Sully Movie CLIP - On the Hudson (2016) - Aaron Eckhart Movie 

Never underestimate the power of a mustache.

God I love u broseph

🤣😂🤣😂🤣that’s funny

All hail the 'stache!

Thanks 😂

Oh, if only Harvey Dent had that moustache too...

and Christian Bale...

The mustache is only surpassed by the glutes on his chin 😍

but which one... which ONE

Yeah, I wish Aaron Eckhart kept that for the long run.

"You can't give in...YOU CAN"T GIVE IN!!" LOL

I understood that reference.

LOL XD

shut up shut up shut up T_T

She wanted to go swimming with them

She says not knowing that a) he turned the APU on before they pulled the QRH and b) that turning on the APU isn't actually ON the QRH. She was guessing.

The video before this one was of Skylar as the bimbo accountant in Breaking Bad true story 😅

In the real investigation, the NTSB very quick determined the aircraft was brought down by a bird strike, their wasn't any attempt to blame the pilots from the start.

I suspect the reason we got Flight (2012) is that Sully is just too darn mature and competent so they had to create a fictionalised event.

If they could've done a 180 and landed back on the runway, it would have been much safer than a water landing. Initial simulations suggested they did have enough momentum and altitude to turn around, so there was a serious investigation into whether the right choice was made. Eventually they found that Sully was right. By the time they were ready to make the decision (checked the plane's systems and made the mayday call), they'd lost too much height to turn round.

@@st0rmforce they addressed that in the movie. They could have made it back if they started to turn towards the airport immediately after the bird strike. No reaction time, no calling ATC, just turn and hope you don’t hit another plane.

@@whatisgoingonherebruh1 What I meant was that there had to be a full investigation to make sure the right choice had been made. Lets say there was a tiny bit of thrust from an engine, or they were higher when they hit the birds, or something like that, then a turnaround could have been possible. It didn't need to be a tight turn if they had enough hight. IF it was possible to safely turn around, an emergency landing on the ground would definitely be safer than on water. Listen to Sully and Jeff talk about how risky it was. Water landings are dangerous, no matter how calm the water is. If he'd miscalculated and there was enough margin to turn around, then in choosing the river he needlessly endangered everybody. So they had to make sure he'd made the right choice. And everyone agreed that he had.

Yes, but then you wouldn't have a movie.

*They’re(as in they’are)

I see what you did there o_O

It's about what's fair!

The only only unfair thing is his mustache: it’s unfair because none of us will ever have a beauty like that....

It's design to float as long as the hull is intact

@@johnwhite5897 this is true, but enough mass will sink anything. And let's face it, the combined mass of those two men's testicles adds up to a very large number. So i was impressed the plane could float

@@johnwhite5897 r/whooosh

Yeah a 737-800 would have submerged instantly

Testicles float

Kelly Rayburn Which, in the Air Crash Investigations episode, the real woman Skylar is based on goes out of her way to confirm.

Why is that? I am not second-guessing you, not at all. I just wish to understand, thats all.

@@roadwarrior144 Loss of both engines checklist was made for 20000ft of altitude to start with - following up a single engine loss in cruise altitude. They encountered the birds at around 2800ft.

Sylvia Divinora Yes, all of that makes sense, but in the event of the loss of both engines, why is activating the APU 15th? If you loose both engines, why not start the APU first, because it will provide electrical power to communications and hydraulic pumps to control the aircraft. I wonder, is it because the air-driven generator is deployed first, and the next task is focused on re-starting the engines? If so, that would explain why, in another clip, Skyles was reading off the checklist and said “optimum re-light speed: 300 knots.”

@@roadwarrior144 yes, relight speed relates to restart engines, the RAT comes out immediately and provides hydraulics and electrics. I think the APU is no emergency equipment on Airbus, takes minutes to run it all up. I think it is really mainly intended for ground operations and to give a tiny extra of takeoff power in hot and high conditions - taking over pneumatics (bleed air for A/C) and electrics from the engines

I'm not sure if "a normal aircraft would sink much quicker" - I've never heard of a valid comparison being made. But it is certain that if a passenger hadn't opened one of the rear doors allowing river water to flow into the cabin then the a/c would have stayed afloat for even longer. Also, even though the initial impact caused superficial damage to the belly, the a/c's fuselage didn't rupture, and that structural integrity ensured prolonged buoyancy. Broken metal tubes sink rapidly.

He actually used Jeff's moustache as an extra flap during the landing.

I mean yeah, but seeing as how the equipment tells you if the plane is level or not that’s not the impressive part.

Actually, no. They would blame Airbus and their inconsistent manual. It has happened before with Boeing. Even though the movie portrays NTSB as villains they are extreme professionals

Watch the Mayday episode concerning the Hudson incident

Maybe you should read about the actual investigation rather than the movie portrayal of it. Eastwood's script made the NTSB guys out to be assholes, cos it made for more drama. Even Sully asked for the script to be changed, and not include the real names of NTSB people because it did not portray them properly. The real investigator in charge, a guy called Benzon was actually a former US Air pilot, and had previously flown the very plane that Sully and Skiles landed on the Hudson. Benzon also personally tried the simulations and concluded that Sully made the right call because the chances of making it back to La Guardia were not good enough. If portrayed more realistically then the movie would have had one major point of drama - the birdstrike and landing, and then just the grinding process of a drawn out inquiry.

From what I've heard the movie plays up the investigation side of things for dramatic effect, and in reality this wasn't nearly as antagonistic as it's shown in the movie. The investigation did happen, and part of that was going into detail of every decision made in the cockpit to understand what happened and how it could have been improved, but the intention of the process wasn't to villify Sully, but rather to understand what happened and how we can better react to similar situations in the future. Yes, this involved playing Devil's advocate on a lot of decisions made, but again from what I've heard I think everybody was on the same page of what the purpose was.

Serenity113 a

This isn't what happened in reality

Didnt play out this way. It was a lot less dramatic.

It’s frustrating how naive people are when they see this movie. Most of this didn’t happen.

Because it's a movie. And that's what happens in movies that try cashing in on real life situations. 's why i dont like this movie.

In movies, sure. In reality these people are indispensible.

It's not about what I want, it's about what's *FAIR!*

Two face

Aaron Eckhart is the actor's name.

it wasn't a crash

It’s a water landing

a FORCED water landing.

All 5 of your children need proper education then its safer to fly than use a bicycle lol

Dear lord don’t them see Flight!!