Once Titanic's power went out, no one could see what was happening to the ship as it was a moonless night. That's why there were so many contradicting testimonies, as to whether the ship went down in one piece or broke apart.
@@MilotheRoseWolf titanic had a whistle, also the whistle used steam from the boilers which would've stopped venting steam by then because they didn't have fire in them.
The only Titanic film to feature the explosion sound survivors heard coming from beneath them after the stern went under. It wasn't that immediate, but very shortly after the last of the stern disappeared. It must have been terrifying for those not knowing what to make of the sound of an explosion (implosion) coming from beneath; especially on the heels of what they had just witnessed.
Poor special effects, but this film really captured the atmosphere. Father Byles and Lawrence Beesley were good inclusions, and "She's gone" was an emotional touch at the end.
@@nassauguy48 yes indeed. I think that is due to the tendency of movies to focus, on the one hand, on the romance of the first class chivalry, and on the other hand, on the desperate situation of the steerage passengers. I suppose second class were too middle of the road. SOS Titanic was the only film to handle second class characters.
@@wes8723 the scene at 1:53 was reused from A Night To Remember. No, its not bad; but other shots that were done on the Queen Mary look clumsy, and in a few they had water flowing down the deck (from the dry part of the ship!) and simply tilted the camera to make the ship look like it was sinking. SOS Titanic did it's best on a tv movie budget. I thought the script deserved a better treatment.
This may not be the best film from the collection but I've always loved it's soundtrack. I also think that this scene is done pretty well considering. I've always loved the effect of the painting falling off the wall and the glass opening on the mantle clock, really gives a sense of gradients. Similar to the effects of moving furniture and breaking crockery used in the other films. ❤️😄💪👌👍
@@rodrigolefever2426 what he’s saying is that David Warner, who portrayed Lawrence Beasley in this movie would later go on to portray Spicer Lovejoy, Cal’s valet, in the 1997 movie
@@rodrigolefever2426 Bernard Fox was also in two Titanic movies ......1959 a night to remember as the lookout Fredrick Fleet and in 97 as Col. Archibald Gracie ....... both survived the sinking but Gracie died later that year in 1912
this comes from Sos Titanic an Anglo-us TV movie from 1979. This footage is taken from the edited version. the full length version was 3 hours long but they cut it to 1 hour 40 mins for global audiences and changed the story flow (As you do). Sadly they ruined it in the process, on you tube there was a original version but it got taken down. The other issue was the film was really ambitious but the budget didn’t go far enough. I have discovered since they did build a model of the titanic for this movie but it looked awful and cheap. They still used in the final moment before the ship disappeared and for one of the wide sinking shots from the lifeboats pov - the rest of the effect as such where done by a matte expert who coloured in a night to remember footage or use matte paintings with basic animation. it had be done in a hurry as another Titanic film (raise the titanic was due out and they wanted this in Europe before then) . The ship was meant to break in two in the script (even though it was made before the wreck was found) however budget stoped that so in the 3 hour version the sound effects of the sinking point to the ship breaking in two and you see reactions in the lifeboats but they just couldn’t show it. Sadly when they cut it to 90 minutes they removed the extended plunge and shorted it and removed the original sound effects (possibly as they where disturbing - to a degree). You can still find the original sound effects mix it’s been used as the audio track over a video of the ocean liner Oceanos sinking (the one with 10m+ views not helicopter sound). I would not recommend watching the 90 minute version of Sos titanic but if you go to the right places you can find the full length version which is well worth a watch.
From what I heard, SOS Titanic was produced by Lew Grade's brother, or maybe it was some other relative, and they had a verbal agreement that the production could borrow Lew's ship miniature that was built for "Raise the Titanic,” which was being shot concurrently in Malta. At the last moment, the two men had a big falling out and Lew refused to loan them the model, leaving the "SOS Titanic" production team high and dry and forced to improvise. At such short notice, they had to rely on stock footage and tracking matte paintings As for "A Night to Remember" stock footage, it obviously looks like black and white footage that was colorized, albeit surprisingly well (for the most part.) It also looks like they didn't use the ACTUAL footage that was featured in "A Night to Remember." Rather, the editors searched through the vaults at Rank Organization to find scraps of unused shots and outtakes from the film and repurposed them for their version.
Daniel Drabble All of a night to remember was shot in BW 35mm I’ve heard it was coloured in for some markets but never seen it. Most ANTR shots are off the original masters as some of the angles and the model set up is different from final cuts used in ANTR. There own model was used for final moments, side shot and for shot of passenger on the stern but as you can tell they shot it and keyed out the background and just put it in over water shots from ANTR water tanks scences. Same true of Matte paints used for carpthia and titanic who where keyed into ANTR footage or footage of the ice field they shot the intro at. One biggest problems was the budget and pressure to get this done before Raise the Titanic came out especially for the European market where it would go into the cinema. They couldn’t afford to mount an effects unit and hire the water tank at pinewood nor send a unit to Malta where raise the Titanic had been shot. It wouldn’t surprise me if they asked to use raise the titanic model as raise the titanic had finished production by the time shooting had started on S.O.S. titanic again the budget and time pressure may of stoped it.
