STOP Printing Calibration Cubes!

Подписаться 69 тыс.

Просмотров 97 тыс.

50% 1

Get the Calibration Flow and Written Guide: vector3d.shop/products/califl...
Quite simply, this 3D Printer calibration method greatly improved my prints. This calibration flower is a simple and robust method for calibrating the X and Y axis of your 3D printer to get more dimensionally accurate prints. I hardly need to show you how to calibrate your 3D printers, you simply, print, measure and update your settings. Most instances only require a single print to get amazing results but if your printer is poorly set up, you may need to repeat the process a second time for best results. In my opinion it's the best 3d printer calibration method available at the moment.
Patreon: / vector3d
Twitter: @Adam_V3D
Join the Vector 3D Discord: / discord
Vector 3D Shop: vector3d.shop
Tools:
Wera Hex Keys: amzn.to/3gIYdNV
Wera Ratchet and Socket Set: https: amzn.to/3gH0OrY
Knipex Cutter: amzn.to/2Wylf2M
Ifixit Tool kit: amzn.to/3BdJXES
Wire Stripper Tool: amzn.to/3kC7hoW
3M Applicator Tool: amzn.to/3jqc8ud
0:00 How Accurate is your 3D Printer?
0:38 Calibration Cubes
1:07 How Size Affects Error
1:37 Internal And External Dimensions
2:22 Filament Shrinkage
2:49 Text Ruins Dimensions
3:13 Don't Ignore Skew
4:05 My Calibration Flower Design
7:30 Celebration

Наука

Опубликовано:

7 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 275

@tvathome562 2 года назад

Very clever approach, I think this is first skew and multipoint single print calibration I've actually had faith in.

@toma.cnc1 2 года назад

Very nice indeed! I have printed some 5 or 6 cubes in a year on 11 printers as i never thought it has any real use at 2x2x2cm, but i did print a 50x50x50 once as it is more useful for accuracy.. This video changes that! 😃

@kevfquinn 2 года назад

Great stuff - I've always been dissatisfied with the so-called calibration cubes, and instead printed much larger strips etc - but haven't been measuring internal dimensions (obvious as soon as you said it that's needed!), and just never thought to check skew, wasn't aware it was something that could be accounted for in the firmware! A new dawn of dimensionally accurate prints awaits!

@genau14zeichen 2 года назад

You can tell a lot of effort went into this :) I just purchased it from your store. Keep up the good work

@arvenebinny 2 года назад

Thanks for taking the time to do this mate. I just got a 3D printer and did a cube calibration and was wondering how to correct the settings and in youtube i found this video. THanks again.

@FilamentStories 2 года назад

What a great way to get better dimensional accuracy measurements. Love it!

@scramsby 2 года назад

Really appreciate this calibration test. With a couple of prints I was able to go from ~0.43% XY error and ~0.23° skew to ~0.04% XY error and 0.06° skew. Trickiest thing is getting your calipers squared up with the part when taking measurements. Wonder if as another suggested having notches for this would help.

@shigeokageyama0 2 месяца назад

Hello! He actually updated the flower to make measuring with the calipers easier

@TheNickelGhost 2 года назад

Love the design, thanks for sharing! My go-to calibration object has always been the "5 mm calibration steps" (scaled 2x because 5 mm is too puny for a 0.4 mm nozzle): it has the same advantages of internal + external dimensions for measurement, but also has a little section for bridging, and the progressively smaller tiers also let you gauge the cooling (increasing "overextrusion" at higher Z is usually a symptom of insufficient cooling in my experience). But it doesn't have anything for skew, which is something I've never even thought about before, so I'll definitely be giving your flower a shot 🙂

@Daepilin 2 года назад

Looking good, will definitely get this for my next calibration :D One thing I would find interesting would be skew/accuracy of the z axis, as I feel this is the weakest link in a lot of 'cheap' printers

@stevenmcculloch5727 2 года назад

It actually makes sense! Nice idea for calibration that isn't just the classic (terrible) tweaking x/y/z steps/mm until your calibration cube measures 20.00

@mehowcreate5832 2 года назад

This is great, I calibrated my Voron 2.4 printer with it and since I did it in ASA I can now use it as a impromptu coaster haha. Thank you very much

@vanlife4256 2 года назад

Great contribution to our Community! Thank you!

@DavidGunter 2 года назад

Thanks for this. Just purchased the files and I'm starting a new set of calibration prints. Cheers!

