Тёмный

Stridsvagn 103: Sweden's Turretless Cold War Super Tank 

Megaprojects
Подписаться 1,3 млн
Просмотров 346 тыс.
50% 1

After WWII, Sweden relied heavily on tanks produced in other countries. But when they became too expensive to repair, the Ordinance Department decided to design its own tank that was better suited to Sweden's terrain - the Stridsvagn 103.
Got a beard? Good. I've got something for you: beardblaze.com
Simon's Social Media:
Twitter: / simonwhistler
Instagram: / simonwhistler
Love content? Check out Simon's other RU-vid Channels:
Biographics: / @biographics
Geographics: / @geographicstravel
Warographics: / @warographics643
SideProjects: / @sideprojects
Into The Shadows: / intotheshadows
TopTenz: / toptenznet
Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
Business Blaze: / @brainblaze6526
Casual Criminalist: / thecasualcriminalist
Decoding the Unknown: / @decodingtheunknown2373

Опубликовано:

 

21 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 636   
@hafden
@hafden Год назад
As a S 103 tank commander I thank you. Small correction - we had three forward and reverse gears.
@kristofferhellstrom
@kristofferhellstrom Год назад
As a Swede I'm so proud of this tank! Berätta gärna hur den va att köra, skjuta och underhålla :)
@PlumSack79
@PlumSack79 Год назад
Sweeeeeeden, IKEA Meatballs Volvo Saab and weird outdoors/camping pornography
@wombatwilly1002
@wombatwilly1002 Год назад
@@PlumSack79 Dude,how can you forget Smoking Hot Blondes?
@More_Row
@More_Row Год назад
@@PlumSack79 huh
@More_Row
@More_Row Год назад
@Räche SD honey is yummy for my tummy
@hattyfarbuckle
@hattyfarbuckle Год назад
My favorite tank of all time- - brilliant design for a specific set of Swedish circumstances and requirements
@youtoob4life
@youtoob4life Год назад
I really love this tank as well, not sure why, but it's definitely one of my top 5!
@P4hko
@P4hko Год назад
@@youtoob4life It's very different from everything else but so perfectly suited for the enviroment and doctrine it was made for. It's like a perfectly placed brushstroke on a masterpiece or a perfect clear in tetris.
@juanlu3958
@juanlu3958 2 месяца назад
stupid design.those ikea guys thinking their enemies are stupid like them
@hattyfarbuckle
@hattyfarbuckle 2 месяца назад
@@juanlu3958 Yeah the Russians would never use crazy tactics on the battlefield after the lessons of the Great Patriotic War, right?
@juanlu3958
@juanlu3958 2 месяца назад
@@hattyfarbuckle Any infantry vehicle can destroy this idiot-designed tank. funny as heck.sitting duck tank lol
@andersisacson8262
@andersisacson8262 6 месяцев назад
As a Strv 104 Centurion driver in the Swedish army I can vouch for their lethality. If you knew the S-guys were waiting for you in a defensive position you were in for a real fight. The gun was almost the only part sticking up. If you couldn't find the flow of heat from the turbine you were shit out of luck. The gun was very accurate and with the right gunner things could get uncomfortable real quick.
@PantsuMann
@PantsuMann Год назад
My absolute favorite tank since I was a kid and my dad took me to an military exhibition where Försvarsmakten had all kinds of systems and vehicles to show. Me, being 7 years old climbing into a Strv S had me happy for months, years even. Really cool experience.
@TigreQuiMiaule
@TigreQuiMiaule 8 месяцев назад
Le plus difficile a du être de ne pas pouvoir repartir avec.
@PantsuMann
@PantsuMann 8 месяцев назад
@@TigreQuiMiaule English ffs
@TigreQuiMiaule
@TigreQuiMiaule 8 месяцев назад
@@PantsuMann traduction bro.
@davidk6269
@davidk6269 Год назад
Yes! The Strv 103 is one of my favorite cold-war tanks! The Stridsvagn 103: coming soon to an Ikea near you! Come for the Lingonberry meatballs, leave with the Strv 103 (some assembly required).
@888johnmac
@888johnmac Год назад
Lol , I’d does look like a flat pack assembled incorrectly
@isidorsvenvik999
@isidorsvenvik999 Год назад
Hihihihi
@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188
@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 Год назад
The tools delivered in the box are the wrong size!
@loke6664
@loke6664 Год назад
Unlikely, we have moved to German Panzers ourselves since then. We might sell you some Gripen though (and lots of shoddy furniture). I was in the Airforce myself, but I have friends who crewed the 103, it was an odd piece of machinery but it had it's advantages. It was very lightweight for how good protection it had but it was pretty vulnerable to infantry anti tank weapons since it was weak on the sides. Not the best cold war tank but not the worst either, but you really don't want to use a 60s tank on a modern battlefield. The turret is still a tanks weakest point but it do makes targeting easier, a large percentage of the destroyed Russian tanks in Ukraine have their turrets destroyed but it is so darn convenient that most tanks in history had it anyways. No turrets makes defense better and lowers price but it has an offensive disadvantage.
@AndersJackson
@AndersJackson Год назад
@@loke6664 but out army is all about defense and no offense.
@BadYossa
@BadYossa Год назад
Sweden has had one of the most capable military forces amongst western nations since WW2. Their proximity to Russia has made that necessary. Cue jokes about IKEA etc., but they are extremely highly regarded amongst Western military. Same with the Finnish.
@Turinnn1
@Turinnn1 Год назад
As a Finn I've always been a bit jealous of the Swedish ability to design and build their own military hardware (tanks/aircraft etc.) Finland got the troops and Sweden has the Steel. 😁👍
@andersgrassman6583
@andersgrassman6583 Год назад
@@Turinnn1 That's why we should always fight together!
@VisibilityFoggy
@VisibilityFoggy Год назад
@@Turinnn1 Don't sell yourselves short. A Finnish-designed surface-to-air missile system defends Washington D.C. 24 hours a day here in the USA!
@bpomowe224
@bpomowe224 Год назад
@@VisibilityFoggy NAMSAS is Norwegian, not Finnish :) Finland has good small arms and armoured cars though.
@VisibilityFoggy
@VisibilityFoggy Год назад
@@bpomowe224 Ahhhh, yikes, sorry! The "N" in NASAMS literally is "Norwegian" (at least until we renamed it "National" lol). Kongsberg made me think of Finland for a moment, for some reason! It's been about 6-7 years since I've been in that region, ha.
