Soviet Space Shuttle Buran - News Coverage - 1988

Подписаться 3,8 тыс.

Просмотров 9 тыс.

50% 1

Buran was the space shuttle developed by the Soviet Union with its first and only launch on November 15, 1988. The mission included only two Earth orbits and was unmanned.
Welcome to the Shuttlesource space shuttle video archive highlighting rare and exclusive video celebrating the program's 30-year history. Created for shuttle enthusiasts, historians or video creators, this project seeks to preserve and release original shuttle mission video for the historical record.
Started in 2003 after the Columbia accident, I began the collection as a simple quest to watch some of the earlier program mission video which at that time was simply not available on the internet. With the help of private enthusiasts and NASA, I have now amassed a collection of over 2,000 hours covering every shuttle mission. Over time, this full collection is slowly being converted to a digital format and released.
Thanks to all who have contributed your old and beaten VHS tapes and for those still with tapes sitting in a box please reach out.
Enjoy the videos!
Facebook: / shuttlesource

Опубликовано:

26 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 43

@lunarmodule5 Год назад

Great stuff Mike and really unexpected

@Lord_Merterus Год назад

"Saturday's maiden shuttle flight will be as historically significant as the Soviet's first space satellite Sputnik" That didn't age well.

@jshepard152 Год назад

19:06 James Oberg getting it right, way back in 1988.

@gscranage4594 Год назад

Just skip to 32 minutes unless you want to see about 6 different TV news companies repeat the same story of “When Buran is going to launch!”.

@frankgaulke3221 Год назад

Would you be able to post any television news coverage from the 1986 challenger disaster is a 2003 Columbia Disaster? Greetings from Munich Germany!!

@Shuttlesource Год назад

I know a lot has been posted for these two missions but I may have some unique footage to post. I'll see what I can find!

@1mpact594 Год назад

Way more impressive than those u.s space shuttles. It's fascinating

@ronaldtartaglia4459 Год назад

Yeah o missions compared to 133

@robwilton9539 Год назад

I would like to get into your mind to understand how anyone could possibly make such a declaration.

@1mpact594 Год назад

@@robwilton9539 there is nothing inside my mind, everyone including me, had a expression base on our opinions & we don't take it seriously.

@robwilton9539 Год назад

LOL. You are being deliberately obtuse I think. It must have taken great effort to compose a reply with so much deficiency in written English. Perhaps I am wrong though and you never took school seriously either. @@1mpact594

@thefirebirdflock3440 6 месяцев назад

@@ronaldtartaglia44591 successful mission, flew and landed completely without a crew.

@pi.actual Год назад

So where's the launch? I see the ignition but never saw the vehicle clear the tower. Is that the best footage they've got?

@SoloSailing77 Год назад

The space version, of the russian Concordski! Because they always designed unique aircraft/spacecraft! Looks like they took the four jet engines off the back! Smart. And we know it's just better than the Space Shuttle, because their propaganda said so! had to joke a little. But, thanks for the video and your hard work. It was very interesting. New sub! Please don't think I was mocking anyone. Joking about things, is one thing. Insulting people is another, and no thanks to that!

@Shuttlesource Год назад

Thanks, glad you enjoyed the video!

@dizzyizzie6354 Год назад

I wish there was more info on the CIA opertion that Fed false design & flight data to the USSR. I have a feeling a modern equivalent is being done with Chinese aviation & space flight. They got access to f35 "files" ages ago what happened ? Same with Shangdong 003 or w.e it's called

@bb-gc2tx Год назад

china owns biden hes probably having a ship built for them free of charge . #installednotelected

@yallowrosa Год назад

22:00 Shuttle is better than Buran because it is nearly fully reusable only the orange fuel tank (which feeds the 3 Shuttle main engines), is expandable in the launch

@OliverMiles98 Год назад

Counterpoint: Buran is (hypothetically) better than the Shuttle because it can lift more payload to orbit, is not an integral part of the launch system (meaning the launch vehicle can launch other things, not to mention to boosters being developed into their own), is inherently safer (due to liquid boosters as opposed to solid) and is capable of fully automated flight. As for reusability, Energiya's boosters are (once again hypothetically) recoverable (which is what the darker grey things are on the booster), just like the Shuttle. The core-stage is expandable (and it would be incredibly difficult to reuse it) but the RD-0120 engines were cheaper compared to the RS-25s.

@nminh_th Год назад

buran is better, the stage A (four strap boosters) is reusable, and buran can launch, landing fully automatic and unmanned

@robwilton9539 Год назад

There are two of these machines in an abandoned building today. The fact that they have not been put on public display, to be applauded in a flight museum, makes me think the whole programme was just Soviet propaganda and that they may not even have achieved orbit. There is video tape of the air flight but no video tape of space flight from the onboard camera.

@Валерий-у9ф 9 месяцев назад

Ищите другие видео

@robwilton9539 9 месяцев назад

Покажи мне другие видео @@Валерий-у9ф

@ins1616 2 месяца назад

Видео объективного контроля с борта Бурана есть. Вы плохо ищете, так как ваши мозги забиты пропагандой.

@TheBleuakuma Год назад

Never shown taking off the whole video. They only flew it like a plane

@nminh_th Год назад

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-4NS3kmSYEqE.html

@nminh_th Год назад

32:09

@rudexbruiser2604 Год назад

The US shuttle was so much better

@Mr.Fry31 Год назад

I think it's hard to compare them due to the fact that Buran never entered operational status and only flew once. At least, the Buran was able to perform fully automatic landings.

@Lord_Merterus Год назад

@@Mr.Fry31 So could the US shuttle.

@yam2278 Год назад

@@Mr.Fry31Don't Feed The Trolls

@oscar_bru8455 Год назад

i wouldn't really agree, the soviets diddnt use SRB's so incase of a problem then can detach it when they want and the spacecraft would be much safer. would love so hear your reasons.

@rudexbruiser2604 Год назад

@@oscar_bru8455 this is kinda hard to read

@davidholder3207 Год назад

Cheap production. Too much Russian and heaps of repeat loops.

@Instigator917 Год назад

Were we more advanced back then or did we just think bigger?

@TheBleuakuma Год назад

Neither. All propaganda. Earth not space is not at all what were told in school.

@JunoCinematics 2 дня назад

I think it was that we thought bigger. We certainly weren’t more advanced back then. But the Soviets built Buran because they viewed the US space shuttle as an “orbital bomber”. They thought that the military would use the space shuttle a lot more to deploy spy satellites, and things to neutralize soviet forces. So they authorized Buran, but it’s lead designer wanted to keep the soviets path to the moon still open. So, as is said in the video, they designed Energia to be a separate independent rocket from Buran, and energia could lift more than 100 tons to low earth orbit. So yeah, they thought bigger back then.