I spent a decade exploring the hill tribes of South East Asia on a moped and was fascinated by their ancestry. I had no idea how much was known genetically and archaeologically. What a brilliant, thorough, scholarly presentation.
Sir, I am very happy. I have been looking for this for so many days.. May your research continue And. Greetings அய்யா ரொம்ப சந்தோசம். இத்தனை நாள்கள் இதைதான் தேடினேன்..உங்களுடைய ஆய்வு பனிகள் தொடரட்டும் And. வாழ்த்துக்கள்
Because O1 is a very ancient type, O2a representing Han people separated from O1 30000 years ago. The main body of O2a is the Han Chinese and Tibetan people, who are the most powerful ethnic group in East Asia, occupying almost all of the land in East Asia, especially the Han people. Two thousand years ago, the Qin Dynasty began to expand south of the Yangtze River, and O1, representing the Baiyue people, constantly fled to Southeast Asia. O1 is just like you Tamils, you are the Dravidian peoples(திராவிடர்), and it was the Indo-European who came to India and drove you to South India.
Thanks for the concise explanation! I am a northern ethnic Malay from Malaysia, recently got my Y-DNA result as of Haplogroup O with subclades O2a1 M95> M88> PK4. It is interesting to know that my early paternal ancestors started in between upper Indochina and central Chinese plain before they migrated further to lower Indochina and Malay Archipelago. We also thus are distant cousin with some Korean and Japanese, as well as the aborigines of South Asia. However, I am quite confused because contrary to this explanation which shows NO and O as originated from upper Indochina, some others located them to be around northwest China through the northern corridor?
The robotic computer voice was originally off putting, but the material was so interesting I was able to tolerate it. I do love that you included visual locations and representations of the groups you were designating, so very helpful to have an image of the diversity and similarity of our human family! Thankyou!
I agree 100%. I am willing to do the voice if you want. :D Never done voice over work, but literally every week people tell me I should be on the radio or ask if I do voice work.
haha same, i endured till end. Just 1 correction: “Gojoseon” is pronounced go-jo-son, 3 syllables only, not go-jo-see-yon. otherwise, thanks for this video !
Polynesian here,Samoan and Tongan to be exact. Haven't taken a DNA test yet but from what I've been able to learn, our lines are predominantly Haplogroup O. Hi everyone!
I'm Polynesian of Samoan (Dwayne John, Troy Polamalu- haplogroup O) & Hawaiian (Jason Momoa-haplogroup C). Both have melanesian, but Samoan are link to the ami tribe of Taiwan. 😁 I'm also Filipino, Chinese, and Japanese.
I see many groups in Southeast Asia that have similar style of outfits, headdresses, and similar physical features like those who lived I the mountains and are able to preserve their music, clothing, music etc. besides the haplo grouping, similarity are evident in the clothes their wear, the jewelries they have on, food they eat, clothes they wear, musical instruments they play, etc. sadly, western colonization’s brutally destroyed them.
I love this information, There are so many different kinds of Male "O" groups everywhere in the East and South East and in India. Great Stuff! Cynthia Allen McLaglen
Not very much india mainly its found due to tibeto burmese people settled in north east where as we are mainly r1a,r2, j2 and h haplogroup mostly.o haplogroup is mostly found in bangladesh,myanmar,bhutan,nepal,and some parts of stilanka but not in adequate amount there also r1a,j2,r2 is major.originally indians are west eurasian people with slightly mongoloid influence at north east due to tibeto burmese influx from tibet.majority indians are caucasoid people.
@@changchadchanamdong2668 but guess is wrong.ghenghis khan is having r1b m343 and he was a great mongol warrior with farsighted skills and diplomatics and strategics.r1a,r1b is indo aryan lineages.aryans or west eurasusn people are supposed to be great warriors by blood if yu guess truely by events happened in histroy.haplogroup o belonged to a sino tibetan family not west eurasian category mind it.
@@مريمداودي-ي4ص N = negroid - semang / senoi +- 50k bc K = papua +- 55k bc Khmer people O1a dna also have 6% N dna semang senoi Mix +- 18k bc Javanese sundanese balinese people O1b dna also have 7% K dna papua Mix +- 19k bc
@@dore3faso6sidosenoi !!! It sounds like seloi...Seloi were one of the Ancient people of Manipur(kangleipak/Tai Pong Pan/ Lai Lam/Lai-Pham) Meitei(Lai) people have seven clans.They are Mang-Ngang(sun- light colour),Lu-wang(highly brainy) Khuman/Khu-mam(Very Dark), Moirang,Angom(chak-pa), kha-ngangpa,Sa-lang-Leishangthem(Seloi)...From our folk lore we know Majority of Seloi migrate to others parts of the world many thousands of years ago.Now Sekmai,Andro,khur-khul and Phayeng came under Angom clan...In pre historic period they reside in Seloi Lang-mai Ching (Nong-mai Ching/Ching-goi Ching/Seng-goi ching/Ching-goi baruni) hills and nearby valley...Seloi Lang-mai people's stories were still preserve in Lai Lam harouba rituals. Any Senoi who know about Ingourok (pronounce as Engourok).In Meitei language:"I want to eat food" is Ei/Ai Chak Cha-k/Chage." I eat food" is Ei/Ai Chak Chai".