@KA-dx2kz
@KA-dx2kz Год назад
Centurion didn't have a 150mm main gun, a version was made with a 153mm to counter soviet heavy armour but was only a prototype.
@2KOOLURATOOLGaming
@2KOOLURATOOLGaming Год назад
I think it was just a typo of 105
@target844
@target844 Год назад
The centurion in Swedish service did have a 105mm gun at the time. This is the reason this tank is named Strv 103. The number is the gun caliber in cm and then a number per adopter tank with that caliber. strv 101 was a Centurion purchased with 105mm guns and strv 102 was an older Centurion that initially had a 84mm gun that was upgraded to 105mm. Upgraded centurion lager becomes strv 104 in the1980s The current Swedish tank is strv 122 so a 120mm gun and the second model with that caliber. Strv 121 was leased German Leopard 2A4 and Strv 122 is an improved Leopard 2A5 build for Sweden
@History_with_Sirius
@History_with_Sirius Год назад
Figured it was a typo. I first heard it and had to do a double take. Then was like oh yeah 150 and 105 are easy to mess up. Also the strv 103 is one of my fav tanks in World of Tanks 😂
@jonathanfalkman6041
@jonathanfalkman6041 Год назад
The FV 4005 was even fitted with a 183 mm Canon mounted on the centurion hull;)
@Zerox88
@Zerox88 Год назад
@@target844 There was a project to slap a 120 L/44 to a Centurion in sweden tho only a few test vehicles where made (1 or 2).
@Krogenator
@Krogenator Год назад
Would also love a video on the "Bandkanon 1" swedish self propelled gun. the swedes had a lot of interesting stuff during the cold war.
@scruffy7760
@scruffy7760 Год назад
Best history lesson on the Strv103 on YT. An offensive main battle tank, not an ambush tank destroyer! Good job!
@berryrijnbeek5938
@berryrijnbeek5938 Год назад
nope, so much wrong information.......
@scruffy7760
@scruffy7760 Год назад
Really? I'm glad you pointed them out 😅
@coenogo
@coenogo Год назад
@@berryrijnbeek5938 Such as…?
@andersjjensen
@andersjjensen Год назад
"You have no rear armour, so your best chance is to just ferociously attack them head on. We are the sons of Vikings after all, and our battle tactics should reflect that!".
@viceralman8450
@viceralman8450 Год назад
@@berryrijnbeek5938 STRV 103 was a MBT in rol and Swedish doctrine.
@Kefito_
@Kefito_ Год назад
Absolutely my favourite tank ever conceived and built! Ingenious, unique and stylistic, they really are something to marvel at and praise Sweden's engineering among its other wacky and wonderful war machines! I would absolutely love to see something expanded on with the Strv 2000, and just how morden and futuristic and ingenious it could've been if was ever produced, great stuff as always!
@Vinterloft
@Vinterloft Год назад
It reminds me of a Lancia Stratos :D
@michaelgautreaux3168
@michaelgautreaux3168 Год назад
Many have "Railed" against it for offensive use. But the defensive mode, it would be pure hell to dig out. The S-tank & MBT-70 (Kpz-70) are my top 2 favorite AFVs, warts & all. Many thanx Simon 👍👍
@gattonero2915
@gattonero2915 Год назад
>"Many have "Railed" against it for offensive use." Swedish military doctrine literally says that they are to be used as offensive vehicle. It's even written explicitly in their field manual. If anything, it's the enemy that will be at a disadvantage trying to take out this vehicle, especially the said doctrine will have the tank spearhead the attack to defeat VDV threat or bridgehead defenses lol
@pvtj0cker
@pvtj0cker Год назад
Soviet tank commander: "Tank, 3 o'clock, 1200m" Soviet gunner frantically rotates in the target's direction and spots it: "That's no tank."
@rex9502
@rex9502 Год назад
Ah finally my country's wacky machines are put to show. Always happy to see the 103 in a video
@Zeithri
@Zeithri Год назад
Agreed!
@vanguard9067
@vanguard9067 Год назад
And also a country that spent very intelligently on their national defense!
@Goat-vy2bi
@Goat-vy2bi Год назад
Do a story about the Swedish Coastal Defences during the cold war! It was MASSIVE
@josefstalin4532
@josefstalin4532 Год назад
I mean was it though? For neutral Swden it was substantial sure, but from the rest of the world's perspective it was kind of just an ordinary coastal defense.. When compared to US coastal defense during its peak for example, it had 1/50th the manpower and a tiny fraction of the number of guns, as well as WAY smaller guns. The coastal defense just seems massive because it's what remains of any war preparations from that time in Sweden, as the air force, which was actually really impressive is gone.
@kraftstationen228
@kraftstationen228 Год назад
Lägg av greta!
@Goat-vy2bi
@Goat-vy2bi Год назад
@@josefstalin4532 it was massive, no country can compare to the US tough, people lived in concrete caves 2 people on islands and was just waiting to release the minebelts they had to their disposal.
@Goat-vy2bi
@Goat-vy2bi Год назад
@@kraftstationen228 Hur vågar du!!!
@AZREDFERN
@AZREDFERN Год назад
My favorite tank in WarThunder. It’s a 0 death sniper if you use it right. The velocity and auto rangefinder is an insane combo.
@guythomas7051
@guythomas7051 Год назад
Wat Thunder is not real life.
@AGENTA909
@AGENTA909 Год назад
@@guythomas7051 he didnt say it was
@Denamic
@Denamic Год назад
It's the first tank child me ever saw, and it has cemented the image of what a tank looks like in my mind. I think I even had a phase where I was drawing nothing but turretless wedge-shaped tanks.
@bluebanana6753
@bluebanana6753 Год назад
So i have gotten this from a guy with first hand experience. After the cold war we had friendly relation exercises with the russiand. He said the russians always said (after some alchole) that they where always afraid os the s tank. Then never figured out how to actually combat in
@Algabatz
@Algabatz Год назад
I once rode in an "S" when it went full speed through a pine forest, cutting the tree trunks right off. It was hardly noticeable inside.
@alvinkwok587
@alvinkwok587 Год назад
Just one small correction, HEAT shells should be called High Explosive Anti Tank instead of high energy. Also unique trenches in the ufp also increases protection.
