Тёмный

Stalingrad: Chances for a Breakout? 

Military History Visualized
Подписаться 772 тыс.
Просмотров 474 тыс.
50% 1

Of all the debates about the Battle of Stalingrad, perhaps none causes more controversy than the question of whether or not the Sixth Army would have been able to break-out of the Soviet encirclement. Some people argue that the break-out had good chances. Yet, this is highly debatable.
Historically, a very large number of German generals suggested an outbreak during the crisis, yet, it never happened due to objections of Hitler. Nevertheless, the question remains if a breakout could have been successful if immediate action had been taken. To properly assess this question we need to take a look at the combat power of German troops at Stalingrad, their logistics, mobility and some other factors, before the encirclement happened.
Some thumbnail images generated by OpenAI's DALL-E.
»» SUPPORT MHV ««
» patreon - / mhv
» paypal donation - www.paypal.com...
» Book Wishlist www.amazon.de/...
»» MERCHANDISE - SPOILS OF WAR ««
» shop - www.redbubble....
»» SOCIAL MEDIA ««
» twitter - / milhivisualized
» facebook - / milhistoryvisualized
» twitch - / militaryhistoryvisualized
» minds.com - www.minds.com/...
» SOURCES «
Glantz, David M.; House, Jonathan M.: Armageddon in Stalingrad. The Stalingrad Trilogy, Volume 2: September-November 1942. University Press of Kansas: United States, 2009.
Glantz, David M.; House, Jonathan M.: Endgame at Stalingrad. The Stalingrad Trilogy, Volume 3: Book One: November 1942. University Press of Kansas: United States, 2014.
Glantz, David M.; House, Jonathan M.: When Titans Clashed. How the Red Army stopped Hitler. Revised and Expanded Edition. University Press of Kansas: USA, 2015
Wettstein, Adrian E.: Die Wehrmacht im Stadtkampf 1939-1943. Ferdinand Schöningh: Paderborn, 2014.
Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg - Band 6. Der globale Krieg - Die Ausweitung zum Weltkrieg und der Wechsel der Initiative 1941 bis 1943, Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt: Stuttgart, 1990
Germany and the Second World War - Volume 6 - The Global War
Hartmann, Christian: Wehrmacht im Ostkrieg. Front und militärisches Hinterland 1941/42. De Gruyter Oldenbourg: 2010.
DiNardo, R.L.: Mechanized Juggernaut or Military Anachronism. Horses and the German Army of WWII. Stackpole Books: Mechanicsburg, USA, 2009.
Wette, Wolfram (Hrsg.); Ueberschär, Gerd R. (Hrsg.): Stalingrad - Mythos und Wirklichkeit einer Schlacht. Fischer: Frankfurt am Main, 1992.
Ausbildungsvorschrift für die Panzertruppe - Führung und Kampf der Panzergrenadiere - Heft 1 - Das Panzergrenadier-Battaillon (gp.) - H.Dv. 298/3a (5. 8. 1944)
Klatt, Paul: BAKALOWO - Ausbruch au seiner Einschließung - Ukraine 1944; in: Truppendienst - Gefechtsbeispiele aus dem Zweiten Weltkrieg, S. 207-2014
» DATA CHAIN «
Made with Natural Earth. Free vector and raster map data @ naturalearthdata.com.
Made with GeoHack Data. tools.wmflabs.... - License: creativecommon...
» CREDITS & SPECIAL THX «
Song: Ethan Meixsell - Demilitarized Zone
#ww2 #stalingrad #militaryhistory

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,5 тыс.   
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 6 лет назад
Dr. Jens Wehner recently made a German video on this, that also includes some new sources, be sure to check it out here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-nTQVd_u96hs.html Corrections: It was the 23rd November 1942 as written, NOT October as narrated. It was "Guards Army" not "Guards Amy". Video on Wehrmacht & Red Army Tactics at Stalingrad here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BEhkkzIenr0.html If you like in-depth researched videos on Military History, consider supporting me on Patreon: www.patreon.com/mhv/
@WildBillCox13
@WildBillCox13 6 лет назад
Chuikov's memoir is a great read. 64th Div, and others, were ground down to nothing in the process of "Bleeding White the Hitlerite". The attritional perspective-easier for the historian to integrate into his or her narrative-discounts the planning of Operations and Operational strategy. As German Generalship declined through attrition, Russian Generalship advanced through experience. Even though I am making that point, I still wonder about how much direct influence the two policy makers had on troops at he front. I am still afraid of Stalin . . . and Hitler . . . and Churchill . . . and Missaloony.
@fanta4897
@fanta4897 6 лет назад
Ok, we got this question out of the way so let's move to another: would attempt of breaking out of encirclement pay off more than just staying in the city? Would they inflict more damage/would the losses that happened, and would happen anyway, be less of a waste?
@manyinterests1961
@manyinterests1961 6 лет назад
I would rather guard Amy too
@davidbros849
@davidbros849 6 лет назад
Can you make a video assesing if Hitler gave Mainstein full control of the army in the east which he did and the front was stabilized. But then left him in control. Could have Mainstein changed the outcome of the war? If you cannot make a video can you please give your oppinion? Thank you.
@claudejunkers4348
@claudejunkers4348 6 лет назад
Brilliant ! This video helps explain a lot. Many thanks ! I wonder what did the Germans also find as obstacles in the eastern front (Moscow, Leningrad, Kiev...etc)
@LuisLopez-zh9kh
@LuisLopez-zh9kh 6 лет назад
" Where are the horses?" " We are the horses."
@alex20776a
@alex20776a 4 года назад
I get the reference
@HappyFlapps
@HappyFlapps 4 года назад
Watched it last night.
@claudeschaumkell6514
@claudeschaumkell6514 3 года назад
They ate the horses
@steventhompson399
@steventhompson399 3 года назад
I LOVE THAT MOVIE :) - Where is our artillery? - YOU ARE the artillery!
@RA10H56
@RA10H56 3 года назад
Great reference! What a grim movie.
@michaelolsen2760
@michaelolsen2760 6 лет назад
My great uncle was actually part of the airlift. The conditions he described were hellish.
@ximrade4287
@ximrade4287 5 лет назад
@Alex English Left the chat....
@myrmecologistjp9228
@myrmecologistjp9228 4 года назад
@Alex because some one says nazi scum dosent mean they are communists, of course, the same could be said for the person you replied because they don't know if that member of family member was a nazi.
@skyboxmagee8038
@skyboxmagee8038 5 лет назад
Stalingrad at the end of January in 1943 must have literally been one of the worst places to exist in all of history.
@oyuk4618
@oyuk4618 4 года назад
How about first day of somme
@bleepbleep5245
@bleepbleep5245 4 года назад
Still slightly better than modern days Detroit though...
@apoc3037
@apoc3037 4 года назад
How about November 23, there you have more horror in front of you
@michaelengel3407
@michaelengel3407 4 года назад
There are some places which were stigmatized during world war. Auschwitz, Dresden, Stalingrad. That places stand for all terrors and fears that war and hate can bring to the people up to our days.
@jmbpaz
@jmbpaz 4 года назад
Not even close
@buster117
@buster117 6 лет назад
Warning: huge wave of hoi4 players are coming to suggest opinions
@AlexanderSeven
@AlexanderSeven 6 лет назад
Germans could definitely break through if they used artillery only.
@RouGeZH
@RouGeZH 6 лет назад
Artillery only would've saved 6th army
@edoardodalpra4742
@edoardodalpra4742 6 лет назад
Man, that game is so unrealistic. Hoi3 was way better IMO.
@Edax_Royeaux
@Edax_Royeaux 6 лет назад
Change the divisions trapped in Stalingrad to a paratrooper insignia, and paradrop them back behind your own lines!
@rainyvideos3684
@rainyvideos3684 6 лет назад
Fools. I wouldn't have been encircled in the first place! I would have them surrounded from the inside!
