A lot of know it all’s on here,I’ve been logging for 35years these fuel injection saws are awesome.carburetor saws will be a thing of the past real soon.
Husqvarna is and will always be the best chainsaw for loggers cause we know what lasts.I have a 185cd they were only made one year 1977 and mine still workin.88cc chainsaw lots of balls
At one point I had a couple dozen vintage saws, almost all Husky. I have a 395. That was not how they cut. They are an absolute beast. Something wrong with that example.
The two premier saw brands in the industry, Take your pick, either one, you won't go wrong. I'm a Stihl guy but I am interested in the new saws that " Hoosky " came out with.......
That 500i is a game changer, mega performance from it, I'm a husky guy thru and thru, but it really kicked arse there.. It'll be interesting to see what husky brings out to counter it..
Interesting, that he brushed off the dirt for the Stihl. But had the Husky just motor through it. Yes I am a Husky user. And the grind on my 390's would have cut that size of log in less than half those times. Good saw performance is like good coffee. It's all about the grind.
i own a 390 and unless yours is ported you would never cut those in half the time, the 395 is a half horse bigger than the 390 and in that size wood you will never beat a 395 let alone cut the time in half.
И пилу заводим сразу рывком без введения в зацеп , на весу, и пилим обеими машинами внаглую, не слушая их завывания от перегрузки... Зато мощь ёпте... Такое ощущение, что если наступит апокалипсис - топором себе все что можно отрубит. Если вообще вспомнит, что это такое.
The 500 looks to be a great saw and most likely the wave of the future. However, anyone who has ran a 395 knows the one in the video was not running to its full potential.
Dude you say good i have stihl 500i,stihl 651,husqvarna 390xp and 395 husqy eat dtihl for breakfast 390xp and 395xp,500i is piece of shit they have problem with settings ewithbcomputer all time
I didn't watch the video but I already know what a 394/395 run like. They need to be woke up and reved out with heavy gas mix. I put many hours behind them. In stock form they're a bit slow but they take well to a few tricks.
People need to understand that the Stihl i500 is the first fuel injected mass produced saw. The power of a 660/ husky395 and the wieght of a 362/550xp.
Not sure what happened here but the 395 doesn’t lose ever to the 500i unless out of tune or less sharp chain. Heck that would be like the videos showing the 572XP beating the 500i. No one believes those either😊
Hat nem tudom. Nekem a husy meggyőzőbb volt. Biztos van aki lemérte én nem tettem. Az viszont látszik, hogy a husynak beakasztja a rönktámasztves nyomja neki, az megy, a stihlnél el kell venni a feszitesből, mert fullad/fulladna. Meg kicsit macerásan indul a német. A jövő az injektor felé megy el, ez nem kérdés. De azért itt még van feladat a stihl előtt. Mind a két fűrész nagyon jó. Ez tuti.
Ugyanazt a videót néztük? Úgy tűnt, mintha fulladna az 500i? Inkább a 395 terhelődött be, így a kisebb láncsebesség miatt kicsit lassúbb volt. Nem mintha ez valamiféle verseny lett volna, túl sok értelme nincs is, hiszen a vágási sebesség csak egy szempont a tucatból. Gondolom nagyon más karakterisztikájú a két gép, máshogy kell vele vágni, de abban biztos vagyok, hogy Gyuri részéről egyik felé sem volt részrehajlás, mindkettőből kihozta, amit lehetett.
