Stanislavsky Acting Мethodology 

This video is really good but the narrator makes me want to harm others.

The background music is too conflicting with the narrator

Stanislavsky denounced "Emotional Memory" on his death bed. Stella Adler and Lee Strasberg had a big falling out because of it. Stanislavsky replaced the dangerous "Emotional Memory" with "Emotional Imagination" which is far more advanced. You must include death-bed proclamations when citing the body of a man's lifetime work.

This video is a fucking fever dream

honestly, idk y everyone be hating on this video, its got great animation and I find it helpful!

the narrator's voice makes me feel incredibly uncomfortable

The narrator's inflection is confusing. It's as if he's asking questions rather than stating the information confidently.

This video is more for public speakers than actors, but Stanislavski created the system SPECIFICALLY for actors....

Wow, these comments are brutal! I think for a 5 minute video this was really well done. Obviously anyone with an interest in Stan. Will do more research. Civilians don't need to know more than this video presents.

Great and fun video. Keep it up. Except Stanislavski didn't create Method Acting. He never used this term. Stanislavski had a System. "Method" implies one way of doing things. "System" implies a flexible approach with various techniques available to suit the situation. Method Acting is an American invention and interpretation by Lee Strasberg (and others) primarily of Stanislavski's first book "An Actor Prepares." Two other books were published in English (3 total). He intended the first two books to be published in one volume (and I believe they were in Russia) but the publisher thought it would be best to split them up. Method Acting certainly encompasses the things mentioned in the video. It has produced some fabulous actors and amazing performances on screen. It is not without controversy though. Actors reliance on emotion memory (a technique where a detailed memory of a personal emotional experience is recalled and used in rehearsal or in performance) is not for everyone. Especially if someone has experienced trauma or a painful upbringing. In fact, Stanislavski's best student, and master of his technique, Michael Chekhov (often considered Russia's finest actor), abandoned emotion memory on the grounds that it was too destructive and limited the actor and character to his own life. Chekhov moved toward imagination and movement to ascend personal experience. Later in life, Stanislavski abandons emotion memory and also moves toward a method of physical action.

This is so wrong. Stanislavski was never focused on what an audience was supposed to do after a performance.

I personally think that the background music isn't very good. The narrators voice is annoying.

Here's the video transcript for the people who can't understand his suicidal thought-inducing narration. It happens you come to the theatre. You watch the show, but there's nothing to watch! Boring! Or even worse; the actor as we say overacts; Yells, twitches, twirls. But he's empty inside, and the audience even feels sorry for you. Oh dear, why does it take you such great pains? Have a rest. And sometimes the actor seems to be simply voicing words. But the audience in the hall is crying. What's the secret? How does it happen? The answer was invented by Constantin Stanislavsky more than 80 years ago. He invented the method not for geniuses, but to ensure that any actor could act l'audibly. Actors have to know it. But the basics of the Stanislavsky method can be helpful for anyone performing in public. After all, it is the method that can make the speaker a charismatic one

Please do not use this in education; we educators have to undo wrong teaching such as this.

I will always use this tool. Thank you Stanislavski.

After this video. I totally NOT understand the system lol

I didnt understand anything. I should read him in Russian.

you should try donning the Stanislavsky method

absolute rubbish.

The music is really god awful annoying Jesus

Awesome thank you! Clearly explained. Was totally in the dark.

The voice is too irritating

i like this Video :-), but could you PLEASE send me the source of your Informations? I can't find all three principles. :-( (sorry for my english) would be very very nice

NOTE: Constantin Stanislavski is the correct way to spell this... NOT Konstantin Stanislavsky ... WHO is that???

While the approach to the Suspension of Disbelief was confused with Method Acting (a method Stanislavsky HATED, by the way), I really appreciated this as a refresher for my theatre final! Thanks!

this is the most indirect, but blunt piece of bad animation/"tutorializing" on RU-vid . . .

BRUH

this video was really helpful for me, I have a really short attention span and it made sense for me

Also I swear literally no one can spell his name right. it's constanin stanislavski you melts

If you are going to talk about a man At least Spell his name right....

The narrator is impossible to understand he talks too much and too fast

Oooh GOD THAT BELL RINGING AT THE BEGINNING. … the whole ROOM CRINGED … The rest not bad

Is there a book that goes over Stanislavsky's technique?

Hi

What a graphic...woww

whos here for drama [ online school ]

Happy anniversary and all the best !!! ... :)

This is a great video! I think there is a lot of people who have to watch this video in Drama class =))

helped with homework

2:59 larry david what are you doing here

I liked the Animation in this video.

thank you for making this video

First idiot post : "I didn't understand that." Second: "What am i doing here?" (you know, on Earth in general which is a good question :/) Third post: "Why am i breathing? Maybe i should hold my breath", followed by the reply post by same user "Why am i turning blue? I don't understand what's happening! Doi*"

Are these videos good for CUET?

THANK YOU SO MUCH

Bro, first of all, it's the Stanislavsky system, not the Stanislavsky method. As far as I know, Stanislavsky wrote 3 books, 1 An. Actor Prepares 2. Building a character 3. Creating a Role. What you described is what is somewhat common in all of them. But you missed some critical points. What about taking inspiration from real-life events and using the 'what if ' technique to move closer to the character from your starting point. How about breaking the script into text(ahat's actually written) and sub-text(what the actor is supposed to deduce from the script). Sorry to say but incomplete video.

It’s very helpful.

Wonderful. Thank you .

This seems to be a corporate video for public speaking in general. It should probably be presented as 1. Know what you want your audience to take away from your speech. 2. Believe what you’re selling them so they’ll believe you. 3. Present possible conflicting arguments to make the journey to the conclusion more interesting.

It was the "Stanislavsky system" (good acting) and the Lee Strasberg "Method" ( dwell on past sensory circumstances similar to your character's).

Just watching this, made me understand A LOT more, and in FAR LESS time, than reading his, "An Actor Prepares" book.

Epic

so it means Stanislavsky's acting methods are 3 in number!

Пацаны помогите вопросы по английскому составить на этот видос🥺🥺

happy birthday Konstantín

Man, tomorrow I have to film, and I am so fucking scared. But thank you, this helped.

What is my audience expected to do after my performance? someone answer this

In soviet russia acting acts you

Lonely!!!

samuel turma 302

impresif.thx

Thanks!

❤️❤️❤️

Thank you for the accessibility of the method for secondary age learners

Great video but I surmise the view count would be much higher if it was titled "Become a Better Actor in 3 Easy Steps"

This video just changed my life.

Why the narrator sounds like the True Facts one lmao