@danielwallace1759
@danielwallace1759 6 лет назад
I like how a horse had a better chance of escaping Stalingrad than a German soldier.
@nks406
@nks406 6 лет назад
If it wasn't eaten
@danielwallace1759
@danielwallace1759 6 лет назад
Or used as a source of fuel to cook said horse.
@andyl8055
@andyl8055 6 лет назад
I would be surprised if any horses ultimately survived the eastern front. If you weren’t human you were basically fucked.
@danielwallace1759
@danielwallace1759 6 лет назад
If you were a human you were also fucked tbh
@jackharter660
@jackharter660 6 лет назад
@@andyl8055 horse's had value they could Pull supplies through the mud and snow if you were Russian you could always get more people.
@ianbirge8269
@ianbirge8269 6 лет назад
Given what we know about what happened to POWs on the Eastern Front (from both sides), if I was in the 6th Army, I would have preferred the breakout, whatever the odds.
@edi9892
@edi9892 6 лет назад
I thought the same about WWII in general. My grandfather has seen horrors beyond your imagination, but still I would have preferred to test my luck in combat rather than hide from constant bombing raids, starve and have to fear torture and rape...
@Bota367
@Bota367 6 лет назад
So you have 2 options: 1. Surrender and hope you, as exhausted soldier, won't freeze to death on your way to Gulag. 2. Break out as exhausted soldier, fight the Soviet and hope you don't freeze to death or die by Soviet hand. So both options offers you freezing to death only 2nd one gives you chances of being killed in combat. So your chances for survival are higher if you surrender no matter how brutal the POW treatment is. They were in shit and maybe you would like to break out but I don't think many of them cared at that point. There is a saying the dead ones are lucky because they don't suffer anymore.
@orgami100
@orgami100 6 лет назад
My father was there with the Hungarian army, not as a combative soldier as a forced slave labor... According to him about 800 laborers who when there less than a dozen survived. . He survived because exchanged his labor clothing with a dead Hungarian officer. . As he was walking the ice road truck came along, next thing he remembers being in a hospital in Budapest. . Hated Hungarians with a passion, accordingly wishes all would've been killed by the Russians. .
@djeieakekseki2058
@djeieakekseki2058 6 лет назад
Jason Wilson what a story, interesting!
@slimchancetoo
@slimchancetoo 6 лет назад
Or by Feldgendarmarie hand. "Where is your weapon -------- you have lost it" "A bullet will perhaps teach you not to lose it again".
@sevenproxies4255
@sevenproxies4255 6 лет назад
A fighting chance with the risk of death is always preferable to certain death.
@subhikebbeh3490
@subhikebbeh3490 6 лет назад
Manstein was promising Paulaus that Army group Don is coming to save him. So yeah he believed he had another chances
@sevenproxies4255
@sevenproxies4255 6 лет назад
@transylvanian: What a load of crap. The soviets even worked their own citizens to death in gulags. Why on earth would they treat enemy troops any better?
@sevenproxies4255
@sevenproxies4255 6 лет назад
@transylvanian: Sounds to me like you're thw victim of pro-soviet propaganda. It's obvious youre pining back for the days of "the glory of the soviet union" more than anything. A pinko commie in other words.
@sevenproxies4255
@sevenproxies4255 6 лет назад
@transylvanian In western penal labour systems, convicts were not purposefully worked to death or put through starvation on purpose like the barbaric soviets did. People also weren't sent to penal labour for the mere act of disagreeing with the ruling communist party, like the vile, disugsting soviets did. What's next? Are you gonna tell me that the Holodomor was just "an accident"?
@sevenproxies4255
@sevenproxies4255 6 лет назад
@transylvanian: Ever heard about the Katyn Massacre? The victims in that were not nazi germans, but polish officers and soldiers. Are you gonna claim that poles would defend or buy into a nazi narrative just because they hate the soviet union?
@hawksrob1961
@hawksrob1961 4 года назад
I love listening to smart people talk, matters little what the subject is, so long as it’s passionate and ethical
@looinrims
@looinrims 2 года назад
You’d deny what smart people would say on the basis of ethics (assuming what they’re saying is factual)? How’s that work?
@Luca-vk8zt
@Luca-vk8zt 6 лет назад
When you encircle the whole 6th army in Hoi4 *outstanding move meme*
@spleen5527
@spleen5527 6 лет назад
owned
@spleen5527
@spleen5527 6 лет назад
German troops sucked Russian wiener.
@biz4twobiz463
@biz4twobiz463 5 лет назад
Luca Pinne ... totally a supply and demand issue. What's worse, is that upper command new they didn't have resources to aide the breakthrough forces...and YET they sent them anyway. Waist! Waist! Waist! Of men and supplies.
@biz4twobiz463
@biz4twobiz463 5 лет назад
@Sovereign only if yours is small lol!! As a girl, that is all I can do.... haha
@biz4twobiz463
@biz4twobiz463 5 лет назад
@Sovereign ... lmao!! You are way to silly lol
@echoofhistory7583
@echoofhistory7583 6 лет назад
First of all, very good video. But some parts of 6th Army manage to breakout from Stalingrad. There were two 7th and 6th Lithuanian Auxiliary Police Battalions which were lead by major Jonas Semaška. Which got permission from 6th Army HQ to retreat with the rest of his men separately from the main forces. And they managed to breakthrough from "Stalingrad Pocket". 400 Lithuanian soldiers reached Lithuania out of more than 700. As a side note these men were conscripted to German army against there will. Only source of this story is in Lithuanian language in book called ''Priesaika, Jonas Semaška-Liepa ir bendražygiai''. Also I made short video about it in English.
@alganhar1
@alganhar1 6 лет назад
There is a big difference between 400 men breaking out and 200,000. While I do not know the story I will make the assumption that those Lithuanians did not in fact 'break' out, but for the most part 'infiltrated' out, in other words relied on stealth more than combat power to affect their withdrawal. You simply cannot do that with 200,000 men, especially considering so many of them were in effective direct contact with the enemy, thus any withdrawal would have been immediately noticed. I would not be surprised to hear similar stories of small numbers of men being able to extricate themselves from the Stalingrad pocket, but I will make a bet that pretty much all of those that managed it successfully did so by relying on stealth rather than combat/
@echoofhistory7583
@echoofhistory7583 6 лет назад
@@alganhar1 Thank you for your response. To start with, I was not talking about possibility of major breakout of 6th army. It was Unthinkable, and I completely agree with information in this video. However, I just wanted to tell that history is not just black and white. Secondly, you made a logical assumption that was mostly stealthy sneak out from Stalingrad rather than breakout. Well at least from my source it seems that there was fierce fighting involved. Sometimes even hand to hand combat. Also, there is information about that battalions got into artillery fire in some occasions. So, combat was real. You can see that from numbers. Around 700 started and approximately 400 survived. Of course, stealth tactics were used because units moved through swamps and forests avoiding strong points but losses were still high. Another piece of information is that some of battalion’s men got military awards. In my opinion, this should prove that if even Germans consider award worth achievement it sure seems like a quite big accomplishment.
@matteoorlandi856
@matteoorlandi856 6 лет назад
Well the italians tryed to break trough and they did It at the end. And we are talking about an entire army, even if the losses where really heavy
@alganhar1
@alganhar1 6 лет назад
Perhaps I should have been a bit clearer and said that they would have relied *mostly* on stealth, fighting only when it was absolutely neccessary. My mistake. An interesting story however, one I intend to look up. I have heard of a few scattered groups escaping Stalingrad, but they would have numbered a few thousand at best if you add them all up. Even the best encirclement will have enough small gaps that will allow small, determined, and skilled groups to escape.
@fuzzydunlop7928
@fuzzydunlop7928 5 лет назад
@@echoofhistory7583 I think you just wanted to bring an anecdote to the table - there's nothing wrong with that but you don't need to put on airs about it.
