад
I apply log or ln on both sides first and then solve, but tysm for showing me a different method :)
@mitthrawnuruodo2880
@mitthrawnuruodo2880 2 года назад
-2log6/log3 -log2 is the answer for the last question
@mathsprofabderrahim
@mathsprofabderrahim 2 года назад
Thank you brother
@Ewheii
@Ewheii 4 месяца назад
The main way I do it (I don't know if this is the most efficient way) is log both sides of the equation, move the exponent to the front. The equation for this scenario currently would be x(log(2))=x+2(log(5)). Divide either log on both sides of the equation. (For this equation I did log(5)/log(2)). After this you are left with x=x+2(log(5)/log(2)) or x=(roughly)2.32192x+4.64385. Subtract x from both side which leaves you with 0=1.32192x+4.64385. Subtract 4.64385 from both sides then divide by 1.32192. This gives the answer -3.512958, its not exact, (off by around 1/10,000 but it would be exact if you either use the ans key or write out the entire decimal.
@enomoto-kudamono
@enomoto-kudamono 2 года назад
Is anyone calculate by changing any number n to (e^ln(n)) first?
@chaosredefined3834
@chaosredefined3834 2 года назад
I did this instead... 3^2x = 6^(x-2) Taking log of each side 2x log(3) = (x-2) log(6) Subtract x log (6) from both sides 2x log(3) - x log(6) = -2 log(6) Take advantage of 2 log(3) = log(9) and -2 log(6) = log(1/36) To clean things up a bit x log(9) - x log(6) = log(1/36) Combine log(9) - log(6) to give log(9/6), which is log(3/2) x log(3/2) = log(1/36) Divide both sides by log(3/2) x = log(1/36) / log(3/2) Apply quotient rule to all logs, and multiply numerator and demoninator by -1. x = log(36) / (log(2) - log(3))
@NotSoDrewby
@NotSoDrewby 2 года назад
Despite learning this multiple times throughout my lifetime, I never retain any memory from my math classes
@Zacht1980
@Zacht1980 2 года назад
Before we start, is a PokeBall required to solve the equation?
@ntdtv
@ntdtv 2 года назад
Hello, I wanted to kindly remind you that I sent you a message regarding your videos. Do we have your permission to use them? We would be happy to know if there is any special requirement for publishing your videos that we could fulfill. Thank you! :) Sincerely, Divya
@lumina_
@lumina_ Год назад
hah ignored
@say-less-O3O
@say-less-O3O 11 месяцев назад
Fr
@TomFromMars
@TomFromMars 8 месяцев назад
Depends what you mean by publishing. Using it in the classroom is probably ok. Profiteering out of it is probably not.
@donatello7968
@donatello7968 2 месяца назад
that was very helpful thx
@ESOMNOFUONLINEMATH
@ESOMNOFUONLINEMATH 2 года назад
I have been your subscriber for over 3 years now. You inspired me to start my own channel
@nevoitzhak2092
@nevoitzhak2092 2 года назад
Log_6/9(36) for the end question
@HershO.
@HershO. 2 года назад
Nice
@_QWERTY2254
@_QWERTY2254 2 года назад
yeah same as log 2/3 36
@GoSlash27
@GoSlash27 2 года назад
I did it a different way and didn't need a calculator to solve it. I converted both sides to log10 and substituted the bases. 2=10^.3 and 5=10^.7 That left a simple algebra problem .3x=.7x+1.4. This simplifies down to x=-3.5.
@kidisthing
@kidisthing 2 года назад
In last we can put values of log on base 10 which is log5= 0.698, log2= 0.3010, log3=0.4771 🇮🇳
@TheMasterGreen
@TheMasterGreen 2 года назад
I'm in 8th grade and I solved his question at the end. 3^(2x) = 6^(x-2) (Pls pin me @just algebra) x = ~ - 8.838 How I solved it... I first did 3^(2x) = 6^x/6^2 Then I took Log (base 3) on both sides Log (base 3) 3^(2x) = Log (base 3)6^x/6^2 Then using logarithmic rules I got the right side = 2x because Log (base 3) of 3 = 1 and the exponent was 2x so it was just 2x On the left side, I got (using other logarithmic rules not going to type) x * Log (base 3) of 6 - 2 * Log (base 3) of 6 then Log (base 3) of 6 was in common so I factored that out on the left side So then I got: 2x = (x-2)*(Log (base 3) of 6) Then I divided by Log (base 3) of 6 on both sides to get: 2x/Log (base 3) of 6 = x-2 Then I divided by x both sides to get: 2/Log (base 3) of 6 = (x-2)/x Then I split up (x-2)/x to 1 - 2/x Then I added 2/x to both sides So I got 2/Log (base 3) of 6 + 2/x = 1 Then I subtracted 2/Log (base 3) of 6 on both sides getting: 2/x = 1 - 2/Log (base 3) of 6 Then I multiplied by x and divided by 1 - 2/Log (base 3) of 6 and I finally got X = 2/(1 - 2/Log (base 3) of 6) and then I used a calculator for the first time and I got X = ~ - 8.838. Please let me know if you understood my work or if you have any questions and also keep in mind I'm only 14 and a half so pls don't hate if I made a mistake Thanks
@aftabmohammad2579
@aftabmohammad2579 2 года назад
Yo, I got positive 8.838.
