Тёмный

Structuralism and Functionalism (Intro Psych Tutorial #5) 

PsychExamReview
Подписаться 68 тыс.
Просмотров 132 тыс.
50% 1

In this video I describe two early approaches to psychology; the structuralism of Wilhelm Wundt and the functionalism of William James.
Need more explanation? Get my full psychology guide here: amzn.to/2eTqm5s
Video transcript:
Hi, I'm Michael Corayer and this is Psych Exam Review where I answer common questions and explain the key concepts in psychology.
In this video I'm going to talk about some early approaches to psychology. We're going to start with a guy named Wilhelm Wundt and Wundt lived from 1832 to 1920, here's a picture of him here and he's generally credited with starting the world's first experimental psychology lab at the University of Leipzig.
Now Wundt was a structuralist and structuralism was an approach to psychology that involved trying to break consciousness down, to try to break it into manageable parts that could be studied. And the idea was if you could understand all parts or the structure of consciousness then you would have a better understanding of consciousness itself. The way that structuralists did this, one technique that they used, was known as introspection.
Introspection involved participants coming into the lab and reporting their experience. So you might go into a structuralist lab and they'd show you some stimulus and they might ask what is it like to see this red circle, how do you describe this experience?
And the problem with this approach, as you might guess, is that it's too subjective so it might be interesting to hear what it's like for you to see this red circle but if I ask 100 people I'm probably going to end up with 100 different answers and this is gonna make it very difficult to analyze the data in any sort of meaningful way.
So structuralism kind of faded and another view around the same time supported by William James, an American psychologist you can see here who lived from 1842 to 1910. William James supported the idea that we have traits and abilities, but rather than try to understand the experience of these traits and abilities we should remember that they serve a purpose, and this approach was known as functionalism.
So rather than asking what is it like to see a red circle, a functionalist approach would say why do we see red? What purpose does color vision serve, how does it help in some way? And James thought that would help us to understand consciousness more than trying to break it down into pieces which he thought couldn't really be done.
And as you might guess James was heavily influenced by the ideas of Charles Darwin who had published On the Origin of Species in 1859 which gave his view of how natural selection occurred. So while there's not really any functionalist psychologists today, this general approach of looking for the purpose of traits and behaviors continues in the form of evolutionary psychology.
That's structuralism and functionalism, if you found this helpful please like the video and subscribe to the channel for more. Thanks for watching!

Опубликовано:

 

