State Citizen Challenges Jurisdiction. Case Dismissed!

Подписаться 1,5 тыс.

Просмотров 138 тыс.

50% 1

After previous court appearances back in September and December, this state citizen once again returned to Forsyth County District courtroom 1A this Monday, January 31st, at 9AM, to continue with his challenge of jurisdiction (see video below). Contrary to his last appearance, his hired court reporter was actually allowed to set up this time and do her job. Once the actual transcript is available, it will be posted here as well. Judge Lawrence J. Fine was presiding, along with ADA Kim Furr Davis.
Full Article Here:
www.ncrepublic....
First Appearance:
www.ncrepublic....
Second Appearance:
www.ncrepublic....
Assert your rights! To learn more, schedule a seminar in your area:
www.americasrem...
PREVIOUS CASES:
Mandie Rose
carolinaliberty...
Christopher Pierce
www.ncrepublic....

Опубликовано:

28 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 605

@wearytraveler3524 8 лет назад

I have no doubt that the police officer was told to remain absent specifically so that this case could not be heard!

@marksterling324 11 лет назад

You are SOOOOO Wrong. How can a court create case law when it has no Jurisdiction over the person? The prosecution in these cases will not fight because they cannot win. They have no standing. Its that simple. To argue otherwise would establish case law, and thats something they dont want to do. The real question is one of courage, something most Americans dont have. This young man has courage. You should salute him.

@leojmullins 5 лет назад

We live in a lawless age that means might is right. Appealing to the law against lawless men of might (govt) is a waste of time.

@Will_JC 3 года назад

Leo Mullins Are you okay with emailing me? I want to privately talk about something, but if emailing is uncomfortable for you, I have one NON-email option you can consider.

@StriderHoliman 10 лет назад

He's right... and the system is corrupt.

@Mxxx-ii9bu Месяц назад

Almost everything he said was wrong. He's not properly educated on this material. His sources are social media gurus.

@tomrogers4828 8 лет назад

Your problem is not what you are bringing up. You need to communicate it all to the court through paper not your voice.

@matthewwatkins18 2 года назад

“ We assume we have jurisdiction….” Well, that’s the problem your honor, you assumed, but I’m correcting you…you don’t have jurisdiction…

@normanpearson8753 2 года назад

In fact they do .You have to show why they don't .This jurisdiction chestnut is no- hoper .It hasn't worked in court yet , which should tell you something .

@harleyborgais Год назад

FYI, to take jurisdiction not given or refuse that which is, are treason to the Constitution just like making war against it in any other way, or aiding or adhering to those who do. That carries a penalty of no less than ten years up to life in prison or death by lethal injection in US Codes see: "It is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not; but it is equally true that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the Constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the Constitution. Questions may occur which we would gladly avoid, but we cannot avoid them. All we can do is to exercise our best judgment and conscientiously to perform our duty. In doing this on the present occasion, we find this tribunal invested with appellate jurisdiction in all cases arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States. We find no exception to this grant, and we cannot insert one." supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/264/ www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381 www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/3591 You can start by submitting the evidence to the several grand jury departments of several federal courts around where the alleged crime would have occurred, file criminal charges if you can put together "probable" evidence, or civil suit for violation of duties like neglect to prevent deprivation of rights under color of law (allowing anything to the Contrary of the Constitution and Laws made in Pursuance thereof, not any Thing to the Contrary). You can submit evidence to impeach judges and legislators to the House Reps too, and if they dont do their duty you can use the other methods as "checks and balances" to remove them from office and prosecute them for that! www.NRDL.org/howtosuegovt/

@JEHERETIC 11 лет назад

I cannot find this presidential veto anywhere on line, I would love to read it further

@ProsecutorX 8 лет назад

the lunatic fringe .. best entertainment on the planet... come one, come all ... free laughs :) thanks guys i appreciate you.. not for the reason you want .. but .. take what you can get I'd suggest with these rantings :) have a great day and keep these videos coming

@justaman-km1hl 8 лет назад

stop trolling.

@ProsecutorX 8 лет назад

Your funny.. I like trolling you :)

@6StimuL84 8 лет назад

You boot licking Tobies are soooo precious.

@PatrickHenry2K 12 лет назад

There must be a contract/obligation (Article I Section 10) to connect statutory law to a living man which is governed under the original jurisdiction of the United States over admiralty/maritime cases (Article III Section 2). Add the commerce clause (Article I Section 8) to that mix and you have a bona fide slave with absolute consent. I realize contract law derives from common law so thats the main channel in which liabilities are given. Otherwise no contract, injured party or cause of action.

@bryantschroder5479 5 лет назад

Case was dismissed because COP DID NOT SHOW, not because jurisdiction was not proven. Besides your in the wrong court. Traffic courts are not court of record. They are unable to hear these types of issues.

@DarylBuck 10 лет назад

If ya can't dazzle them with your brilliance...

@bryanbarrett8985 6 лет назад

If you have any adhenshion contract's you are a 14 th Admendment Citizenship STATUS, If you don't have ALLODIAL TITLE LAND PANTENT, you are a 14 th Admendment Citizenship STATUS tax Slave, Married Certificate Registration Voter's Registration Tax Bill anything at all you are a 14 th Admendment Citizenship STATUS, All courts don't operating under Constitutional law but Admirlty Maritime Defacto inferior Psuedo Courts LEGAL LEAGLIZE TERMINOLOGY COLORABLE LAW not LAW at All, These courts can't hear you, You are a living breathing blood and flesh man how can a Fitcioious piece of paper hear you??? They can't and won't!!!! File your Affadavits of STATUS with the Secretary file it with your local Countries,

@Colgate64 5 лет назад

Misleading title. The case wasn't dismissed because he challenged jurisdiction, It was dismissed because the cop didn't show up.

@oldbaldone1 8 лет назад

It was dismissed due to the officer did not show up, it was not jurisdiction. it is not a valid legal argument.

@jaymorgan. 8 лет назад

Challenging jurisdiction is a valid legal argument. Look up federal rules of civil procedure rule 12b1.

@6StimuL84 8 лет назад

Bullshit... 1 AmJ2d Section 70 Actions Loss and wrong both elements which MUST exist in combination as the ESSENTIALS of a cause of action. State had neither element and no case, therefore no jurisdiction.... And law is simple...No loss and wrong, no jurisdiction...Period. You cannot wrong a legal fiction.....

@michaelroberts5999 7 лет назад

James Barnes bullshit, if the officer testified it would have been open and shut conviction for this turd.

@chikehenderson8709 6 лет назад

jurisdiction has nothing to do with arguing, invalid claim = no jurisdiction to test man.

@claytonroberts344 6 лет назад

Maybe the cop did not show up bc they told him not to so they would not have to come clean on this.

@LukeSkywalker-wj8nv 7 лет назад

sounds like oregon and the state of oregon

@jessicaarmstrong3169 6 месяцев назад

Having a case dismissed because the cop failed to show up, is NOT THE SAME as winning a case.

@Teutonick143 4 месяца назад

You weren't charged, you won

@jessicaarmstrong3169 4 месяца назад

@@Teutonick143 no, it's not the same. There's nothing to win or lose, if there's nothing to challenge.

@LivelysReport 11 лет назад

That case is so interesting... two states, one re-instituted under military force... can not be a free state... I sure would like to know more about the different jurisdictions one can present...

@joshpierce9089 8 лет назад

why did i get thrown into contempt for challenging in jurisdiction

@joeschultz2 8 лет назад

+josh pierce Because in that case the cop probably did show up so you had a trial and became disruptive.

@jaymorgan. 7 лет назад

You have to have some sort of evidence that they do not have jurisdiction like challenging them on subject matter, personal, territorial..etc, and you have to file it in writing FIRST before orally speaking it into the record. You can't just disrupt the court by screaming they don't have jurisdiction. By leaving a papertrail you will catch the liar if they ignore jurisdiction and it isn't met with an answer and PROVEN should you need to appeal. Courts hate paper trails and that's probably why the cop never showed up in this guys trial. They'd rather lose by default or some other bogus reason then press the record with jurisdiction.