This shows how human beings are so distinctive as they move and mutate into different culural groups, yet we are all related, if you go back in time, back to Africa. I know my African Ancestor was an African called Manju (L3) and she mutated many times and created many descendants in India who spread to all the rest of the world. How Marvellous this information is. We are all one family with many cousins. Cynthia Allen McLaglen
Of the numerous ethnic groups the Nagas spread over India and Mynmar are yet to confirm which haplo group fits in, their original home et al.please highlight.
Naga and other NE Indians basically are nowhere near India. They are near burma and separated by Bangladesh but India just happened to have claimed that area and the people. Nagas are more closely related to east asians sharing more with their tibet, chinese, SEA parts.
@@st4r444 You say, "Nagas and other NE Indians" and then say "nowhere near India". That doesn't even make sense. How can you call the "NE Indians" and then say "nowhere near India"? Northeast India is part of India even though the majority of people are genetically closer to East Asians and Southeast Asians. India is simply a country and not correlated to genetics. I say this as someone who shares ancestry with Khasi, Nagas and Meitei. It is indeed a shame that many people have no idea of Northeast India and how it's quite different to other parts of India though. I speak of Northeast India and people think it's like North India, which is so far from reality.
@@geonomad1 Thank you very much🙏 I saw your video about the migration of different Haplogroups. I’m sorry but you show the migration of C-M130 wrong. The migration of Macro-Haplogroup C-M130 was on the Cost of south India and migrated to Southeast Asia. And from there, it split to the north costal route to North East Asia (who became C-M217) and to the south to Australia (who became C-M347). This migration can you also see in the map from FTDNA about Haplogroup C.
This is a very misleading video. Some of the tribes haplogroups are correct but some are also wrong. BTW, there are lots of errors in Wikipedia which are written by amateurs. Quoting wikipedia is wrong in the first place.
The why don't you make a video about it? Other than just commenting that it's wrong. I don't believe you as you have no credibility than a simple "RU-vid comments"
@@lkchoh1454It used to be O1 O2 O3, but now O1 and O2 are merged because they found their common origin. The original O1 O2 is redefined as O1a O1b; the original O3 is redefined as O2. So now the two main branches under O are O1 and O2.
I'm curious of the y-haplogroup of the Vietnamese people as the information in the internet indicates that 90% of Vietnamese male having O as their paternal lineages (40% O1b-likely from Autroasiatic speaking peoples, 30% O2-likely from Chinese domination and 20% O1a-likely from Austronesian speaking peoples) meanwhile N, C, F and D share an equally small amount of the rest of 10%.
Also why do the Viets hate Han Chineses so much? Vietnamese has 50% haplogroup O3(now O2a) in their total population, which they are technically Han Chinese.
@@karlkun717 No. The majority of Vietnamese paternal lineage belong to y-haplogroup o1b1 (which come from Austroasiatic speakers). O2 only account for 20-30% on average (in which a significant of O2 come from Hmong-Mien speakers). There're also a small proportion of C2, N, F, D and J2.
@@karlkun717 Han Chinese is cultural identity not by blood according to Chinese scholars and government. O3 aka O2a isn't even Chinese as every Asian have this Hg. Also, Han Chinese isn't even referring to people of China originally, you should check out Ming historian Tao Zongyi on eight types of Han people - none of them mention Hua tribe.
YT algo. THey don't recommend your subsciprtion or subs anymore just value the "recent" searches more over the "bell" notifications. Also nobody reads those email notifications, they go directly to spam or trash.
It's wonderful to start seeing the mists of our past clear and reveal (for now, at least rough ideas of) how we covered and colored Earth with our sometimes-similar, sometimes-not-as-similar faces and cultures. Can't wait for you to show what today's Africa is like, too -- with it's second-to-none breadth of variation in DNA. Suggestion: It might be a good idea to start each episode with a disclaimer, reminding everyone (like you did in your response to Nabil Nadri, below) that this is only one hypothesis from among multiple hypotheses (based on the most recent and reliable research).
The NO group migration and genesis is completely wrong, the first NO were between Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, and the N went north and covers from finland to east Siberia, while O spread south passing by mongolia and to the coastal china, they PASSED by, didnt settle or habitated there for thousands of years until agriculture of rice was possible in there.
yep i feel there's tons of missing data for sure. Also 0 commentary on the hundreds of chinese dynastic changes or the influence of mongol empire. No mention of the Halogroup C, D, and others that settled there before group O.
@@feilox exactly, migration of haplogroup D resulted in modern groups like the Tibetans and Ainu. Native Australians, Polynesians and Native Siberians for C. Them and mongolic groups settled in the region and heavily influenced O's migration and settlement (warfare, territory etc).