@ignitionfrn2223
@ignitionfrn2223 Год назад
1:25 - Chapter 1 - Background 3:05 - Chapter 2 - Design 7:30 - Chapter 3 - Engines & performance 9:25 - Chapter 4 - Flaws 10:10 - Chapter 5 - Service - Chapter 6 -
@bpomowe224
@bpomowe224 Год назад
Thanks, mate!
@josephalexander3884
@josephalexander3884 Год назад
The Centurion had a 105 mm cannon, not a 150. Sweden did not use a 155 mm main gun, that would classify it as a self propelled howitzer.
@johanmetreus1268
@johanmetreus1268 Год назад
The Kranvagn )KRV) has a 15 cm gun for the main alternative. "Howitzer" has nothing to do with calibre though, it's all about trajectory, like the 10 cm howitzer version of the Sherman.
@TransGirlGaming
@TransGirlGaming Год назад
yep, as Johan said the caliber in mm isn't the deciding factor on howitzer vs gun but rather velocity, a good example is Russia or rather the Soviet Union with 152mm howitzers such as the D-10T in the KV-2 and the SU-122 with the M-30S and then 152mm cannons such as the SU-152 which had the ML-20S Gun-Howitzer as it performed both anti-tank capabilities also howitzer needs, there were also the experimental BL series guns two of which being 152mm those being the BL-8 and BL-10 these were both proposed as upgrades for the ISU-152 series Self-Propelled Gun the BL-10 being a upgraded BL-8 tho the end of WW2 saw the program put to a end, another example now popular due to War Thunder is the Object 120 SU-152 "Taran" which used the M-69 152mm gun which was a 9.45m long barrel designed for anti tank use firing APFSDS projectiles, and also if you want to get specific with the Sherman howitzer it's a 10.5cm or 105mm
@daviddevlogger
@daviddevlogger Год назад
People often say that motivation doesn’t last. Well, neither does bathing. That’s why we recommend it daily
@ZETH_27
@ZETH_27 Год назад
1:30 - 105mm L7 cannons were used on the later Centurions, not 150mm cannons. 2:37 - The Kranvagn tank concept was of a Heavy tank, not a medium tank (one of the reasons it was dismissed). The vehicle was to feature a 150mm (could explain the confusion at 1:30) Additionally, a significant reason for motivating domestic development in Sweden was the fact that Britain's forecast when it came to delivering Centurions stood at 0, meaning in the event of a war, Sweden would be stuck with only the tanks they had available at the time. This is also the reason why the project was later cancelled, and Great Britain was able to deliver Centurions to Sweden which were cheaper and still showed military promise. 3:49 - The last S-tank production model (Model C) weighed 42 tonnes as indicated in the video, yes. However, the earlier variants were 37 and ~40 tonnes for the A and B models respectively. 6:05 - The S-tank featured 40mm thick plates on the upper and lower front. Not 70mm plates. Sode armour was limited to only 20mm, not 40.
@tor2919
@tor2919 Год назад
Nice video! One thing worth mentioning is that because of the turret less design the gun barrel could be much longer than turreted tanks. The resulting projectile speed and accuracy was unmatched.
@petter5721
@petter5721 7 месяцев назад
One benefit the 103 had with its long Bofors main gun was that it could open fire long before the T55, T64 and T72 could because of its range and accuracy. This is why this tank was one of the first to use a laser range finder and ballistic calculator for precision hits. The fast auto loader made it possible to hit each target twice to inflict maximum damage before changing target. It was a complex machine for its time, built for one thing, stopping a numerical superior Soviet tank force at the border.
@Sandhoeflyerhome
@Sandhoeflyerhome Год назад
British 105 main gun. Very well thought out design, still able to track a vehicle by moving the entire vehicle in yaw. Super special hydraulic suspension made it really work in a static defensive position. But of course not on the move. However they were a none aggressive country so these were self defence only ...
@SilverionX
@SilverionX Год назад
They were designed to work like any other main battle tank. If Russia was going to attack Sweden they couldn't just sit around and wait for them to come around to static defensive positions, for obvious reasons. Sweden would have to hit them before they were ready. There were platoons that had Stridsvagn 130 and those that had Centurions, and their roles were pretty much the same with a few minor changes. No tanks could shoot on the move at the time, so that didn't really matter. Later on tanks could shoot accurately on the move, which is why they were phased out and replaced by a more conventional tank design.
@bpomowe224
@bpomowe224 Год назад
Swedish 10,5 cm gun, the L7 was too short. Basic rule for all tanks of the era, if you actually want to hit something you stop the tank before you shoot. Self defence in this case was to aggressively wipe out bridgeheads of invading forces before they got a chance to consolidate and expand.
@geodkyt
@geodkyt Год назад
Sweden's defense doctrine could best be described as "geopolitical and strategically defensive", "operationally (the brigade and battalion level of warfare, where the focus is mire on manuever and position to get your actual shooters into place where they can shape the firefight) offensive", and "tactically (the actual trigger puller level stuff from individual soldiers to about the company level) a mix, depending on circumstances". It's a good plan, fairly common even for nations that don't have a tradition of neutrality. Strategic & geopolitical - try to avoid the war altogether, but make sure if the war happens, it happens on terms most favorable to you as possible. Operational - sieze the ground the enemy *must* take or traverse to win, and set up your front line shooters for success. Tactical - depending on terrain, enemy composition and actions, and your own maneuverability and survivability, either hold from chosen positions or assault at the most vulnerable enemy points, as appropriate. This is literally Sun Tzu stuff, hardly unique to Sweden. But Sweden has done a very good job at the first, and a credible enough job at preparing for the last two that it has reliably reinforced the strength of their strategic and geopolitical goals - Sweden has managed to look like invading them is simply *way* to expensive and risky for an aggressor to bother.
@GrowlingRB24
@GrowlingRB24 11 месяцев назад
" Sweden has managed to look like invading them is simply way to expensive and risky for an aggressor to bother." That was actually the same mindset Karl XI (Carolus Rex's father) had when he decided to reforge Sweden's forces with a standing Army (Caroleans) and Navy after the battle of Skåne.
@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188
@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 Год назад
Irish/American: "The Chieftain" tried one of these in his films about tanks and vehicles, and liked it very much, also for its automatic tension-system for the bands! Also the Jerry Cans on each side, which by being hit, eventually would burn outside, or just loose their content. And it is so low.