@edwinirizarry9277 2 года назад

Wonderful good sir ! This seems like very valuable time and effort I can’t wait to start checking all my printers with this test! Ty very much for all your hard work here sir. !

@Flashbang_Photo 2 года назад

Just bought this! I've been printing some multipart pieces that did sort of fit-but-not-really, and i was already on the edge of buying this. Seeing how the parts ended up fitting, i bit the bullet. Being 00:11AM here i may not print the flower just now, but i'm already testing the bridge part. Cheers!

@cdl1701 2 года назад

Ran this on mine and my errors were 0.02, 0.02, 0.06 so not bad. This is a great tool to check for accuracy and the excel file is great addition. Well done!

@Spacekriek 2 года назад

I have an older CR-10S printer and use Cura as a slicing program. There is an add on for Cura called skew compensation. I found this add on to be really useful and it was quite an eye opener to discover that my precious printer was not all that accurate on the three basic planes as I expected it to be ! It was even out by a fraction of a degree on the XY plane. Fortunately, the fix for this plane required a relatively quick and flat print and a bit of basic algebra. For the other two planes I designed a kind of pulley with a sturdy axial piece and printed a few. I am fortunate to have a large old Meccano set and built myself a test rig to analyze the wobble on a number of these test pulleys. After about 5 or 6 tries I had the wobble reduced to virtually zero. This was a very interesting project on its own !

@zuluDhillon 2 года назад

I appreciate the thought and the effort you put into this. Your excel and pdf are what convinced me it is worth purchasing.

@Vector3DP 2 года назад

Awesome, thank you! I do try and go beyond just the model because making sure you use it correctly makes a huge difference to the success. Enjoy :)

@GlitchLock 2 года назад

Absolutely brilliant! I hope you use that congratuling yourself step liberally! Thank you for sharing this.

@avejst 2 года назад

Interesting new approach 👍😀 I wil give it a go soon Thanks for sharing your experience with all of us 👍🙂

@Vector3DP 2 года назад

No problem 👍

@weisnowhere 2 года назад

Started printing models with gears and several parts interacting with one another and noticed some dimensional inaccuracies. Thanks for the content! I'll be calibrating this way for now on!

@christianmarkussen6412 2 года назад

Brilliant👍. I am in the middle of calibrating my printer and profiles do perfect timing. I have always found the calibration cubes less than ideal.

@X11-35-2 2 года назад

Wow, that’s awesome. Better printing 2-3 of this flowers instead of 20 cubes. Voron cubes are nice to indicate lots of things, but xyz calibration normally sucks

@anotherguycalledsmith 2 года назад

Hello, Adam, you just won yourself a new subscriber ;-) Thanks a lot!

@paulstephenson5311 5 месяцев назад

Thanks for this. The video from Stefan brought me here. I wish you the best outcome in this difficult period (I went through it 3 years ago).

@philevans4021 2 года назад

Looks more like a waffle than a flower 😛

@Vector3DP 2 года назад

SHhhhhh, nobody noticed. 😉

@AndrewAHayes 2 года назад

I spent ages making adjustments to get a calibration cube 20.00mm on all measurements on an Ender 3, I am curious to know how this machine will fare with the flower calibration

@FrancoisMathieu 2 года назад

Nice of you to share, thanks!

@Vector3DP 2 года назад

My pleasure!

@xenontesla122 2 года назад

Good work! I noticed you even made sure to chamfer the edges and the bottom for even extrusion and to avoid elephant’s foot.

@brettcoutermash2651 Год назад

I was curious about this and the potential effects of that, This just sealed it for me that I'll try this soon

@steveh8724 2 года назад

Great explanation of a great tool! Definitely looks superior to many of the other options for printer calibration.

@VITO-Wood-and-Goods 2 года назад

Thanks for it, I bought it. Question... I can adjust the XYZ Axis steps on my display. (Marlin Community Firmware) What should I input if the Settings are not in prozent? Example: X=80, Y=100 and Z=400.

@H0mework Год назад

Thank you. I am excited to calibrate.

@Trevs-Shed 2 года назад

Many thanks. I will be using that tomorrow after tweaking some mechanical settings today.

@Trevs-Shed 2 года назад

Or maybe not. Page not found when I try to get the files.

@Trevs-Shed 2 года назад

Ah, I found it by going to the shop and looking for it. Might be nice to mention this is £5 on this video's description. I will order one later today, seems well worth it.

@NotDoingThisToday 2 года назад

Bought it! Thank you! Nice done!