@TheMasterGreen
@TheMasterGreen 2 года назад
I don't think that's possible because 5 ^ 11.8 can't be equal to 2 ^ 8.8
@Hills1996
@Hills1996 2 года назад
Got your answer 😅
@大大-u3m
@大大-u3m 2 года назад
Good video for high school math!🤩🤩
@swarley2500
@swarley2500 Год назад
I got -(ln 36)/(ln 1.5) for the last question👍
@ham.x
@ham.x 2 года назад
Thank you for the nice lesson
@tbg-brawlstars
@tbg-brawlstars 2 года назад
Just do it like this for unlimited values of x xlog2 = xlog5 + 2log5 2log5 = x(log2-log5) *"x = 2log5/(log2-log5)"* Now put any base Keep getting ∞ values of x
@mel_ha22
@mel_ha22 2 года назад
I'm a new subscriber. Just one question, do you have a video abt logarithms? If you don't have it, can you make a video abt it? I haven't seen that before.
@shediegheit1910
@shediegheit1910 2 года назад
Hello sir... I've not understood how you have cancelled the log 5 with denominator of log2-log5.. whereas we have negative sign before it... please elaborate
@isaahreynoso9135
@isaahreynoso9135 2 года назад
Could of used log from the very beginning to bring the exponents down.
@weggquiz
@weggquiz Год назад
For the assignment question, the answer is x= 2 log 6/(log 2 - log 3)
@HUMV33
@HUMV33 4 месяца назад
2ˣ = 5ˣ⁺ ² 2ˣ = 5ˣ • 5² 2ˣ / 5ˣ = 25 (2/5)ˣ = 25 log(2/5)ˣ = log 25 x log(2/5) = log 25 x = log 25 / log(2/5) x ≈ -3.513
@anjaneyasharma322
@anjaneyasharma322 2 года назад
By simple algebra are they equal lhs and rhs. If not do you think you can make them equal by using log jugglers?
@satrajitghosh8162
@satrajitghosh8162 2 года назад
(2/5)^x = 2^2 Taking log to the base 2 one gets x* ( 1 - lg(5) ) = 2 or x = 2/( 1 - lg(5) )
@davidseed2939
@davidseed2939 2 года назад
in the old days before slide-rules even, we had to use log tables, so I know that log(2) =0.3010 and so log(5)=0.6990 so taking logs 0.301x = (x+2)(0.6990) 0 = 0.398x + 1.3998 x=-1.3998/0.398 x= -3.5170
@GodbornNoven
@GodbornNoven 2 года назад
x=2(ln5/ln2)/(1-(ln5/ln2)) first equation
@ashleyadair2850
@ashleyadair2850 2 года назад
idk but i am feeling proud after solving it myself
@Michael-sb8jf
@Michael-sb8jf 2 года назад
I always used natural log because Ln is shorter then log and doing that over a half page of more complex problems saves time
@domingosantonio3688
@domingosantonio3688 2 года назад
I recommend this maths problem . This guy is crazy applied a method that I have seen before in RU-vid . ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-z2OyVIJznHw.html
@glasssmirror2314
@glasssmirror2314 2 года назад
Tks sit for this nice equation.Now here what would prompt you to apply logs while we normally use normal calculations
@maths3998
@maths3998 2 года назад
2^x=5^(x+2) Applying log(natural log) on both sides x•log2=(x+2)•log5 x/x+2=log5/log2 x/x+2=log base2(5) x=x•log base 2(5)+logbase2(25) x•{logbase2(2)- logbase2(5)}=logbase2(25) x=logbase2(25)/logbase2(2/5) x=logbase2/5(25) solved This question is solved using property logbasea(b)=logbase c(b)/logbase c(a)
@thillairajahadnane9687
@thillairajahadnane9687 2 года назад
you are right this method is very easy We can use only property for Naperian logarithm (Ln a^x = x Ln a )
@keremdirlik
@keremdirlik Год назад
natural log is ln
@AD_ArnvD0323
@AD_ArnvD0323 8 месяцев назад
xlog2 = (x+2) log5 (Base is 10 ) xlog2 = xlog5 + 2log5 x= 2log5/ log2 -log5 = -3.54
@assburgers3457
@assburgers3457 2 года назад
An exponent divided by an exponent doesn’t cancel the exponent? 4/25=625?
