SPARTANS Vs ROMANS - TABS - Totally Accurate Battle Simulator 

Ok

The battle of marathon?

I think that would be to many soldiers for tabs.

K k boi Hardy it did

COOL

Romans are actually stronger than them by watching roman documentary they beaten the macedonian phalanx and conquered the whole greek state

@@RAMON-pv8ej no spartans are stronger but Romanians won because the FireMegas put the spartans few, but if the numbers were equal the spartans would definitely take this etc.

cem umay ill point out that romanian is a different country and rome is italy.

cem umay dumbass he’s talking about real life not game also the romans were much better since Spartan phalanx is a tight formation and cannot split as well as Roman centuries/cohorts therefore Roman tactics were better also once the romans bypass the spears they can win in close combat

Roman they have tactical

Spartans: say hello to our friends Spartan horses: Brrrr

Sorry

FireMegas Its fine

13 RAMON 31 cause the mods were a little bia to Spartans so the they are stronger

Actually, the Romans would have lost if the greeks werent constantly trying to tear each other apart, so yeah, thats why they lost.

But Greece would never be able to invade Rome

But the truth is. Romans used actual intelligence to beat the macedonian phalanx. They even conquered all greeks lands. They also beaten their spam of war elephants. They even got about less of egyptians. The romans were a small country a whileback until they conquered the whole italy

@@RAMON-pv8ej that's what I said but shorter

flameking not real name Alr

@@RAMON-pv8ej the thing is when rome invaded Greek the Greeks where already weak so they didn't stand a chance if they were in their prime Greek may have won

@@jaden1601 the Greeks had no chance even at prime the Romans still have a higher recruitable population

Thanks :)

Unless there is too many numbers

Thanks

nah bro rome absolutely cucked sparta historically

@@apparentlyjeremy lol

Rome actually beaten the greeks because of their intelligence in war. And not just random. They actually have each century is a centurion and 1 legion comes up to 6000 troops. If a general was saif used 3 legions. Do not expect it to be low its actually 18000 troops. Carrying alot of centurions of strong elites to the battle field.

No Rome just knew that going behind the enemies was better then going in front

Well that’s cause tabs unit just charge towards the enemy and the Spartans in mods are op as hell plus going head first against a hoplites phalanx wasn’t what helped the romans win irl

No in the actuall history. The romans actually won each battle. They never lost againts greeks they only lost in germania. Germania was romans first lost battle but they never lost to the greeks because they apply intelligence againts every battle ever heard of history? Just dont assume spartans are strong because you watch 300 spartans but rome would actually win that in only 2 legions

@@RAMON-pv8ej I never said that I'm talking real history I'm literally talking about the game

-GodVon- I used a sentence to compare both of the game and the book i read about documentary anout them

@@RAMON-pv8ej nc

13 RAMON 31 did also lost in Parthia/Persia also 2 legions is like 10K men

Yes definitely because they are moded a unit.

@@gagepotter-gendle3586 thanks for the info, how much do I nerf them?

Why?

Good idea bro

Spartans would win that

Camden Schweizer But in the actuall history. Romans won the battle againts greek and beaten the macedonian phalanx system. The romans may be a small country before but they use intelligence to expand their empire

sparta will win that bro

Thanks

Mm yes its too late. The romans had conquered the whole greek state. No its true search the map of how fast they grow

Well the spartans would win anyway go look at another video the Spartans can easily do the impossible levels

@@camdenschweizer7700 I know that they are very good but I say it just for fun I think its cool to see historical battles

Wdym????

No too long. They only have phalanx and other types. But the phalanx is no longer effective on the romans because they know what tactics they will use and greeks lost in the battle. They use a cohort formation againts sparta and won each battle

@@wesleybmgo7990 it actually is

Cause the Spartans are op.

Philippine Ball but the romans are actually stronger than greeks. Ever heard of history? I study history and learned that the romans never lost a battle againts greek but greeks lost alot againts the romans.

Good thing this is not real life

Maybe in real life if the Spartans defended against the Roman's the Spartans might win cause there one of the best or the best defenders in the world

@@camdenschweizer7700 Not only was a Roman legion far superior to a phalanx in terms of defense, but cavalry was for smashing through enemy lines.

Mm somethings weird. Rome always won in battles againts greek and even conquered their whole state.

Romans didn’t muscle their way through the phalanx they used strategies like leading them to uneven terrain or out flanking

Yeah. They beat literally every battle againts greek and even beaten their phalanx system

That’s cause they out flanked them or lead them to uneven terrain where they flexible Roman legions has the advantage not just out right destroying the phalanx from the front

@@EMtheBEST8D Bruh man, they are too op cause the dev nerfed it.

@@auberginereverie what

Nah sparta won cuz romans have their main weapon gladius a shortsword and sparta main weapon milkenza a spear so spartans gets the kill first fair play