It was appropriate at the time. At 16 he should have known better and there is no definite sentence for the crimes he committed. Her job was to interpret the law and she did. It’s just that he was found guilty on all 17 charges and he got them consecutively. My point being, understand the law before you open ur damn mouth.
@@raheemwhite9384 just because you disagree with a sentence doesn't mean that you 'dont understand' law. 16 is old enough to understand your actions, yea. But sentencing someone to damn near TRIPLE a human lifespan is overkill PERIOD. Besides....law seems to be AND HAVE ALWAYS SEEMED TO BE rather subjective.
@@raheemwhite9384 it was not appropriate then and it's not appropriate now. There are murderers getting lesser sentences even though they're adults. This judge needs a reality check.