Most beszélünk valamiről, amit érezni kellene a helyszínen. Gyuri, hogy érezted? Nekem van 395 60-as lappal, viszont 8-as csillaggal, pont a rövidebb lap miatt csináltam nagyobb lancsebesseget. Ezzel csökken a nyomaték a sebesség miatt, de így is van bőven. :-) hidd el nehéz megfullasztani ezt a gépet. Mivel az 500i ről nem találtam se max lancsebesseget azt írja, hogy 100 ra gyorsul az 27-28m/s a husy 133% teljesítményen 27-28m/s. Ha mind a kettő ugyanolyan motor lenne, és csak az áttétel változna, akkor a nagyobb lancsebesseg miatt a láncon megjelenő nyomaték lényegesen kisebb lenne a stihlnel. De nem erről van szó, mert a stihl 72ccm a husy 95ccm, csak a köbcenti kiadja, hogy a husinak lényegesen nagyobb nyomatékának kell lennie és ehhez jön hozza a stihl lancsebessegre kihegyezett teljesítménye. Ebből adódóan a stihl nyomatéka a láncon biztos, hogy jelentősen kisebb. Az meg, hogy fullad vagy nem, abban a nyomaték játszik nagy szerepet. De ez mind csak teória. Gyuri, hogy érezted???
It doesn’t matter if the 500 i is new or not look at the husky it’s Not spitting out sawdust evenly where the 500 i is he needs to learn to properly maintain is chains my 390xp would run rings round that 500i bc it’s maintained properly that 500 i is probs running a brand new chain
The 395XP is a bigger saw and has more power than the Still 500i. The Sthil is not far behind the 395xp in power, but it is a smaller saw. If the Sthil 500i appeared to cut faster, the only way it could do that is if the chain was dull on the 395xp. The 395xp is the better saw for BIG wood, it's just the way it is.
There's something wrong with that Husqvarna either he ain't pressing that trigger all the way because it sounds like it's not reaching Peak RPM. That's awesome cut through it like butter with no bogging
husky carb governs its rpm by flooding via ball and spring in carb. a small piece of gasket material to block that port, and your husky will sing a higher tune....more rpm’s. tech tip of the week...
matthew thomson never happened to me yet, a tank of gas runs longer......I don’t let it rev out unloaded! This does not change the air fuel mixture, I am not talking about adjusting the jets...this is a separate ball and spring inside the carburator, you must remove carb. A brass screw with a slot head accesses the spring and ball seat.
@@jimhofoss9982 oh ok nice. Got any videos of it cutting? Would be interesting to see. I dont understand how blocking a port would give higher rpms though?
Ive got a 395xp and my climber has a 500i. The 395xp easily has more power and cuts faster its heavy but reliable. Tune it with a screwdriver. Constant problems with all these auto tune saws they have to put them on a computer to service them so it costs alot over the life of the saw. Apart from that the 500i is superior. I just hate stihl because ive had 3 blow up
This guy needs some sharpining tip... say what you want I run them every this guy cant cut to start with he never let it stay on it's high side so it's in the bone head running it too ...
Mind 2 gép nagyon jó,de itt most nekem az 500i meggyőzöbb volt. Ha valahol picit nedves pincében szárítják 1 évig a fakorongokat,akkor talán nem repednek szét. Utánna már nem igen fognak.😉👌
Én le mértem az időt a Husqvarna 1 perc 16 másodperc alatt vágta le a fát. A Stihl meg 1 perc 3 másodperc alatt vágta le. A Stihl nyert jó kis videó lett
Igen ,de ne felejtsük el,hogy sthil-nel mar par cm-rel kisebb volt az átmerö ,ami szemmel lathato is,de meg igy is valoszinüleg gyorsabb adott idö alatt,mint minden sthil ...
In a full chain work is fantastic chainsaw this Stihl MS500 i. I LOVE IT. Con la cadena totalmente trabajando el Stihl MS500 i es fantastico. Lo quiero
Both are great saws but, he pissed around with the 395. He was feathering the throttle and backing out of it, this wasn’t a true comparison. Having said that I still think the stihl would have won but should’ve been much closer.
Kicsit most gyengének tűnt a 395 xp a 15 köbcentivel kisebb 500i mellett. Múltkor még a 880-hoz mértem a 395 xp-t, de lehet, hogy nem is gyenge, csak az 500i nagyon erős. :)
How can this be, the Husqvarna 395 has always been the Mercedes of the heavy chainsaws and it cuts this huge log in approx. 75 seconds while the stihl ms 500 cuts it in 64 seconds with a loth less displacement.