@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188
@finncarlbomholtsrensen1188 Год назад
I saw one in Munster some years ago, and they also have one in Kubinka. Hopefully it isn't sent to Ukraine to be used there, as the Russians seems to soon have run out of new tanks? 🤔
@peartree8338
@peartree8338 Год назад
Well...if it must die, then at least it should be by a CG. 😄👍
@Jim54_
@Jim54_ Год назад
Would love a modern version of this concept if practical
@luckyleo8751
@luckyleo8751 Год назад
ah yes, I’ve been waiting for this one.
@schwabbel_di_babble3253
@schwabbel_di_babble3253 Год назад
Love your vids, really helps relaxxing after a hard day
@lex1945
@lex1945 Год назад
This tank seems almost impossible to take out head on, considering it's shape and low profile. Brilliant!
@gattonero2915
@gattonero2915 Год назад
Armor Piercing fin-stabilized discarding sabot says hi. the profile made it quite easy to bounce the older generation APDS. Not APFSDS. APFSDS ignores angling, and the Swede find this out themselves when they managed to acquire some T-72 samples from ex-Warsaw pact country, and the 125mm sabot round, while has shorter penetrator length than standard NATO saboted penetrator, was more than enough to defeat the Stridsvagn 103 frontally even on its upper frontal section.
@Dunken88
@Dunken88 Год назад
@@gattonero2915 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_ikXfN5VAgw.html
@gattonero2915
@gattonero2915 Год назад
@@Dunken88You do realize T-62 has a 115mm kinetic penetrator right? I'm talking about a 125mm kinetic penetrator, ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5H9Tj-N385c.html
@UglukGPZ900
@UglukGPZ900 Год назад
@@Regarded69 When I was a kid in the 80-ies my best friends older brother served as a tank driver before becoming a fighter pilot. He claimed the s-tank could actually dig itself a shallow trench with the blade, and use the hydraulic suspension to raise itself on tip-toes so to speak, fire on a target previously located by periscope, and then lower down out of sight in a few seconds. Don't know if it's true, but he was certainly the coolest big brother in the neighbourhood.
@Vinterloft
@Vinterloft Год назад
@@gattonero2915 You could defeat the tank, sure. But the crew is another story, as both engines take up the front third of the tank with an additional armour plate behind them.
@rolffalt219
@rolffalt219 Год назад
The long canon was also an advantage. The long barrel due to the tanks design made precision and range better then basicly all counterparts. I think. #Krigshistoriepodden
@florianstock376
@florianstock376 Год назад
Germany also experimented with turretless designs: During my service in the Bundeswehr, I was stationed for some time in Augustdorf, and in front of our barracks was a prototyp tank: Turretless with dual (!) cannons (if you search "Kampfpanzer 3 (BW) GVT" you find pictures and some story).
@TransGirlGaming
@TransGirlGaming Год назад
Oh yeah the VT1-2 (or potentially earlier version) depending on the version it was either dual 105mms or dual 120mms which should have been able to be elevated and depressed independently if I remember correctly, very interesting prototype!
@foo219
@foo219 Год назад
@@TransGirlGaming I get a mental image of a battleship turret roaming around on its own! Love it!
@TransGirlGaming
@TransGirlGaming Год назад
@@foo219 yeah that's roughly what it was like lol, tho if it was a battle ship you'd have like 280mm+ cannons
@foo219
@foo219 Год назад
@@TransGirlGaming Yeah. More like a gunboat I guess. Man, now I have to model this in From the Depths...
@Gabriel3244
@Gabriel3244 Год назад
1:28 - 1:34 Just a small correction there. The later model Centurion tanks used the 105mm cannon not the 150mm.
@EAcapuccino
@EAcapuccino Год назад
Yay! There it is, the Swedish 🇸🇪 tank we've all been waiting for! Ja! 👍👏👏
@nimrods4380
@nimrods4380 Год назад
Do you know swedish?
@EAcapuccino
@EAcapuccino Год назад
@@nimrods4380 I'm British 🇬🇧 born of Swedish 🇸🇪 descent mate, so a few basics Så, korrekt!
@nimrods4380
@nimrods4380 Год назад
Okej jag förstår.
@EAcapuccino
@EAcapuccino Год назад
@@nimrods4380 And no I didn't use Google translate haha so Tack så mycket herrn!
@nimrods4380
@nimrods4380 Год назад
Varsågod
@jiggsborah7041
@jiggsborah7041 Год назад
Cool looking tank that..Very futuristic looking. I wonder how it would have done on the modern battlefield. The Stug was pretty well represented on the eastern front.
@Ass_of_Amalek
@Ass_of_Amalek Год назад
tank destroyers were trash, there are reasons why they're not athing anymore and neither is this one. especially nowadays, with gun stabilisation and electronic aiming making shooting while driving viable. these things can only shoot forward while driving, proper tanks can shoot all around while driving.
@jiggsborah7041
@jiggsborah7041 Год назад
@@Ass_of_Amalek ..I suppose so. Yet that low profile would make them excellent defensive weapons and their mobility would be a good asset. I dunno. I personally think that heavy armour has become more of a liability than an asset in the modern battlefield. The Ukraine war has revealed this. You would need a hell of a lot of very expensive tanks to maintain momentum. The 2nd world war already proved that. It was said that the T34 never finished a tank of fuel
@Ass_of_Amalek
@Ass_of_Amalek Год назад
@@jiggsborah7041 in WW2, tank destroyers were indeed mostly used for anti-tank ambushes. they would be hidden, fire at enemy tanks, and then get out of there because they would generally lose any exchange of fire. tank destroyers were mostly built because their simpler design made them cheaper and faster to produce than tanks with moving turrets. I like the flattened sharp shape of the stridsvagn, but I think the merkava does that much better. and the stridsvagn is only 10cm flatter than a T-72.
@jiggsborah7041
@jiggsborah7041 Год назад
@@Ass_of_Amalek ...Yes i agree with you about the stug.. that's why vast numbers were produced. The Merkava is a superlative example of heavy armour. Israel is just about the most experienced people out there in armoured warfare. That turret is awsome and the vehicle keeps evolving as more experience is gained.