Nope, there are NO fossils found in Indonesia, but never in Central Asia. It is only possible for O and N to be migrated from south into the north, not the other way around.
NO group came from South N emerging in North China later move to Siberia with Neo Siberian migration O remained in South China and later dispersed to North and South
new studies show southeast CHINA above 90% O2, I doubt the sample has been taken. because today many places have had large immigration over several generations from other place
If I'm not mistaken, the Liao River civilization (遼河文明) was predominantly Haplogroup N in the early stages. This video perhaps purposely avoided the most important question many in Japan and the Korean peninsula still cannot figure out. In other words, where did Haplogroup O1b2 come from? What migration path did they take? When did they arrive? What kind of language did they speak? What happened to their relatives? Where are their genetic footprints and cultural/archaeological centers outside of Japan and Korean peninsula? Since the split of O1b1 (observed in Southeast Asia and Southern China) and O1b2 is hypothesized to be nearly 28,000 years ago, we must be missing something...literally. What if the O1b2 migrated towards what is now called East China Sea, when it was still dry land during the last age. Perhaps that's why we can hardly find O1b2 groups in present-day China. Many scholars have argued northern route by foot, southern route by boat looking at everything from genetics to cultural traits to mythology. But nobody so far is able to make a convincing case on the origins of the O1b2 people.
As you said, O1b1 is mostly found in SEA and China, while O1b2 in Korea and Japan. So I’m wondering also, how is it possible that O1b2 and O1b1 are so geographically far apart today, leaving no descendants in the middle?
@@auburntiger6829 The Chinese ancestors were the 02-N nomadic tribal alliance that invaded from the northwest, destroying the C and O1 indigenous peoples on the East Asian plain between 7000 and 4000 years, and establishing their own federation
O1A Proto Austronesians for Philippines (Highest into Igorots/mountain people 95-100%) While Majority lowlands Filipinos males belongs to this O1a around 50-60% for lowlands Filipinos with a mixed of O3 from Chinese immigrants during medieval times and K from Early Negrito/Basal Sundaland people lived in Philippines during 50 thousand years ago
So probably this O3-N6 branch (which is 18% in the Philippines) came earlier before Han Chinese set foot in the Philippines and may one of the founders of Austronesian language together with o1a (42%) migration in the Philippines.
@@ninjas7978 this is why Philippine language grammar is different to Malay, mostly Philippine language is VSO and have higher proto austronesian language loanwords(those originated in Taiwan) with have mixed proto malay(originated in Sumatra and mainland Malay
I don’t believe that evolution is by chance mutations but from previous forms stored in DNA and reappearing in combinations when the species is under stress. This would partly explain parallel evolution.
@@dore3faso6sido i doubt Javanese, Sundanese and Balinese are involved in that. I think only people from Borneo are involved, hence their language similarity
Can you show me the paper you have that shows O1 in Yangshao culture, please? The most popular one out there only shows N1 (xN1a, N1c), N1c, C/C3e, O3a (O3a3), and O3a3c. No N1b1 is not Yi people. Ancient Yi people are O1 at Liangzhu River known as San Miao. Mong / Hmong people today are still more culturally similar to N1b1 than Yi O1. If you read Mongtzer known as Mencius It references the Yi as San Miao who belongs to the JuiLi people. If you could provide me your sources that would be great. Thanks ahead of time.
@@H3ll0-W0rld1 all O3 are subclade of O3-M122. I haven't look closely into C3 and C2 to see if both have interdependent mutation like O3 and O2 which is now O1 and O2.
O1a are tribes of Shem or Brown skin tribes no doubt. while O1b are tribes of Shem mix with Ham or Blacks stranded in Indian subcontinent going to Indo-China region, Indonesia, Papua NG, and then becoming the Australian aborigines. While O2 are tribes of Shem mixed with Blacks or O1b, that further mixed with Japhethite White tribes of North, either Mongolia or Altaic Huns, living along Eurasian steppes.
@@kazisadman5872 its very common among south east asians mainly belonged to tibeto burmese people in bangladesh,myanmar,burma.where as most people in bengal having r2a,r1a(especially in brahmins as r m420,r y6,r y7,r m198 about 72.22 percent).and most frequent haplogroup is j2 (j m172/m241/m68) in y dna and h m69 in some bengalis as well its indo aryan lineages(of caucasoid origin).and o haplogroup is of tibeto burmese people from purely east asian lineage not west eurasian(who are predominantly caucasoids)at all.
I'm ethnically Sinhalese too and have paternal haplogroup O-M95. All of the genetic studies done on Y-DNA in Sri Lanka have never revealed any information about how widespread Haplogroup O is among ethnic Sri Lankan people (despite the fact that Sri Lankan Malays are a significant group). The majority of Y-DNA haplogroups among Sinhalese are either West Eurasian or indigenous South Asian haplogroups per the studies they have done. We're from a minority that are closer to East Asian-related people than other Sinhalese. I'm guessing your test also told you that have recent ancestors of East/Southeast Asian and/or Northeast Indian origin within the past 200 years.
