Can you beat the latest Stockfish 16.0? *ChatGPT* I don't directly play games like chess, but I can certainly help you analyze games or improve your chess strategy by discussing principles, tactics, and various scenarios. As for playing against advanced chess engines like Stockfish 16, which is one of the strongest chess engines in the world, the capabilities needed to potentially beat such an engine involve high-level strategic understanding, as well as immense computational power and advanced algorithms specific to chess. These engines are designed to evaluate millions of positions per second and use highly sophisticated algorithms to determine the best moves based on extensive databases of opening theory and endgame tablebases. Their strength lies in their ability to perform deep calculations and error-free play, which is a significant challenge for any human player and most AI not specifically optimized for chess. So, while I can provide support in learning and analyzing chess, playing directly against something as powerful as Stockfish 16 would be outside the scope of my capabilities! If you're interested in improving your chess skills or understanding specific aspects of the game better, feel free to ask!
Chat gpt is humble he don't want to hurt stockfish feelings.if you ask him if he could beat Magnus he will say the same.but if he played with him he will show his powerful strategy to play deferent opening with rare variations that player will not often analyze or play .
@@jeanmichel9207 Yes, ChatGPT is very humble, agree. However, I have played ChatGPT 3.5 at chess and wasn't good at all. I even had to correct illegal moves. It would reply, sorry for my mistake. Granted, I have not tried version 4.0 but since its focus is on general things and not specific things I believe it.
Ninguno de los dos es ChatGPT, ChatGPT no puede jugar una partida de ajedrez de esta manera ni mucho menos de tantos movimientos, si de verdad jugó ChatGPT debió tener mucha ayuda externa de por medio. El verdadero título debería ser Stockfish vs Stockfish.
stockfish is an open source code thats why it is so hard to defeat because all most talented programmer join the development of the stockfish engine .....
I’d take the pawn first, return to H8, then migrate to F8 and then E8 and then chop the rook.. Because I’m a bit weak, I’d hunt the bishop and then go for mate, but that is boring.
🤦 This is Stockfish vs. Stockfish, no ChatGPT involved, there were some interesting moments but showing all the moves is completely unnecessary, plus you incerted your own move for black at end so that white wins. It was equal for the entire game, then in a completely drawn endgame black blunders a rook??? Ive never seen worse clickbait in my entire life
By the way they made it look so boring trying to over stretch the ''elasticity threshold'' of these 'entities' to their very limits. It's technically drawish. In fact one can fancy black to muscle out a win with a rook and a bishop and two pawns against just the white queen. It's not exactly sure if truly its chatgpt playing against the stockfish.
30:25 rook f2 in black turn wns the queen by discovered check but black doesnt find it, but he has resisted more than 100 movements and still winning against stockfish with that carence of logic, what the heck?
No, white wins, but they don't show the last moves. If king moves, queen takes rook, and if bishop come back to protect, queen takes pawn, check, and it's over
@@captainploum3376could you explain further? Bishop comes back to protect king, queen takes pawn and check, but bishop again protects (g6). Right? And then there are different options, the end is not obvious to me
@@logic7878 In fact, don't need to take the pawn. Queen f8 check, King g6 (only move), queen e8 check, and you will take the rook. After, it's mate in about 10 moves according to Stockfish
Не говори глупости . Каким образом программа вынудила черных не делать ничью , если на доске ничья ? Где ты увидел победу ? Ничья была , ничья и осталась .
@@user-kw4vm9pq3q Si te fijás, con la última jugada ganan las blancas. Pero es algo artificial porque el negro hace una mala jugada a propósito que les permite a las blancas ganar. Si no, es un empate técnico. Saludos!
i don t think so . black were forced to move bishop . If not they were mate . But in moving the bishop , they expose the rook , and the white can take the rook or the pawn