@heathen2487
@heathen2487 4 года назад
I've read Stalingrad by Antony Beevor and Victory at Stalingrad by Geoffrey Roberts. This video fills in lots of questions i had from the books.
@cowgoesmoo3850
@cowgoesmoo3850 3 года назад
Those were good books. I listened to the audio versions of both. Also Tigers in the Mud. How the described the Eastern front was insane, couldn't even imagine something like that, and various other "Eastern Front" books.
@daveyboy_
@daveyboy_ Год назад
Beevor's book was awesome
@stalkingtiger777
@stalkingtiger777 6 лет назад
I would be interested to know how many Soviet formations were tied down encircling Stalingrad that would have been freed up to join the main front of there had been a breakout. In other words was it more beneficial for the Germans that the pocket held to tie down Soviet assets or would it have been more beneficial to alleviate the beleaguered German supply chain from supplying the pocket and potentially recovering a part of the manpower of the 6th army for future operations.
@cpob2013
@cpob2013 6 лет назад
eh a german army was a nice trophy to mount on the wall. dont forget about the political aspects of warfare.
@Vlad79500
@Vlad79500 5 лет назад
@@arjunvardhan8134 "More than a 100 formations" Why not 200? "After the front, which had come to chaotic movement as a result of the Russian breakthrough, finally stabilized, the intelligence department of the headquarters of our corps gradually managed to get a more or less complete picture of the situation from the enemy. Now, when the entire 6th Army was concentrated in a relatively small area inside the ring, we tried to identify and strike on the cards all enemy strike formations operating against the 6th Army. Only large *Russian formations here at first numbered about 60* - these were mainly rifle divisions and tank brigades, combined into seven armies. To this should be added some of the compounds in reserve, whose presence was not easy to detect. The main forces of the enemy, and above all his artillery, were concentrated in the western sector of the ring, which was defended by parts of our corps. We calculated that enemy formations that surrounded us with a steel ring possess at least threefold numerical superiority and have an awesome amount of heavy weaponry. Our army, however, the number of which before the entourage was about 330 thousand people, now after the losses suffered as a result of the Russian breakthrough, according to our data, there were about 280 thousand people, including Romanians, as well as some units that were not previously part of the army, but trapped with us in the pot. Among the surrounded were representatives of absolutely all German lands (one of the army corps was formed in Vienna). All of them were henceforth bound by one unkind fate. They were addressed the words of the order, promised salvation: “Hold on! The Fuhrer will rescue you! ” Wieder I. "The Catastrophe on the Volga" This Wieder data is not far from the truth. By that time, not three, but two fronts acted against the encircled ones, as the Southwestern acted on the outer ring of the encirclement, and the 51st Army of the Stalingrad Front acted here. On November 27, up to 10 rifle divisions, one tank division and three cavalry corps acted on the external front of the encirclement. The 62, 64, 57th armies of the Stalingrad Front and the 65th, 66th, 21st and 24th armies of the Don Front were active on the inner ring. It should be borne in mind here that they all suffered losses, especially the army of the Stalingrad Front, the composition of each of them, as Wieder himself points out, is not exceeded the composition of the German army corps, and for the most part was inferior to it. Therefore, the final conclusion about the threefold superiority of the Russians is an exaggeration. By December 1, the Stalingrad direction as a whole had the following ratio: Soviet divisions - 68.5, German - 48 (ratio 1.45: 1); 854,776 from the Soviet side, 846,000 from the German side (1: 1); soviet tanks - 797, German - 770 (1: 1); Artillery and aviation ratio was about the same. Triple pre-rise Soviet the side had only large-caliber mortars. The enemy, however, had a qualitative superiority in the field artillery. *Directly against the encircled forces there were 43.5 Soviet divisions* consisting of 479,672 men (1.45: 1 ratio); 465 tanks against 340 (1.3: 1); Cannons and mortars 8491 against 5230 (1.6: 1).
@looinrims
@looinrims 3 года назад
Look up Eastory, he has mapping videos of the nazi Soviet war, it was a lot of units
@CarrotConsumer
@CarrotConsumer 3 года назад
All of Army Group South was a mess at this time. So yes the longer 6th Army held out the better the strategic situation was.
@stevenwolfe7101
@stevenwolfe7101 3 года назад
Several authors on the topic have written that at any given moment after December 7, 1941, at least two-thirds of Wehrmacht soldiers were on the Eastern front.
@cannonfodder4376
@cannonfodder4376 6 лет назад
15:51"Unless you have the reaction time of a stone." A quote I am going to be using from now on, thanks. And a fantastic and informative video as always.
@derkach7907
@derkach7907 3 года назад
Every russian after hearing your pronunciation of Stalingrad : *dies
@wojta610cz5
@wojta610cz5 3 года назад
Every Slav too
@BIAWorldofWarships
@BIAWorldofWarships 6 лет назад
Your english is spot on mate, I love watching your videos :) Danke Schon!!
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 6 лет назад
thank you!
@packmule_
@packmule_ 4 года назад
Ive always felt that the sheer motivation of "hey we might live" would push them out with crazy casualties. Maybe even motivating the outside force alittle more to try and save there comrades as well, but those are things that can't be predicted. Just feel that the choice of fight or die is a huge motivation to put your head down and go no matter what.
@jackray1337
@jackray1337 6 лет назад
I see some questions on things not directly related to the video. If you support MHV through Patreon, you can get those questions answered via Q&A videos. If you are very interested in learning more about military history, support the channel more and get Discord access. The MHV Discord channel has a good community of helpful people including MHV!
@blackedelweiss601
@blackedelweiss601 5 лет назад
That's too bad. I hate discord.
@aussieboy77
@aussieboy77 5 лет назад
I watched a documentary on Stalingrad and when the order came for the Germans to remain in Stalingrad, they (the Germans) couldn't believe it. They desperately wanted to break out and they were ready and willing to do it. Whether it was possible was another matter. Great video BTW. You obviously did your research.
@SantiFiore
@SantiFiore 6 лет назад
I could not have thought of a better birthday present, MHV. You had my heart before, but now you have my soul. /s
@3johansendaniel
@3johansendaniel 6 лет назад
Could you do a video on german fuel production comparet with the other powers and then do a breakdown on german fuel distribution between her allies, navy and different fronts. It would also be great if you could do a general breakdown of german resources and there they were investet steel, workforce, capital and so on. A comparison in soft area production like trucks, radio, ammunition would also be great since most only look at tanks,ships, guns and so on. It would also be interesting to look at german AA, antitank guns and artilleri production both total and the ratio of AA to the other two relative to the other powers.
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 6 лет назад
can yes, will unlikely. Just for the German side I would need to read around 1000 pages, for the others I would have to find proper books, what you are asking for is basically something along a phd or even more.
@3johansendaniel
@3johansendaniel 6 лет назад
@@MilitaryHistoryVisualized Could you please do a video on german antiaircraftgun production both total and ratio compered to artilleri and antitankguns relative to the other powers or a video on german fuel production and distribution(germany seem to have a lot of diesel and soviet fuel production look very low) please conside my request it has been very defficult to find anything and the numbers I did finf look odd thank you.
@RU-zm7wj
@RU-zm7wj 6 лет назад
Could you also calculate Pi to 2 billion places while you're at it?
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 6 лет назад
@daniel: for questions may I refer you to the Oberst rank: www.patreon.com/mhv
@sorinfluturica9537
@sorinfluturica9537 6 лет назад
I like the way he says "Stalingrad"
@Igyzone
@Igyzone 6 лет назад
Germans like to pronounce the letter S as "Sch" or should I say the letter S with caron, known as "Š"
@Tarik360
@Tarik360 6 лет назад
@@Igyzone so that's why their ß or "SS" letter is their regular "s" sound. Thanks for reminding.