@Offcut55 2 года назад

I have often thought the letter on the cube will mess the measurements I tend to use a temp tower and a flow topless cube for my measurements but will try yours for sure

@MrScienceMaths 2 года назад

Great work, well thought out, thank you!

@kraemrz 2 года назад

Will test this right now !!!!

@karipenttila2655 2 года назад

Thank you. This is great. I will try this out soon. 👍👍👍👍

@MartinStephenson1 2 года назад

A possible enhancement to the flower would be notches the width of the calipers jaw along the measuring edges. This would help to measure squarely as the jaws would sit in the notches I think ?

@richieThach 2 года назад

Was able to go from 0.2 tolerance to 0.1 tolerance on a tolerance coin test, thanks!

@frankcellini9363 2 года назад

Used this system to calculate error but for a Prusa Mini, where would I add the calibration error? For XY shrinkage should I add it to printer firmware or in the Prusa Slicer settings? Make it filament specific? What about skew correction?

@TalkingGIJoe Год назад

great info! Thanks for sharing!

@Acheiropoietos 2 года назад

I loved this, great job man.

@MBCNC 2 года назад

Does the skew correction value changes when tighten belts right?

@gsuresh2u 10 месяцев назад

Hi, already purchased this, but want to purchase XYZ also, is there any video regarding that ?

@brettcoutermash2651 Год назад

I'd be curious to see how this calibration flower stacks up against teaching techs website and presliced models to dial in a printer. I think I'll use this on my son's printer as mine is pretty heavily molded, and he's got a stock ender 3.

@andrewdunn9001 Год назад

Any ideas on how to apply the results from a califlower print to a Bambu X-1. While my correction factors are small, I have a large part thats very reliant on dimensional accuracy. I see in "Printer Settings" that I can add/modify the start and end g-code and its Marlin (legacy) flavor but I don't understand where to add the worksheet code.

@kbruin79 2 года назад

Very cool, would love to try it. Is there a compensation needed for different nozzle sizes? I am using 0.6mm.

@hermangaviria690 2 года назад

I bought the STL and read the instructions. Basically, what you're getting at is that we should get accurate prints by changing the E-steps and rotation distance (also account for Skew)? I have always used horizontal expansion to get accurate prints but the approach here is different. Am I correct in these assumptions? Should I never depend on horizontal expansion again? Will changing rotation distance really carry over dimensional accuracy to other models and prints?

@gordodefuego 2 года назад

Awesome, thanks for helping our the 3DP community!

@BinaryClay Год назад

Is the size of the print still the best choice if you have a 500X500mm print bed, or would a larger version make sense?

@jsal92 2 года назад

Liked and subed. This was quality work, thank you, I'll get printing immediately

@fabianfritz1655 2 года назад

Hello, think you vor this nice Tool. I have a question on this Thema: I have a Prusa Mini can I put the Correction parameter in the Start-G-Code. Or what should I do?

@enrilopez 2 года назад

Currently printing this on all my 5 FDM printers ,i do have a question, my tenlog and ender 5 plus i don't have access to the firmware so i won't be able to change the skew correct??? And does the nozzle size matters for this calibration?

@MrMun33 2 года назад

Have you considered caliper tolerances in these measurements. Maybe there is nothing to change if it's readings are in tolerances of your calipers. By the way this will differ between Prusa Slicer and Cura because Cura calculate rectangle area for line protection, therefore 0.4 mm thick line which is 0.2 mm high, will be arround 0.44mm wide if you print with 100% flow for outer walls (extrusion multiplier)

@robertgcode965 2 года назад

This is GENIOUS!

@Vector3DP 2 года назад

Thanks

@NULL_POTATO_EXCEPTION 2 года назад

I don't understand how to use the Klipper G-code fix and the Marlin firmware adjustment. Is just one of the two needed? Or both? I also don't really know where to use them. I'm currently using Ultimaker Cura 4.12.1 and an Ender 3 V2 on firmware v1.0.2. I see I can change the starting G-code in Cura for my machine. Is this where I should put the G-code fix? How do I know if my machine supports Klipper? Is Klipper firmware for my machine? Or is it a flavor of G-code? I am even more lost with the Marline firmware adjustment. Any one can help me?

@konturgestalter Год назад

Great tool! thanks! The description says: "If you have CoreXY...use the average of the errors". But where do I put the error? the spreadsheet does not account for CoreXY then. also: The inner an douter errors have hitns when inner is neg and outer is positive and vice versa. But mine are both negative. what does that mean?