Saya orang sunda.ciri fisik ku kulit kuning mata sipit hidung pesek rambut lurus.kalau melihat orang asia lainya seperti orang orang taiwan,india timur laut,shino tibetan.kok serasa kaya masih 1 nenek moyang ya
Negrito's haplogroups are known to be diverse. We have C, K, and O. There seems to be a lot of O among them. The research paper reported in Nature is attached to the link below. Hope this helps. We do not have any information about Sengoi. sorry. I can't give you an answer to this. www.nature.com/articles/ejhg2010162
@@geonomad1 There is study from prof zaharina in Malaysia who say that Y haplogroup DNA O1b in Kelantan (51%) are living side by side with negritos senoi Y haplogroup K2 mix with small number of O. Thats way malays claim already there in peninsula since 70 Kya.
@@afahimi14 Ethnic cleansing must have happened, but what gave O the advantage was probably agriculture, which provided more food and sustained a larger population for the O.
Racism and ethnic cleansing part of depopulation of D haplogroup. In South East Asia D haplogroup exclusive in deep jungle area and isolated. When Austronesian O haplogroup arrived gradually they replace and intermixed with D haplogroup people.
@@hwasiaqhan8923 . smarter and more cunning too. Plus the O people are diverse in appearances too . Some look East Asian while some look South East asians
@@Brucefann East China Sea O1b2's home was flooded（The reason for this could be they weren't sea 10k years ago. ）, O1b2 stayed on the Korean Peninsula, O1b1 and O1a stayed in South China
Is o1b1a1a early proto khmr people who migrated from west to SEA? o1b1a1a M95 and o1b1a1a PK4 are related? Why does PK4 have japanese and other people too? PK4 is javanese and javanese are so similar to khmer. M95 is proto austro asiatic and khmr are austro asiatic
He‘s probably Korean. A map screenshot he showed in his first y-haplogroup video is in Korean. He also refers the culture created by the Dong Yi people in modern China as the mysterious Gojoseon.
Its only haplogroup not of caucasoid origin or from fghijk cluster with r1a and r1b as two haplogroups from central and west asia.o haplogroup is purely mongoloid and generated a family called tibeto burmese.
Then what was the history and origins of the O1B2 gene only found in Korea and Japan? And why is it so far from the o1B peoples of Southeast Asia? The o1b2 seems to be the most mysterious Haplogroup of them all…
From around 3000 B.C. to around 1000 B.C., people with the O1b2 gene came to the Japanese archipelago from the southern part of the Yangtze River in China. It seems that the gene of 5,000-year-old rice found in the Japanese archipelago matches the gene of rice in southern China about 7,000 years ago. I don't know why, but the gene of o1b2 is hardly found in China now.
Still no O2b human bones found in ancient Yangtze River civilization tombs. Therefore, it cannot be said that O2b is the main body of the ancient Yangtze River civilization. And The oldest R144 in O2b is found in Jeju Island. It is not found in ancient Yangtze River ancient tomb human bones. In most ancient Yangtze River tombs, only O2a O3 O1 are found. The highest frequency is O1. So, the main body of the Yangtze River civilization is O1. And it has not yet been proven that O2b came from the Yangtze River, so many scholars have only hypothesized and conjectured, but there is no clear evidence. It is true that O2b probably came from around China during the Ice Age (N also from south to north), but it was not settled in China, and it seems to have been around the Yellow River region and Jeju Island.
Originally, HaploGroup O was classified as O1, O2, O3. But since 2017, it has been reclassified as O1 and O2. Writing in the old classification method in the comments creates a lot of confusion, so it would be nice to use the latest classification method.
@@marasujan4787Yangtze River culture is divided into two. One is the Daxi Culture in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, dominated by O2a (formerly O3), and the other is the Liangzhu Culture in the lower reaches of the Yangtze River, dominated by O1a (formerly O1).
@@geonomad1 have you made the melanesian yet? As a Polynesian/Samoan+Hawaiian I read my haplogroup is O and we're a mixture of melanesian and ami aborgine from Taiwan. I would love to watch it 😁😁 I want to know my ancestors as much as I can 😁😁😁
Wikipedia has two versions of haplogrup evolution.One is from primates Lutungs, Macaque and chimpanzee.Y-Chromosome DNA is stronger than female genes,since Y-Chromosome can produce original form nonthles whole your mixed while female doesnt for kids face Wise and hair color as they slowly grow up.Y-chromosome also affects body as well jaw skull structure and hands as feet size on male and female offspring.Only a male relative with 80% to 100% can prove siblingshipp for male and females.Sadly je can go up to Four Times prodeucing a original form while females cant one.But either way if je doesnt fin a Valid partner the fourth time hes dead and gone.
The jaw shape and bone structures and hair and eye colors and beard and bodily hairs are all controlled by your autosomal genes, not the Y chromosome. The Y chromosome only activates the production of testosterone so your body will develop into a male.
