SpaceX Reveals NEW Raptor V3 Engine!

Подписаться 267 тыс.

Просмотров 84 тыс.

50% 1

SpaceX Reveals NEW Raptor V3 Engine!
Last Video: The Real Reason NASA Developed The RS-25 Engine!
• The Real Reason NASA D...
► Join Our Discord Server: / discord
► Patreon: / theteslaspace
► Subscribe to our other channel, The Space Race: / theteslaspace
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: derek@ellify.com
#Spacex #Space #Mars

Наука

Опубликовано:

16 май 2023

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 102

@ricardoabh3242 Год назад

Crazy years to come…

@TheOtherSteel Год назад

It looks like a Starship booster with 33 v3 engines will be able to dig an even deeper hole in their launch platform.

@climber950 11 месяцев назад

Anything is possible

@Time2gojoe 3 месяца назад

I've always thought that the first IFT test was done purposely without water diverters just to get data on how much damage they can do, so they can build a good data model for how to land and take off with all those engines safely.. and how strong their infrastructure has to be.. or how tall landing legs have to be..

@nirbhay_raghav Месяц назад

I hope you are not on YT now. Because it is full of aesthetic launch videos from IFT2 and IFT3. WITHOUT ANY PAD DAMAGE AT ALL!

@anthonyshiels9273 Год назад

I am glad to see that Arthur C. Clarke's station from the film "2001 - A Space Odyssey" is finally taking shape.

@francom6230 Год назад

"I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that." -- Scary thought with AI taking our minds ...

@sgfx Год назад

3:30 Increased efficiency and power translate to reduced fuel requirements for achieving the same weight-to-orbit ratio. Consequently, this advancement enables several potential benefits, such as shorter booster stages, taller starships capable of accommodating larger cargo (not necessarily heavier), or increased fuel capacity for orbital refueling purposes.

@thomabow8949 Год назад

Larger cargo is a rather important point; observe the JWST (James Webb); it had to be intentionally segmented in several parts to fit in delivery vehicles, requiring systems on board to extend and assemble for function. This introduces many critical points of failures.

@TheAmericanCatholic Год назад

This also allows starship to spend less time fighting gravity thus saving fuel

@jimmyrussell9749 4 месяца назад

Perhaps the tank itself were the cargo then fuel could be put in from Mars atmosphere as their now planning.

@maniakares Год назад

man this vast/spacex partnership is gonna yeet us into the future so fast

@Erudite_TWR Год назад

does anyone else think spacex wont push v3 to 100% for flights , something similar to neutron? not stressing the engines a much? sounds like it makes sense for rapid reuse?

@shaunfosmark Год назад

They never do. Theres max output, and then operational output.

@jebes909090 Год назад

12 raptor 2's were destroyed on ascent. im assuming the initial 3 pushed the rest of the engines to have to work harder, eventually destroying a full 3rd of them and then failign to get to orbit.

@diverbrent Год назад

Great work, thank you!!!

@JeffreyBue_imtxsmoke Год назад

I predict that with engine improvement, the heavy booster will evolve to use less engines.

@cjmixmaster Год назад

If the engines get better would they not just push more mass?

@jason_m_schmidt622 Год назад

A good idea as less engines equal less possible points of failure.

@alecbaldwinsnotpropgun Год назад

Whatever decreases the cost per ton to mars is what they will go with

@cjmixmaster Год назад

@@jason_m_schmidt622 and less redundancy.

@thegouse Год назад

apparently they were considering making the top part of starship taller

@phaysyk Год назад

This is more interesting than Twitter 😂

@milindghodke9821 Год назад

So true Hah.

@rpmcitycruiser Год назад

Remember, the Neutron rocket isn't fully reusable. There is a second stage that they won't recover.

@nawwk79 Год назад

I am from the future, 1 SpaceX Raptor 17 engine just sent 160,000 tons of payload into Mars.

@kristiankoski3908 Год назад

4:48 Was that Halo? Pretty neat.

