Тёмный

SpaceX's Starship Super Heavy New Landing Method Just Shocked NASA! 

Q88M
Подписаться 52 тыс.
Просмотров 31 тыс.
50% 1

SpaceX's Starship Super Heavy New Landing Method Just Shocked NASA!
===
#Q88M #q88m #spacex #starship #elonmusk
===
SpaceX's Starship Super Heavy New Landing Method Just Shocked NASA!
SpaceX has made a name for itself with its mind-blowing ability to land rockets on drone ships, a feat they've perfected with the Falcon 9. Why aren't they using this method for their mighty Starship?
Well, why not? Many people are under the misconception that landing on the "chopsticks" is the be-all and end-all for Starship. They're all wrong.
SpaceX has always had an audacious vision-landing Starship right in the middle of the ocean.
So, how exactly is Starship going to land on drone ships? And what does SpaceX need to do to ensure a safe touchdown for both the spacecraft and the booster?
Let’s find out in today’s episode!
SpaceX's Starship Super Heavy New Landing Method Just Shocked NASA!
SpaceX's ambition to land Starship on a drone ship is crystal clear, especially with their decision to launch Starship from LC-39A. That’s right-not just Falcon 9, but soon this iconic launch pad will witness the debut of the most powerful rocket ever built. SpaceX has already submitted a detailed operational plan to the FAA, which includes environmental impact assessments and landing options for both Starship and the Super Heavy booster.
In this plan, SpaceX has proposed three landing scenarios for Starship. The first-and perhaps the most ambitious-is the "chopsticks landing." This concept is well-known among SpaceX fans: the launch tower will use two massive arms to "catch" the rocket's two stages as they return to Earth.
The second option is landing on a drone ship, a floating platform in the ocean. This method has become a SpaceX trademark with the Falcon 9’s boosters, and for Starship, it promises flexibility in landing site selection. Landing on a drone ship allows SpaceX to easily position and recover the launch vehicle, especially during missions far from shore.
SpaceX's Starship Super Heavy New Landing Method Just Shocked NASA!
The final option, known as a "controlled softlanding," serves as a backup in case the other methods aren’t feasible. This is a “destructive” scenario where the rocket is intentionally landed in the ocean and not recovered.
SpaceX successfully tested a soft landing during Starship's fourth flight, and landing on Mechazilla’s arms is a familiar concept and a must-achieve goal for SpaceX. But what about landing on a drone ship?
This raises an intriguing question: How could Starship safely touch down on a flat surface? The answer lies in landing legs.
In fact, landing legs aren’t something new for Starship. They’re already part of the Human Landing System version designed for Moon missions and will be crucial for future variants built to land on Mars. Imagine-these landing legs need to be robust and flexible enough to handle terrain far more rugged and unforgiving than Earth's surface. So for the upper stage of this launch vehicle, landing on a drone ship is never an issue. Starship has variants specifically designed to tackle challenges far tougher than that.
However, Super Heavy, the main booster of the Starship system, is designed with a different philosophy compared to the Autonomous Spaceport Drone Ship (ASDS) systems we’re used to seeing with Falcon 9 missions. Instead, the Super Heavy booster is equipped with special mounting points on its body to facilitate the "chopsticks" system-a unique catch-and-land mechanism developed by SpaceX exclusively for the Starship system.

Опубликовано:

 