@@user-jt3dw6vv4x You're right. I went back and did some more looking at different haplogroup distributions and it looks like they would be C3. O is mainly concentrated in China and Southeast Asia.
Chinese and Koreans seem to be arguing about Goguryeo and Balhae with some historians, but I think Goguryeo and Balhae are Tungusic people called Buyeo who came from the north. They were not East Asians, but nomads who lived in cold regions such as present-day Russia.
고구려의 옛 수도는 중국과 북한의 국경이고, 중기와 말기의 수도는 평양이고, 실제 사람들이 사는 영토는 현재의 북한영토. 고구려의 북방영토는 산악지대라서 인구가 적음. 현한국인 = 고대 한국인(요동반도에서 한강 이북정착)과 고대 반도일본인의 혼혈. *인종 구성과 언어는 고대 한국인이 지배적. 발해는 고구려인 + 여진족의 다민족 국가.
6:47 Questionable choice here. Xi Jinping is very likely a descendant of ethnic Mongols (haplogroup C), not really an ethnic Han Chinese (haplogroup O2). Chiang Kai-shek is arguably the best choice here. Even Mao Tse-tung is a better choice than Xi Jinping.
@@hhhasdsad-bs7le You know nothing about China's history. Around 1126AD, Jurchen Jin invaded and killed Northern Song dynasty (靖康之难). All midland Chinese migrated to Zhejiang region, i.e., Chiang Kai-shek's hometown. This migration process finished in 1234AD when the Southern Song's army found that the midland became an uninhabited land (端平入洛). Nearly all people (more than 90%) in the midland China were killed or starved to death at that time. In a nutshell, people from Zhejiang, Jiansu, Shanghai area are direct (and arguably the most direct) descendants from indigeneous Chinese living in midland China around 200BC. O2 is the dominant group, not O1b as you imagined.
@AkiraNakamoto Sure I am only pointing out the possibility of him being O1b since O1b is also the natives in those regions, so no need to be hostile. By the way, the Song Dynasty itself wasn't built by haplogroup O neither O2 or O1 created Song, the Song royal family has been proven to be from haplogroup Q and all the Song emperors and ruler's Y-DNA are Q, not O.
@@hhhasdsad-bs7le Nowadays Han Chinese is mainly O2 (50% - 60%), plus some O1a (~15% overally, ~10% along southeast coastline) and O1b (~10% overally, ~15% along southeast coastline). I don't like your comment because your conclusions are alchemy. Q is negligible in Han Chinese. And more importantly, the royal family of Song Dynasty is of haplogroup O1a, not Q. This data is collected from DNA research on real people descending from Song's royal family.
y dna o-m175 countries 🇰🇷🇯🇵🇹🇼 east asia peoples of genetic east asian o1b2+o2 Korean japanese higher frequency 40%+38% 31%+22% o1a han taiwanese taiwanese aborigines higher frequency 70%
True we are all brothers. Nobody should be murdered and detained without charges nor trials just so someone else can hop on a place to steal the home of a fellow human.
Classifying the Gojoseon as O2a is an error. This video confuses the Chinese Yeon Dynasty with the Gojoseon. Gojoseon people are descendants of the Shang people of China and are a group of Haplo C2. This is confirmed through the genetic distribution of the family name group and region, which self-proclaimed descendants of real Gojoseon.(Chinese surnames like Lee and Chang are not Gojoseon people. These are the surnames that the Chinese things as they immigrate with historical distortions.) Also, there was always a death threat to ancient maritime activities, and only groups with blood-related and religious connections could use ships. The O2a group, which is not maritime culture at all, cannot move with the O1b group of maritime culture. Today, more than half of Japan's 20%of O2a is dominated by the Chinese Tang Dynasty's O-m117, indicating that O2a's migration to the Korean Peninsula and Japan is during the Tang Dynasty (7th-9th century). Today, O2a is distorted in history as Yayoi, Kofun, Gojoseon, Korean. It is the traditional method of the Chinese people that has continued since ancient times.
고조선은 주영역은 요동에서 대동강(평양을 흐르는 강)일대의 동일한 청동기양식 문화를 가진 집단입니다. 유물적 근거로는 O2가 맞습니다. 그리고, 하플로그룹 그룹의 분기는 수천년으로 알고있습니다만? 수나라 사람들이 당나라 시절에 딱 분기하는게 아니에요 😅. 고대문명 이후로는 인구가 너무많아서 유전적 분기는 힘듭니다.