@Ass_of_Amalek
@Ass_of_Amalek Год назад
@@jiggsborah7041 merkava is my favourite tank entirely because the turret looks like a flying saucer xD
@ZappaSheik
@ZappaSheik Год назад
My dad woke up an early morning in the early 90's. Sleep drunk he started to do breakfast, while preparing he looked out the window and it was a thick fog but something wasn't as it usually is in a small rural village at 05:45. A Stridsvagn S was parked right outside our house in the slope. Of course he went out to look at it cause he is A Russo-Swede and didn't care, while walking up to the main road he turned around to look at the tank and he could hardly see it. S is the most fun of a tank ever, anything is a parking space and that's why we are going to buy one.
@aquaman3874
@aquaman3874 Год назад
2:03 The Strv 103 was not intended to replace the Centurion and never replaced any foreign built tanks. Sweden needed a newer tank to replace the aging fleet of Strv m/42 tanks from late WW2. It eventually replaced the Strv 74 (Strv m/42 with new turret and gun) in the armoured brigades.
@rogerbartlet5720
@rogerbartlet5720 Год назад
A World of Tanks legend!
@EAcapuccino
@EAcapuccino Год назад
Try armoured warfare too at some point
@DavidCurryFilms
@DavidCurryFilms Год назад
I like how it poops the shell case out the behind 😊. Great tank.
@salsheikh4508
@salsheikh4508 Год назад
These have the ability to be BEASTS in the right geographic areas.
@deltavee2
@deltavee2 Год назад
If you are going to get into a gunfight in the forest this is the tank for you. Short wheelbase, low profile, gymnastic for a tank and you could drive it backwards which was a hell of a good idea if you are going to be fighting in Sweden's forests.
@Zeppathy
@Zeppathy Год назад
5:37 In case you ever wondered what a tank pooping looked like. You're welcome.
@moendopi5430
@moendopi5430 Год назад
Is this a reupload? I swear I saw a notification for this the other day.
@sanginius3920
@sanginius3920 Год назад
Sure i watched this the other day, but I've slept since then so im not sure! Uploaded under same title 3 days ago. Problem with the upload now, new information?
@TalesOfWar
@TalesOfWar Год назад
I think they had problems with the thumbnail on the last upload.
@MaskinJunior
@MaskinJunior Год назад
It is not turetless, It has the tracks mouted directly to the turret, so it is hull-less.
@redkite8377
@redkite8377 Год назад
😀 It does not have a cannon turret, however the tank commander has a small turret for an external smoke grenades launchers and a machine gun (M-58).
@MaskinJunior
@MaskinJunior Год назад
@@redkite8377 Well, it was capable of moving the gun as fast, or even faster than contemporary tanks at the time, so it is fair to say it has a turret, but no hull, like the tank museum in Sweden say about the tank.
@foo219
@foo219 Год назад
Genius! I just love the idea of a gun turret roaming around on its own!
@Ulgarth
@Ulgarth Год назад
A little dyslexic today. The Centurion had a 105 not 150mm gun. No biggy. Wow I did not realize it used the 6V53 diesel, that was also used in the M113 and AVGP family of vehicles.
@huwzebediahthomas9193
@huwzebediahthomas9193 Год назад
Below hedge level up lanes, rapid movement. Lateral thinkings. 😎 🇸🇪
@Mrgunsngear
@Mrgunsngear Год назад
Thanks
@badtothebone7613
@badtothebone7613 Год назад
Awesome! More Swedish/Scandinavian tech please!
@konzetsu6068
@konzetsu6068 Год назад
6:31 the slat armour is actually the fence like thingie shown In earlier pictures.
@michaelemory552
@michaelemory552 Год назад
Any fan of this tank wants a role for it if only that it looks so cool. With modern guided munitions, computer assist targeting/re-acquisition I wonder what could be. The low profile and self-revetment in a forest is sensible. I once lifted a good sized snapping turtle from a road and placed it by the wooded lake and on firm mud. Rather than move away, it swiveled and lowered right down into the earth to leave only a bit of snout exposed. I watched and was impressed and disturbed. I also thought of the s tank.
@Lord_Squirrels
@Lord_Squirrels Год назад
Can't wait to see a video about the Bkan 1
@doc70rdwng62
@doc70rdwng62 Год назад
At 1:31 he made a small mistake. Centurion actually had a 105mm gun, not 150mm.
@elroyfudbucker6806
@elroyfudbucker6806 Год назад
Correct. Ever seen the recoil from a 150mm artillery gun?
@poodlescone9700
@poodlescone9700 Год назад
I love the Strv-103. I am working on assembling a model of it right now.
@TheCimbrianBull
@TheCimbrianBull Год назад
The Trumpeter one in 1/35 scale perhaps? 😁
@waynemangan9925
@waynemangan9925 Год назад
Here in the US I rarely get to hear a man of around my age speak in such a proper British accent, also well dressed. Great work on all the vids Sir!!!
@Kottekungen
@Kottekungen Год назад
Ive been told that the Stridsvagn 103 could be used by one person, effecive with two, but sinze only two ppl in a fighting tank would be a strain on any two individuals, so a third member was added, becuse if the war dident kill the two crewmen, they themselfs would. Please correct me if im wrong I would have loved to serve on one of thees beauties, jävla snygg vagn
@JarlBSoD
@JarlBSoD Год назад
Yes, the tank would be fully operational with just 1 crew member though allot less effective for obvious resons :)
@josefstalin4532
@josefstalin4532 Год назад
​@@JarlBSoD What does "fully operational" mean? Because the driver having to climb to the gunners seat every time he has to fire isn't exactly operational right?
@JarlBSoD
@JarlBSoD Год назад
@@josefstalin4532 The driver is the gunner.
@bpomowe224
@bpomowe224 Год назад
@@josefstalin4532 Both the commander and driver stations have a duplicate set of all controls, and gunlaying was done with the driving controls. Only time anyone would need to climb around was to use the radios, as the rear driver was also the radio operator.
@FiveTwoSevenTHR
@FiveTwoSevenTHR Год назад
My favorite tank. I love using it in War Thunder.
@ditzydoo4378
@ditzydoo4378 Год назад
Ah a moment if you please. The Centurian tank had a 17 pdr (76.2mm), a 20 pdr (84mm), then the L7 105mm main gun. Not a 150mm canon, it wasn't the Deathstar. 0~o
@RedXlV
@RedXlV Год назад
That was a typo in the script that he read without noticing.