@StaticBlaster
@StaticBlaster 2 года назад
For the bonus question I got the following answer: x = Log[base 6/9](36) or x = 2*log(6)/(log(6) - 2 * log(3))
@TheReaIestOne
@TheReaIestOne 2 года назад
I reduced it even more to 2{log2+log3}/{log2-log3}
@StaticBlaster
@StaticBlaster 2 года назад
@@TheReaIestOne That works too. Because log(6) can be broken up into log(2) + log(3) and in the denominator log(2) + log(3) - 2log(3) reduces to log(2) - log(3), which is what you got in the denominator.
@TheReaIestOne
@TheReaIestOne 2 года назад
@@StaticBlaster yep
@liamjarrett2999
@liamjarrett2999 2 года назад
I just multiplie the power of the base 5 by log2(5) then let the exponent of LHS = the exponent of RHS
@jeriesakroush7763
@jeriesakroush7763 11 месяцев назад
For the last one x= -log(36)/(log(3)-log(2))
@susrutakumarghosh2047
@susrutakumarghosh2047 2 года назад
The final answer is x= -3.5
@dr.kishorahire6739
@dr.kishorahire6739 2 года назад
The answer to question given by you at end is x = log2/3(36)
@TheFlairRick
@TheFlairRick 2 года назад
Is there a way to solve 2^X = 57^X+1? How about Squrare root X= X^3 solve for X?
@shubhamgarg09
@shubhamgarg09 2 года назад
I am new to this channel Content is great One question why does he have pokenon in his hand?
@fabianstohr1080
@fabianstohr1080 2 года назад
I got x = -8,84 ( approximately) Is that the right answer?
@rounaksharma8999
@rounaksharma8999 2 года назад
I did by integrating both sides wrt dx
@netosa3174
@netosa3174 2 года назад
1/(1 - ln(x)) = e^(1 - 1/x) how to solve for x?
@nicolascalandruccio
@nicolascalandruccio 2 года назад
Nice problem, x=1 0. First, let f(x)=1/(1-ln(x)) and g(x)=e^(1-1/x), and let's solve it 1. Then, ln both sides: -ln(1-ln(x))=1-1/x 2. Isolate 1/x: 1/x=1+ln(1-ln(x)) 3. Let u=ln(x), thus, x=e(u) and 1/x=e(-u) 4. We get, e(-u)=1+ln(1-u) 5. Now, let h(u)=e(-u) and let k(u)=1+ln(1-u), and the problem is first to check if the two graphs intersect 6. Case of h: h’(u)=-e(-u), thus, for all u in R, h’(u)
@netosa3174
@netosa3174 2 года назад
@@nicolascalandruccio Thank you so much
@ToddKunz
@ToddKunz 8 месяцев назад
I love your videos. Thank you.
@mohammedameen6824
@mohammedameen6824 2 года назад
Simply take log of both sides first and then solve. Much easier. X log 2 equals (x+2) log 5
@nativeman
@nativeman 2 года назад
Excellent sir..
@b213videoz
@b213videoz Год назад
I chose to divide both sides by 2^x (instead of 5^x) and my result is different: x = log5/2[1/25] = -3.51294159473206 ...I plugged it into that original equation and it checks out 🤪
@Carvin0
@Carvin0 10 месяцев назад
I'd just take the log of the first equation, after which it's routine manipulation. Just fun I'll take the natural log.. 2^× = 5^(× + 2) becomes x* ln(2) = (x + 2) * ln(5) or x*(ln(2) - ln(5)) = 2 * ln(5) or x = 2 * ln(5)/(ln(2) - ln(5)) = 2/(ln(2)/ln(5) - 1) = -3.5129415947320600588642107219209 You could use log of any base instead of e (natural log, ln) to do this. In particular you could use log base 10 (aka "log" on your calculator). A good question is to ask why the base of logs doesn't matter. Answer: To convert bases consider definitions x = a ^ (log_a(x)) = b ^ (log_b(x) So taking log base a of both sides we get the base conversion formula log_a(x) = log_b(x) * log_a(b) Now let's use this to consider log_a(x)/log_a(y) = (log_b(x) * log_a(b))/(log_b(y)*log_a(b)) = log_b(x)/log_b(y) Note the cancelation of log_a(b). that is, for a ratio of logarithms to the same base, the value of the base doesn't matter. QED
@hovedgadegaming
@hovedgadegaming 2 года назад
Keeping my knowledge fresh as always.