@@KrMorgan12 왕건은 스스로 당나라 이씨의 부계 후손이라고 자칭했고 당연히 이것은 정치적 목적의 거짓말입니다. 왜냐면 이씨로 대표되는 중국인들이 신라말기에 번식을 위해 역사적 조작을 하고, 그 당나라 세력에 왕씨가 편승하였기 때문입니다. 신라 6성은 낙랑국 설화라는 주현제에서 갑자기 국이 등장하고 중국이 공격당한 기록도 없는 최씨를 제외하면 모두 당나라 성씨와 똑같은게 우연의 일치입니까? 설은 당나라 장수 성씨고, 배도 수당의 외교관 성씨고 이는 당나라 황제 성씨죠. 삼국사기나 대월사기전서는 그 이전 시대의 참고자료로 삼은 사서가 모두 누군가에게 사라집니다. 우연히도 모두 당나라의 이주를 겪은 국가입니다. 조선인, 고려인은 스스로 고구려보다 영토가 넓다고 기록했습니다. 네 왜냐면, 그들은 낙랑군의 영토만이 중국적 고구려이고 나머지는 야만인 지역이기 때문이죠. 고구려는 비낙랑군에서 건국되었지만, 중국계 조선 역사기들은 낙랑에서 건국했다고 조작했습니다. 고조선의 단군 전설에서 기원전 2333년이란 중국인들의 조상신 제요의 제위년도입니다. 제요의 후손은 대표적인 중국인 한나라의 유씨와 당나라의 이씨가 있죠. 오늘날의 한국인은 당나라인들이 번식을 위해서 이주하고, 민족표백과 역사조작을 하여, 스스로의 정체성을 고대 반도인의 후손으로 착각하는 당나라계 중국인들의 후손입니다. 이에대해 평가해서, 중국사에서는 매우 흔한 일이며, 이게 전세계에서 중국인들 생리적 역겨움을 느끼거나, 다양한 민족들이 중국의 동쪽을 피해 서쪽으로 이동한 이유라고 느낍니다.
@@jupiter8474That's haplogroup R. R1a is Gog(Russia, Turks) and R1b is Magog(whyte Europeans), who occupied Israel and controls the whole world. They are the biggest enemy of the true Israelites a.k.a the so called Black Africans.
please translate all into Portuguese Brazil is very important because we Brazilians are the most missigenated people in the world.. I have 9 European nations. German. Dutch. French. Irish. Scottish. Welsh. Italian .Ukrainian. Portuguese. Nigerian.Kenya.West Africa. mbuti congo. mandé .seneganbia .is Mesoamerican Andean Central and South America
The current human Y haplo-tree is all wrong! Haplogroup K2 is the line of Shem, and Haplogroup O is the line of Abraham. O1 is the line of Esau, and O2-M122(LINE1+) is the line of Jacob and the 12 tribes of Israel! Haplogroup N and P is the line of Lot, the nephew of Abraham. N is the ancestor of the Moabites, and P is ancestors of the Ammonites, including haplogroup Q and R, which are the ancestors of all the Huns, Turks, and the Europeans. Haplogroup C, D, and E is the line of Japheth. Haplogroup C is Magog, the Mongols, and haplogroup D is Gog, the Japanese. C and D have always been living among haplogroup O, N, and Q in history, because Noah said Japheth will dwell in the tents of Shem. Haplogroup F, H, L, G, I, J, K, are all the line of Ham, haplogroup J is the line of Canaan. And haplogroup A and B are the line of Cain.
The most important halogrup with balls is halogrup Q. İt's my halogroup but at the same time most important jewish scientists , money inspectors,and handsome film stars also have halogrup Q🤣. And it's main halogrup of orginal Turks. Siberian anchestors connected with Turkish roots, native american, mesoamerican, inuit etc.
If ghenghis khan is r1b m343 then he should be connected to an ancestor from west eurasian lineage or having a fully caucasoid anecstry and they mixed with momgoloids for decades.its then sure that west eurasian category(or aryan people)invaded different countries and ruled there, very prideful truth and good vibes for them and they spread their cultures and education to get all people educated.now we are all equal.
1. The video is not about Genghis Khan and R1b, no one talks about Genghis Khan here, you just came out of nowhere with your comment. 2. Who tf told you Genghis Khan is R1b, and why some of you so obsessed with Genghis Khan being white, you are not even confident with yourself by using the "If", so why did you continue giving conclusions with the rumor?
@竜巫 | Siwaga Miriko . True O is very great and has broad variation group with in it. O1 O2 O3 are all realated but not the same. O well probably dominate the world
Haplogroup is not correlated to appearance. Remember this a patrilineage, the ancient men who carried this haplogroup intermixed with so many people across Asia.
It is written in the Nihon Shoki that a large number of refugees came to Japan and became naturalized during the collapse of the Han Dynasty and the period of the Three Kingdoms on the Korean Peninsula, so I think 20% of them are people from that period. The people who originally lived in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula were the Wa people, not the ancestors of the Chinese or Koreans. O1b2 is the lineage of the Yamato people who lived in western Japan. Chinese and Koreans have O2 ancestry. It has also been proved that most of the human bones of immigrants who came to Japan from the 3rd century to the 7th century and were naturalized were genes of the O2 lineage.
