Тёмный

Start Learning Logic 2 | Disjunction, Tautology and Logical Equivalence 

The Bright Side of Mathematics
Подписаться 182 тыс.
Просмотров 29 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

14 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 20   
@haydeeholliday8866
@haydeeholliday8866 Год назад
It's only been 2 videos, and you are filling in gasps for my math brain. Thanks for putting this together.
@brightsideofmaths
@brightsideofmaths Год назад
Glad you liked it!
@svenschmidt1735
@svenschmidt1735 2 года назад
Thanks! Don´t you ever close down this channel! 🙂
@brightsideofmaths
@brightsideofmaths 2 года назад
Thank you very much :)
@Florian.Dalwigk
@Florian.Dalwigk 3 года назад
Very well explained! Keep up the good work :)
@brightsideofmaths
@brightsideofmaths 3 года назад
Thank you very much :)
@enasgeravi4372
@enasgeravi4372 2 года назад
شكرا و جزاك الله خيرا
@JehPortal
@JehPortal Год назад
Logical equivalence symbol should be = with one extra line, the next video says that represents a tautology from the if and only if statement
@brightsideofmaths
@brightsideofmaths Год назад
Yeah, there are different notations used by different people :)
@VictorHugo-xn9jz
@VictorHugo-xn9jz Год назад
Should also mention how you can build the other logical operations with only negation and conjunction. For example, the operator "or" can be defined : A or B = not( not A and not B ). Another example is the XOR operator, which can be built with "and" and "or" : A xor B = ( A or B ) and not ( A and B ).
@brightsideofmaths
@brightsideofmaths Год назад
Yeah :)
@jobaidajarin356
@jobaidajarin356 2 года назад
Thank you, Sir.
@enasgeravi4372
@enasgeravi4372 2 года назад
Very well explained
@enasgeravi4372
@enasgeravi4372 2 года назад
Thanks
@paulgeorge2024
@paulgeorge2024 11 месяцев назад
Great Video sir.
@brightsideofmaths
@brightsideofmaths 11 месяцев назад
Glad you liked it! And thanks for the support :)
@AleXander-eo3iz
@AleXander-eo3iz 2 года назад
Question: @1:40 we see a circuit that is used as an analogy to the truth table on the right. The circuit is supposed to represent A or B, just like the truth table shown. Only problem is that in the circuit, it can ONLY be A or B, but it can't be both. This is in contrast to the truth table where A and B can be true so it isn't an exact analogy. Did I get this right or did I miss something?
@mamoon_3738
@mamoon_3738 2 года назад
The analogy is true 100% it's not "it can only be A or B" it's if one of A or B is true it's enough if A and B were true then the fact that B is true with A is not important what is important is that at least one of them is true, it's not the best example but it's good enough.
@saii221
@saii221 3 года назад
Awesome!
@SabavatVis
@SabavatVis Месяц назад
Assume explanation
Далее
Truth Table Tutorial - Discrete Mathematics Logic
7:51
Tautology
10:05
Просмотров 33 тыс.
Truth Tables Tutorial (part 1)
11:38
Просмотров 686 тыс.
Start Learning Sets 4 | Cartesian Product and Maps
10:33
Propositional Logic − Logical Equivalences
17:23
Просмотров 850 тыс.