@ditzydoo4378
@ditzydoo4378 Год назад
@@RedXlV proves the point, never trust the script. you just know some joker was laying in bushes to pounce.
@fr3088
@fr3088 Год назад
The L/62 you refererred to is not a designation but a "caliber length ratio" indicating that the barrel was longer than the centurions standard L/52 gun. The "designation" you refer to is actually L74.
@grahamhunt5847
@grahamhunt5847 Год назад
The video did not go into detail about all of its abilities. 1) In western tanks sharp angles caused by sloping armour wastes space as it is unusable. This either means cramped interiors causing crew stress and inefficiencies like the Russian tanks, or caused bigger tanks (easier to spot and easier to hit) which meant more heavy armour meaning more weight creating a slower underpowered tank with extra costs in manufacturing and maintenance. Instead the S-Tank used the sharply angled and unused space at the front of the hull to put a rubber fuel cell in the wedge area at the front, using the otherwise useless space as fuel storage and as spaced armour. Rubber fuel cells were stuffed elsewhere too in unused spaces adding extra spaced armour and using all free space. 2) The hull was split into 3 separate sealed compartments each acting as spaced armour with the crew being in the third and last compartment, being safe at the back of the tank. 3 layers of spaced armour instead of one as in other tanks. 3) The engine and transmission were in the first two compartments acting as extra spaced armour for the crew. 4) The crew were in the largest compartment and the safest being the last compartment and hardest to hit. No swimming pool and holo deck for the crew but nonetheless roomy and comfortable compartment compared to Russian and other tanks. 5) Using an automatic loader reduced the crew size making for a smaller and cheaper and more manoeuvrable tank. The ride was very uncomfortable though because of the short wheelbase but then longer wheelbases increase the chance of throwing a track when turning. 6) The auto-loader gave it a VERY HIGH rate of fire. 7) Reloading was done in the safety of behind the tank. 8) The plastic fuel drums attached to the sides over the tracks added extra spaced armour. Diesel is very good for this. 9) The high angle of the frontal armour more than doubled the effectiveness of the thin armour, giving reasonable protection without the weight plus the added advantage of a chance of the shells ricocheting off and HEAT rounds not forming a proper penetrating jet. 10) The spade added extra spaced armour as well as for digging a defensive position to fire from providing extra protection and cover. 11) The fence set off HEAT rounds before the shells hit the tank or destabilized the shell’s trajectory causing a chance of ricocheting or HEAT rounds failing to form a penetrating jet properly. 12) The stepped ribs up along the hull front were a very light yet highly effective spaced armour that destabilized the incoming shell causing it to ricochet or break up before hitting the tank’s hull armour. Such an insufficient looking and minor thing but with major effects against HEAT and solid shot beyond belief. 12b) The ribs also stopped shell splinters from sliding up the hull taking out sighting and ranging gear on top. 13) The low height of the tank makes it hard to spot, and hard to hit. During WWII over 50% of hits were to the turret. The S-Tank did away with the turret. Being the size of a large family car instead of a country barn made it a very small target, hard to spot, hard to hit. 14) Had a river-crossing screen that after being erected enabled it to cross any river. No stuck in the mud for this tank. 15) Duplicate controls at all stations allowed a single crewman to drive or fire the tank in emergencies. 16) Designed to fire and kill large numbers of advancing enemy tanks like a shoot-em-up arcade game until the Russian hordes were nearly on top of them then be able to skoot backwards at high speed to another pre-prepared defensive position to start the killing all over again while keeping their hull front (thickest armour) always towards the enemy, as the third crewman faced backwards and drove the tank to the rear at high speed (Most Russian tanks even today only have one reverse gear and can only move in reverse at a couple of miles per hour meaning they can not dodge by quickly backing back into cover in a hull down position, and the Russian driver being in the front of the tank can't see where they are going backwards). Shooting while halted greatly improves accuracy while the rushing Russian horde either had to stop to fire and make themselves a target or fire on the move and have an inaccurate fire, as the Russian fire control/gun stabilisation/ turret stabilization, ballistic computers, range finders, etc., we're either nonexistent or no better than their WWII tanks. 17) Highly efficient and cheap diesel engine plus a gas turbine engine for that super power and speed when needed. Only the US Abrams tank has a gas turbine engine too, and it earned the nickname ‘The Whispering Death’. But it took the US decades to add an aux power plant to run when idle to keep the turret powered and operating, as a turbo engine spins at a constant gas-guzzling rate even in idle. The S-Tank had the best of both worlds. 18) having the gun mounted so the breech was at the back of the tank instead of the middle meant a longer barrel could be used and most of the barrel was protected. 19) Like hot women and hot sports cars, sexy makes for a very dangerous and fast tank, and the S-Tank has it all, in spades.
@Mithirael
@Mithirael Год назад
One note, 12b is correct, but 12 is not. The ribs were simply welded in place, and would have no noticeable impact on the shells at the time. They were only for protecting the gear on top of the tank.
@martinstallard2742
@martinstallard2742 Год назад
1:18 background 3:01 design 7:23 engine and performance 9:22 flaws 10:05 service
@martinstallard2742
@martinstallard2742 Год назад
5:38
@spectralcoffee5177
@spectralcoffee5177 Год назад
Great video mate, thanks for the effort put into this!
@chugachuga9242
@chugachuga9242 Год назад
While there were some centurions modified for experimental or demolition roles with their guns getting up to even a bore diameter of 183mm, most main line centurion variants had either a 84mm or a 105mm gun, with Sweden never operation any centurions that had guns bigger than 105mm.
@cynicaltroll6057
@cynicaltroll6057 Год назад
This tank on the defensive side of a battlefield today, has so many possibilities of being a very effective weapon for sure. 👍
@dwarfy_sweden
@dwarfy_sweden Год назад
Big problem is that the gas turbine light up as a Christmas tree nowadays in thermal vision and are easy to spot from far away
@Mithirael
@Mithirael Год назад
Unfortunately, time has left the gun in the dust, and while it was capable of surviving direct hits from expected combat ranges from most contemporary APDS, today's APFSDS would slice right through the entire thing like a hot knife through butter. It is of course possible to modernise it, but it would be far more costly than what you would get out of it.
@ghadanouairia6125
@ghadanouairia6125 15 часов назад
Stridsvagn means tank in swedish so it souneds like you said tank 103 when you say it's name in swedish. I LOVE sewdish engenering.