11 ноя 2016

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 113   
@critgens
@critgens 6 лет назад
truly amazing how you explained 2 views on psychology I have been struggling with for days in less than 4 minutes, thanks! :-D
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 6 лет назад
No problem, glad to hear that it was helpful!
@clarenceoliveriii
@clarenceoliveriii 4 года назад
Yo fr, I’m about to do a pop quiz and he summed this up better than many professors💪🏽💯🙏🏽🔥thanks!
@nessasnursingdiaries5018
@nessasnursingdiaries5018 3 года назад
@@clarenceoliveriii is this acceptable knowledge at university level
@clarenceoliveriii
@clarenceoliveriii 3 года назад
@@nessasnursingdiaries5018 Mann, sadly I don’t think so but these institutions just allow professors to waste time instead of getting to the point clearly
@karmaav3273
@karmaav3273 3 года назад
Understandable and useful for freshman student like me taking up BA Psychology. Thank you. Keep uploading.
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 3 года назад
Glad it's useful, best of luck in your studies and let me know if you have any questions!
@sankhayanbhaumik6452
@sankhayanbhaumik6452 3 года назад
The way you explain it is really fantastic.....Thank you so much......
@leilaniahkoi
@leilaniahkoi 5 лет назад
Mahalo for simplifying thesis two terms for me. I feel much more confident going to take my quiz today.
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 5 лет назад
You're welcome, good luck on your quiz!
@patricegrant7036
@patricegrant7036 4 года назад
wow you just made my presentation perfect! Because now i understand!
@despacitokcm1986
@despacitokcm1986 Год назад
Young teacher, brevity and clarity are ur hallmarks. Cannot be better explained. Thanks a lot...I too am a novice at psychology and had been struggling to get things into me. But u opened up a whole new dimension to learning and understanding! Well done sir..
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview Год назад
Glad to hear that, hope you keep learning and improving!
@melisaamorales
@melisaamorales 2 года назад
thank you for this video! it helped me so much. i was having a lot of difficulty understanding both for the past week and your explanation was perfectly clear and understandable:)
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 2 года назад
Glad to hear it was helpful for you!
@babynamz
@babynamz 3 года назад
took my prof 20 slides to explain this and this vid took 3 mins with better explanation :))
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 3 года назад
Glad it was helpful!
@syamilysasi8677
@syamilysasi8677 3 года назад
I have just begun learning psychology formally and these words are completely unfamiliar and confusing for me. But by watching this video, i could really grasp the concept clearly! Nicely done,very informative.. thank you so much sir!
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 3 года назад
You're welcome, glad it was helpful!
@agg4300
@agg4300 4 года назад
Thank you for the thorough explanation of this. I read my History and Systems book and it just did not make sense to me. I get it now! Thank you again.
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 4 года назад
You're welcome!
@emblagsk
@emblagsk Год назад
you're explaining in a great way ! I actually understand this now. Thank you!
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview Год назад
You're welcome!
@sanguine_viper3531
@sanguine_viper3531 3 года назад
Your explanation was soooo good, sir. Better than the wall of text crap I read everywhere and i could not understand. God I love you
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 2 года назад
Glad it was helpful!
@Nicole-wo5nb
@Nicole-wo5nb 2 года назад
I have been stuck with this since day 1 of my class and your explanation is the only one that I actually understand. I was starting to think that I was too dumb to not get it after watching several crash courses. Thank you so much
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 2 года назад
You're welcome!
@margaretcunningham7146
@margaretcunningham7146 Год назад
I'm in the same boat, but a year after you!! I've a notebook full of terms that I need definitions of and I'm only on module one!!!
@zulakhabegum4667
@zulakhabegum4667 4 года назад
Please Upload a video on extra sensory perception (esp)
@mayankmehta2713
@mayankmehta2713 2 года назад
You are really doing great work!
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 2 года назад
Thanks!
@cobbbytv4053
@cobbbytv4053 3 года назад
That’s perfect ❤️
@saraostadi7606
@saraostadi7606 2 года назад
You are a LIFESAVER! thank you so much!
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 2 года назад
You're welcome!
@amirmuizzudinmohddin166
@amirmuizzudinmohddin166 3 года назад
thank you sir for the good explanation, i very appreciate your video
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 3 года назад
You're welcome!
@rebeccajones8555
@rebeccajones8555 2 года назад
thank you for this!
@umenk3637
@umenk3637 2 года назад
this just saved me honestly thank u so much
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 2 года назад
You're welcome!
@brianwallace6112
@brianwallace6112 Год назад
Came for the linguistics (the Skinner and Chomsky vid) and stayed for the psychology, perception, etc. You're an excellent presenter.
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview Год назад
Thanks!
@joshthesage7093
@joshthesage7093 2 года назад
Fuck yeah~~~ that was my reaction to experiencing this video, your content, the way you explain things and write them down after explaining the key concepts is invaluable!!! It is truly helpful :) Thank you.
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 2 года назад
You're welcome!
@Nafraz
@Nafraz 3 года назад
well explained
@baxtermoonga9145
@baxtermoonga9145 2 года назад