@nirfz
@nirfz 6 лет назад
Don't russian people also pronounce it the same? St or Sp are usually pronounced sh-t or sh-p in german (some folk in the north of germany refuse to do so, but the rest does) As long as theese letter don't belong to seperate words which are combined into one (like in Hausputz)
@anderskorsback4104
@anderskorsback4104 5 лет назад
Schtalin. Just like in the Hitler Rants meme.
@Sike12
@Sike12 5 лет назад
@@Igyzone actually it's the "st" combination that in some regions in Germany is pronounced as "scht" (like "Stalingrad" in the video)
@Bota367
@Bota367 6 лет назад
15:51 ?? I am stone and I find this offensive :D
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 6 лет назад
good :)
@Captain_Carrot
@Captain_Carrot 6 лет назад
It's okay, Rocky, you go when you feel like it.
@WildBillCox13
@WildBillCox13 6 лет назад
A lot of that fuel fraction was to turnaround transports. That means it was lost to the troops on the ground. Airplanes are fuel hogs.
@callumdavis8307
@callumdavis8307 5 лет назад
If Paulus was replaced by tommykay they would have never been encircled in the first place
@TheReaper569
@TheReaper569 6 лет назад
I loved that wolf in sheep image. Also you missed an important opportunity to use your classic pony instead of a horse while talking about evacuated horses.
@Oscuros
@Oscuros 3 года назад
It's always great fun to try, like with Market Garden. Paulus was known to be a delayer from his Kriegakademie wargaming, that was noted about his style. That's why in books like Hitler's Generals they style him as a cunctator. Meyer boasting that he could supply the entire Sixth and barely managing 10% of the minimum needed was kind of understandably demoralising for Paulus as much as being left there to just inconvenience the enemy, something we all do all the time in gaming, but the Stalingrad story tells us how that feels and should be instructive. I agree with your Clausewitzian argument of "friction", though. Like with the logistics, it's hard to tell what lesson to draw from this, like with the unique logistical problems to that front that don't seem to apply in Europe or North America, for example.
@Snagabott
@Snagabott 6 лет назад
I must say that when you say that a breakout might still have been possible (albeit difficult), the decision to just leave the army to its fate cannot be defended either on a military, humanitarian or from a morale point of view. A chance of recovering some > 100% chance of losing all of them. Even if the soldiers could not see the future, they probably had a good hunch that their chances of suriving as a Soviet POW were grim (as would indeed be shown to be the case). They would have been quite ready to make great sacrifices in a push to have a chance at a breakout. The generals of the time seemed to think that it would have been possible. Consider that even if Soviet strenght was theoretically hugely superior in the Stalingrad area as a whole, they would have had to move an absolutely enormous amout of men, weapons and supplies locally in order to turn around the attacking troops being conducted west of Stalingrad and bring all of that to bear on the sallying Germans within the space of 3 days. None of that excuses, ofc, that Germany didn't start the withdrawal _before_ encirclement was complete. They had pragmatically conceided defeat before when an attack turned out to not work they way they wanted, and this should not have been different. The string of defeats on the flanks and the time that had passed since Germany more or less showed its hand in that area (mid summer 1942) should have cued them into the idea that the Soviet counterattacks meant business.
@hjalmar4565
@hjalmar4565 6 лет назад
But what would have happen if the breakout would fail and Stalingrad was taken by the Soviets much earlier? Maybe the 6th army bought just enough time for the Axis to stabilize the front, so the Soviets couldn't attack the lines again and encircle Army group A.
@davidmiller-qh8op
@davidmiller-qh8op 6 лет назад
I saw this channel when a good mate suggested we watched some of the Bovington tank videos. Bovo, well FMD, there’s a fair dinkum shit hot place. So any-ol’-hoo as they reckon in Canadia, I copped a squiz at this little ripper vid and strewth, by the end of it I was happier than wombat comin’ across a brand spankin’ new 200m earthen walled dam just beggin’ fer a right royal burrowin’. Whatta absolute bloody hoot! Truly sensational stuff mate. Hadda perve at cha other titles and you’ve been busier than a blue arsed fly. Youse blokes are legends.
@StephenFarthing
@StephenFarthing 6 лет назад
Thanks for a great video. I once attended a lecture given by a military historian who was trying to explain the post WW2 psyche of the Soviets and the roots of the Cold War. I wish I could remember his name. His main point was that at Stalingrad the Russians fought soldiers from over 20 different nationalities. Whilst the Germans were most numerous there were armies from Romania, Croatia, Hungary and Italy and smaller units from Belgium, the Baltic states, Norway, Denmark and if I remember rightly, from “liberated” parts of the USSR, such as the Ukraine. There were also units made from Russian POWs. Some of these took really heavy losses, for example the Hungarian Army had 80,000 killed. His point was that, from the USSR’s viewpoint, Stalingrad was viewed as not just a fight with the Germans, but a fight against most of Europe. So post war the Soviets “ occupied” Hungary, Poland, Romania and the Baltic states partly to make sure they wouldn’t have to fight them again. And the effect on the “psyche” was for the USSR to think of itself alone against the rest of the world, which contributed to the Cold War, and is still the attitude of many Russians today. I’m sure you are very busy but if you have the time I would welcome a video on the battle of Budapest in 1944. It’s not widely known about but the Red Army didn’t have things its own way there and Stalins plan to knock Hungary out of the war failed. However Hitler unwisely diverted reserves to Hungary which hastened the fall of Berlin. Or so the conventional view goes.
@davethompson3326
@davethompson3326 6 лет назад
Since the Mongols, every threat to Russia came from the West, Poland, Teutonic Knights, Sweden, Prussia, France, Britain & France, Germany-Prussiax3
@Celebmacil
@Celebmacil 6 лет назад
That might well have been how things were seen from the Soviet standpoint, indeed. Of course it was also an utterly "created" narrative on their part, given their history with various nations and groups within that force involved against them. So while it was how they saw things from their point of view, it certainly wasn't "true", aside from "a certain point of view".
@StephenFarthing
@StephenFarthing 6 лет назад
Celebmacil But it was true. The facts are that at Stalingrad, the Red Army alone faced the Germans, Italians, Romanians, Hungarians and Croatians as well as minor units from other countries.
@Celebmacil
@Celebmacil 6 лет назад
Oh, I'm aware. I'm just stating the mindset of "having to fight them again" as if they were somehow an innocent and unfairly aggrieved party in many of the cases is an... interesting... view to take for the Soviets (or Russians), in context of what they'd been doing to some of those nations for centuries, or even as recently as two years previously, or what they then went on to do once more in the next two to twenty and more years. It's like repeatedly kicking the crap out of all the neighborhood dogs for a decade and then being amazed that they come hunt you down and gang up on you, and feeling like "well, I guess I'd better REALLY kick the crap out of them this time so I don't have to kick the crap out of them again!".
@Vlad79500
@Vlad79500 5 лет назад
@@Celebmacil "in context of what they'd been doing to some of those nations for centuries," What about examples?
@jeroenstrompf5064
@jeroenstrompf5064 5 лет назад
Thank you for this amazingly thorough video! I especially enjoyed the "But..." section (which included my favourite "but, namely Operation Winterwetter)
@vincentstella5131
@vincentstella5131 6 лет назад
Sir, as always, another incredibly awesome video. I appreciate the research and thought provoking analysis you do on all your subjects. Your even handed approach to the question of the success or failure of a German breakout from Stalingrad is commendable. Keep up the great work.
@QED_
@QED_ 5 лет назад
Some days you wake up . . . and you feel like fighting loss historical battles all over again. Thank heaven for RU-vid (!)
@makinapacal
@makinapacal 4 года назад
Thank you! What you have demonstrated was that the decision to not try to break out was under the circumstances at the time and with the knowledge they had a reasonable decision.