@222222e 6 лет назад

Jay Morgan If they’re the plaintiff he doesn’t have to have proof. They do. The burden is on the plaintiff.

@63maddog 8 лет назад

Not a shred of truth expressed here.

@Gargamoth Год назад

Every natural born American needs help getting back into Free man Jurisdiction.. We The People have been defrauded. I never consent to this jurisdiction. #Constitutionalrepublic #BIRTHCERTIFICATES #SocialSecurityTrustAccount

@JEHERETIC 11 лет назад

They in fact do not have jurisdiction but your appearance constituted jurisdiction, your argument was great and awesome and resulted in win for you, but they will never prove lawful jurisdiction, they can't it would expose their racket!!! hahahaha

@normanpearson8753 4 года назад

Errr it wasn't a win . Jurisdiction disagreement has never won a case . The cop couldn't show .Happens thousands of times a year .

@PatrickHenry2K 12 лет назад

We must misunderstand each other because I think we are on the same page. Yes, common law is common to all MEN or WO(MB) - MEN, but unless a man creates a legal fiction, it does not exist.

@normanpearson8753 4 года назад

And legal fiction ( sic ) is the first step to Contempt .

@hairnsap 6 лет назад

Where is this clown now ? Just curious

@ieha2012 11 лет назад

Where did you get you Doccument for the Act of 1867, I looked every where I can only find rewritten copys not the real thing ( ie..copy)

@ChasingMayzie 6 лет назад

The police officer in this case was on vacation out of the country and that is the only reason this was dismissed! This guy ran into a lot of unnecessary expense and accomplished absolutely nothing by it!

@lyndaharris4848 10 лет назад

"freeman" Whom is he referring too? African (freed slaves) or white men (slave owners). He makes some very good points and I am looking into it. Thanks.

@argyllservco 8 лет назад

they only own the soil around the ten mile area known as the district of columbia under the act of 1871..... anything out side of that area is colony same as the square mile in london, anything out side that is a colony.

@ikannunaplays 10 лет назад

I'm giving this video a thumb's down for a misleading title. I've had my court cases dismissed for the cop not showing up without having to argue jurisdiction. Most tickets can be beaten just by contesting and showing up in court. If the cop does show then you still have a chance depending on the ticket. If it was speeding ask for the information use to determine the vehicle's speed, then ask when was the equipment last calibrated and calibration certificate. Same for red light camera's.

@PORTUGAL1010 10 лет назад

For red light cameras you ask when the cameras were last calibrated and for the calibration certificate?

@ikannunaplays 10 лет назад

Yes, the law varies from state to state on how often the equipment needs to be calibrated. But they all require they are calibrated and there is a certificate proving that it was by an independent third party. This goes for all equipment cameras, radar, lidar, police vehicle speedometer, etc... Anything they might use. For a camera speed is determined by taking tge FPS of the camera and how far you traveled in the cameras view. If the FPS, viewable angle or area change it can affect the calculation of speed. Small changes will not make a huge difference on speed but it is a valid argument and the argument is why they have calibration cycles and certificates. But its your gain if they fail to follow the maintenance routines.

@KivaTV 10 лет назад

I'm giving YOU a thumbs down for NOT KNOWING what really the h*ll is going on out here! SMDH

@ikannunaplays 10 лет назад

KivaTV elaborate please.

@KivaTV 10 лет назад

Brad Schlangen The judge is NOT going to tell you the REAL reason you win a case. Even IF the Policy Enforcer showed up, by LAW he cannot be a witness or victim and neither can the city or state. If they let the Real reasons a case is won show to everyone else, they will wake up and the courts are going to lose a loooot of money and people are going to start suing them for a whole bunch of stuff...Kidnapping, human trafficking, ponzi and insurance schemes and much more lol That's why we neeeeeeeed to study to show thyself approved! I got tired of this non article 3 judge here taxing my bum for non sense tickets and saying 'ignorance of the law is no excuse' ughh She was right though and it is no excuse for her either! People Record your Affidavit of Corporate Denial, FAST!

@aaronshoyt 6 месяцев назад

Awesome man.. I to am American State

@ProsecutorX 8 лет назад

Cimon guys .. serious now ... :) please show me one case ... just one case, where ANYONE ( with an IQ) has said that this shit isn't baseless ludicrous drivel?

@godis1truthis372 8 лет назад

Is this info "baseless"??Who Owns You? 1. The IRS is not a U.S. Government Agency. It is an Agency of the IMF. (Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Public Law 94-564, Senate Report 94-1148 pg. 5967, Reorganization Plan No. 26, Public Law 102-391.) 2. The IMF is an Agency of the UN. (Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. Pg. 816) 3. The U.S. Has not had a Treasury since 1921. (41 Stat. Ch.214 pg. 654) 4. The U.S. Treasury is now the IMF. (Presidential Documents Volume 29-No.4 pg.113, 22 U.S.C. 285-288) 5. The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States. No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of operating under bankruptcy its finally over. (Executive Order 12803) Do not personate one of the creditors or share holders or you will go to Prison.18 U.S.C. 914 6. The FCC, CIA, FBI, NASA and all of the other alphabet gangs were never part of the United States government. Even though the "US Government" held shares of stock in the various Agencies. (U.S. V. Strang , 254 US 491, Lewis v. US, 680 F.2d, 1239) 7. Social Security Numbers are issued by the UN through the IMF. The Application for a Social Security Number is the SS5 form. The Department of the Treasury (IMF) issues the SS5 not the Social Security Administration. The new SS5 forms do not state who or what publishes them, the earlier SS5 forms state that they are Department of the Treasury forms. You can get a copy of the SS5 you filled out by sending form SSA-L996 to the SS Administration. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2) Read the cites above) 8. There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789. Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and Codes. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178) 9. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators. (FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178) 10. According to the GATT you must have a Social Security number. House Report (103-826) 11. We have One World Government, One World Law and a One World Monetary System. * 12. The UN is a One World Super Government. * 13. No one on this planet has ever been free. This planet is a Slave Colony. There has always been a One World Government. It is just that now it is much better organized and has changed its name as of 1945 to the United Nations. * 14. New York City is defined in the Federal Regulations as the United Nations. Rudolph Gulliani stated on C-Span that "New York City was the capital of the World" and he was correct. (20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2) 15. Social Security is not insurance or a contract, nor is there a Trust Fund. (Helvering v. Davis 301 US 619, Steward Co. V. Davis 301 US 548.) 16. Your Social Security check comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of the UN. (Look at it if you receive one. It should have written on the top left United States Treasury.) 17. You own no property, slaves can't own property. Read the Deed to the property that you think is yours. You are listed as a Tenant. (Senate Document 43, 73rd Congress 1st Session) 18. The most powerful court in America is not the United States Supreme Court but, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. (42 Pa.C.S.A. 502) 19. The Revolutionary War was a fraud. See (22, 23 and 24) 20. The King of England financially backed both sides of the Revolutionary war. (Treaty at Versailles July 16, 1782, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80) 21. You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520) 22. America is a British Colony. (THE UNITED STATES IS A CORPORATION, NOT A LAND MASS AND IT EXISTED BEFORE THE REVOLUTIONARY WAR AND THE BRITISH TROOPS DID NOT LEAVE UNTIL 1796.) Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, Treaty of Commerce 8 Stat 116, The Society for Propagating the Gospel, &c. V. New Haven 8 Wheat 464, Treaty of Peace 8 Stat 80, IRS Publication 6209, Articles of Association October 20, 1774.) 23. Britain is owned by the Vatican. (Treaty of 1213) 24. The Pope can abolish any law in the United States. (Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol.1 53-54) 25. A 1040 form is for tribute paid to Britain. (IRS Publication 6209) 26. The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493) 27. The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people. (Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493) 28. The Pope's laws are obligatory on everyone. (Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44) 29. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing not even what we think are our children. (Tillman v. Roberts 108 So. 62, Van Koten v. Van Koten 154 N.E. 146, Senate Document 43 & 73rd Congress 1st Session, Wynehammer v. People 13 N.Y. REP 378, 481) 30. Military Dictator George Washington divided the States (Estates) into Districts. (Messages and papers of the Presidents Vo 1, pg 99. Websters 1828 dictionary for definition of Estate.) 31. "The People" does not include you and me. (Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S. 243) 32. The United States Government was not founded upon Christianity. (Treaty of Tripoli 8 Stat 154.) 33. It is not the duty of the police to protect you. Their job is to protect the Corporation and arrest code breakers. Sapp v. Tallahasee, 348 So. 2nd. 363, Reiff v. City of Philadelphia, 477 F.Supp. 1262, Lynch v. N.C. Dept of Justice 376 S.E. 2nd. 247. 34. Everything in the "United States" is For Sale: roads, bridges, schools, hospitals, water, prisons airports etc. I wonder who bought Klamath lake. Did anyone take the time to check? (Executive Order 12803) 35. We are Human capital. (Executive Order 13037) 36. The UN has financed the operations of the United States government for over 50 years and now owns every man, women and child in America. The UN also holds all of the Land in America in Fee Simple. * 37. The good news is we don't have to fulfill "our" fictitious obligations. You can discharge a fictitious obligation with another's fictitious obligation. * 38. The depression and World War II were a total farce. The United States and various other companies were making loans to others all over the World during the Depression. The building of Germanys infrastructure in the 1930's including the Railroads was financed by the United States. That way those who call themselves "Kings," "Prime Ministers," and "Fuher,"etc could sit back and play a game of chess using real people. Think of all of the Americans, Germans etc. who gave their lives thinking they were defending their Countries which didn't even exist. The millions of innocent people who died for nothing. Isn't it obvious why Switzerland is never involved in these fiascoes? That is where the "Bank of International Settlements" is located. Wars are manufactured to keep your eye off the ball. You have to have an enemy to keep the illusion of "Government" in place. * 39. The "United States" did not declare Independence from Great Britain or King George. * 40. Guess who owns the UN? * Caveat Redemptor - Verify for yourself

