Spearman Correlation 

Sophy Swift did you pass?

Sophy Swift I am part of the Spearman

This is Pearson Correlation, not Spearman. How did it go?

Um? How did it go? The formula used is for Pearson Correlation and not Spearman Correlation.

its not related at all lol

Yes I've the same question

It would be 7,6,1,2,3,4,4. Because the 2nd 4 would've taken the place of 5

True. This is Pearson, not Spearman. I'm about to get confused. Good thing I read my modules first.

Actually, if there are no ties and the ranks are used in the Pearson formula calculation instead of the raw data, the result is algebraically equivalent to Spearman’s rank formula.

they are called "ranking", basically, just sort the value and the 1-6 is the order. E.g if the value of x is 0.1, 0.3, 0.2 then your order will be 1,3,2

Dian Zhang Oh, ok! Thanks. I get it :)

+Dian Zhang,Hey Sir, is there a way in which we can link the function to new data and find automatically the solution? i.e ranking helps to know the order of original number and in case we have a lot of data replacing corresponding data manually is not handy

@@terefeadugna9797 In continuation to the question,In spearman does it mean that X and Y just needs to be ranked for the given data,for eg if X is 22,32,42,11 and after ranking X would be 11,22,32,42 ??