In the O2b subclass, Japanese are mostly 47z, but Koreans are mostly L682. The two lineages differ in age and origin. 47z initially resided briefly on the Korean Peninsula and soon migrated to Japan, where it greatly influenced the reproduction of the Japanese population. And L682 had a great effect on reproduction in a large population in the southern part of the Korean Peninsula. L682 is very rare in Japan, but 47z is also a very small number in Korea. They are only 4-6% of each other. Sometimes, from region to region, their genes are not found. The earliest lineage for O2b, R144, is found at high frequencies in Jeju Island. And 2% in Jeonnam, 1% in the central part of the Korean Peninsula, 0.3% in Yanbian and 0.1% in central Japan.
So O2b itself cannot be said to be a Japanese gene. You may think so because Japan has a larger population than Korea. And the oldest gene in O2b is in Jeju Island and spread from there to Korea and Japan. And each subgroup spread out and went its own way to reproduce.
@@marasujan4787 Japanese O1b2-47z and Korean O1b2-L682 have different divergence ages. O1b2-47z is known to be older. The human bones that are the parents of these two DNAs have been excavated in Miyakojima, Okinawa, Japan. O1b2 is a descendant of O1b1 in South China, and migrated in the order of Okinawa → Japanese archipelago → Korean Peninsula → Manchuria. According to the materials on the Chinese side, the DNA of a person named Wang Geon of Goryeo is O1b2-47z, a type common in Japan, and he was a person who came from the Japanese archipelago during the Silla period.
1，Ydna C1b+D1a+M-The first settlers/ aboriginal/Melanesians 2，Ydna O1a+O1b+O2-The second group of settlers/Mongoloid Austronesian O1a/Austroasiatic O1b/Sino-Tibetan O2a Atholl Anderson wrote that analysis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA, female) and Y chromosome (male) concluded that the ancestors of Polynesian women were Austronesians while those of Polynesian men were Papuans/Melanesians.. Haplogroups C and D represents an extremely ancient lineage of modern humans in East Asia-The first settlers C1a+D1a2 Ainu people and Japanese（Jomon people） C1b+D1a1 Polynesia Melanesia Australian Aborigines Proto-Mongolian and Tungusic may have originally been C2b, inhabiting modern Mongolia and northeast China C1b1a1 South Asian C1b1a2 Vietnam/Hoabinhian C1b2a Indonesia, Melanesia (especially New Guinea), Micronesia, and some islands of Polynesia C1b2a1a Polynesian C1b3 New Guinea Highlands. Australian Aborigines 60.2%C1 Polynesia 53.5%C* (M130） Melanesia 57%M Cenderawasih 36.4%M When compared with present-day populations, the sampled ancient Hoabinhian individuals are genetically closest to the Semang (also known as "Malaysian Negritos") and the Maniq in the interior of the Malay Peninsula, and to the Andamanese Onge and Jarawa. Hoabinhians had haplogroups C1b and D* Genetic studies have revealed that the Andamanese people are relatively closely related to the indigenous South Asian hunter-gatherers The Andamanese also show high affinity to other Australasian populations , such as Melanesians, as well as to East/Southeast Asian peoples . Andamanese peoples Ydna D1a2 Haplogroup C is another extremely old lineage that left Africa approximately 60,000 years ago and spread over most of Eurasia. Two subclades of C are found in Japan: C1a1 and C2a. The first group to separate was C1, which colonized the Middle East and South Asia. One branch (C1a ) may have moved north to Central Asia and then split in two: One tribe moved to Europe (haplogroup C1a2,C1a2 is now nearly extinct in Europe.), while the other migrated to East Asia and survives today only in Japan (C1a1). The second branch of C1 spread into South Asia, Southwest Asia, and Central Asia, where it is found today at low frequencies (C1b1a1). During this time, other C strains continued their eastward migration into Southeast Asia, where they split into four main regional clusters: The first branch colonized Indonesia, Melanesia, Micronesia, and Polynesia (C1b2a). A second branch went south to Australia, where they became the Aborigines (C1b2b). Another settled in the highlands of New Guinea (haplogroup C-P55). The fourth branch went as far as Northeast Asia (haplogroup C-M217)：Mongols， Turkic peoples, Siberian tribes , Tungus，Chinese (Han, Hui, Manchus), Koreans，Native american The second group of settlers K2a/NO Haplogroup O-M175 =O1 +O2 The O-M175 haplogroup origin were Yunnan-Burma border. Before separated into 2 branch, O1 (O-F265) and O2 (O-M122) O2 (O-M122) entered East Asia with the western route (Himalayan-Yunnan). And became to Sino-Tibetan O2a2b1 (M134) and Hmong-Mien O2a2a1a2 (M7). O1 (O-F265) They separated to 2 branch, O1a and O1b. O1a (M119) moved to Taiwan and became to Austronesians. O1b1a1a (M95) became to Austroasiatics who lived in Indo-China and O1b2 moved to Korea and Japan. migration path Yunnan O2→ Qinghai→ Sino-Tibetan/O2a2b1+Hmong-Mien/O2a2a1 Qinghai O2a2b1→O2a2b1a2 + O2a2b1a1 O2a2b1a1 →Tibet-Qiang tribes/Tibeto-Burman/ydna D+C→Tibetan，Burmese O2a2b1a2→North China, Manchuria/ydna C2→Northern Han Chinese O1b=O1b1（O1b1a1+O1b1a2）+O1b2 Yunnan O1b1a1→Mainland Southeast Asia /C1b1a2+D→Austroasiatic→Munda +Mon-Khmer O1b1a2→Mainland China O1b2→moved to Korea/Samhan people Austro-Tai O1a (M119)→Yangtze River Basin→Baiyue people Yangtze Riverm O1a (M119)→Fujian→Taiwan→ Austronesian→ Islands of Southeast Asia/C1b2a+D+M→Malayo-Polynesian Fujian O1a →Guangdong and Guangxi O1b1a1→Kam-Tai/Zhuang people Kam-Tai→Mainland Southeast Asia→Laos →Thailand North China O2a→Guangdong and Guangxi O1b1a1+O1a→Modern Han Chinese
@@夜行者-s2x yes I also have the dna bank but updated, polynesia is not a good representative, polynesian islands have different percentages, aotearoa infact is 90% haplogroup c. You are speaking to a māori from Aotearoa, and we kept the world's history.