@ProsecutorX 8 лет назад

as I said .. the most useless baseless ludicrous drivel i have ever read .. you, my friend, are stark raving mad ...

@godis1truthis372 8 лет назад

cameron pope you have just described your own post my nutty friend! , As my post contains case numbers and references for all to see , which you have obviously not checked out or verified! Have you?????

@CMWangs2005 8 лет назад

+God is 1 truth is 3 2+2=4 score and seven eleven plus mal feces and the battle of 1812 which obviously shows that I am right because I too have numbers and junk.

@ProsecutorX 8 лет назад

Links to meaningless drivel ... again ...

@jlove6346 4 года назад

Excellent!!!

@Will_JC 3 года назад

J Love Are you okay with emailing me? I want to privately talk about something, but if emailing is uncomfortable for you, I have one NON-email option you can consider.

@splendora7111 8 лет назад

Hmmm........ Wonder about Texas?

@lollilolly3900 9 лет назад

Well, it looked like it worked,the argument of the jurisdiction.The understanding of wording is critical here, blacks law dictionary should be helpful.

@LegalTyranny 5 лет назад

Blacks law is for beginners who haven't studied enough to know that if you're going to deal with definitions, you had better get them from the Statute that you're dealing with if it has them; otherwise, you're not following the law as it's intended.

@quevicular 10 лет назад

you contracted a drivers license, you gave them subject matter jurisdiction before you even got to court, your GUILTY!!! Cuntstitution means jack squat. When will you people wake the hell up. You are creating a commercial agreement with them and must pay. You became a debtor, pledger and a constructive trustee, using their license to DRIVE COMMERCIALLY. The vehicle is now their property when you registered it. If you maintained your right to free travel unencumbered and ran your own plates and didnt agree with their corporate name when getting pulled over, you would be fine and free to go. Give NOTICE to the DMV and the MOT that you give them back the title and retain full possessorary rights to claim the car as your private property. 9/10ths of the law is possession. You publicise this and they ,(anybody) has 21 days to come forward and claim if the vehicle is theirs. If not, then your claim stands. Get a fee schedule together, a conveyance bond and your private plates NOT FOR HIRE. Take the man, not officer to court and charge him for obstruction, conversion of your private property(name), theft, intimidation of your private property if they impound the car, and lay boots to these thieves. File your statement of claim DEMANDING and Requiring Common Law jurisdiction and demand to be paid before the court even proceeds. Deny ALL lawyers from coming in on the defense because they have NO first hand knowledge of the facts at hand and you can nail the lawyer for perjury and demand an arrest for him because he is in your court and is in CONTEMPT, because you are laying the claim and not his stupid, sorry perjuring ass. Put in your statement of claim, affidavit of obligation and fee schedule all of this info and they will not show. Everything you say mention for and on the record and DEMAND the transcripts free of charge because you were forced to appear in any court whereas you had already set up court in your conveyance and the asshole cop tried to overthrow the real Law. Always address the cop in private capacity and never as an officer or you are done. You NEVER acknowledge their jurisdiction, ever. Fancy uniforms and guns and other apparel are for cowards and thieves and degenerates who think they are better than others and can get authority over them. Peace.

@stopdemockery 10 лет назад

Wow! If I ever get in trouble with corporate agents, I'd like to have you in my corner.

@quevicular 10 лет назад

Thanks brother. Very kind of you. I just received my Lawful Traveller package that Trent Goodbaudy has. I gave him some good insight and im going to apply what I have experienced to solidify this process. People seriously need to get off their asses and apply this knowledge. Go to www.freedomfromgovernment.org

@stopdemockery 10 лет назад

ChiefJustice Middleton ~ Thanks for the link. I'll check it out. You might appreciate my Real Democracy Petition to End Political Corruption at secure.avaaz.org/en/petition/Humanity_Start_real_democracy . The banksters' demockery only works for them. It's time we tried out actual democracy.

@StrategySpectacular 10 лет назад

this is some great stuff i think you should make videos or have a talkshoe radio show its free to use unlike blogtalk, but yeah you can help alot of us idiots (wink) lol

@Farawaystone 10 лет назад

My License is for if and when i decide to conduct commerce. To cash a paycheck or other business, My signature is a signature of Convenience, Not Compliance! But Believe what ever You want.

@RetSquid 11 лет назад

The Expatriation Act of 1868 had nothing to do with reconstruction. It also had nothing to do with nationality, just Citizenship.

@courtjester7407 7 лет назад

Well, pretty well done, certaly jurisdiction cannot be presumed, it must be proven

@detectiveman1 12 лет назад

Nut,.....and even my strawman agree's with that. Hopefully more Appeal Bonds will be issued to these criminals to keep them from appealing simple misdemeanor case to superior court. I don't mind some one challenging or having doubt with the direction our federal government but to ridicule local peace officer and to go around and place false lien on them. Crazy,....hey let me use all caps this time CRAZY

@anonymous-tn6ij 7 лет назад

standard and sitting for the judge would be you giving him jurisdiction over you

@Spirit_Of_Prophecy_777 8 лет назад

asking a tyrant, not to be a tyrant? a guy with guns and fists "enforcing" his decisions? once you step foot into his courtroom, you are within the jurisdiction of the court (according to law) denying the party is you, (john james doe) the court cannot proceed against an incorrect party, they must prove the named party IS you peace )

@normanpearson8753 4 года назад

And you get thrown in jail for talking like a knob .

@richardmartin6744 8 лет назад

citizen? hmmm

@michealtaylor4078 6 лет назад

Once again in this case only side presented. Again about not paying minor fines and fees. He desires/demands safe roads but with others paying for them. Self-Serving Much!!

@TheOnlySaneAmerican 8 лет назад

Stop with these misleading titles already. The case wasn't dismissed because of jurisdiction arguments. It was dismissed because the officer didn't show up to testify.

@agb1953 8 лет назад

+BelligerentTruth - Nope. The title clearly states the 2 things that happened in court. Nothing misleading about it at all.