@mpriymak
@mpriymak 6 лет назад
It is necessary to point out that whatever force was fortunate enough in successfully escaping the encirclement at Stalingrad would do so without most of its heavy equipment/tanks/artillery/etc... and after suffering incredible casualties during such escape. Such a decimated force would need to be shipped back to Germany for reorganization and re-equipment and would not be able to participate in meaningful defensive operations against the Soviet "Little Saturn" operation (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Little_Saturn). Essentially, after the successful encirclement at Stalingrad, Case Blue was doomed no matter how you look at it.
@kirillavitch
@kirillavitch 3 года назад
I respect this channel so much. Thank you so much for providing actual educational material on the subject as opposed to conjecture and propaganda garbage
@free_at_last8141
@free_at_last8141 6 лет назад
Traversing a one-way rail line into Stalingrad would be a fantastic Thomas the tank engine episode.
@elrjames7799
@elrjames7799 5 лет назад
"As so often there are many arguments that can be made, yet a German breakout at Stalingrad was definitely not easy, nor was it without risk: yet at least it would've given the men a fighting chance instead of starving to death." Absolutely brilliant summation! The MHV's allusion to FM Manstein is indicative. According to Ziemke & Bauer, 'Moscow to Stalingrad (Decision in the East) NY 1988 page 475: on 24th Nov 42 FM Manstein reported to O.K.H that "he could not concur at present with Army Group B’s stand in favour of breakout.” However, by 19th December he had changed his mind and informed Hitler that because LVII Pz Corps probably could not achieve contact with 6th Army, he believed the only answer was to order it to break out. He maintained that this would, at least, save most of the troops and whatever equipment could still be moved. To Paulus, he sent advanced notice of a breakout order, but the message ended that 6th Army was merely to get ready but not start until ordered. Hitler, encouraged by LVII Pz Corp's recent success, refused to approve. Instead he ordered Pz GrD Viking from Army Group A to 4th Pz Army and insisted that 6th Army was to hold out until firm contact was established, so that a complete, orderly withdrawal could be accomplished. Note Hitler was ready to evacuate Stalingrad on 19th Dec but wanted to play 'safe': fatal in this fluid situation.
@samstewart4807
@samstewart4807 6 лет назад
As usual a fascinating and provocative video. Maps showing the distances would be a huge help. Your comments provoke this question- What was 6th army's time table 11/1/42? Suppose the Germans had full control of Stalingrad by 11/15- what next? Were they then going to turn south for the oil fields? What was army group central doing at this time? There was a 500? mile gap between central group and Stalingrad Was NO ONE looking at this? Do Manstien's personal papers hold the only info on his thinking between 10/15- 12/23
@MrRelojero
@MrRelojero 6 лет назад
all your quesitions are answered here ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pucJTYK7_Yo.html
@WildBillCox13
@WildBillCox13 6 лет назад
Where else, but a tank, can five men effectively use a 5cm gun, two or three MGs, and stay behind bullet-proof armor all the while? Nobody EVER says that Germany had enough tanks to absorb converting a bunch into infanterie halbgruppen. Further, armor is the wrong tool for any job in towns and other built up areas. Like Leningrad, the idea was to reduce fortifications through artillery and air close support. There was siege artillery available, but planes could be transferred between fronts (and rear areas) much more quickly than giant cannon and howitzers.
@pablopeter3564
@pablopeter3564 4 года назад
The encirclement date: There is a discrepancy in what is beeing shown in the picture and what is being mentioned in your speech. The proper date was November 23, 1942 and not October same year. Thanks for the documentary you are doing a great job.
@MJKarkoska
@MJKarkoska 6 лет назад
The main thing people fail to understand, at least among those with whom I debate military history, is that even had the 6th and 4th Pz broken out, the entire southern sector of the Eastern Front would have collapsed in short order. The encirclement was just tying down too many Soviet formations, and were they all suddenly freed, the Germans would have been faced with a disparity of forces in the southern sector for which they were not prepared. It is debatable I suppose, since those forces were eventually freed, but at a later date, giving the Germans more time. Personally I think a breakout could have succeeded relatively easy early on, given that the encirclement was very loose behind the German positions. The later they waited, the less chance they had of success, and the more equipment they would have to abandon.
@ineednochannelyoutube5384
@ineednochannelyoutube5384 6 лет назад
Thing is, those units were freed up in rather short order, and the Voronyez front absolutely shattered armygroup south. If the Soviet counteroffensive came during the summer, the axis might have even faired better considering a big part of their weakness was the low motorization of theirtransport capacity was very ineffective in the winter.
@schlechtgut8349
@schlechtgut8349 3 года назад
wow the fact about horses being evacuated was so surprising
@justvideos3216
@justvideos3216 5 лет назад
One aspect is missing. A breakout would have put up the moral of the German troop drastically. If you would have told the soldiers: "We prepare to get out of this winter hell immediately. Fight as hard as you can to get back home or we all will die here." They could have done the impossible.
@Whitpusmc
@Whitpusmc 6 лет назад
This begs the question, why was an army (the 6th) that was so unfit for offensive operations still trying to push forward? Was the lure of Stalingrad so bright that the Wehrmacht ignored the condition of its forces and kept going forward? Why were the offensive forces so low on materials (assume it’s the length of the logistics train). Why was German intelligence not more aware of the disparity of forces facing it?
@jamestang1227
@jamestang1227 6 лет назад
I am in no way and expert on this topic but as stated in this video, the Germans felt perhaps not "superior" but felt the Soviets were incapable of mounting real determined resistance against them, secondly IIRC German intelligence on the Eastern front was bad in general. The Germans were also firm believers in bewegunskrieg, war of movement, and the initial Fall Blau plan wanted to take Stalingrad to cut off the Soviets from the Volga and Caspian. Suffice it to say, Fall Ball was not a good plan and heavily overstretched limited German resources.
@TheAngryAstronaut
@TheAngryAstronaut 3 года назад
One of my oldest friend's Uncles fought for Germany at Stalingrad. He refused to surrender, somehow slipped through the Soviet lines, and made it to Turkey. He lost all of his toes from frostbite, but took a ferry to German occupied Greece, insisted on joining another unit, and ended up fighting on the Western Front. I despise Nazi Germany, but that guy had balls of solid rock.
@surducalexandru9553
@surducalexandru9553 3 года назад
Bullshit....
@HeilLoki
@HeilLoki 6 лет назад
Here is what one of my relatives had to say in Stalingrad before trying to engage a soviet sniper. These are his actual final words before getting headshot by said sniper according to a letter written by his comrades adressed to his wife: "Und jetzt leckt's mich am Arsch!" (literally: "And now lick my ass!", meaning "Fuck off!") I think that sums up Stalingrad pretty well. And I still think to this day that these are probably the best final words, I've ever heard (read) anyone saying.
@fanofrunbot9771
@fanofrunbot9771 6 лет назад
Much better analysis than TIK. Has anyone proffered that Paulus should have been re-enforced or an OFFENSIVE launched?
@JHei10
@JHei10 6 лет назад
Excellent video mate! will subscribe your channel!
@joshb7300
@joshb7300 3 года назад
Had Stalingrad not continued to resist huge Russian forces would have been freed to destroy the whole Southern flank in Russia.
@stevenwolfe7101
@stevenwolfe7101 3 года назад
Stalin was fully committed to the defense of the city which bore his name. Before the battle, he learned from Sorge, a highly successful spy, that Japan was going to abide by the Russo-Japanese Treaty and was not going to mount an invasion of Russia in the far East. Armed with this knowledge he was able to move a tremendous number of troops from the far East to Stalingrad. Previously, Sorge had advised Stalin of the exact date of the planned invasion of Russia by Germany. He was also advised of this by the West but ignored it believing it to be merely a "provocation". Despite his paranoia, Stalin refused to believe that Hitler would violate the Russo-German Non-Aggressive Pact and invade Russia. His shock at the event caused him to escape reality for about a week, with some close to him describing him later as having suffered a breakdown. He made no radio announcements during the first 6 or 7 days after June 22, 1941. His inaction resulted in the loss of thousands of Russian planes while on the ground during this time.