@hoctrimededebutry8655 2 года назад

Hello and thanks a lot for this video. I bought your Calibration flow, print the calibration flower on my Prusa Mini, log the measurements in the calibration calculator. OK, and now ? i'm lost.... As i can't update the Marlin's firmware of the Prusa, how can i make adjustments ? I found a X correction of 0.25% and Y correction of 0.40%. The skew correction is 0.29°. I don't know how using these measurements in the prusaSlicer.... Sorry for my English, i'm French 😉

@lap87 2 года назад

Lovely stuff you bring to the community! This will be a great tool for freshly built diy printers to make sure they are true and correct.

@Vector3DP 2 года назад

Absolutely!

@86abaile 2 года назад

Is there a way to input the correction code into duet printers?

@JonathanScruggs 2 года назад

How do I set the shrinkage value in PrusaSlicer v2.4.1? My filament settings page looks nothing like your's. I have X error -0.40%, Y errror -0.43%, and Skew -0.18. How do I find the shrinkage % that you entered in the box. And I'm missing the box even on Expert settings. I did a search for it and it doesn't come up in the search box. EDIT: In print settings, there is now a XY Size Compensation in mm. Is there where I would place a value? If so, which one?

@zabejaga9489 2 года назад

No, XY Size compensation is about to add/reduce "thickness" to the object. PrusaSlicer doesn't have shrinkage parameter, but you can use scale factor at object manipulation frame.

@Killerjack007 2 года назад

Will definitely try it out and see how it goes. Single print multi calibration no hassles printing 20 diff stls. I'm assuming this works for Deltas , Corexy's and Cartesians since the logic behind it is the same

@fontanadamiano7729 2 года назад

Bought the test and ran it on E3D toolchanger. Skew 0.32° off! -> Unscrewed the Y axis and put it back on the square, re-tensioned the belt -> 0.01°. Quite disappointed that E3D give a machine in such a bad calibration. It would be interesting to have some data on flow regulation, do you have any ideas?

@jheins3 2 года назад

You're correct, this is a superior measurement system for calibration. My only concern with this method (as its not described in the video) is how you're determining/separating form from position. All measurements are measurements of form/size. Whereas, I believe, skew would be a measurement of POSITION. This means that all measurements relating to skew (or features out of place) should originate from the same feature, ie a Datum. You could do this by applying a cylindrical feature in the center of the part and cylindrical features at the diagonals and measure center-line to center-line for these lengths. This would probably yield less than 3% improvement, but for accuracy sake... now you know.

@brettcoutermash2651 Год назад

You mean like how a ball-bar test checks movement? Not gunna lie, I'd love to be able to do that ki d of test on my printer

@nitshuwa2757 Год назад

Works good, tnx

@hendrickstrauss3311 2 года назад

Thank you for this! I'm converting my old ender 3 v2 to a belt driven z system (just because and it looks fun) and this will be a fantastic calibration test to test and tune it.

@GeekDetour 2 года назад

Hi there! Please, tell me why are you going to replace the Z thread to a belt? I ask because the threaded rod is actually the only always accurate axis in the Ender (since each turn will move exactly 8mm, it is the specification of the thread). 🤔

@hendrickstrauss3311 2 года назад

@@GeekDetour For no other reason than it would be a nice and fun thing thing to do actually. I was going to do a dual Z rod with stepper motor upgrade - even get some acme rods that I know are true - but I had some Gates belt laying around and the mod would essentially give me the same effect as a dual Z rod; perfect X gantry control. So this has nothing to do with better quality or the like. Purely a fun mod to apply to the printer. Like adding linear rails. Won't increase quality, just reduce maintenance and guarantee printing parity from print to print. :)

@David_Best 2 месяца назад

How do you put the skew factor into a Prusa MK4 printer? In the Prusa slicer - I don't see how? In G-code? Someplace else?

@Vector3DP 2 месяца назад

Sadly Mk4 doesn't have facility to add skew correction as far as i know. sorry.

@borolo222 Год назад

Thankyou. Finally can print something accurate. Being stgruggling with this for years. Now I can print usefull things. 0.11% X, 0%Y and 0.01 skew.

@hsnorh8180 2 года назад

Very Clever, Thanks...👍

@JonS 2 года назад

Very nice. One issue with most calibration objects is they can be impacted by elephant’s foot (which is an issue to be resolved separately from E steps). Does this have chamfers to prevent elephant’s foot from impacting the measurements?

@Vector3DP 2 года назад

Of course it does :)

@JonS 2 года назад

@@Vector3DP you’re too good!