@joeschultz2 8 лет назад

+agb1953 The title was worded to give the reader the idea that the case was dismissed because of problems with the court's jurisdiction, when the truth was the sole witness, (the cop), didn't bother to show up.

@briancross6820 Месяц назад

RATIFICATION inherent attributes sky,earth,wind,fire❄️💧🌪️🔥✨🌌🌠🪶🪶🦅⛲🗻🎇🪔🕯️🔦💡🌋🌫️🌲🏊🧑‍🦯🗣️

@russellstone9056 10 лет назад

"In order to protect these rights governments are instituted among men and DERIVE THEIR JUST POWER TO GOVERN BY THE CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED." ~ Declaration of Independence and first organic law of the United States of America.

@battlegrounds541 Год назад

"The United States of America"!

@russellstone9056 Год назад

@@battlegrounds541 "the American union states" is more accurate.

@BRENDAH6699 10 лет назад

The only way to over rule the courts is to go above them and their jurisdiction. In other words you must become God-realized. Unfortunately, most people of today have completely forgotten their divinity. The only thing a person can really own is their state of consciousness. Arguing with another man over a speeding ticket takes two. Learn to cut out the middle man.

@Steelmage99 5 лет назад

Mythological figures hold no jurisdiction in modern civilised societies.

@normanpearson8753 2 года назад

Learn to stop talking like a knob .

@6StimuL84 8 лет назад

Should have required she issue a warrant for the sworn servant that did not show up as ordered....What they would have done to you. Then billed them for the unlawful waste of your time.... Personal liberty largely consists of the right of locomotion- to go where one pleases only so far restrained as the rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways to transport his property thereon by horse drawn carriage, wagon or automobile is NOT a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but the common right which he has under is right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. Under this Constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly manner neither interfering with nor disturbing anothers rights he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct. ll Am.Jur. (1st)Constitutional Law, Sect.329, p. 1135 "Complete freedom of the highways is so old and WELL ESTABLISHED a blessing that we have forgotten the days of the robber barons and toll roads, and yet, under an act such as this, arbitrarily administered, the highways may become completely monopolized. If, through LACK OF INTEREST, the people submit, THEY MAY LOOK TO SEE THE MOST SACRED OF LIBERTIES TAKEN FROM THEM, ONE BY ONE, BY MORE OR LESS RAPID ENCROACHMENT." (emph. added) ROBERTSON v DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ,180 Wn 133, 147 (1934) Dissenting Op.

@jacobbey1465 5 лет назад

Good for you.....let's get back to the original Constitution and not the 2nd Constitution of 1871

@Will_JC 3 года назад

jacob bey Are you okay with emailing me? I want to privately talk about something, but if emailing is uncomfortable for you, I have one NON-email option you can consider.

@iwoman3174 6 лет назад

I think this is my favorite....“When enforcing mere statutes, judges of all courts do not act judicially” and thus are not protected by “qualified” or “limited immunity,” SEE: Owen v. City, 445 U.S. 662; Bothke v. Terry, 713 F2d 1404 “…judges who become involved in enforcement of mere statutes (civil or criminal in nature and otherwise), act as mere “clerks” of the involved agency…” K.C. Davis, ADMIN. LAW, Ch. 1 (CTP. West’s 1965 Ed.) “Not every action by any judge is in exercise of his judicial function. It is not a judicial function for a Judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the Courthouse, when a judge acts as a Trespasser of the Law, when a judge does not follow the law, the judge loses subject matter jurisdiction and The Judge’s orders are void, of no legal force or effect”! Yates Vs. Village of Hoffman Estates, Illinois, 209 F.Supp. 757 (N.D. Ill. 1962)

@jasonshane3243 4 года назад

See also Maine vs thibadeaux

@Will_JC 3 года назад

Are you okay with emailing me? I want to privately talk about something, but if emailing is uncomfortable for you, I have one NON-email option you can consider.

@AmericanConstitution Год назад

See Carl Miller knowing your constitution...on RU-vid

@DrDangerPuppy Месяц назад

OMG this is precisely what I was looking for and couldn't find in my notes. Thank you!

@JEHERETIC 11 лет назад

A dismissal is a win, that is great but where do we go from here? We need more people to wake the heck up, but again, they love their illusions and boob tube dramas more than life its self

@rexnonpotestpaccare5043 6 лет назад

JeHeretic place a commercial lien on there house & personal vessel.. Via there business card..

@ChasingMayzie 6 лет назад

Yeah, JeHeretic, do that and go to federal prison for racketeering for 38 years like Bruce Doucette did when he tried it. www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/05/23/sovereign-citizen-bruce-doucette-sentenced-38-years-prison

@LegalTyranny 5 лет назад

@@ChasingMayzie Oy vey!!!

@johnstanley8091 5 лет назад

There is recourse for their actions

@normanpearson8753 4 года назад

No ,it isn't .It's as if it never went to court .

4 года назад

Just proves that courts operate merely on assumptions and presumptions until rebutted you must rebut all before proceeding.

@Will_JC 3 года назад

JOHNNY HAYNES Are you okay with emailing me? I want to privately talk about something, but if emailing is uncomfortable for you, I have one NON-email option you can consider.

@PatrickHenry2K 12 лет назад

@JonDeth Your not going to necessarily create case law being 'sovereign' because the statutory realm is their(govt) creation. Statutory law = law of fictions/dead-> This is where corporate personhood resides. This is the ONLY place it can reside, common law doesn't recognize injuries to legal fictions. Common law = law of man/living-> This is the foundation for our nation. We have failed to understand CONTRACT, CAPACITY(TITLE), and CONSENT. Look up DEAN CLIFFORD and JURISDICTIONARY.

@tylerdurdenski4334 11 лет назад

The Constitution Article 6 paragraph 2, the Supremacy Clause. The Constitution is the supreme law of the land, Period Marbury v. Madison It is also not entirely unworthy of observation that, in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned, and not the laws of the United States generally...

@ladeda7033 5 лет назад

Did you notarize your paperwork? Maybe you were still viewed as "foriegn" and not native. These evil people, clowns in gowns should all be arrested and tried for fraud and treason.

@Will_JC 3 года назад

La Deda Are you okay with emailing me? I want to privately talk about something, but if emailing is uncomfortable for you, I have one NON-email option you can consider.

@jrc3ky 11 лет назад

The District of Columbia is a corporation. NOT a sovereign state.

@vengeance2825 Год назад

Close. The District of Columbia is the seat of our government, an intended neutral area. The "United States" in so far as it is a federal corporation(28 USC §3002(15)(A)) has its physical address within DC. The National Government/Federal Government is sovereign within its sphere of jurisdiction. While it is not a state admitted into the union, nor can it be, it is a State for purposes of international trade. We can see evidence of this in the IRC.

@aaronshoyt 6 месяцев назад

And a US Citizen is a federal Corporation and a slave..

@RolanRoyce 11 лет назад

That's what always happens, the cops don't bother showing up for traffic ticket cases and therefore the case is dismissed. Why don't they show up? Obviously their superiors must have ordered them not to, otherwise they would be in trouble for skipping court. The cops can't waste tome on ticket cases because the salary they would be paid to do so would be more than the state would get from the ticket. I've seen so many cases where the cop doesn't show up that it must be standard procedure.

@rundreamachieve Год назад

congrats on the win but when they called your NAME, you stood up acknowledging that you were that ALL-CAPITAL-LETTER corporation. No man or woman belongs in a courthouse. You never had to appear ESPECIALLY as a state citizen. Court had no jurisdiction over you

@crackahcrackah 11 лет назад

Current state governments are corporations. Not only that, but one isn't given the option of telling these corporations that they do not want to be a traffic ticket customer.

@normanpearson8753 4 года назад

Some people didn't want to be a member of the "I'm in court for mass murder" club , ,but ...that's the law .