@GeorgeHutchins
@GeorgeHutchins 5 лет назад
I would like to see a video of yours about the May 1-3, 1945, breakout of Berlin, which began at the TIER GARTEN to reach the Spandau Berlin Bridge which crossed the Haven River, and the dangers the evacuees faced while on route. Plus, other routes which were taken, once their services were no longer required in Berlin.
@seegurke93
@seegurke93 6 лет назад
Tik did great videos on that :) I like how your videos and his add up together. would love to see a coop !
@c-4po298
@c-4po298 6 лет назад
Thanks for your assessment of the situation. Could you please go one step further and hypothesize what YOU would do if you were in command of the German forces attempting a breakout. When, where and how (troop formations, mechanized unit formations, what roads!). Using the historical information in this video do you think you could achieve it? Knowing all these facts would be a best-case scenario for you as a German-commander but I would be curious to know if you could make it out of Stalingrad and what kind of losses you would expect to have along the way. As always, thanks for the historical summery!
@roberthan3908
@roberthan3908 5 лет назад
If the 6th Army did manage to break out, the Soviets would have trapped the entire Army Group A in the Caucasus
@fonzo2525
@fonzo2525 5 лет назад
In the movie Stalingrad the movie opens with a german unit on leave somewhere in italy i believe,i'm not sure if they were then transferred to the eastern front after fighting there or were sent there on leave from the eastern front which doesn't make much sense,they must have arrived as reinforcements or replacements before the encirclement,really wish the movie gave a better timeline of their involvement in the war,i know this comment seems a little in left field but we are talking about the encirclement so these had to had arrived before the 23rd of november.
@billbob654321
@billbob654321 6 лет назад
Ich cannot even believe people talk about a Breakout!!! That wasnt the point... OKH absolutely didn't want a breakout. They needed those men to stay put there. Sure, for civility they thought about it and discussed it but they Knew it was of Strategic importance for the 6th army to remain in Stalingrad. 6th army was sacrificed to hold the front and free up the Caucasus Area. So no, a breakout wasnt even really considered, expect maybe by Paulus. Poor Paulus always getting the blame. I dont agree with that either. Anyways they were doomed from the Start logistically Speaking.
@CarlosSempereChen
@CarlosSempereChen 6 лет назад
fruler I’ve heard that argument before and it makes some sense. The 6th Army pinned a large concentration of Soviet troops by staying there.
@billbob654321
@billbob654321 6 лет назад
@@CarlosSempereChen i think it is pretty clear from retrospect that they were there in Stalingrad to keep the Caucasus safe, for it oil resources. They didnt even manage to do that. If they wanted they could've probably broke out in November... But that would've caused a collapse of the southern front... Where the oil was. It just turned out to be the most horrific battle in all of german history, possibly world history. THe suffering on all sides was insurmountable, indescribably horrific and brutal. I dont blame Paulus, he had his orders and he followed them like a good general would. He wasn't weak like people described, i would say hes strong for what he did and went through. I think he was a smart highly intelligent man in a bad, no way of winning the battle situation. Hopefully people will have more respect for him in the future and hopefully historians will agree that a breakout wasnt even on the table... 6 armee was to hold the line.
@Mies78
@Mies78 6 лет назад
I think you nailed it. The 6th was sacrificed.
@billbob654321
@billbob654321 5 лет назад
Michel van Dijk I agree
@billbob654321
@billbob654321 5 лет назад
Michel van Dijk and sacrificed at a high cost too. Man power is more valuable than technological advancement. Soviets realized this more than the Germans did. Wehrmacht was highly trained, highly advanced. They had 20 years of post ww1 to study their loss and they did and learned from their mistakes more than any other Nation
@josephpercente8377
@josephpercente8377 3 года назад
The troops in the Caucasus were left there for I believe a month. A faster reorganization of forces may have made a differance.
@ddickson1167
@ddickson1167 5 лет назад
When I look of a Stalingrad breakour I find myself comparing it to the 8rh Army and General Wenke at Halbe Forest at the close of the war. There was no Tangermünde awairing Paulus or any possible relieving force. The only possible "breakout" would have been for the 6th Army to go into an "every-man-for-himself" scenario. In the Russian Winter instead of the German Spring.
@dr.johannesmunch891
@dr.johannesmunch891 5 лет назад
Während meines Militärdienstes (bei der 10. San/6) war die Doktrin: "wenn man gezwungen ist, eine Stellung zu evakuieren, sind ca 50% Verlust nicht zu vermeiden." das war natürlich eine Richtschnur, und sollte eigentlich heißen: evakuiere, wenn deine Situation schlecht ist und dabei ist so schlecht zu werden, dass ein weiteres Festhalten an der Stellung zu mehr als 50% Verlust (basierend auf der momentanen Stärke) bedeuten würde. Wir sprechen hier natürlich von einer taktischen Erwägung. Die Evakuierung einer strategisch bedeutenden Stellung kann an anderer Stelle natürlich zu erheblich größeren Verlusten führen.
@golfscienceguru
@golfscienceguru 5 лет назад
The breakout would had the shorter "inside line" vs the "outside line" of the surrounding forces. Instead of having actually to traverse 21 miles, the spearhead of the breakout likely only needed to go 16 miles to begin to sandwich the surrounding force guarding the breakout route so they would be 2.5 miles facing the spearhead to the front while they would have the relieving force at 2.5 miles at their backs so that the surrounding force guarding the route would either had to evacuate, or face liquidation as the spearhead grew rapidly, as the escaping forces had tremendous incentive and energy to breakout to save their lives, while the surrounding forces were not in a live or death situation other than the commissars were waving their pistols to force the surround troops to advance. This means that the spearhead composed of the strongest troops forming the spearhead could had reached the 16 mile point in 2 days (or less) by traveling 8 miles per day instead of the 6.5 miles per day. Once the spearhead linked up with the relieve force, there might even be a chance to rollup the more spread out surrounding forces.
@abdullahmahathi
@abdullahmahathi 6 лет назад
23 October or 23 November 1942 is the real one
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 6 лет назад
23rd November as written, sorry misread.
@karlosmontoya459
@karlosmontoya459 3 года назад
14:53 They brought in the 2nd Amy and the Germans knew they were toast. The first Amy had almost broke them by constantly talking all the time. Just playing. Thanks for the vid.
@JagerLange
@JagerLange 6 лет назад
Red Army At Stalingrad: It Came In Uranus.
@MrGrevanar
@MrGrevanar 5 лет назад
There were a lot of Nazi forces in the Caucasus, to the south east. These were at risk of getting cut of if the front shifted west too much. So even if the 6th army had managed to get away with the last of its strength, the question remains whether the front could have held. While the 6th army was in the city, it was very hard to shift, even if the position was untenable in the long run. It still bought the time for the forces to the south to retreat.
@MrGrevanar
@MrGrevanar 5 лет назад
Also, where would you put the troops once they had broken out? Quarters were bad and tight in the city, but could the troops be housed for a Russian winter if they had made it out?
@michaelhoffmann2891
@michaelhoffmann2891 5 лет назад
It would be interesting to contrast any possible break-out attempt with the later Korsun/Tcherkassy pocket - considered a "successful" effort. For various definitions of "successful". See also: Douglas Nash, "Hell's Gate".
@comanche6943
@comanche6943 6 лет назад
It was Kalach at the Don Bend that AGC 6th Army received it s first major counter punch in the mouth. Soviet losses were immense but german losses were significant enough to give Hitler a gut check as well. Kalach destabilised forward momentum of Panzer & Infantry long enough for Chuekov to mass reserve Siberian divisions et al. for Stalingrad's defence. IMO the knife fight started July 25th the 6th Army was reduced to a fully filleted corpse by Christmas.