@UKCM 2 года назад

Well .. I don't think I can get better than this. On a Tenlog TL-D3 Pro, ran the calib flower and got a skew of 0.0012 ... on first run 😁😁😁

@alexeigeorgiou3008 2 года назад

I'm guessing that you measure inner dimensions to cancel out actual line width. Though using your model you can not only measure shrinkage rate but also horizontal expansion (Cura setting, there is also one in super slocer). Shrinkage = (measurement of 100mm - measurement of 50mm ) / (100-50); horizontal expansion = (100 * shrinkage - measurement of 100mm) / 2.

@elgeotuberarceo9829 Год назад

Wow! it's Amazing I did it well ! Perfect work !

@andrebonneau8738 2 года назад

I found that the best way to adjust step/mm is actually to measure the physical x y z movement of the printhead , 3d printed objects tend to shrink when cooled.

@voicesarefree 2 года назад

I bought a dial indicator exactly for that reason. That being said, I have never attempted so many measurements on a calibration print, and never for skew, so I’ll be giving this new method a try.

@Dystrackshun 2 года назад

Yes, this measures the actual filament after shrinkage. its designed to adapt a tuned printer to produce parts that are dimensionally accurate after printing and cooling.

@electricpaisy6045 4 месяца назад

I printed it on my Core XY but I have two questions about the excel file: 1. The file says "If you have CoreXY, X and Y are 'locked' to each other so use the average of the two errors." But wouldn't it be better to rotate the print by 45° to be exactly on the axis and have x and y seperate rather than getting just the average? 2. My part turned out slightly to small so the file suggests to either Scale the Part up in the slicer or adjust the Steps but if I decide for the later, if I understand correctly the printer will move a further distance without knowing that it also has to extrude more material to make up for the now bigger part did the file already calculate with that or do I have to adjust the extruder after this aswell?

@scottcook6844 2 года назад

Using the filament shrinkage setting in superslicer with a very small value, eg 99.965% results in lots of overextrusion and print looking crappy. Ultimately after hours of work to arrive at the desired adjustment value, the recommended strategy does not work. Tried with the current stable release and nightly build, same results. If perhaps I could access the source files in the protected spreadsheet, I could calculate an XY compensation factor, which requires an absolute value rather than a percentage. Recommendation: if you are going to protect the sheet, provide the values we need to plug into the slicer too for both SS shrinkage and XY compensation factor.

@miclaro 2 года назад

hmm, I don't see a skew setting on prusa slicer, is this something that can be adjusted on prusa printers?

@Vector3DP 2 года назад

Skew is a firmware setting rather than slicer setting.

@Dystrackshun 2 года назад

My x and y were about .3% different, but in Superslicer the shrinkage only allows for overall. How do you determine what value to enter? Is the avg of the x and y %? My values were x 0.57% y 0.27%.

@aircoholic 2 года назад

I'm wondering the same thing, did you figure anything out yet?

@adamfilipowicz9260 2 года назад

After I print a flower and use the Skew Calibration in reprapfirmware. when I print the 2nd test to check results. How do I compensate for existign Skew. when it recalculates?

@Vector3DP 2 года назад

Unfortunately you can't but from the results I've seen you shouldn't actually need to do this iteratively.

@billmartin6687 4 месяца назад

First of all thank you designing this tool. I printed one ,measured, then did the adjustments on the printer saved the settings. Round two same thing. It was worse than the first one . Back to square one with the measurements. Round eight still no better than the original settings . Decided to go back to what I had in the beginning.

@Vector3DP 4 месяца назад

You only need to do once.

@myJorge7777 Год назад

I have Prusa i3 mk3 where do I add step/mm info and rotation dist. Thanks.

@tapirath 2 года назад

The sheet shows separate correction for X and Y but shrinkage in PrusaSlicer is a single value for XY. What to do?

@RubixB0y 2 года назад

He just averaged them. Ex: -0.5% for X and -0.9% for Y, you'd avg to -0.7% and input 99.3 into prusaslicer ( assuming it's the same as superslicer)

@Flagazz 2 года назад

wonderfull!!! Well done, I wanna print this today with diferent nozzles as well ;)

@theahmadperson 2 года назад

Very nice! I wonder how hard it would be to create a hexagon-based version for delta printers…

@davethetaswegian 2 года назад

Nice. Just wondering if you have made any allowance for elephants foot? This tends to screw up dimensional measurements for anything on the the print bed unless you are that rare person who has perfectly levelled your bed and set the correct z offset, etc. I know that I tend to err in being a little too close to the bed to get good first layer adhesion.