@chiefpoko4907 Год назад

masterchief is coming

@jimmyrussell9749 4 месяца назад

Idea would be a Flying Explorer. Inflatable guided parachute design concept. Vertical lift. No extra weight of landing gear.

@Dunbar0740 Год назад

"Those Iconic wheel shapes we've seen in moves like the Martian...". I think we saw them is some other old movie once, I might be wrong... (...and breathe...).

@EnnuinerDog Год назад

A certain little film about an odyssey of the space variety.

@paulhaynes8045 Год назад

No shuttle to get you up there now, though ...

@richbarrows3922 Год назад

I thought NASA found the rotating wheel would not work for humans because the coriolis acceleration of centrifugal motion would mess with the inner ear making balance near impossible?

@ReddwarfIV Год назад

@@richbarrows3922 For a small drum like _Discovery One_ had, sure. But the larger the diameter, the less coriolis force affects your inner ear.

@TheGoldNinja101 11 месяцев назад

Raptor 4: ~375 bar

@rancejones5634 Год назад

Can you do an update on companies that are tracking space junk? I hear Leo Labs wants to be the Google Maps of space.

@conradnelson5283 9 месяцев назад

Yeah, it’s getting very crowded up there

@johnstewart579 Год назад

Very exciting that more private companies are entering the lucrative space industry

@spitfire2885 Год назад

There's a company named Weyland corporation their logo says building better worlds ....that looks very promising too ..

@jason_m_schmidt622 Год назад

🤣

@juanandresgalindez9883 5 месяцев назад

Le pusiste un Nivel de protección térmico interna de la raptor es 30 % . Carbono y cerámica

@bureboburebo4188 Год назад

19 billion in revenue? Something is wrong there. Also, the Neutron, while very cool, is not really fully reusable. It's more like the Falcon 9: only the first stage is reusable.

@catchnkill Год назад

Neutron reuses fairing. The fairing will be reusable and thus will be recovered for each launch.

@bureboburebo4188 Год назад

@@catchnkill Yes, that is true, but is not sufficient to make the vehicle fully reusable. The 2nd stage is not reusable.

@tylercreger6762 Год назад

He meant $19M.... their 1Q23 revenue was $54.9M, $19.6M from the Launch Services business... the rest was from the space systems busienss

@juanandresgalindez9883 5 месяцев назад

Todavía queda cosas que mejorar

@NicholasNerios 8 месяцев назад

😎 cool 😎

@smoochfa973 Год назад

Do you by any chance enjoy the warhammer franchise?

@Zanagash Год назад

They could also put less engines on super heavy and carry the same weight… or a little more payload since they don’t have the weight of the engines.

@jason_m_schmidt622 Год назад

The most important factor to using fewer engines is less possible points of failure.

@jason_m_schmidt622 Год назад

At a certain point the limits of current metallurgy catch up with you and you pay the price.

@Wesh997 Год назад

Lets go Nuclear already.

@douglaswilkinson5700 11 месяцев назад

Very nice but can't match the power of the Saturn V's F1 engines.

@NERDXspace 11 месяцев назад

yeah

@viarnay 6 месяцев назад

I disagree because you can buy a lot of raptors for the price of one F1

@juanandresgalindez9883 5 месяцев назад

Ya no puede contruir o diseñar modelos nuevos de raptor . Conformante con eso

@lonestarvoid Год назад

Start a podcast bro

@maniakares Год назад

dont they have plans for a "heavy starship" that could be why they are pushing so hard for new engines

@jason_m_schmidt622 Год назад

Yes. The proposed “Starship 2.0” with an 18m diameter would require approximately 100 Raptor engines.

@jebes909090 Год назад

@@jason_m_schmidt622 ya that thing aint gonna happen :D

@jason_m_schmidt622 Год назад

@@jebes909090 SpaceX would need to design a new and very large engine. They already have too many possible points of failure with 33 engines

@jebes909090 Год назад

@@jason_m_schmidt622 its ironic that elons favorite axiom is 'the best part is no part' then goes and makes a rocket with 39 engines that has to be caught by a tower 😅😅😅😅

@obiang24 Год назад

Rocket lab has made 19 billions this year?