@maplesyrup7959
@maplesyrup7959 Год назад
Apart from Ikea,Saab (partly dead company) Koeinigsiegg, Volvo, meatballs and the author - Stieg Larsson - I wasn't aware of any other significant thing made in and by Sweden 🇸🇪 Now this tank is added on to that list! 👍👍
@lasskinn474
@lasskinn474 Год назад
Nokia is not swedish. Ericcson is. Edit: they export a bunch of weapons to usa etc too.
@TalesOfWar
@TalesOfWar Год назад
Saab is still a thing, just not the automotive branch. Their defence division still lives on.
@PrinceAlhorian
@PrinceAlhorian Год назад
SAAB still exist, they build fighting aircraft like the SAAB Gripen, which is powered by a Volvo turbine.
@terryv.2531
@terryv.2531 Год назад
Never heard of Bofors?
@maplesyrup7959
@maplesyrup7959 Год назад
@@lasskinn474 That latter half - Interesting... 😮 The former - Damn I stand corrected Nokia was/is Finnish! 🇫🇮
@qwertyuio266
@qwertyuio266 Год назад
When the STRV 121s(Leopard 2) came into service the STRV 103s beat the crap out of them in the last exercises. A few years later it would have been the opposite.
@alfrede.neuman9082
@alfrede.neuman9082 Год назад
Small corrections: HEAT stands for High Explosive Anti-Tank, and NOT “High Energy”. Secondly, the L7 is the “Royal Ordnance L7” not “Royal Armament L7”.
@Pekkamannen
@Pekkamannen Год назад
För Kung och Fosterland! 🇸🇪 Thank you for showing our beloved Strv 103!
@sweden4thewin
@sweden4thewin Год назад
Great video, thank you
@user-mv6he6gl8m
@user-mv6he6gl8m Год назад
Tanks with turrets of that era had to stop in order to shoot straight so getting rid of the turret wasn't a big disadvantage but a great plus.
@tvgerbil1984
@tvgerbil1984 Год назад
The Swedes already had Centurion Mk5s and then Mk10s with stablized main gun in that era. They could fire their main guns on the move while the Stridsvagn 103s couldn't.
@johanmetreus1268
@johanmetreus1268 Год назад
@@tvgerbil1984 The 103 could fire on the move at distances up to 200 metres, while the Centurions could do the same at 400 metres with the same expected accuracy. Stabilisation made it a lot faster to take accurate shot after coming to a halt, but main rule for all tanks of the era was that if you to actually hit, you stop your tank.
@Ragedaonenlonely
@Ragedaonenlonely Год назад
@@tvgerbil1984 The 103 is fully capable of firing its gun on the move. It just can't do so accurately. Which the Centurions couldn't either for that matter. Hence the practice of stopping for an aimed shot to actually hit anything with any kind of reliability. The stabilizers of the time weren't good enough to allow for any kind of guarantee of a hit at combat ranges.
@tvgerbil1984
@tvgerbil1984 Год назад
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RcRpeSSwpvE.html Maybe the Swedes used their Centurions differently but the latter marks of Centurions should have decent stabilizer installed.
@josealcantara3996
@josealcantara3996 Год назад
Flaws??? Strv 103 didn´t have any flaws... It was marvelous
@andrewspohrer7183
@andrewspohrer7183 6 месяцев назад
They may have increased it's viability for a little longer by keeping a few low explosive "blanks" to clear the dirt sqwibbies. It'd be a fast, cheap, and easy way to clean out barrels and allow them to hold off the deep cleaning until it was more convenient to do so. Just an idea tho, not really applicable now that it's been retired so long. Something about the increased visual acuity of looking behind one's self.
@petter5721
@petter5721 Год назад
Sven Berge, the father of the S-tank later helped the Israelis to develop the Merkava.
@MrNebbers
@MrNebbers Год назад
How about a megaproject on the Severn Barrage? Massive opportunity for tidal power... if it ever gets built
@282sleeper
@282sleeper Год назад
This is true. I live in a swedish county that is called the county of a 1000 lakes. And with lots of lakes comes alot of swamps. Hence the specialisation of equipment and machinery.
@thehorriblebright
@thehorriblebright Год назад
I would be so bold as to state that "battle wagon" would be the best translation.
@Michael_OBrian
@Michael_OBrian Год назад
Any chance of a video on the Merkava family?
@markusb3712
@markusb3712 Год назад
I think Chieftain from Inside the Cheiftain's Hatch did a better job of explaining both the history and functions of this tank. Not once was Sven Berge mentioned in this video. You could also watch the British Tank Museum's video as well.
@foo219
@foo219 Год назад
He did, though he is a tank specialist, too.
@Hilariumosis
@Hilariumosis Год назад
Behind some elevated terrain you woudn't see it but the gun smoke, shooting at it and the shells either fly over or hit the ground cover. Nightmare ambush tank. Flanking it or strike it vertically using mortar/artillery or air strike only options. But the S tank crew knows this so won't linger too long in one place. Hit and run.
@Schmorgus
@Schmorgus Год назад
Alright, it's done... So, found any weaknesses? Well... It can get uncomfortable... That's the most Swedish thing I've ever heard about military situations.
@raintubalinal5380
@raintubalinal5380 Год назад
My favorite door stopper
@zaubermaus8190
@zaubermaus8190 Год назад
ha. it's back! what was wrong with the first video?
@kentnilsson465
@kentnilsson465 Год назад
Number one thing that is being overlooked is the perception that the S tank couldnt fire while moving when other tanks could. While it is true that the S-tank couldnt fire while moving, neither could other tanks, at least not efficiently enough to do so. It was no until the late 80s that regular tanks actually had a good stabilized gun that could fire while moving. Test by the British army during the early 70s showed that the S-tank was just narrowlingly slower at first shot that a Chieftain.
@anariasiseve5349
@anariasiseve5349 Год назад
The pronounciation of "Kanonenjagdpanzer" made me burst out laughing :D
@iansheppard6735
@iansheppard6735 Год назад
Tanks a lot 😁
@westerngothia59
@westerngothia59 Год назад
Make a video about Karlsborg Swedens backup Capital.