@夜行者 if Polynesians y dna is haplogroup c and classed as melanesians that would make the melanesian genetic c which therefore would make the c1 haplogroup melanesian, it isn't the case, haplogroup c is the haplogroup of the australoid, sundaland genetics, cm130 originates in the sunda, therefore other haplogroup c descendants migrated from the sunda land bridge. The out of sundaland model is the correct hypothesis for the cradle of civilization based off the most ancient migration paths
Firstly, Gojoseon is just a myth fabricated by Korean nationalists with the aim of inspiring Koreans occupied by Japan to resist the Japanese. There has never been a record of such a country in real history books. Moreover, the Koreans pieced together the legend and Qizi Joseon(箕子朝鮮), which was the first country in the history of the Korean Peninsula established by the Chinese people in the northern part of the Korean Peninsula. The ancestors of the Koreans were still in the tribal era at that time.
Hi I'm curious about what y-haplogroup most likely I belong to when my paternal grandpa is from myeik,tanintharyi division, Myanmar.His ethnicity is bamar.
i heard two of four samples found in the Lower Xiajiadian Culture their downstreams are belonged to O2a1b-F238 and N1b each, and there is a O2a2a-FGC50558 sample found in neolithic age past human bones from the Ando, Yeosu-si, South Jeolla Province, and there are a few samples of O2a2a-FGC50558 and O1b2-L682 found in three kingdom period past human bones from Yuha-ri/Daesung-dong, Gimhae-si, South Kyeongsang Province, Korean peninsula, according to studies 2021~22.
The data I read is a paper that jomon gene D1a2 and yayoi gene O1b2 was found. Are you sure you read the same paper as me? Or, Are you now distorting genetic data because you are afraid that the Chinese's historical distortion of "ancient Koreans are O2a" will turn out to be lies?
I recently took one of those DNA tests and it indicated that my Y chromosome was from heplogroup O, apart from the possibility of an error in the reading, it would be a wild result for in the analysis of ethnic groups I have nothing to do with East and Southeast Asia. Of course, the Y chromosome can have these surprises, but it was genuinely what caught my attention the most in the result.q
Southwestern Korea has one of the highest concentrations of O-M175 y haplogroups in entire East Asia.. How is it possible that they come from Altai, when Altai have almost 0% O-M175? This suggests there is a southern source of y-DNA input for Koreans!
WTF is this??? Its good and bad at the same time. Unique... I'm hooked. Two things I suggested to improve: the robotic voice and the background music. Use your own voice, its ok if its not great, we are here for the content. Also the music... its actually a good idea but use music from the region ure talking about. Those are minor things compared to the great content. Keep up the good work.
INSIDE ALQURAN AN NISA,chapter 4 | بِسۡمِ اللهِ الرَّحۡمٰنِ الرَّحِيۡمِيٰۤـاَيُّهَا النَّاسُ اتَّقُوۡا رَبَّكُمُ الَّذِىۡ خَلَقَكُمۡ مِّنۡ نَّفۡسٍ وَّاحِدَةٍ وَّخَلَقَ مِنۡهَا زَوۡجَهَا وَبَثَّ مِنۡهُمَا رِجَالًا كَثِيۡرًا وَّنِسَآءً ۚ وَاتَّقُوا اللّٰهَ الَّذِىۡ تَسَآءَلُوۡنَ بِهٖ وَالۡاَرۡحَامَ ؕ اِنَّ اللّٰهَ كَانَ عَلَيۡكُمۡ رَقِيۡبًا (4:1) O men! Fear your Lord Who created you from a single being and out of it created its mate; and out of the two spread many men and women.1 Fear Allah in Whose name you plead for rights, and heed the ties of kinship. Surely, Allah is ever watchful over you.
