Stunning Animated Video Effects Using Free Software 

dang it... i need one XD

Agreed. Gotta have it

Loool

colorful linux meme merch please. I will buy loads

I'd interject for a moment. What you're reffering to as GNU/Linux in real live is just Linux. Calling the entire Linux as GNU/Linux is technically incorrect, because not all distros use gnu software. I hope you learned that debian should be called as GNU/Linux, but the whole Linux should be just Linux as there are distros like alpine that hates gnu and don't uses gnu software.

I'd interject for a moment. What you're reffering to as GNU/Linux in real live is just Linux. Calling the entire Linux as GNU/Linux is technically incorrect, because not all distros use gnu software. I hope you learned that debian should be called as GNU/Linux, but the whole Linux should be just Linux as there are distros like alpine that hates gnu and don't uses gnu software.

@@glowiak3430 i use alpine with GNU software. :]

😄

l0l !!!!

I cannot configure debian, because I can configure Devuan, which makes more sense

I'd interject for a moment. What you're reffering to as GNU/Linux in real live is just Linux. Calling the entire Linux as GNU/Linux is technically incorrect, because not all distros use gnu software. I hope you learned that debian should be called as GNU/Linux, but the whole Linux should be just Linux as there are distros like alpine that hates gnu and don't uses gnu software.

Post installation debian configuration is hard for me because of lack of proper documentation unlike arch linux.

@@rishirajsaikia1323 I can't configure debian, cuz it doesn't have any drivers (even with nonfree software :O), and that's why I live Devuan. It's complety free and has many drivers (without enabling nonfree and contrib repos).

My pleasure. :D

😃

I'd interject for a moment. What you're reffering to as GNU/Linux in real live is just Linux. Calling the entire Linux as GNU/Linux is technically incorrect, because not all distros use gnu software. I hope you learned that debian should be called as GNU/Linux, but the whole Linux should be just Linux as there are distros like alpine that hates gnu and don't uses gnu software.

@@glowiak3430 why are you commenting this to me ? I was just suggesting a better program to use for these kind of graphics.

@@renealbrechtsen9743 No, Richard, it's 'Linux', not 'GNU/Linux'. The most important contributions that the FSF made to Linux were the creation of the GPL and the GCC compiler. Those are fine and inspired products. GCC is a monumental achievement and has earned you, RMS, and the Free Software Foundation countless kudos and much appreciation. Following are some reasons for you to mull over, including some already answered in your FAQ. One guy, Linus Torvalds, used GCC to make his operating system (yes, Linux is an OS -- more on this later). He named it 'Linux' with a little help from his friends. Why doesn't he call it GNU/Linux? Because he wrote it, with more help from his friends, not you. You named your stuff, I named my stuff -- including the software I wrote using GCC -- and Linus named his stuff. The proper name is Linux because Linus Torvalds says so. Linus has spoken. Accept his authority. To do otherwise is to become a nag. You don't want to be known as a nag, do you? (An operating system) != (a distribution). Linux is an operating system. By my definition, an operating system is that software which provides and limits access to hardware resources on a computer. That definition applies whereever you see Linux in use. However, Linux is usually distributed with a collection of utilities and applications to make it easily configurable as a desktop system, a server, a development box, or a graphics workstation, or whatever the user needs. In such a configuration, we have a Linux (based) distribution. Therein lies your strongest argument for the unwieldy title 'GNU/Linux' (when said bundled software is largely from the FSF). Go bug the distribution makers on that one. Take your beef to Red Hat, Mandrake, and Slackware. At least there you have an argument. Linux alone is an operating system that can be used in various applications without any GNU software whatsoever. Embedded applications come to mind as an obvious example. Next, even if we limit the GNU/Linux title to the GNU-based Linux distributions, we run into another obvious problem. XFree86 may well be more important to a particular Linux installation than the sum of all the GNU contributions. More properly, shouldn't the distribution be called XFree86/Linux? Or, at a minimum, XFree86/GNU/Linux? Of course, it would be rather arbitrary to draw the line there when many other fine contributions go unlisted. Yes, I know you've heard this one before. Get used to it. You'll keep hearing it until you can cleanly counter it. You seem to like the lines-of-code metric. There are many lines of GNU code in a typical Linux distribution. You seem to suggest that (more LOC) == (more important). However, I submit to you that raw LOC numbers do not directly correlate with importance. I would suggest that clock cycles spent on code is a better metric. For example, if my system spends 90% of its time executing XFree86 code, XFree86 is probably the single most important collection of code on my system. Even if I loaded ten times as many lines of useless bloatware on my system and I never excuted that bloatware, it certainly isn't more important code than XFree86. Obviously, this metric isn't perfect either, but LOC really, really sucks. Please refrain from using it ever again in supporting any argument. Last, I'd like to point out that we Linux and GNU users shouldn't be fighting among ourselves over naming other people's software. But what the heck, I'm in a bad mood now. I think I'm feeling sufficiently obnoxious to make the point that GCC is so very famous and, yes, so very useful only because Linux was developed. In a show of proper respect and gratitude, shouldn't you and everyone refer to GCC as 'the Linux compiler'? Or at least, 'Linux GCC'? Seriously, where would your masterpiece be without Linux? Languishing with the HURD? If there is a moral buried in this rant, maybe it is this: Be grateful for your abilities and your incredible success and your considerable fame. Continue to use that success and fame for good, not evil. Also, be especially grateful for Linux' huge contribution to that success. You, RMS, the Free Software Foundation, and GNU software have reached their current high profiles largely on the back of Linux. You have changed the world. Now, go forth and don't be a nag. Thanks for listening.

@@glowiak3430 comedic genius

you can use the appimage of it.

Oh

I'd interject for a moment. What you're reffering to as GNU/Linux in real live is just Linux. Calling the entire Linux as GNU/Linux is technically incorrect, because not all distros use gnu software. I hope you learned that debian should be called as GNU/Linux, but the whole Linux should be just Linux as there are distros like alpine that hates gnu and don't uses gnu software.

@@glowiak3430 I use Gentoo with no GNU coreutils w busybox btw

Add a float rule to gimp and not have it tile.

I've tried Olive, the good thing about Olive is gpu acceleration, but it crashed a few times with me. So I'll stick with kdenlive

@@WildVoltorb it's still in alpha so that's expected

@@WildVoltorb kdenlive also has gpu acceleration but you have to enable it.

I'd interject for a moment. What you're reffering to as GNU/Linux in real live is just Linux. Calling the entire Linux as GNU/Linux is technically incorrect, because not all distros use gnu software. I hope you learned that debian should be called as GNU/Linux, but the whole Linux should be just Linux as there are distros like alpine that hates gnu and don't uses gnu software.