@kestaskiesza
@kestaskiesza 6 лет назад
600 Lithuanian volunters escape from stalingrad kottle, throw three soviets rings. The leader of mission was Jonas Semaska.
@alganhar1
@alganhar1 6 лет назад
I had heard that, though I had heard it was 400, but I am willing to bet they used stealth and tried to avoid fighting as much as possible. That is not a cowardly thing, but a sensible choice. The main issue though is while you can get 400 - 600 men out by using stealth, moving at night, scouting ahead heavily, avoiding enemy concentrations etc, you CANNOT do that with 200,000 men :) Still, good job by them.
@mdstmouse7
@mdstmouse7 6 лет назад
where can I find this information? I was under the impression that no one made it out
@alganhar1
@alganhar1 6 лет назад
There are plenty of examples askjiir. Plenty of examples where breakout was impossible as well. Lets just take one issue, Sixth Army had lost almost all its transportation vehicles, not to mention its tanks. To break out they would have had to *walk* out, taking their heavy equipment would have been impossible, which means almost no anti tank capability. The shortest route to break out was covered by 3 Soviet Armoured Corps.... Want to guess the chances of an army relegated to walking breaking out against an army with superior mobility, superior reserves, and superior supply situation? EDIT: *HAD* Sixth Armies supply situation been much better, its tanks still relatively intact, and its transportation assets relatively intact, then yes, a breakout would have been possible. Given their actual situation however, then no. I do not believe there was aeven the faintest chance of it being successful.
@alganhar1
@alganhar1 6 лет назад
Is that the best you can do? Purile, childish insults? It is obvious your 'knowledge' of modern warfare can be written on the back of a postage stamp in crayon. 1) The Sixth Army did not have the supplies or heavy equipment required to mount your precious breakout. 2) Had they mounted a breakout they would have been trying to break contact from a more mobile enemy. 3) They were outmatched in artillery, ammunition and personnel 4) They were already in direct, and I mean direct contact with the enemy so keeping a breakout secret (its ONLY chance of success) was impossible 5) The Soviets at this time had complete air superiority 6) The Soviets had mobile reserves already close to the only real route of a breakout, the Heer did not. In total, this means any attempted breakout without serious resupply including delivery of adequate transportation (and fuel) for at least anti tank guns was doomed to utter and abject failure. So go away little man, go do some actual reading and research rather that masturbating over your fetishist fantasy. Absolutely pathetic.
@kestaskiesza
@kestaskiesza 6 лет назад
Its true.The son of Jonas Semaska is still alive and we have long vid about stalingrad breaking, but nobody translate that spech, because all smarter peoples have brain wash about nazys and bolshevism...
@noahconard5348
@noahconard5348 6 лет назад
Great videos!! Keep up the good work!
@averagejacobinsubscriber
@averagejacobinsubscriber 6 лет назад
@karlanders1200
@karlanders1200 3 года назад
I love the way you say "Shtalingrad"
@sowelie1
@sowelie1 6 лет назад
Great wolf-sheep icon at 10:38
@the_Googie
@the_Googie 3 года назад
uwu
@lovablesnowman
@lovablesnowman 6 лет назад
Am I missing something obvious when I suggest the Germans should have just went around Stalingrad? As in surround the city and then move on?
@Sebi_ad_portas
@Sebi_ad_portas 6 лет назад
The Wehrmacht did not intend on crossing the Volga during Case Blue. The main goal was in conquering the caucasian oil fields and Stalingrad was not even near that. The city itself was important as it was a stronghold at the main transportation line of oil into mainland Russia from the oil fields. Now leaving Stalingrad in Sovjet hands would bring the risk of later attacks from this position.
@AlexanderSeven
@AlexanderSeven 6 лет назад
You are missing 1km of Volga river. And overwhelming Soviet forces on the other bank.
@Igyzone
@Igyzone 6 лет назад
I'm no war expert, but looking from the bigger picture, Germans didn't have much time left against the frezzing winter, so surrounding the area and long siege was out of order. There was no other way but to move in full assault.
@slimchancetoo
@slimchancetoo 6 лет назад
Move on ------------ where to. Stalingrad was 'The End of The Line'. Outside Stalingrad (Volgograd) even today there is ENDLESS STEPPE which is not very hospitable in Autumn Winter and Spring and sweltering in Summer. I know -- I have lived there for a full 10 months.
@rexfrommn3316
@rexfrommn3316 5 лет назад
The key to understanding the outcome at the battle of Stalingrad was the determined Soviet defense of the Don Bend west of Stalingrad. The Don bend fighting in July and August 1942 caused heavy Germany infantry losses for the 6th Army. The other key point, were the the Soviet attacks in the Kotluban region north of Stalingrad with four armies. These vicious attacks tied Paulus's tank divisions depriving his infantry of the bulk of their tank support. So the situation of the German Wehrmacht was already grim before the battle of Stalingrad ever got started. Most of these two major military actions have been largely forgotten by Western historians until recently. David Glantz talks about these combat actions in his Stalingrad series of books. Any discussion of a German 6th Army breakout, without first considering the heavy combat losses both in the Donbend summer of 1942 and the Kotluban battles during the Stalingrad battle in the city, leads to distorted conversations apart from the historical realities on the battlefield.
@pepperfan111
@pepperfan111 2 года назад
For anyone interested in the battle and the escape of troops , I highly reccomend blood red snow by Gunther Korroshok, he fought as a machine gunner in the battle and managed to escape.
@ops3892
@ops3892 6 лет назад
You should do a video on why the Germans ran with their gun in their right hand. I have always wondered this, you should do a video on it.
@eddraper
@eddraper 5 лет назад
It would be interesting to hear of the role the anti-aircraft batteries played in this as well. Tactical air support was greatly suppressed in this environment.
@s.p.ltd.3886
@s.p.ltd.3886 6 лет назад
Just and you said and I agree the key factor was with an attempt at a breakout the soldiers had a fighting chance (maybe only a small chance) otherwise they had no chance.
@seanf5634
@seanf5634 6 лет назад
The other issue not discussed is the weather during Nov 23-Nov 30 for a breakout attempt. I am thinking it was cold, but clear, hence German air support could help the breakout troops. I am not suggesting an easy breakout, but with decent weather and air support, they may have had a better chance.
@leechristy7003
@leechristy7003 6 лет назад
air superiority, a given earlier in the war, no longer existed - and distances were a problem even in the air
@iiNeedSkins
@iiNeedSkins 6 лет назад
Love your videos my man.
@MrDarrylR
@MrDarrylR 2 года назад
The Soviet destruction of the rail bridge across the Don between Rychkovskii (Рычковский) and Logovskii (Логовский) seems by far the critical reason why the German 6th army couldn't supply itself, even before encirclement. Logistics had to be offloaded at Chir (Чир), transported by truck 38 km across the pontoon bridge at Kalach (Калач), then onto a single line Soviet broad gauge railroad for the 64 km km to Gumrak (Гумрак), itself 14 km from the Don. The German war machine was trying to feed the 6th Army through a straw. No wonder most of the horses had to be evacuated west of the Don in October, there was no way to bring that much fodder in, along with the munitions, spares and food the 6th Army might need. And without horses, German infantry divisions couldn't transport much/most of their firepower, they became static. The only hope for most entrapped at Stalingrad was a successful push by Hoth's 4th Panzer Army, the 6th simply couldn't accumulate the fuel or ammunition or spare parts for their mechanically unreliable panzers to make much of a dent themselves. And Hoth was so outnumbered that was hopeless. I do wonder what might have happened if German leadership had stopped at the Don, cleared out the Soviet beachheads in the 3rd Romanian Army sector, entrenched and preserved reserves, and focused more on the Caucasus to Baku fight. Stalingrad offered the prospect of halting barge traffic up the Volga, Baku etc offered Germany the prospect of having a viable mechanized military.