Thank you Grace. I do too. Its been easy for some to criticize this one mercilessly (it was likely created in part to fly with the 70s Disaster Movie cycle) but there's a lot of effort put into this.
I just don't get how in all these movies, even though it's supposed to be around 2am at night, everything is so well lit everybody can see everything. All this inexplicable bright lighting boggles my mind. Rose can even see Jack under the water as he's sinking. That's not how darkness works.
The lack of actual continuity in this movie is ridiculous. First the propellors are out of the water and then now they are just rising, and then the ship is plunging to the point of propellors being in the water, and then the next shot whole stern is high up in the air. Had they paid more attention to this, it might have been good. But the lack of attention to actual chronology is pretty noticeable.
Bad! Wrong! They refer to Hop A Long Cassidy that was created in 1913 - years after the sinking! A character asks for a martini: so wrong!! It was invented in 1914 eg years and years after the foundering...one character smokes a Roberto Fuentes cigar! They weren’t available in Ireland until late 1912- again so wrong! Most people will have been shocked by such ridiculous error
This has been cut and chopped around a bit, I have a full version and this clip is missing scenes and scenes have been put out of sequence. But the full version has continuity issues as well. This movie unfortunately suffered in the editing department.
:Titanic 1979 relases :People and Titanic movies 'Two things first you coped A night to remember and Two your ship looks like Titanic Combined with the Queen Mary
Yeah every titanic movie don’t have same stuff because in like 1950s and under they use green screen all the time and they use hotels so thats why staircase is different and I think I have a place what has a BIG GRAND STAIRCASE IN MANCHESTER
the sos titanic of 1979 in the sinking scene is the same with the night to remember but colorized!!! i love that filmof 1979 the best movie ever made for the titanic@@Kazakhstan_Mapping_edits
The wreck wasn't discovered yet, but the movies made about the sinking before the discovery usually took a collection of survivor's witness accounts to detail the sinking.
The first movie about the sinking was made in the summer of 1912, just a couple of months after the event. Many more followed. The sinking also featured in series as diverse as Time Tunnel and Upstairs Downstairs.
Oddly, three actors from Peter Hall's 1968 film version of Shakespeare's "A Midsummer Night's Dream"--Ian Holm, David Warner and Helen Mirren--had roles in this movie, and their characters all survived the sinking.
David Warner who portrayed second class passenger Lawrence Beesley in this television movie, portrayed Spicer Lovejoy 18 years later in the movie Titanic (1997).
@@tisstufffilms7006 you clearly know nothing about the Titanic then. That is most certainly not the 2nd class staircase. It's meant to be the grand staircase but it's nothing like it.
sos titanic 1979 was the first titanic movie that i wacth i love it! then i saw the titanic 1997 and i realized that play lovejoy!!!!! again hahahah actualy the sos titanic of 1979 is the same with the night to remember of 1958 but colorized the sinking of the ship is exactly the same but colorized and the most important is that the titanic not break in half! because the ship discovered in 1985 by robert balard.
the things fall and people slip and scream and the ship goes high then the ship rises but there 4 funnels left how and the ship rises and the stern sinks
So the passengers sunk to the bottom with the ship? That obviously did not happen, as most of the people left on board were struggling in the water and screaming for up to a half hour before dying of exposure. There was not dead silence after the ship disappeared.
It didn't split half because it's a movie how it sinks or the story.this movie is the 70s and they use submarine go the see the wreck of titanic in 80s but it spits so yeah
It sinking whole came from the the Crew survivors during the British inquiry. They said it went down as one to keep White Star's reputation from being tarnished. They didn't want to be seen as building and manning "Weak Ships".
I really wish they didn’t use the clip from a night to remember to capture the ship sinking. I mean, 20 something years later, you’d expect better CGI.
This was a Good movie but they used seances from the 1958 titanic movie a night to remember and that was a Good movie and its cool that sos titanic made thoughts seances in colour both where good movies and sad
No there was another movie that came in 1996 called titanic its the first one to show the ship splitting but it looked bad cuz they didnt really have CGI
The unedited version has never been released on DVD except for in like Australia, the only other option is a highly edited and cut version or trying to track down one that is unedited online, which can be tricky
Some scenes are missing from this where’s the piano crash? where’s me Andrews stayed? And wheres the scene where they get the collapsable off the top? This is not a scene this is an edit
THE TITANIC WITH CLIFTON WEB, A NIGHT TO REMEMBER.THIS MOVIE , TV TITANIC 96 HAD A VERY SAD SINKING SCENE, IT WAS BETTER. OF CAUSE 97 TITANIC WAS GOOD BUT 96 TITANIC SINKING WAS BY FAR THE BETTER SCENE. THERE WAS NO WAY THE TITANIC STOOD UP LIKE THAT BEFORE SHE SANK. CAMERON WAS WRONG. IN 96' MOVIE THE TITANIC SINKING WAS CORRECT.
No this isn’t a night to remember it looks like it because S.O.S Titanic used clips from a night to remember and btw this is the short version the tv version is WAY longer