I have a Sthil MS 880 magnum and the Husky 3120XP and I can honestly say the MS880 is a pound / pound half lighter and it has more torque than the Husky 3120XP. I have cut wet hickory/Pecan and Wet Oak with both saws - same chain setup and the Sthil has more torque (Period). If I lived up North or Northwest - then Husky probably would be the better pick because of a little higher RPM seems to be the case across the board for different models. But, down SouthEast where the wood is harder - I will take a Sthil anyday 1st. The fir up north and northwest can't hold a candle to pine (longleaf, loblolly,slash) down in the south East - The weight difference and specific gravity is atleast a 3rd more down in the SouthEast. I do want to ask everyone here a question - Why is it? Every Video of men cutting huge trees of extremely hard wood in the Amazon or Africa or Asia; why in every single video are they running the 090's Sthil? I think we all know the answer - the difference is the torque (might be slower RPM - but it will keep eating it up. Don't take me wrong - Husky's are great saws - and the 395 is probably like the Cummins 5.9 to all other Diesels , but across the board ; when considering all models - I'm sticking with my Sthil. And yes, the reason I bought that 3120XP brand new was that I wanted to do a comparison for myself and I have repeatdely . Great saw , but my MS 880 will eat it. Cheers to the 395 - I want to add one to my collection. The 500i is great saw , but the price cant be justified right now.
Sharpen the fucking saw the husky is so blunt look at the powder coming out of the thing definitely needs a good air filter clean or carb adjustment I've used both these saws the 500i and the husky aren't comparable and I'm not one siding because there both awesome in there own ways
@@lactosis--undefined Still the cost and the fact I'll probably need a laptop to fix it over at the woods. Lol. What 5 seconds? Them 500s are expensive. Probably should stay away for a couple years. Then 10 years from now it will be worth what your iPhone 2 is worth.
Weird too because the HUSQVARNA has a higher chain speed aka higher RPM! HUSQVARNA has a better air filtration system. HUSQVARNA has a better vibration damping system! & Most of all HUSQVARNA is soooooo much easier to work on!
Mert pár másodpercel hamarább elvágta,lánc se biztos egyformán éles volt, és persze köztudott,hogy a Stihlek pörgősebbek , mikor 10.000 köbmétert végig nyomatsz mind kettővel utánna lehet értékelni...
Első dolog hogy a husqvarna 395xp öregebb is mint a stihl 500i masik dolog hiaba van nagyob fordulat nyomateka a stihlnek ha a lanc nem egyforman van meghuzva te akarmekora fureszel osze tehed ha lanc tompa
Kíváncsi voltam már ,hogy mit tud az 500i egy hosszabb lappal,hát azt kell mondjam ha napi termelésbe is bírja hosszabb távon,akkor sajnos a husi nagyon le van most maradva.
@@whistle194 Ha Jól tudom Nem 15 Éves technológia hanem annál sokkal több, ugyan ez a konstrukció 394 XP néven jellent meg még 1991 ősszén HD szűrő nélkül talán a Muffleren (kipufogon) is volt változtatva a károsanyag kibocsátás miatt később a 395xp nél amit 2001 től kezdtek megint gyártani, Eredetileg 5,2kw os volt a 394xp és 1996 ig volt gyàrtva!
@@barnabodor8334 Nekem van 394 xp, és 1997 gyártás! Meg a 394 7,1 ló. A 395 meg 6,8 ló. Meg azért még van köztük más külömbség is. Pl. A 395 impulzus csöves a henger, a 394 -ben a hengerbe van az impulzus járat kialakítva. A 395 gumi szívótorkos, a 394 meg a régi bakelit. Főtengely dugattyú ugyan az.
A ridiculous comparison, the 395 was not running right, in big hard wood it's a 395 or a 660, in medium or softer wood the 500, 462 or 572 are all great