@Vector3DP 2 года назад

Yes, a chamfer around the bottom edge of the print deals with that.

@davethetaswegian 2 года назад

@@Vector3DP cool, thanks

@GnuReligion 2 года назад

Yes, was also wondering about the Horizontal Expansion that I ordinary use to make mechanical prints? I do not suppose this value will affect your test results though, as you are averaging inside and outside measurements.

@nickrp88 4 месяца назад

Can anyone point to a guide on how to apply these results to a prusa MK4? I found lots of forums complaining about changes to "pronterface" whatever that is, but have not been able to find an actual step by step for adjusting the printer firmware.

@radioactiveolix540 2 года назад

Very Nice!

@frankdearr2772 10 месяцев назад

great thanks for sharing 👍

@Brocknoviatch 2 года назад

Prusa printers have wizard for detecting skew etc, would this still be useful?

@RubixB0y 2 года назад

You could use it to measure the material shrinkage still, if anything I suppose it could verify the results of the Prusa

@jeffsabel9363 2 года назад

Thank you!

@holgerabend2282 8 месяцев назад

In Superslicer you entered 99.35 for Shrinkage. but were is this value in your excel? where does it come from?

@scottcook6844 2 года назад

I purchased the suite and have emailed you and gotten no response, so trying here. What do you do if the calculation results in a substantially different X and Y value, eg one is negative and one is positive? The slicer only has one adjustment that seems to work in both axes. Does the skew calculation compensate for this at all? Klipper/superslicer here.

@Vector3DP 2 года назад

Inbox has been a little swamped the last couple of days. There might be other problems with your machine, or perhaps your steps/mm are not quite correct for your X/Y axis? My V0.1 has a slight difference between X and Y but is not as large as you suggest. I'd try this: try differenet filament, calibrate/validate E-steps, print and measure again to see if its consistent.

@aircoholic 2 года назад

Thanks for the great work, I really appreciate it! However, after printing and measuring, I'm a bit lost what to do with the results. I understand how to process the skew value, but where do the X and Y values go? In the video you mention the x/Y Shrinkage setting in SuperSlicer, but that's one value, but I have two different values for X and Y - so which one to apply where and how? Maybe I'm missing something really obvious, but atm, I think this part could use a little more detail. A quick pointer where to put which value would be greatly appreciated.

@Vector3DP 2 года назад

V6 spreadsheet with more guidance and details on implementation coming soon.

@aircoholic 2 года назад

@@Vector3DP Fantastic news! Thanks so much.

@martinlacher7932 2 года назад

Great idea! If I understand correctly, it just calibrates x and y but not z. Is this not necessary or not possible?

@RubixB0y 2 года назад

It can be calibrated for and prints exist, but I imagine there are more factors to wrangle in for xz and yz skew calibration: like nozzle offset, bed leveling, eccentric nut adjustments. You would want to be measuring and compensating purely for z-axis alignment. Maybe a print on a raft could get rid of first layer artifacts, but then you have to measure off of a rough bottom.

@jeremyrileysmith Год назад

When I put in the skew in the Klipper command window, it says "Unknown command:"SET_SKEW"" Do I just add "[skew_correction]" to the printer.cfg or are there additional settings I need to go with it?

@Vector3DP Год назад

Ye, you're right, you need to add the section to printer.cfg.

@johnhawkes7681 Год назад

Hi there. I've just purchased the cauliflower and done a few runs. I've added the skew correction to my Marlin firmware. When I'm implementing the X and Y size adjustments in super slicer should I add the X and Y compensation values as well as shrinkage or just one or the other. Thanks.

@tubeyoului Год назад

Have you ever found out? I've got the exact same question ...

@johnhawkes7681 Год назад

@@tubeyoului one or the other from what I remember.

@PitPrint 4 месяца назад

Hi hi! Nice video. How i fix the skew on a Bambu Lab P1S?

@fontanadamiano7729 2 года назад

Really good stuff, I Will try It and report result the here

@notcorrect Год назад

This is a great calibration tool. I may need a little input though because results got worse. I expected the print to get bigger but it got smaller. I'm using Klipper and Cura. I used the SuperSlicer setting in a Cura plugin for "Scaling Factor Shrinkage Compensation". I'm thinking this value for Cura should be 100.19 and not 99.81 like in the Excel file. X = -0.19% Y = -0.20% Skew = -0.03% Inner = -0.01% Outer = -0.37%

@Vector3DP Год назад

Join us in the Vector3D discord and we can help you better there.