@TheRedLocker
@TheRedLocker Год назад
You manage to release this on my birthday, great day to be born and better to be in the swedish armed forces! :D
@jayburn00
@jayburn00 Год назад
Think you got something wrong, no tank had 150mm guns (kv2 had a 152mm, but no production western tank that was called a tank had a 150mm). Largest common gun in the west was and still is (while becoming even more common) 120mm. In the 60s, tank guns were usually 90mm or 105mm on Western tanks.
@Ynffy
@Ynffy Год назад
Reading tip if you want to know more: "Strv 103 Photo guide till stridsvagn 103 "S-tank"" by the Swedish Armour Historical Society. Text in Swedish and English. It is probably out of print but you may find it on eBay or at armour museums.
@louhodo5761
@louhodo5761 Год назад
A few other minor corrections. It had a 105mm not 150mm cannon. Also... HEAT stands for High Explosive Anti Tank. Not High Energy.
@RedXlV
@RedXlV Год назад
You're mistaken, the Strv 103 isn't a tank without a turret. It's a tank without a hull. Instead, the tracks are mounted directly to the turret. :P
@Sevo-
@Sevo- Год назад
The Canadian Avro Aero is an interesting one, The story is the us bought it and burned the plans. I believe the fastest jet of its time. The alloy used on almost aircraft was invented for this Jet. 1 is MIA to this day stolen by a pilot.
@johanmetreus1268
@johanmetreus1268 Год назад
About the Kranvagn (KRV) , the issue never was light armour but armament. HEAT-rounds, basically a cone of metal with explosives on one side, that on detonation gets formed into a metal spear travelling at 6000-10000 metres per second, was regarded the future of anti-armour, but it has a few particulars. One of them is that the penetration is proportional to the diameter of the cone, siply put the wider the cone, the longer the resulting spear. The second is that rotation (like the one used to stabilise projectiles) distorts the spear and makes it less efficient, which is why the Soviet tanks who heavily relied on HEAT had smoth bore barrels in their guns. The Swedish army wanted a HEAT round that was cheap, accurate with good penetration and short travel time even at long distance. Bofors engineers never managed to solve this, as fast shells require really fancy fuzes to be able to detonate the charge in the fraction of a second between impact and the shell smashing itself to pieces against the armour... while a highly accurate shell would rotate so fast that the penetration got severely reduced. Before a round was decided on, no one knew what cannon to pick (imagine finding out that the gun you installed in all you tanks are the wrong type for your shells!), and without a final gun, there was no point in making a turret as the exact shape and construction depended on what weight and dimensions the gun would have. In the end, one of the KRV chassies built became a test bed for the S-tank suspension, while the other was rebuilt as a SPH, that served as a concept for what became the Bandkanon 1.
@johanmetreus1268
@johanmetreus1268 Год назад
Also, Stridsvagn 2000 never got further than a wooden mockup. Here is a clarification to be made, in 1980 the Swedish army requested the S-tanks and Centurions to be replaced with a future tank expected to be in service past the year 2000. For convenience, this unknown design was referred to as strv 2000 in official correspondance. Budget restrictions (these were the years of high inflation that followed the energy crisis) saw the Army make due with a REnovation and Modification program of the existing tanks instead. The REMO finally brought the S-tank up to the standard it was intended to have, but they were still fairly old, and originally only intended to be in service for 10-20 years before being replaced as the technological development rapidly progressed. In the late 1980s, the usual suspects (Bofors, Hägglunds et all) were involved in a pre-studies of a new, domestic tank together with FMV, the military procurement agency. Different configurations were considered: turretless, conventional turret, unmanned turret and so forth), and a wooden mockup of the most promising alternative was made under the name Stridsvagn 2000. Meanwhile, the Berlin wall came down, Germany reunited and the Swedes got their hands on some T-72s. Results in the gun-tests were shocking, as the modern longrod penetrators went straight through the Swedish tanks, front to rear. Mobility was also far higher in the bogs and forests up north than predicted, further empathised with the trials of Abrams, LeClerc and Leopard 2. Swedish tanks were not just outdated, they were obsolete. Projected development time for the Stridsvagn 2000 was between 4 to 8 years, and that was its doom. The replacement was needed soonest possible, and Germany not only have a really good tank they were willing to licence, but could also offer stopgap Leopard 2A4 to be used meanwhile.
@xmeda
@xmeda Год назад
1:30 150mm gun? You mean 105mm gun.. cmon
@linkizlinkizzon8427
@linkizlinkizzon8427 Год назад
JAS 39 GRIPEN next Simon plz
@aw3s0me12
@aw3s0me12 Год назад
without google,... as a german... I would translate it as: German: *Streitwagen* Sweden: Strids-vagen >> Both consisting of 2 words Streit- (Strids-) & Wagen (Vagen) >> Direct word for word eng. translation: Strife-/Fight- & Vehicle/Car
@stefankarlsson7467
@stefankarlsson7467 Год назад
Sweden: Stridsvagn
@aw3s0me12
@aw3s0me12 Год назад
@@stefankarlsson7467 i know, just added the "-" to better see the word "vag(e)n" after "Strids". *Etymology:* From Old Norse vagn, from Proto-Germanic *wagnaz (“cart, wagon”), from Proto-Indo-European *woǵʰnos, from *weǵʰ- Interesting how close those word combos are between German & Swedish. One can clearly see similarity and find fast *the context* of each, if you see the written words. It is clear to see both Languages are based from one *Proto-Language* . Which is again, realy interesing to me.
@MrAnonymousme10
@MrAnonymousme10 Год назад
one of my favourite tank
@isaacmasinde1994
@isaacmasinde1994 Год назад
Known for being early to this channel 😂😂 lol
Далее
MBT 70: The Battle Tank Ahead of it's Time
20:14
Просмотров 266 тыс.
FOUR 'Great' WWII Tanks That Were Actually Terrible
19:46
GIANT Gummy Worm Pt.6 #shorts
00:46
Просмотров 47 млн
Tank Chats #117 | Stridsvagn 103 | The Tank Museum
26:52
Tank Building: Swedish Tanks
24:10
Просмотров 130 тыс.
The Panther: Hitler's (Terrible) T-34
17:26
Просмотров 139 тыс.
Inside the Chieftain's Hatch: Strv 103C part 1
25:44
Просмотров 1,3 млн
The Kubelwagen: The Nazi Jeep
19:48
Просмотров 332 тыс.
The Weirdest Main Battle Tank
15:59
Просмотров 474 тыс.