I have a new idea, you have to do it in the mountains map or hill. You have to do 300Spartans vs 200knights=the immortal army , 100archers=the persian’s archers, and 100squires=the Persians. Based off the Greek-Persian war( I hope this get hearted) Edit:Idk if it’s gonna be a lot to fill but I hope you’ll try :D
@@RAMON-pv8ej no spartans are stronger but Romanians won because the FireMegas put the spartans few, but if the numbers were equal the spartans would definitely take this etc.
cem umay dumbass he’s talking about real life not game also the romans were much better since Spartan phalanx is a tight formation and cannot split as well as Roman centuries/cohorts therefore Roman tactics were better also once the romans bypass the spears they can win in close combat
Im kinda into the romans. The fact they are the smallest country in the first history when they were discovered and conquered all the known lands even greek so i was a bit mad when i saw them loose because romans never lost to greeks when they actually fought in the B.C. times.
But the truth is. Romans used actual intelligence to beat the macedonian phalanx. They even conquered all greeks lands. They also beaten their spam of war elephants. They even got about less of egyptians. The romans were a small country a whileback until they conquered the whole italy
@@RAMON-pv8ej the thing is when rome invaded Greek the Greeks where already weak so they didn't stand a chance if they were in their prime Greek may have won
Rome actually beaten the greeks because of their intelligence in war. And not just random. They actually have each century is a centurion and 1 legion comes up to 6000 troops. If a general was saif used 3 legions. Do not expect it to be low its actually 18000 troops. Carrying alot of centurions of strong elites to the battle field.
Well that’s cause tabs unit just charge towards the enemy and the Spartans in mods are op as hell plus going head first against a hoplites phalanx wasn’t what helped the romans win irl
No in the actuall history. The romans actually won each battle. They never lost againts greeks they only lost in germania. Germania was romans first lost battle but they never lost to the greeks because they apply intelligence againts every battle ever heard of history? Just dont assume spartans are strong because you watch 300 spartans but rome would actually win that in only 2 legions
Camden Schweizer But in the actuall history. Romans won the battle againts greek and beaten the macedonian phalanx system. The romans may be a small country before but they use intelligence to expand their empire
No too long. They only have phalanx and other types. But the phalanx is no longer effective on the romans because they know what tactics they will use and greeks lost in the battle. They use a cohort formation againts sparta and won each battle
Philippine Ball but the romans are actually stronger than greeks. Ever heard of history? I study history and learned that the romans never lost a battle againts greek but greeks lost alot againts the romans.
That’s cause they out flanked them or lead them to uneven terrain where they flexible Roman legions has the advantage not just out right destroying the phalanx from the front
Nah sparta won cuz romans have their main weapon gladius a shortsword and sparta main weapon milkenza a spear so spartans gets the kill first fair play