@harbifm766766 Год назад

The whole rockets business is not 19 billion!!! how Elcton rocket is making any money at all not 19 bullion? your numbers must be extremely wrong

@vibecheck2787 Год назад

This has to be bait

@wesleyjohnson597 6 месяцев назад

Gd what grammar skills

@dglsdgls3663 Год назад

So RocketLab made $19B from revenue of $211M somehow?

@godagon97 Год назад

Question: Why did they build the R3? Answer: If it is within the laws of physics, we will try to make it a reality. -to paraphrase Elon Musk

@RA-II 11 месяцев назад

Do you really think this will happen ??

@mmchipoperwa Год назад

Bro you deserve a million subs

@Bosscheesemo 10 месяцев назад

Remember...."Cryptocurrency" means "Tax dodge" If you're willing to dodge taxes, you're willing to dodge more, and in light of Oceangate maybe dodging policy might not be the best business model? Cool ideas though definitely hope it works. Won't trust it if the CEO himself doesn't take the trip

@Jam-In-With-Ben Год назад

@user-go5ih3ji6k Месяц назад

Twin are special he always imuse me because we are twins can nobody but god can stop twin flan gbbusy🎉😂❤❤❤❤

@n.g.s1mple29 Год назад

All these worlds are yours, except Europa. Attempt no landing there

@Alex26894 Год назад

? What

@williamtsmith9668 Год назад

@@Alex26894 It's a quote from the end of the movie, 2010 Space Odyssey. You might watch it.

@user-uc2cr3ji4m Год назад

@Study49 Год назад

Space X’s heavy launch vehicle and its Raptor engines are promising breakthroughs, however; several engines failed during the first stage’s launch and ascent. An outside source stated that it appear: E1, E6, and E7 had failed at launch. E18 failed violently at T+30; E19 failed at T+46; E22 failed at T+60; E23 failed at T+94; at T+122 flames were visible at the thrust section; and at T+130 the rocket started spinning out of control. Also, the rocket did not reach its design attitude for stage separation.

@MrXMasterTrader 10 месяцев назад

Those are old batches of engines they wanted to get rid of.

@iknujbyhvtgcrfxedw-nb6ew Год назад

I'm sorry

@NERDXspace 11 месяцев назад

?????

@user-go5ih3ji6k Месяц назад

Cogrartionly❤😂🎉

@dieterkoch6563 Год назад

Try a new tack-report only what has been done-showing video proof, NOT what is promised. This simple system will give you unmeasurable credibility.

@iceetmarne3571 Год назад

Lol. Why don't you try NOT watching if you don't like it my egotistical friend!

@dieterkoch6563 Год назад

@@iceetmarne3571 Do not worry , that was the first and last time

@iceetmarne3571 Год назад

@@dieterkoch6563 fair enough.

@thisguyhere85 Год назад

Astra will be bankrupt by August 2023

@vreality. Год назад

first

@Marcus001 Год назад

congratulations

@paulhaynes8045 Год назад

So now they can blow up the whole launch stand...

@chrisallton4409 Год назад

First they built the v2 1944 then Saturn5 1960s now those same people are trying to launch the starship.

@CliftonDavis-je7qu 11 месяцев назад

Seam's like a wast😅 of time just build deep space 9 already 😅

@terryhigson434 Месяц назад

nonsense, almost all of it....

@BUMHEAD1100 Год назад

Wow - you kids will believe any old rubbish…..

@menotyou1234 Год назад

RU-vid was hiding this video from me. It had over 700 likes when I finally found it. I am subscribed, but it was not showing up in my main list. It showed 4 hrs old. Had to scroll all the way down over 200 subscriptions to get to channels that start with the word "The" then click your channel to find it. I could see the vid listed on my phone..?? Not on my large tv with the same account..?? 👽👽🤠👽🏗🚀