Thank you it was helpful
@sadibouchra686
@sadibouchra686 3 года назад
This is So helpful thankkk U a bunch U saved My life!!
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 3 года назад
You're welcome!
@karlasilva7522
@karlasilva7522 3 года назад
This is truly so helpful, you explained them both so clearly
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 3 года назад
Glad to hear that, thanks for commenting!
@starsandmoon855
@starsandmoon855 3 года назад
What was the criticism on the structuralism and functionalism.
@olin_1
@olin_1 13 дней назад
Amazing
@MysticMel90
@MysticMel90 3 года назад
Hey love your channel!!... do you have any videos on behaviorism and John B Watson or B.F Skinner and or any videos on psychoanalysis and Sigmund Freud
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 3 года назад
Glad to hear that! You can find a full playlist on learning theory and behaviorism here: ru-vid.com/group/PLkKvotUGCyLdWmS-YBp58DTmjN3Q9nih0 as well as several videos about Freud at the start of this playlist on personality: ru-vid.com/group/PLkKvotUGCyLe8owpX2t0RMSbOEzCoY7hG
@Carlos-oi3tj
@Carlos-oi3tj Год назад
thank you this helped me
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview Год назад
Glad to hear that
@nadialino7282
@nadialino7282 4 года назад
Thank you!
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 4 года назад
You're welcome!
@ajmarr5671
@ajmarr5671 4 года назад
Functionalism: The principle that form follows function (as in evolutionary psychology) rather than function following form (as in learning theory, affective neuroscience), thus arriving at principles that are formal but not functional, and psychological principles that are true to form, dysfunctional. from Dr. Mezmer’s Dictionary of Bad Psychology
@idreessayed165
@idreessayed165 4 года назад
Thank u sir 👍
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 4 года назад
You're welcome!
@aditipaul2906
@aditipaul2906 3 года назад
Thankyou sir!!
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 3 года назад
You're welcome!
@sanaabelhimer2675
@sanaabelhimer2675 6 лет назад
How did Darwin's theory influenced William in specific and functionalism in general?
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 6 лет назад
Hi Sanaa, William James referred to Darwin's work regularly in his writing on a number of topics. In general, functionalism was about understanding the purpose for particular traits and evolutionary theory provided an explanation for how those purposeful traits would have been selected for over time.
@sanaabelhimer2675
@sanaabelhimer2675 6 лет назад
+PsychExamReview Thank you
@aysemelikeagirman8143
@aysemelikeagirman8143 4 года назад
OMG this helped me a lot thank youu
@evanzack2142
@evanzack2142 3 года назад
thank you!
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 3 года назад
You're welcome!
@Matterful
@Matterful Год назад
Hi Michael. Is there a recommendation you could give me to read about the development of these approaches throughout the 20th century? Thanks for the summary!
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview Год назад
Sure, this excellent resource site has a number of original papers organized by topic if you want to read more: psychclassics.yorku.ca/topic.htm
@Matterful
@Matterful Год назад
@@PsychExamReview Thanks Michael!
@shubhankar6283
@shubhankar6283 5 лет назад
Add on to this video about Gestalt, Behavioural, Psychodynamic and Humanistic approaches.
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 5 лет назад
Hi, I didn't describe these approaches in this unit because they are each addressed in more detail in future units. Here's a few related videos that might be helpful for understanding each of these approaches: Gestalt: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-lqque_JJRMo.html Behaviorism: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-E6Qs0Az2au4.html Psychoanalytic & Psychodynamic: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-tRDUlxc6VDw.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-GrjJyvNpQ3I.html Humanistic: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-K3-VC-VH45A.html I hope this helps!
@Duncain-Data-Boy
@Duncain-Data-Boy 4 года назад
Describe functionalism and structuralism and their influences on behaviorism and cognitive psychology. help out
@aichaakachab2451
@aichaakachab2451 9 месяцев назад
Structuralism I believe was established by Edward Titchner. Wilhelm Wundt established the first formal lab for research in Psychology.
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 9 месяцев назад
You're correct that Titchener played an important role in formalizing structuralism and developing techniques for introspection. This was based on his work with Wundt, his translations of Wundt's works, as well as his own research at Cornell.
@h.m1653
@h.m1653 4 года назад
Mr.Michael Corayer teaches you how to be a good teacher *-*
@Mikeoldyo
@Mikeoldyo 2 года назад
A pretty long question here, how is asking the participants to describe an experience when exposed to a stimulus through introspection correlated to "breaking the consciousness down into manageable parts to analyze"? What are the "parts" here? Would anymore care to enlighten please?
@tiyakashash4122
@tiyakashash4122 2 года назад
hello, i asked my psych professor and he said that wilhelm wundut basically wanted to break down and analyse different parts of the brain as to how chemists break down elements and understand the chemical compounds which relates to the approach of structuralism. i hope this helps:)
@kentong9514
@kentong9514 3 года назад
What is the structure of the mind? what are the components of the mind?
@rohanbhalerao2495
@rohanbhalerao2495 4 года назад
will u pl. Explain with one more example
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 4 года назад