@teddyflowers2798 Месяц назад

I heard corporations can’t give out orders. I thought it was a federal offense

@brekinla 11 лет назад

Better to pay up front as it only costs more later. If you can live without a drivers license then you pretty much ignore the lower courts. That is the systems big club to keep the peons in line.

@MrBrianohamill 7 лет назад

Anyone who says that this is not a win should think real hard. The court is NEVER going to say "ok, you win because we don't have jurisdiction." And of course this gets thrown out because they don't want it as a case that can be cited. There goes the summer home, the ten cars, vacations overseas...

@DavidS94938 Год назад

So even though it is a loss, you think it is a win. Because nutso

@JEHERETIC 6 лет назад

Judge prosecuted from the bench

@AllenNelsonBoisjoli 8 лет назад

good try guys...they prolly told the cop not to show so they didnt have to get into the argument that you brought up

@chelle315 5 лет назад

A cop does not skip court for 1 citation, they have more citations to deal with when court is in session, he was there.

@kegginstructure 6 лет назад

Hard to prove, but I wouldn't doubt that the officials of the current state government asked the officer to not show up. They didn't want to even come CLOSE to having that argument enter a court officially, because then a dismissal could be run up to the federal courts. The last thing they want is to find out that the citizens of North Carolina have been paying taxes to the wrong government, and the police have been arresting people and jailing them based on laws passed by the wrong government. That would be such a chaotic situation that the lawsuits for civil rights violations would turn certain lawyers into gazillionaires.

@keensweep 11 лет назад

I am glad you point out the commerce issue. I was not involved in commerce nor by lawful definition traffic. A license holder does not give up any rights. We are born with inherent rights unalienable by man including ownership of private property and travel. A registration does not change ownership. Our public roads are built by the people for the people. I believe we can of act in multiple capacities and in this case I was not actin in any public capacity rather one of the people traveling.

@DjHoodz1 5 лет назад

This is the comment I have been looking for, the fact that being a license holder does not give up any rights. If I am making money on the roads driving people or goods around for profit, I need a license. If I am traveling from point A to B in my Automobile, I do not require a license period.

@normanpearson8753 4 года назад

The judge will disagree ,don't try to convince others ,just the judge .

@keensweep 2 года назад

@@normanpearson8753 judge knew I was right but cannot let it be known which is why he left the court that day. Not only was this case dismissed, several audience members learned truth that day. A couple of them who actually stopped me outside to ask wtf happened.

@brekinla 11 лет назад

So you have experienced revenue court. Yep, I have been there. Cops says such and such and judge says go to window and pay. Some advice, don't give the police a reason to pull you over, know and obey the vehicle code. To get even always answer those annoying jury notices you get. Get your butt on a jury and nullify bad law! It cost the state about 5k a day to run a courtroom. Sorry, hung jury will have to do it over. Get even baby, get even.

@keensweep 11 лет назад

Or here in CA. Im dealing with crooked courts too. What gets me the most is our servants who are supposed to be the guardians of our freedoms are doing more to confuse or fool us than they are doing to help us. The judges really do just ignore evidence and proceed under assumption. My hope is as more of us start defending ourselves the courts will be less able to get away with these things. I for one will no longer just pay as my judge reminded me.. " you know you could have just payed this"

@harleyborgais Год назад

When these courts TRIED to hold me in jail, for not paying $1500 for a taser I threw in the road when the officer threatened "I'm going to tase you" while I was begging for money and holding up AZvBoehler showing its a right of free speech...Well I showed I have a right to release unless there is probable evidence I am a danger to anyone, pending criminal conviction (az const), the purpose of bail (az.crim.procedure) is to assure appearance so they need probable evidence I wont but I always do go to court, and I get cases dismissed a lot (7+ so far), so they had to just let me go on "Own Recognizance", and dismiss the "trespass" charge, meaning they admitted the arrest was unlawful, and now I have to sue to overturn the prosecution for assaulting an officer. But "There shall be no imprisonment for debt, except in cases of fraud." In the Az Constitution and most or all other States making it "the common law" and "the supreme Law" as well, so they could not hold me in jail for never paying my court 'fines' or for that taser. I started to 'represent' myself and keep the 'public defender' as 'advisory counsel' (even though he said he would not do it, or submit the motion, I did, and I got it! He did it! He was surprised too, and he actually started to smile after that!). Now I have been learning to initiate indictments and impeachments myself and hold our judges and legislators accountable, so I am trying to upgrade these main pages to have clearer links to all this info as soon as I can manage: www.NRDL.org/howtosuegovt/ www.GovernPublicServants.com www.HowWeExist.com

@joeythompson262 7 месяцев назад

How awesome! I need some pointers jailed and they have been trying to arrest me the past few days.. all because of my property tax stand

@keensweep 7 месяцев назад

@@joeythompson262 I wish I was more able to help. Its been a decade since I was on point with this stuff and medical issues have had an effect on my memory. I do know taxes would be related but are different than challenging traffic stuff. The information is out but it takes a lot of studying to find the few truths you will need to stand on.

@johngibbs569 10 лет назад

Great Job Jerry I remember when I met You in Greensboro a few years back and You were telling us about your case. I am glad You received the results You deserved keep up the Good Fight brother and may the Good Lord continue to bless You and your family!

@RolanRoyce 11 лет назад

So when they take your license just drive without one. What they gonna do, take away your license again? Of course, make sure you drive a cheap disposable car because they will no doubt impound it.

@BaFunGool 8 лет назад

Court pulled a Snaggle-Puss: Exit Stage Left. Cop not appearing was their exit strategy of not making a determination. Win-win well done.

@normanpearson8753 4 года назад

Cops can be excused for not cancelling holidays for minor offences ,they may be sick ,family reasons ,dozens more .The cop being available ,I bet he'd have got a guilty .

@tylerdurdenski4334 11 лет назад

Murdock Vs Pennsylvania 319 USSCR 105 No state can convert a secured liberty (right) to a privilege and issue a license and fee for it Shuttleworth Vs Birmingham 216 USSCR 216 States that one can ignore the license and engage in that right with impunity

@bogtrotter3068 8 лет назад

cop was told to not show up

@michaelmcneil4168 8 лет назад

You think so?

@TefflonGWolf074WPA 8 лет назад

bog trotter LMFAO hell yea, you know they told him not to show up lol the court knew they were wrong just as simple as that

@bogtrotter3068 8 лет назад

Yes sir

@PatrickHenry2K 12 лет назад

@VillainFL Yup, this guy^ gets it... everyone else look up DEAN CLIFFORD

@normanpearson8753 4 года назад

Who's probably still in prison for talking rubbish .

@AllenNelsonBoisjoli 8 лет назад

good try guys...they prolly told the cop not to show so they didnt have to get into the argument that you brought up

@Jonny2guns1984 8 лет назад

I was thinking the samething, it seems to me, that if they argued, weren't prepared & lost, it could set a precedent, which could open a door for any lawyer to argue jurisdiction who trying a case with similar circumstances.

@oneg1970 8 лет назад

I thought the same thing

@AllenNelsonBoisjoli 8 лет назад

bingo

@alancosens Год назад

So, it was dismissed because the officer didn't show, not at all because the court though the guy's jurisdiction challenge had any validity whatsoever.

@Colgate64 5 лет назад

The Court dismissed the case because the Policeman didn't appear. Happens every day in traffic court. Has absolutely ZERO to do with jurisdiction.

@wgsandh 5 лет назад

The forst paragraph od the Declaration of Independence reaffirms our God given rights as free and independent men and it clearly states that the PEOPLE ARE GOVERNED BY CONSENT..No consent no government!

@rogerthat6221 3 года назад

You give consent when the doctor docks you in a vessel in the ward. Your name is written in all caps on your license isn’t it. You are a ward of the state.