16 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 37   
@hannojaanniidas9655
@hannojaanniidas9655 6 дней назад
I have a suggestion that may work. I'll call it a doughnut : a ring system that has dampers to receive and stablise the landing load, both on land and at sea. A cross between the chopsticks and can crusher.
@kevinmccarthy8746
@kevinmccarthy8746 7 дней назад
Finally a good, normal person speaking. Remember a long, long time ago. I think off the top of my head that the barge would need to be 4 times bigger just for the landing and 4 x the depth/ draw. And if it needs to be that big then you might as well make it a all weather, huricane stoppable platform sescured to the bottom if need be. You could just have the platform and infrasruture floating on another big platform a few miles away, for front row seats. Hotels and the rest.
@Q88M
@Q88M 7 дней назад
SpaceX once bought two oil rigs but later sold them. It seems they had this idea in mind but decided to focus on other goals first. One day, this concept will likely come back to life
@rustyislandable
@rustyislandable 3 дня назад
Since the FAA is playing hard to get, use the time to develop the proposed 12 meter diameter, ahead of schedule. Make it wider, for more stable landing, before you go after more height.
@Q88M
@Q88M 3 дня назад
They are improving the launch towers and infrastructure, and working on the chopsticks to ensure the success of flight 5, while waiting for the license.
@gordonelwell7084
@gordonelwell7084 День назад
Watching it again . . . still trying to find the part where NASA was shocked . . .
@gordonelwell7084
@gordonelwell7084 День назад
Otherwise known as "click bait" . . .
@brucedavenport
@brucedavenport 2 дня назад
Once touched down, the surface may not be stable, not just like a drone ship in waves, but on a surface which might be uneven or one or more legs on a soft surface.
@Nanobits
@Nanobits 2 дня назад
In order for Spaceship to land on sea drones, they will require a very sturdy quad leg platform, it will need to maintain stability for such a large heavy ship. As far as the FAA, i truly think that in the background they are being influenced by Boeing. Boeing has had the ear of the FAA for years.
@sobhuzangwenya8918
@sobhuzangwenya8918 День назад
A Mechazzilla Droneship that would be a must see .
@Q88M
@Q88M День назад
yes, They will pursue that in the future
@factchecker9358
@factchecker9358 День назад
They need to move operations outside the USA.
@noutram1000
@noutram1000 16 часов назад
Can someone explain why it isn’t possible to land Starship in the sea?
@hallahgray3190
@hallahgray3190 7 дней назад
How about robotic arms rising from the deck of the drone ship to engage the body of the rocket to keep it secure to the deck of the drone ship
@Q88M
@Q88M 7 дней назад
They once had the idea of building something like a sea-based launch tower, but they've put that plan on hold for now. I think they'll revive the concept in the future, even when it might take decades
@brettvaughn1058
@brettvaughn1058 7 дней назад
Where is the center of gravity when F9 booster and Starship land?
@Rennyteam359
@Rennyteam359 5 дней назад
Landing on a prepared landing pad is one thing but landing on a uneven, unknown surface like in the moon, and mars is another thing. The chopstcks would work their but are we prepared to construct the system on mars or the moon?
@Q88M
@Q88M 5 дней назад
The first Starships will have landing legs with wide bases to help the spacecraft maintain balance. They will also serve as the initial habitation modules before humans can build infrastructure on the surfaces of Mars and the Moon
@Rennyteam359
@Rennyteam359 4 дня назад
@@Q88M Thanks for making this more clear.
@stephensfarms7165
@stephensfarms7165 7 дней назад
Thanks enjoyed the video 👍👍
@Q88M
@Q88M 7 дней назад
thanks for your support!
@Tommork-bq6ms
@Tommork-bq6ms 5 дней назад
We're waiting We're waiting Someone is... Don't know his/her name... But I'm confident... I think!
@ruthlemler2726
@ruthlemler2726 7 дней назад
Just adds more weight
@raystevens687
@raystevens687 6 дней назад
I wonder if SpaceX has ever thought about arms coming out of the deck of the landing pad to hold of the wings 🪽 of the rocket 🚀 as so it would grab hold of them to keep the rocket from falling over. This is just an idea only
@Q88M
@Q88M 5 дней назад
They've already considered that, but they’re prioritizing closer-term goals first
@andwng5323
@andwng5323 3 дня назад
Building the chopstick caughting capability on drone ship
@Q88M
@Q88M День назад
They had this idea before, and it seems like it will be realized in the future
@mikerash-pc4jc
@mikerash-pc4jc 6 дней назад
Last to reduce the unbeatable weight. Switch to the proven material aluminum use for over 70 years. Aluminum 90% lighter than stainless steel. A stainless steel rocket a mile and half tall still can’t launch and land in one piece. Bigger is not always better.
@Q88M
@Q88M 6 дней назад
materials science. SpaceX chose stainless steel, and they will have to address all the issues that come with their choice
@-guppy8850
@-guppy8850 3 дня назад
L'aluminium fond sur le feu d'une gazinière, je le sais par expérience après y avoir oublié une casserole remplie d'eau à faire bouillir . L'eau s'est évaporée et la casserole était toute rose, toute ramollie et encastrée dans la grille support. Cela n'arrive pas avec une casserole en acier inoxydable. Et il me semble qu'un vaisseau spatial doit pouvoir résister à une température supérieure au point de fusion de l'aluminium, autour de 660 ° C.
@mikerash-pc4jc
@mikerash-pc4jc 6 дней назад
How about land both vehicles in one piece? NASA would be shocked. After the burn up and blowup method. Somebody should send spacex the definition of a reusablty.
@Q88M
@Q88M 6 дней назад
Starship is still in the early stages of development. Surely, they will need more time
@McClarinJ
@McClarinJ 3 дня назад
Do you know how many Falcon 9s were destroyed in testing? Now the Falcon class loftts about 85% of all Earth mass to orbit with China a distant second.
@PETERGAIDOSGAIDOS
@PETERGAIDOSGAIDOS 5 дней назад
same old designs from the 1960's.
@robertbrander2074
@robertbrander2074 7 дней назад
LOL ! ..... SO .... Are You telling Me ? ..... That to Land Musk's BF Monstrosity Rocket on land . like SN 15 ? ... or on a Drone Ship like Falcon 9s , 3x a week ? ... It's gunna need Legs !! .... are You Sure ??? ....... Who is writing this BS ?
@PETERGAIDOSGAIDOS
@PETERGAIDOSGAIDOS 5 дней назад
same old designs of the 1960's.
Далее
The Real Reason The Boeing Starliner Failed
28:31
Просмотров 860 тыс.
The Hidden Engineering of Landfills
17:04
Просмотров 3,5 млн
SpaceX: World’s 1st Civilian Spacewalk in 14 Minutes
14:10
What If You Landed on Kepler 22-B?
12:32
Просмотров 1,4 млн
Ukraine's SECOND INVASION of Russia Begins
20:46
Просмотров 1,2 млн
NASA Has A New Problem With The Moon Mission (Artemis)
12:17
SpaceX's New Starship. What's Inside?
14:05
Просмотров 180 тыс.