@Bull_10RR
@Bull_10RR 6 лет назад
he said "Schtalingrat" in such a german way, i nearly spat my tea out!
@ericcook1201
@ericcook1201 6 лет назад
Just fantastic! MHV does it again!!!
@Angrade
@Angrade 6 лет назад
The bit about the horse earlier in the video made me realized there was a lot of horses used in WW2. How effective were they? They would be a good alternative when you are strained on metals for vehicles seeing horses pretty much only need grass, hay, and alfalfa.
@ineednochannelyoutube5384
@ineednochannelyoutube5384 6 лет назад
They are wffectively just as fast on the march as trucks of the time and navigate roadless terrain better, but they take way less weight, need more "maintenance", and are borderline useless in winter.
@davethompson3326
@davethompson3326 6 лет назад
Horses need food, water, shelter & get tired or scared They do not do starvation well, usually giving up very quickly
@Zajuts149
@Zajuts149 6 лет назад
was expecting to see an asterisk in one of your visualization symbols as you put up the words Operation Uranus:)
@Phantom_Aspekt
@Phantom_Aspekt 3 года назад
2:46 Not gonna lie, I had a giggle
@guate4
@guate4 5 лет назад
If the almost full-strength 29th Motorized Division would have continued its attack to the south, the encirclement of the 6th Army would had been at least badly delayed, if not prevented.
@stevebrennan2873
@stevebrennan2873 3 года назад
What about the other German Army group in the Caucuses ?They would have been lost if the Germans had been able to breakout of Staingrad
@looinrims
@looinrims 3 года назад
That’s exactly it
@501Mobius
@501Mobius 5 лет назад
"The subject of Bezeichnung der gepanzerten Fahrzeugen (names for armored vehicles) was published in the A.H.M. (general army bulletin) dated 20 December 1935. In 6 divided Panzerfahrzeuge (armored vehicles) into three categories: Panzerkampfwagen (tanks), Panzerspaehwagen (armored cars), and Panzertransportwahen (armored transport vehicles). Panzerkampfwagen were further divided into three categories based on their armament (not weight), as follows: leichte Panzerkampfwagen were armed with machine guns or guns up to 7.5 cm, mittlere Panzerkampfwagen were armed with guns from 7.5 cm to 10.5 cm, and schwere Panzerkampfwagen were armed with 10.5 cm guns and above. What this means is that light tank, medium tank and heavy tank doesn't depend on the mass of the tank but the size of the gun. So a tank with a gun under 75mm is a light tank.
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 5 лет назад
thx, I will try to check the primary source, but if that is valid, the definition was changed, because the Tiger had only 8.8 cm and was clearly a heavy tank.
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 5 лет назад
so, just emailed with Dr. Roman Töppel, the situation is that the classification changed several times and - surprise - is quite complicated, because well that is the German Way of War ;)
@501Mobius
@501Mobius 5 лет назад
I checked some other sources and the criteria seemed to have changed. According to Heavy Jagdpanzer by Spielberger on May 4, 1943 the Jagdpanther was named "Heavy Assault Gun 8,8 cm."
@luigicarrasco4270
@luigicarrasco4270 11 месяцев назад
Could small semimovile kampfgruppen (infantry and trucks, mainly) do it so while the main force remains in the encirclement?
@patrickomalley4115
@patrickomalley4115 5 лет назад
these are great videos
@maisonraider4593
@maisonraider4593 5 лет назад
And lets not forget that when the russians encircled the germans in Stalingrad, a titanic struggle was raging in Rzhev. The germans were overcommitted.
@ThomasAffoltertevis
@ThomasAffoltertevis 5 лет назад
It's an interesting question, as a hypothetical. But in reality, would it have mattered? Immediately after the encirclement, a breakout probably would have been possible -- in my view. However, what does that really mean? A breakout would have meant extremely heavy casualties for the Sixth Army and necessarily abandonment of massive amounts of materiel. Put differently, some soldiers of the Sixth Army might have been saved but the end result would have been more or less the same. That is, Germans out of Stalingrad, a completely smashed Sixth Army, and on the defensive on the Southern Front. In addition, in my view (and I won't substantiate it here because it's a long discussion), even a German victory in Stalingrad would have been Pyrrhic -- the city might have been captured but the Germans were bled so badly fighting for a city of questionable strategic significance that a reversal on the southern front was inevitable with the progression of time. The Germans were in a war that they simply could not win.
@Ichika_Sakura
@Ichika_Sakura 4 года назад
13:35 hoi4: That was 240 medium (Panter) tank Vs Soviet. Plus 2000 88 AA you didn't see. The Germans:It is my time to shine.
@nightprince8641
@nightprince8641 5 лет назад
Please do one on the chosin reservoir
@ivanstepanovic1327
@ivanstepanovic1327 6 лет назад
Von Manstein was in charge of Operation Winter Storm. He was leading the attempt to relief German forces in Stalingrad. So, how could it be he was against the relief attempt (as you suggested in 18:14)?! In fact, they got pretty close to helping 6th army break through! He even contacted Paulus and tried to convince him to disobey Hitler's orders and go for break through and link up with his forces coming to Stalingrad. However, what sealed the fate of 6th army was Operation Little Saturn; the attack of Soviet forces against airfields from which German supply aircrafts were taking off. So, in order to protect the airfields, Manstein's tanks were ordered to abandon the relief of Stalingrad. Also, a significant number of transport aircrafts was lost, making efficient airdrops nearly impossible. What if they (6th army) tried breaking through immediately upon encirclement? Well, they might have made it in that case with large losses, but that is all speculation now... Some additional information: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Winter_Storm ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-BwfoDNv6uFQ.html
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized
@MilitaryHistoryVisualized 6 лет назад
lol
@jumo004
@jumo004 4 года назад
I have a problem with your map. The Stalingrad Pocket did not extend to the Don River.
@gianlucaborg195
@gianlucaborg195 6 лет назад
One not considered here is a concentrated luftwaffe operation over the area and at the same time a break out attempt as sujjested by von Mainstein alongside additional support from the German lines in the west when available if only mere groups of 10 with a PaK or Mortar attacking the soviet lines. This aims to cause havoc in the Russian forces on the outer ring while giving the breakout forces a better fighting change.
@khaledzartal2112
@khaledzartal2112 6 лет назад
Best explanation ever...thanks a lot...
@Froot99
@Froot99 6 лет назад
In hindsight everyone knows the best course of action, now try doing it in the moment.
@VonGrav
@VonGrav 6 лет назад
1:36 yes. wasnt it like 3-4 russian counter strokes that they fought off on the outskirts of Stalingrad? I think it was talked about in Myths and Realities of the Eastern front.
@VonGrav
@VonGrav 6 лет назад
And that was Glantz yeh :) Good reads from him
Далее
After D-Day: Rommel's View & Assessments
17:21
Просмотров 815 тыс.
Should Hitler have waited?
9:24
Просмотров 966 тыс.
КОТЯТА В ОПАСНОСТИ?#cat
00:36
Просмотров 491 тыс.
FATAL CHASE 😳 😳
00:19
Просмотров 709 тыс.
Why the Soviets disliked the Matilda II
11:09
Просмотров 102 тыс.
Top 5 Historical Epics of All Time
10:18
Просмотров 666 тыс.
German Field Fortifications
14:50
Просмотров 272 тыс.
[Barbarossa] Just a Stupid Idea or not?  An Analysis
7:19
Stalingrad: The Battle for the Martenovskii Shop
53:33
Просмотров 544 тыс.
Wiesels for Ukraine? Ukraine Veteran's View
15:56
Просмотров 985 тыс.
Flak 8.8cm - The German Gun That Destroyed Bombers
18:49
Invasion of Poland 1939 - Fall Weiß - Case White
17:59
КОТЯТА В ОПАСНОСТИ?#cat
00:36
Просмотров 491 тыс.