@TedBronson1918 8 лет назад

You seem to forget that North Carolina had been in a state of rebellion for 4 years. That rebellion had been suppressed by the national government with the cooperation of the states not in rebellion. What you refer to as the "second state" is nothing of the sort. The rebellion failed and the national (federal) government was put in the position of having to rebuild a republican form of government in that state and the others who rebelled. It didn't matter at that point if the North Carolinians didn't run it. They were not going to allow the rebels to just pick up where they left off in 1861- that would have been ridiculous. The things done politically at that time were a direct result of North Carolina's own illegal actions and rebellion. You should listen to the Memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant (free as an audiobook on Librivox.org). He deals with the problems of secession and the legal quandaries the nation had to resolve after the rebellion far better than I can do it here. Plus, it is an excellent book. But in short, the Reconstruction government was instituted to A) suppress further rebellion, B) remove the rebellion leaders from political power, C) educate the citizens so as to break up the old power structure of slave owner supremacy and make all votes count equally.... that list is incomplete and just off the top of my head. Anyway, my point is that you are ignoring the circumstances of history. Like I said, read Grant's Memoirs. Your case may have been dismissed, but I doubt it is for the reasons you think, though I might be wrong. Have a good day!

@LegalTyranny 5 лет назад

Holy shit you have no fucking clue what you're talking about. Next time READ THE FUCKING RECONSTRUCTION ACTS. We're lorded over by BAR members. They created new nations. You obviously don't even know about the new state constitutions that had to be created. People like you are maddening.

@russellstone9056 2 года назад

The states joined a confederacy in 1776 voluntarily, The Articles of Confederation were enacted voluntarily. The capitol was and is in Philadelphia. The constitution, enacted by Esquires, unlawfully usurped the Articles of Confederation and established a foreign "government" City-State in the District of Columbia. "The District of Columbia is a foreign corporation with regard to a state." US citizens are subjects and considered residents of DC.

@TedBronson1918 2 года назад

@@russellstone9056 Read the Preamble to the US Constitution first of all. Second, the men who wrote it and then submitted it to the various states were their elected representatives. They gathered to work out a more effective form of government because the Articles were ineffective. The Constitution required the validation of of the states to become the the Law of the Land instead of the Articles of Confederation, and that process took months and months because of the debate surrounding it and Amendments made. The District of Columbia is a Federal city seperate from any State so that no individual State will have a special preference, get special funding or treatment because of their status as hosts of the Federal government. In the earliest years of the new USA that would have cause huge problems. THAT is why the the District of Columbia exists - period. Someone who calls it "foreign" needs to read an actual history book instead of learning from youtube. What some lawmakers may have done by using/abusing that status since then is another matter entirely. Take the time to read books. They're far better than videos and have a lot more information.

@russellstone9056 2 года назад

@@TedBronson1918 I agree that reading is often better than watching a video although in some learning studies, lectures and videos were far better for retaining knowledge. The District of Columbia (US) IS a foreign corporation with regard to a state. Look it up. Why is it you say that the Articles were insufficient? Because they didn't have a dictator in place? What is one of the first things Washington did after being appointed dictator? He rode to the Alleghenies and slaughtered a bunch of farmers over a whiskey tax. The farmers were trying to preserve the value of their property through the winter by distilling it. Raping people through massive taxes wasn't as readily accepted then as it is now. People had some sort of backbone and bearing for right and wrong.

@jerrybell4962 11 лет назад

Jurisdicition is created through citizenship or should I say nationality. But they don't want people to know this. Under international law a person has the right to his nationality. That is why under the reconstruction act they had to put in what is called the Expatriation Act of 1868.

@Muma_M 9 лет назад

If only soviet union known this :D...so if i am getting things right, there is no USA (overlaping juridictions issues) ? Did south wrote a capitulation or peace treaty ---very very important diference between those two ;)? If i am right i think this jurisdiction issue is a small peace of a biger problem - sovereignty of USA :D hence sovereignty of any state in the world :D If you go deeper inside this issue a very serious ''problem'' can be made : 1. Definition of sovrereignty ?????? : according to the semantics as a root of definition for an any word that is written, and by wich semantics did they use it in dictionary, and wich dictionary is meritory to determine this??? Was this signed by any authorized person. (Rabit hole continues :D) 2. Sovereignety defines authority, authority defines jurisdiction (authority is a peace of shiit if it has no jurisdiction) (Rabit hole continues :D) 3. By this principal every individual is sovereign ???? Hence, you ARE authority to the '' authority -state''??? (Rabit hole continues :D) 4. If you engage a DEAL with a state( legaly deal is youre signature on any given document issued by the state, Birth certificate, ring a bell :D ) you are quiting youre sovrereignty by signing ANY '' deal '' with a state. (Rabit hole continues :D) 5. Sovrereignty excludes democracy !!!! :D_____If you re a sovereign (what ever that means and defined as :D) and you need to make a law ( i will simplify in order to be more practical ) you need a concsent of every sovereign man in order to put it on the law, meaning for every law to be applied on every sovereign man, EVERY one must sign its approval of this legislation. If Couple of sovereign man (majority in democracy) signs it and the other sov.man (minority in democracy) refuses to sign it -by the premis and sovrereignty its a not a law ( law can be defined as consent of the sovereign men in a unit of a land,sea,aerospace :D-------and VERY important UNIT OF TIME) so again democracy is just a deal on a UNIT of a land and sea, wich can be changed or abolished if one of those consent signatories retract from a deal, bcs man sovereignty is a granted by birth and its fundamental right and defines youre existance, and by that he has a right to pull off the deal, specially if it harms him or his group. (Rabit hole continues :D) 6. You are NOT obligated to pay taxes bcs its youre soveregin land, its youre assets produced by you with youre tools and it is youre right to carie that and use it in any sovereign orientated states. (grey zones are this deals and comerciall acting with other state legislations and laws) (Rabit hole continues :D) 7. What is COMMONS???....i gues close definition is consent of an every sovereign man to use defined COMMON, not soveregin ,unit of land and sea etc. for a agreed purpose-common purose ...so what is commons, its a basis of a state or any politicaly and socialy organized entity. (Rabit hole continues :D) ______Conslusion (maybe)______ authority has been imposed on us by group of sovereign man -hence non consensus,hence non commons hence non state, meaning its invalid since its not consensus. (Gray zones are what is an unit of commons, how many people counts in that number??? Who can defiend wich person is not a part of consensus)Meaning all sovereiggn man on earth must have consensus in order to common makes it in to an obligatory law, in reality that canot be done i supose youll agree, maybe someday i dont know...just living now not tomorrow dont give me a hard time on that :D If we cant do that on entire earth, lets create a common commons if you know what i mean ( UN is a start but we all have issues of colectivism and imperilistic interests and methods of a named org. so by this i dont mean UN nooooooooooooo UN :D) And ofc there are gry zones and rabit holes here...maybe the depest ones:D But lets do an analisys localy .... I live i europe an and i find this colectivist issues ( colectivism (by mine definition) is an authority without consent of soveregin man, EACH one of them, imposed on the others) are booming and freaking geting faster. I think from an aspect of NWO you can reckognize them by this symptom of collectivism . Like to hear youre thoughts and aspects on this issue.....cheeers

@bryanbarrett8985 6 лет назад

Man is100% Correct!! Send a letter of Warning and Demand!!!! With a Notorized Affadavit of Truth, and your Declaration of Status for the Secretary of State!!!!

@ChasingMayzie 6 лет назад

Are you sure that is good advice? It didn't work out so well for Bruce Doucette, Steven Byfield, Stephan Nalty, Harold Cromwell, that Vreeland dude... They are prosecuting "Paper Terrorism" a lot nowadays, and there's no parole in the federal system.

@mr_imperfectiongamingchann1962 6 лет назад

@@ChasingMayzie They still lack jurisdiction only the original 13 colonies are sovereign States. Paper terrorism my ass.

@scottryanlangley9782 9 лет назад

Question? I received 2 tickets in the mail, I had to sign guilty or not in order to get a trial or risk being arrested for not responding. By signing not guilty did I just contract with them & subject myself to their jurisdiction?