Sure, another way you could think of the difference between structuralism and functionalism would be to think about an emotion like fear. A structuralist approach would focus more on the elements of the mind that are involved in the experience of fear, while a functionalist approach would focus more on how fear serves a purpose by having an effect on behavior.
@rohanbhalerao2495
@rohanbhalerao2495 4 года назад
@@PsychExamReview thanks
@terrielovingood4852
@terrielovingood4852 2 года назад
@@PsychExamReview Boom. It just clicked for me with that example. Really hating this current course. It feels like they were seriously overthinking back then. 😂. Thank you!
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 2 года назад
@@terrielovingood4852 You're welcome!
@rutvikmakwana8973
@rutvikmakwana8973 5 лет назад
It's Williams James
@prereflective
@prereflective 4 года назад
The problem with structuralism wasn't that it was too subjective, on the contrary; it was too objective. Wilhelm Wundt tried to quantify behavior into physiological patterns
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 4 года назад
This is a good point and it's true that Wundt wanted to make psychology more scientific and objective. Perhaps the larger problem was trying to make the leap from studies of things like reaction time and visual perception to understanding consciousness.
@chaemomileeee
@chaemomileeee 3 года назад
hey can you elaborate on this, i quite do not understand what you have just said. thank you :)
@matthewrichey2727
@matthewrichey2727 5 лет назад
If structuralism and functionalism have since faded, why are they still relevant to psychology today?
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 5 лет назад
Great question! I think that learning about these early approaches can serve two purposes beyond just being historical trivia. The first is that they can show us which approaches didn't quite work as well as planned and we can better understand why these needed to be modified (this should also help keep us humble, as we can clearly see how even brilliant minds of the past have erred). The second is that we can see how things that did work have been adopted and incorporated into modern approaches and this can help us to better understand these approaches and where they came from.
@matthewrichey2727
@matthewrichey2727 5 лет назад
@@PsychExamReview Thank you!
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 5 лет назад
@@matthewrichey2727 You're welcome!
@mariebryche7832
@mariebryche7832 3 года назад
if i pass my exam i'll say it's because of u
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 3 года назад
The credit will be yours for putting in the time studying, best of luck!
@mariebryche7832
@mariebryche7832 3 года назад
@@PsychExamReview update: i passed ! Needed 50% to pass and I diiiiddddd !! :) thank you very much ✨
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 3 года назад
@@mariebryche7832 That's great, congratulations!
@sanyasingh5389
@sanyasingh5389 3 года назад
was freud a structuralist or a functionalist?
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 3 года назад
I don't think Freud fits into either category particularly well. In some ways his approach to identifying parts of the conscious/unconscious mind could be seen as similar to a structuralist approach, though his emphasis on resulting behavioral effects and explaining why symptoms were occurring and how they could be treated (even if incorrect) could be seen as a bit more pragmatic/functionalist.
@carlgustavjung1343
@carlgustavjung1343 3 года назад
seninle şu konuların üzerinden bir geçelim tatlı çocuk.
@draidichirine1645
@draidichirine1645 Год назад
you are sweet i understand everything
@GummBo3
@GummBo3 4 года назад
Wilhelm Wundt wasn't a structuralist tho, He openly denied reduction and atomism. Also a different common misconception you mention about him was that the used introspection often. It was a small part of his research, he rarely used it in fact. Titchener a seperate psychologist said he learned introspection from Wundt and was a structuralist is the reason for this misconception. READ INTO IT
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 4 года назад
You're correct that Edward Titchener was a greater advocate of a structuralist approach and also used introspection to a greater degree in trying to identify elements of consciousness so I should have mentioned him in this video. He also brought Wundt's ideas to the US and translated his early work, though perhaps in a way that was more in line with Titchener's own views. I'd also add that both Wundt and Titchener were critical of "naive introspection" and believed that subjects needed training in order to be able to provide useful introspective reports, which I also could have clarified a bit here. Thanks for commenting!
@nadrey22
@nadrey22 4 года назад
Hello! May I have a copy of the reading you've mentioned? I'm interested to know more about that. Thank you!
@GummBo3
@GummBo3 4 года назад
@@nadrey22 A Conceptual History of Psychology after John D. Greenwood
@nadrey22
@nadrey22 4 года назад
@@GummBo3 thank you!
@aloatelia3091
@aloatelia3091 Год назад
Wundt was not a structuralist.His student Tichener was
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview Год назад
You're right that things are actually a little more complicated. Titchener translated a lot of Wundt's work and brought it to the US and this may have led to Wundt being seen as more of a structuralist than he actually was. Thanks for commenting!
@paulflemming3075
@paulflemming3075 Год назад
Chur my bro
@BarelyManaging
@BarelyManaging 2 года назад
No disrespect but you look like an off brand Ben Barnes. God bless for saving my ass.
@PsychExamReview
@PsychExamReview 2 года назад
Haha, glad I can help!
Далее
Maybe i need to add instructions @popflexactive
00:14
Watson’s Theory of Behaviourism
5:50
Просмотров 542 тыс.