This is very helpful and informative. I would like to add that his information on FAPE isn’t entirely accurate. It’s available to all children living in the US between the age of 3-21.
Teachings in Education, thanks for your question. It’s at 2:25 in the video. You say that children are entitled to a free and appropriate education between the ages of 5 to 18. But, children are entitled to that from age 3 to 21. On the front end, it covers toddlers who need an IEP to get early interventions. On the back end, if a SpEd kid has to repeat a grade or hasn’t earned the minimum requirement to graduate, they will still have access to an education. It gives kids some wiggle room to obtain the education that they’re entitled to.
Gabrielle Young, I did not specifically say children with disabilities. I said fape is for All children ages 5 to 18. I believe only special needs students get ages 3-5 and 19-21. Children without a disability are entitled to a free and public education between 5 and 18 while special needs get additional time of 3-5 and 19-21. Still I’m gonna keep reading. You obviously have great knowledge and are a great educator. I think I did a poor job of saying what I meant. And I should have focused on special needs as this is a special needs video. I’m gonna read up more on this and put a correction in the description once do all the reading. Thank you again Gabrielle, from one special education professional to another.
I been complaining for a while who I was treated when mom move to Kansas city missouri in 1979. I fround Kansas city school system the worst for special need kid's with disabilitie's. And yes they fill me. And now they feeling my son. The difference between my mom and me. I'm trying to help my son to get him education.
If you would like the full presentation including infographics from the video and additional slides of information: Click the link Here: www.teacherspayteachers.com/Product/Special-Education-Law-Guide-6250011
You mention a powerpoint presentation. Where can I access this? Thanks, this is a wonderful presentation. You might want to update with the Endrew case.
I never been suspended I never got expelled. I did nothing wrong growing up going to school. I have back-and-forth notebook or my teachers and my teacher assistant with bright to my parents and tell them how I did but I was never a bully in school.
I have a question! When I was in school I was in special education classes. I asked my teachers what learning disability did I have they wouldn't tell me. Also I asked to see my files they wouldn't let me see records. Are students allowed to know what there learning disabilities are and are they allowed to see there own files? I didn't know what I had. So the college i went to they tested me because i wanted to know what it was they said i was dyslexic. A few years ago I found an old iep from when I was 7 and it said autistic. But when I went to college and tested a ton of different disabilities and they said only dyslexia
what a strange description of no child left behind. what it did was create a death spiral where schools on the verge of meeting benchmarks were stripped of funding when all their students packed up and left. this is the issue with school choice - parents (who, understandably, all want the very very best for their children) swarmed the best local districts in droves demanding to have their students enrolled at the expense of everywhere and everyone else, and everyone knew there just weren't enough seats in those districts. what ended up happening - as i'm sure you know - is that all schools severely flattened their grading requirements so that all students could pass without effort, alleviating the threat of being considered 'failing'. nobody's issue was ever with the pressure of needing to actually teach kids, but instead the issues were with how this produced a financial incentive to pass every student without them ever showing improvement or effort. i understand that you are providing only a legal summary, but you can't seriously put the subjective statement "highly qualified teachers" as a trait that no child left behind ever had, or ever succeeded at having.
"The text of the legislation and the legislative intent show that the purpose of the law was not to allow each child to achieve their full potential, but to simply provide sufficient resources for handicapped children to access education."
"The text of the legislation and the legislative intent show that the purpose of the law was not to allow each child to achieve their full potential, but to simply provide sufficient resources for handicapped children to access education." Feel free to check for yourself in the Rowley Case
Teachings in Education dont you have better things to do nobody cares about special education instead it should be banned because it rips the life out of the individual thats in sped
I been trying to tell my son caseworker and his IEP about this special education. But the IEP look at me like I'm crazy and say we have special class in public. I told them that public school is not good for my son. Because these's public school teacher don't know how to deal with him. These's special kid's do not belong long in public school. But I use to go to a special school in st.louis mo from 1973 to 1979. The only problem that I had was my behavior and I was deaf and I had learning disabilitie 's . If I can go back in do it all over again. I would it took me till I got grown to figure out what was wrong with me. And I don't want that to help to my son. Bring back the real special education and the special school because they are needed.
At the 7:40 mark, you used the "r-word". The use of this word completely invalidates and discredits the information you put forth. What a shame. It's especially disheartening when you aim to inform others about Special Education. As the older sister of someone who struggles with autism and being deaf, I find this very disgusting. I can only imagine what it feels like to have that word categorize you and your needs. Moreover, this word is outdated... for a reason. I hope you can learn to use less offensive and more inclusive terminology to get your point across.
Alexa Strom, you are disgusting. You are trying to Grandstand to make yourself feel morally superior through this pathetic display of virtue signaling. The word was not used in a negative way at all. You make it sound like I was calling people that word which is obviously not the case. Anyone who watches my videos know I advocate for special needs and I’ve been a special needs teacher for ten years. You should be ashamed of yourself!
@@TeachingsinEducation Do you want a cookie for advocating for those who need it? You could have MOST DEFINITELY used alternative language. Stop having such an outdated, ableist mindset. It would not matter if you were using the word in a negative or positive context. It is offensive terminology point blank period. You'd think after years and years of people trying to erase that word, you'd pick up on WHY there is such a strong push for its removal. Frankly, I have severe secondhand embarrassment from reading your reply. The reason I am so appalled is because I HAVE SEEN the damage this kind of word can cause. So until you have to comfort an inconsolable sibling over being called that repulsive word, I'd sit down and shut my fucking mouth if I were you. XO
Alexa Strom, those aren’t My words, they are the words from the lawsuit. I am reciting the terms from the case. Your ignorance on this topic is revealed, as you try to disguise your jealousy and malice with fake moral outrage and pathetic virtue signaling. I used the accurate term used at the time of the court case. Using another word would damage the credibility of the content. Obviously, I would never use that word to describe a student. You’re so fake
I am sorry that the r word triggered you, Alexa Strom-It triggered me too. In this case, I agree with you that it would have been an easy fix to avoid using the r-word. I think the presenter may have neglected to do that because people are simply tired of having to constantly monitor their language to be “politically correct.” I understand the presenter’s frustration with how aggressively you commented under his video but I also understand that your aggression was a direct reflection of how unsettling the r-word is for you. Blessings to you both.
@@TeachingsinEducation OMG... 🤦♀️ and this is why nothing changes. People are too busy trying to be offended and call attention to themselves by pointing out the minor details, that they completely miss the MAJOR point(s) that are trying to be made. I’m not sure how you were expected to identify a case by anything else but its freakin name Heaven forbid someone may need to reference it. The mere fact that it was even called that may help argue your point. Who knows.
Hello Judy, here is a link to a Google Slides presentation in my TPT store. It has all the infographics from the video, along with additional slides of information www.teacherspayteachers.com/Product/Special-Education-Law-Guide-6250011
@@marydaniels21 I think the one your looking at is the special education one. That one has 20 presentation in total, but not every one that I ever made
@@TeachingsinEducation does the Special Education Presentation (PD Bundle) contain any or all the slides from the Special Education Law Guide? Basically, should I make 2 separate purchases or not?