@ericwsmith7722 9 лет назад

first, pay NO attention to ANY part of this video, its 100% nonsense, sorry to burst your bubble, understand this, I 100% guarantee that you will have to go to court in the same town, city or were ever you got the tickets, knowing that why would they not have jurisdiction ? this video is based on the notion that they are only citizens of there own, and only subject to laws they feel like obeying .... if your not laughing by now, then sorry your stupid then, but if what a say makes sense to you let me know and ill let you know the best way to try and get out of tickets, and not its not 100% fool prof , any one who says they have a 100% way of beating all tickets is lying, pure and simple.

@kitevans6146 7 лет назад

What happened

@CanIbeWithThee 6 лет назад

You sure did

@fjccommish 5 лет назад

@@ericwsmith7722 Get in ze train to ze camp.

@bradleylomas7525 5 лет назад

Scott Ryan Langley should have taken the letter and put it back inside another envelope and send it back where it came from. Easy way to remove there authority

@keensweep 11 лет назад

I challenged nature cause and jurisdiction. They have threatened to suspend my license even though i was acting in a private capacity at the time of the stop. The DA said almost nothing and the judge over ruled or denied anything I entered. The same judge that told me at my third arraignment he thought " I was one of those people who think the law does not apply to them" was the same judge that judged my trial and then denied my appeal..FFS

@UniverseAlphaOmega 2 года назад

He was practicing law from the bench they aren’t supposed to

@keensweep 2 года назад

@@UniverseAlphaOmega Its been a long journey. Thier madness inspired me to keep learning.

@stopcensoringme6481 2 года назад

@@keensweep 14 amend at line/annotate 361 says no license needed

@keensweep 2 года назад

@@stopcensoringme6481 I believe we are capable of acting in multiple capacities. All that commercial stuff is for while acting in commerce. The registration, plate, and drivers license being displayed for use in commerce is not proof of commercial activity but being prepared for commercial activity. Those things not required for acting in private, including possessing and using common means of conveyance for travel. We take our certificate of title for automobiles down to the Ol dmv and register those automobiles as motor vehicle.. aka commercial vehicle

@stopcensoringme6481 2 года назад

@@keensweep you know your stuff but do you know your drivers license is a contract and a scam I am no longer eligible to obtain or hold a driver’s license in any state of the Union because domicile in the “State” is a prerequisite to being issued one. Therefore, this correspondence shall also constitute a formal request to rescind my state driver’s license, if any and purge all records of same. Every state of the Union: 3.1. Requires a “residence” or “domicile” in order to issue a driver’s license. 3.2. Cannot lawfully issue driver’s licenses to non-domiciled persons. 3.3. Cannot enforce the vehicle code against non-domiciled persons. 3.4. Requires everyone being issued a state driver’s license to surrender all other driver’s licenses before being issued a new one, because a person can only have domicile in ONE place at a time. California Vehicle Code 12805. The department shall not issue a driver's license to, or renew a driver's license of, any person: [. . .] (f) Who holds a valid driver's license issued by a foreign jurisdiction unless the license has been surrendered to the department, or is lost or destroyed. [www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=5072529233+0+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve]19 __________________________________________________________________ “A person may have more than one residence but only one domicile. “ [Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, p. 485 under “domicile”] By way of example, California requires domicile or “residence” as a prerequisite to issuing a driver’s license: California Vehicle Code 12505. (a) (1) For purposes of this division only and notwithstanding Section 516, residency shall be determined as a person's state of domicile. "State of domicile" means the state where a person has his or her true, fixed, and permanent home and principal residence and to which he or she has manifested the intention of returning whenever he or she is absent. Prima facie evidence of residency for driver's licensing purposes includes, but is not limited to, the following: (A) Address where registered to vote. (B) Payment of resident tuition at a public institution of higher education. (C) Filing a homeowner's property tax exemption. (D) Other acts, occurrences, or events that indicate presence in the state is more than temporary or transient. (2) California residency is required of a person in order to be issued a commercial driver's license under this code. (b) The presumption of residency in this state may be rebutted by satisfactory evidence that the licensee's primary residence is in another state. (c) Any person entitled to an exemption under Section 12502, 12503, or 12504 may operate a motor vehicle in this state for not to exceed 10 days from the date he or she establishes residence in this state, except that he or she shall obtain a license from the department upon becoming a resident [domiciliary] before being employed for compensation by another for the purpose of driving a motor vehicle on the highways. [www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/waisgate?WAISdocID=49860512592+2+0+0&WAISaction=retrieve] The “State” they are talking about in the California Vehicle Code above, incidentally, is a “federal State” or federal area within the exterior limits of the Republic of California. This is the only area within that state not protected by the Constitution and in which the government may therefore license or make into a privilege the exercise of a Constitutional right to travel. In that sense, the entire state vehicle code is “private law” that applies only to those who, through exercising their private right to contract, place their “res” or legal identity in a virtual place not protected by the Bill of Sec. 151.004. "IN THIS STATE". "In this state" means within the exterior limits of Texas and includes all territory within these limits ceded to or owned by the United States. Rights. Other states of the Union implement their vehicle codes by EXACTLY the same mechanisms. 1. Compelled Participation in Government Franchises: 1.1. Thirteenth Amendment: Prohibition against involuntary Servitude. I am being asked to represent a public office in the U.S. government as a franchisee, that I am not eligible to occupy, cannot lawfully occupy, and which I do not consent to occupy FOR ANY AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION. 1.2. 18 U.S.C. §912: Impersonating a public officer. A private person in possession, use, or control of public property and engaging in a “trade or business” (“public office” pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(26) is guilty of impersonating a public officer. Those who only offer government ID to public officers are indirectly compelling people to impersonate such officers. 1.3. 18 U.S.C. §654: Anyone who uses or compels the use of a public number in connection with your private property without your consent is guilty of conversion. 1.4. 42 U.S.C. §408(a)(8): Penalties 2. Government ID Available Only to “U.S. persons” domiciled on federal territory: Includes driver’s licenses and state ID that connect me with domicile on federal territory and status as a statutory but not constitutional “U.S. citizen”. 2.1. 18 U.S.C. §911: Impersonating a statutory “U.S. citizen”. By compelling me to misrepresent my status as a statutory and not constitutional “U.S. citizen” pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1401 in exchange for the Privilege of being able to conduct commerce using government ID, those responsible are compelling me illegally to impersonate a statutory but not constitutional “U.S. citizen”. 2.2. 42 U.S.C. §405(c)(2)(C)(i): Evidence, Procedure, and Certification for payments. 2.3. 18 U.S.C. §1028(a)(7): Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information 2.4. 18 U.S.C. §1028A: Aggravated Identity Theft 2.5. 18 U.S.C. §1201: Kidnapping. Whether I am physically moved or my legal identity is moved to a foreign jurisdiction without my consent, the result is the same and it is a crime Sec. 521.1426. DOMICILE REQUIREMENT; VERIFICATION. (a) The department may not issue a driver's license or a personal identification certificate to a person who has not established a domicile IN THIS STATE. Sec. 521.021. LICENSE REQUIRED. A person, other than a person expressly exempted under this chapter, may not operate a motor vehicle on a highway IN THIS STATE unless the person holds a driver's license issued under this chapter. Sec. 521.029. OPERATION OF MOTOR VEHICLE BY NEW STATE RESIDENTS. (a) A person who enters this state as a new resident may operate a motor vehicle IN THIS STATE for no more than 90 days after the date on which the person enters this state if the person: (1) is 16 years of age or older; and (2) has in the person's possession a driver's license issued to the person by the person's state or country of previous residence. Sec. 521.056. NATIONAL DRIVER REGISTER. (a) The department may process file check requests under the National Driver Register on behalf of current or prospective employers of individuals employed or seeking employment as operators of motor vehicles or railway locomotive operators if the individual: (1) has given written consent to the release of the information; and (2) has a license IN THIS STATE.

