Fantastic Bilal. Very in-depth 🙌🏾🙌🏾 We're making the adjustments now and everything will be great. Thank you for your hard work and invaluable testing.
Awesome deep dive Belal, thank you! Some notes: For metric people, 5/64" is 2mm. Which i believe is PH00 size. We're going to be including this in the package so people don't have to try to find the correct size. The "certain E Mount lens won't lock on" is caused by the variance of the placement of the indent that the locking pin goes into on different brands and makes of Sony-E mounts. We found certain brands have them slightly offset from where it is natively on EF-M. The only way to change this behaviour would be slightly enlarging the locking pin indentation on the lens itself, as there's no real way to move the location of the original pin found on the EOS M. That would require some drilling and I'm in no way endorsing anyone to do this. We're already working on incorporating your findings into the final. Seriously, Thank you for your extensive testing and this awesome video 👌
Here's one of the anamorphic lenses that I use as a front adapter to recover some of the Lost aspect ratio when shooting 2.39:1 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rZ-gtutrCjk.html
Hello Belal, Nice step by step conversion. But where to find the Filmatura ring to install on EOS-M (and the second ring) ? Thanks a lot and best regards.
@@Scholastique That's the plan. They're saying it should be ready to ship likely in a couple of weeks, given that the updates they've made on the next beta are final.
Two Sony zv-e10 (overhead is vintage takumar 50mm f1.4 at f2.8 and a-cam is sigma 24mm f1.4 art adapted via mc-11)+ audio technica at897 with tascam dr-10x (Fed into the computer and operated via OBS) + 2x zhiyun fiveray lights
It's really going to come down to what it is that you're shooting, and what sort of look you're trying to get. I don't have any one size fits all type of recommendations yet, But I might share some considerations in the future
Great stuff, Belal! Do you know the degree of rotation the E Mount lenses take now from the vertical position normally held by EF-M lenses? You mentioned the labels on the lenses being on the bottom side now, but I’m wondering how much rotation is applied here when adapting manual E mount glass. My reason for asking is for potential E mount anamorphic lenses: they’ll have to be oriented vertically, so knowing how far to rotate the mount/body would be very helpful.
The angle is 100% dependant on the difference of locking pin vs locking tabs placement of M vs E Mounts. It's something there's no way to really affect - so ideally if you wanna shoot anamorphic you wanna use front anamorphic adapters, but if you remove the little Phillips screw on the lens you could theoretically be able to rotate it into the correct location. Not(!) the intended use case of the Dual Mount but theoretically feasible as long as you don't mind the fiddling around.
@@filmatura Thanks! I already use front anamorphic adapters, but find that there are several new and small anamorphic lenses on the market that often only come in E mount and are manual only, which would be a great place for the EOS M. For instance, Laowa Nanomorphs are excellent and tiny, and this mount adapter (if it can fix the lens vertically) could make for one of the most compact setups available.
@@ryanleethomas essentially. Some of the large telephoto lenses have the tripod collar that can rotate and then be tightened. I'm thinking it's the same idea