@aliali-i2z5q
@aliali-i2z5q 2 года назад
Thank you
@rdspam
@rdspam 2 года назад
Just ln() both sides and solve for x. xln(2)=(x+2)ln5 x(ln(2)-ln(5))= 2ln(5). x=(2ln(5))/(ln(2]|ln(5)). Seems easier.
@barackthecomposer6642
@barackthecomposer6642 2 года назад
What is that red and white ball in his left hand? What is the purpose of it?
@Frieswithbruh
@Frieswithbruh 9 месяцев назад
so helpful
@andrebullitt7212
@andrebullitt7212 2 года назад
Thank the heavens for numerical methods. There is no way I could have solved this. 😆
@georgesealy4706
@georgesealy4706 2 года назад
Thanks. That was fun. It has been a long time since I used log functions. Forgot how, LOL!
@Javcae
@Javcae 2 года назад
I still haven't learnt what log is yet or any of this in school but it looks fun so I'll learn it early
@SciHeartJourney
@SciHeartJourney 2 года назад
Thank you. This was excellent.
@johanliebert8637
@johanliebert8637 2 года назад
feeling proud that I actually solved it with my eyes and just came to prove that i’m right.
@handlebar4520
@handlebar4520 2 года назад
heres my method and its a little wierd 3^2x=6^x-2 3^2x=3^log3(6)(x-2) same bases so equate powers 2x=log3(6)(x-2) 2x=xlog3(6)-2log3(6) 2x-xlog3(6)=-2log3(6) x(2-log3(6))=-2log3(6) x=-2log3(6)/2-log3(6) x=-8.838
@game-cholic2969
@game-cholic2969 2 года назад
Gotta Solve ‘Em All
@borggus3009
@borggus3009 2 года назад
edit: I'm wrong but leaving my attempt anyway. answer before watching: 2 and 5 are prime. so any number that can be factored using one cannot be factored using only the other since neither can be factored into the other except 1 (which is 1 * x^0). This is the same as saying 2^x is never divisible 5 since 5 isn't divisible 2 and vice versa. So 2^x only equals 5^x when x is zero. this means 2^x and 5^(x+2) must equal 2^0 and 5^0. Since their powers are different, this problem is impossible. proof: 2^x = 2^0 x = 0 and 5^(x+2) = 5^0 x+2 = 0 sub in each other for zero x = x+2 0 = 2
@nemesis2022pf
@nemesis2022pf Год назад
We can also take the ln on both sides.
@tbg-brawlstars
@tbg-brawlstars 2 года назад
In last question, x = [2log6/(log6 - log9)]
@mathematicsbyraunaksir9778
@mathematicsbyraunaksir9778 2 года назад
2log6 /log 2 -log 3 is it right or wrong ..
@jookie2210
@jookie2210 2 года назад
for the question at the end: x=log3/6(6^(-2))
@FerdiCarrefour01
@FerdiCarrefour01 2 года назад
x=log25 with base: 2/5
@kingsroar7888
@kingsroar7888 2 года назад
U could use log10 at the very first step it could be easy
@huynhuctrung2756
@huynhuctrung2756 2 года назад
Well as i remember in grade 8 or 9, we used to have the same things but different number, but we didn't use log equation Just use the computer to calculate (2/5)^x = 25 Then we gonna have x
@sbyrstall
@sbyrstall 2 года назад
I just taught this to my summer school algebra 2 class.
@DoctressCalibrator
@DoctressCalibrator 2 года назад
If you write log without any base then by default the base is 10. So, how does this work?
@derchrissemann3707
@derchrissemann3707 2 года назад
Everybody: Posts Algebra Me: Why is he holding a Pokeball?
Далее
How to evaluate a rational exponent 9^(3/4)
5:15
Просмотров 319 тыс.
solving equations but they get increasingly awesome
10:44
'Impossible' question stumps students
6:36
Просмотров 772 тыс.
Why is 0! = 1?
6:05
Просмотров 19 млн
so you want a VERY HARD math question?!
13:51
Просмотров 1 млн
The Most Beautiful Equation
13:39
Просмотров 598 тыс.
Solving Exponential Equations
16:36
Просмотров 2 млн
This Video Will Make You Better At Math
4:52
Просмотров 3,7 млн