@ericwsmith7722 5 лет назад

So if i steal this guys car,,,,, take it to my house, the cops have no jurisdiction to take it back , or arrest me... wonder what type or car he has.. before it was impounded and he was tossed in jail ! lol

@bighitmachine 9 лет назад

The war between the north and the south had nothing to do with freeing an indigenous people called (slaves), by people who acted outside moral conduct. The emancipation act was merely a smoke screen for the REAL issue > CAPITALISM. 1. The north told the south, you gotta let those slaves go. Why ??? a. It was easier to buy labor (A SLAVE) one time for a set price ,than to pay for labor yearly. 2. The south began to rise and upset the balance of the union by way of their southern economy due to (SLAVE) labor. a. The north say this as a THREAT. 3. The north invited the south to the table to negotiate.. a. The south said they weren't interested in giving up their (SLAVE LABOR). 4. The north said you are upsetting the balance of the union, since the north is where the constitutional ratification took place, it was the political location of the union government. 5. Once again the south said , that sounds like a personal problem to us, (paraphrasing) and further more we will withdraw from the union. 6. The north said, (you can't do that. 7. The south said we can, and we will. They walked away from the table, AND The Rest IS History called > THE CIVIL WAR If you still don't get it, here's a (hypothesis) that will bring it home.............. Saddam...... was said to have weapons of mass destruction which was a means to the end of justifying an intention without alerting the public to what the REAL HIDDEN AGENDA WAS.. This way of doing things is nothing new here..

@jakevoss4917 9 лет назад

The comparison drawn here is so inaccurate I don't even know where to start. You are right about the Iraq invasion though.

@bighitmachine 9 лет назад

Depending on what perspectives you have on the subject matter, that could be so, certainly Everybody is entitled to draw conclusions based upon his or her own research, that's what makes it interesting to dialogue....

@Reaction1s 8 лет назад

+Sound Man this is almost accurate imo. the difference being that the southern states were aligned with "those wealthiest of capitalists" from England. one should read the Henry Charles Carey currency letters and also reseach "the American System" and "resumption " for the usurpation of the Federal Gov. "resumption" finally ended in 1933 when US finally was drawn to war against Germany because Germany used " the American System" which was sucking the wealth from those Capitalists as Carey's "American system" was suppose to do. these truths were hidden from the people because there are some who felt and feel that only a worthy few that should control the rest. Read "silent weapons for quiet wars".

@CanIbeWithThee 6 лет назад

Word!

@macgyveratlarge2133 5 лет назад

@@jakevoss4917 Donald Rumsfeld had a hardon to take down Iraq after the first gulf war. He used the 911 attacks as a leverage point to get Bush on board with it. As far as the "weapons of mass destruction," everyone and their brother knows full well they were run into Syria, but the State Department decided to play ignorant.

@safetyfirstintexas 12 лет назад

42 cfr 1983-Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress,

@yvonne-transitioning 6 лет назад

Are you in jail yet. Too bad you haven’t had access to a normal education, you seem intelligent. Hey bud you gotta follow our laws. Just remember you are being monitored by the FBI.

@NETWizzJbirk 11 лет назад

Yes, sir. My most recent ticket is Criminal, Speeding in SC on a Private Road, where police have NO jurisdiction AND the speed limit is arbitrary. I got a top trial attorney for $1500. Once we win, we are going to seek injuctive relief.

@KivaTV 10 лет назад

First of all, if you know NOTHING about the Constitution FOR the United States of America and CONTRACT LAW, please don't comment. YOUR so-called government (state, city, courts, etc) is a CORPORATION ( created in 1925), like McDonald's is a corporation. Technically they have NO JURISDICTION over you! They only get it when you CONSENT to THEIR statues, codes, and ordinances which ARE NOT LAW! They said because he travels on the roads they ASSUMED jurisdiction, and if you KNOW and study ALL-LAW, you will automatically KNOW that a judge just cannot ASSUME jurisdiction it must be proven on the record or there is no case. Notice, traveling on the roads (land, soil, etc), not PAPER! lol Corporations are DEAD, PAPER, ENTITIES that are NOT tied to Land or Soil! Go study and research the Supreme Law of the Land and UCC, USC Title 18. Cops aka Policy Enforcers on the roads pulling you over for BS, in a way, is like a MCDONALDS employee putting lights on their car and doing the same thing! LMAO WAKE THE F*CK UP and FREE yourSELF!

@MrHydroguy 5 лет назад

Ok what do you say or do when they just assume jurisdiction and continue to proceed ignoring you? It's one thing to know your rights it is another to enforce them. Wouldn't you agree?

@garretcastlebright8996 8 лет назад

You want the truth? You can't handle the truth!!!!!

@littlerascal2753 5 лет назад

funny!.....sounds like a load of bull$hit!.....good thing youtube doesn't have "smell vision".....yet!!!

@PatrickHenry2K 12 лет назад

Check out Dean Clifford's trust law videos, he ties in the difference between OUR jurisdiction and THEIR jurisdiction. We must know HOW to establish facts ON THE RECORD and how to correctly apply COURT PROCEDURE. I highly suggest looking up JURISDICTIONARY for the structure of how to defend yourself in court but also understanding IN PROPRIA PERSONA in conjunction(in your proper person, Black's 5th). Being pro se is still being considered an AGENT of the court and ADMITS JURISDICTION! NVrepublic

@desireenichole7911 7 лет назад

can anyone tell me what native Americans can do about legal situations like this? I'm an enrolled tribal member but I'm not aware of my rights as one if I indeed have any; I heard natives have different laws their under??? true OR false???

@normanpearson8753 4 года назад

Untrue ,but with reservations .

@MartinDezion 9 лет назад

Of course the corporate NC State has jurisdiction over all those contracted to observe the corporate regulations. Why isn't that acknowledged and why don't you argue that you are not contracted with the corporate State entity therefore not under that particular jurisdiction.

@normanpearson8753 2 года назад

Contracts don't come into it .

@MartinDezion 2 года назад

@@normanpearson8753 exactly, the State has no jurisdiction over one who has not set his hand to participate in a particular regulation.

@dxguy 7 лет назад

They don't have to present anything or debate it with you. You NEVER win or lose a motion, the judge only rules on it - then you can appeal if you like. They merely rule against you and you are free to appeal the case when you lose.

@epicproportionsmediaproduc6697 2 года назад

FOUNDING FATHERS Thomas: “What the bloody hell? You can’t do that! We just fought a violent and bloody war to establish that all men are created equal! You can’t just go out and create a government to rule over everybody!” Ben: “Dude, relax! We will be a nation that is ruled only by the consent of the governed!” Thomas: “Oh? Well, I guess that makes things different then.” Ben: “...Of course, we’re just going to assume that everybody consents to being governed, is all.”

@minnow008 11 лет назад

if you had won. every case in NC prior would be thrown out. every prison emptied. tread carefully my friend.

@justaman6972 11 лет назад

Jerry and Steve is this applicable in Florida? If so where would I locate said nexus to establish the evidence of military rule and non-consent? PM me if you like, this is very powerful and i have been at this since 91' studying ,learning and researching, so this will be a fine addition to unraveling the ball of red tape. Thanks. Respectfully in truth and liberty, Defender of the Republic

@normanpearson8753 2 года назад

You spent 30 years learning nonsense?

@philfreeman8167 2 года назад

You are an idiot. I win in court!

@stevenlovell3300 4 года назад

The only reason this case was dismissed was because the police officer didn't show up. It had nothing to do with your challenge

@dylanhayes5820 8 лет назад

Title 28 USC 1608 7/27/1868 ... 15 statutes ch 249 section 1 expiration is what is broken when jurisdiction is demanded, AND IS NOT MET WITH AN ANSWER....not a lawyer...so dont ask ?'s...amazing what u can learn on youtube

@jaymorgan. 7 лет назад

Because these corrupt courts NEVER have a true valid claim. I believe it has to do with ''Failure to state a claim'' if you challenge jurisdiction and 15 statutes/249....rule 11...and rule 12b1/12b6 is what will make them shyt themselves. lol I remember the prosecutor ambushed me outside to talk to me to make a sweet deal before I walked back into the court room but I refused and it got tossed. I had my friend do the same thing and the prosecutor admitted he has no jurisdiction so they bounded his driving under suspension/marijuana charges over only to let it expire.