Supreme Court issues major ruling on First Amendment in social media case 

Social media is a 3rd party platform. You sign away your freedom of speech when you make your account. Try and keep up.

​@@MaggiesNight if it's third party the white house should stay off it and try to tell the truth. Try to keep up.

Without lies, what else can scumbag Trump possibly post?

@@drzaius1121 their comment still stands.

Its tyranny and the founding fathers wrote in safegaurds against this type of over reach. We need to abolish it and institute new government.

NOT their "best interests"....the majority of social media is overwhelmingly liberal. As long as commenters hold the liberal line THEY WON'T BE SHADOWBANNED.

"I never gave anyone hell I only told them the truth and they thought it was hell" - Harry Truman

MAGA wants to take away your Free Speech 😮

I get strikes every time you say something bad about the left. It's a joke for them to say there is free speech on the Internet

I can’t even ask if Biden will be asked questions about the border on Thursday. Censored every time.

Hahahahahaha That's funny that you think free speech is posting on social media. 😅 lol you stupid

True. But what does that have to do with this case? This is just giving the government a voice on business run social media.

@@DevilTravels Not even close. the government has every right to dispute what you say, they have zero right to prevent you from saying it...directly or by proxy

@@mikehall6912 The government isn't the one removing posts on social media, the private business social media company is. The government makes the request, just like you can...if you have compelling reasons.

​@@mikehall6912Freedom of speech.

How are we harmed by taking down disinformation again I would prefer less lies online

fox lied, 787M trump lied cost him 90M, so say it if you wish to pay for it,

That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.

The founders told us about a time like this.

This is Trump’s SCOTUS… 😂

They want Trump to win the election.

Too many fake conservatives there. Trump made big mistakes in his appointments

keep crying

It’s not wrong. The Supreme Court only rules on law. Cases have to be setup a certain way to be ruled on. This case was amateur hour from the beginning. Reactionary, not strategic. Another, similar case -brought by an educated team- will get resolved.

Epstein frequent fliers...particularly Roberts....

DoI 2.0 is needed immediately.

Get it over it.

@@smorris281 when the pendulum swings the other way, i don't want to hear anyone complaining about government overreach. enjoy the next 50 years of a conservative government.

​@@AustinKoleCarlisleshut up. You are the minority and unwanted

No

It needs to be argued on the merits the justices kicked the can down the road.

@@rainman6080false. You can’t get to the merits of the case if you have no standing. That’s the entire point. If they wanted to kick the can down the road they would’ve never picked up the case to begin with. The US Supreme Court selects every case they hear. It was a failure on the lawyers part to make sure their client actually was ‘injured’ by the acts of the government for them to have standing. Just like how I can’t sue because some cop violated your rights. The ‘injury’ didn’t happen to me, therefore I have no standing to sue. You would so it’s up to you to make it known that you don’t like your rights being violated. Nobody can solicit that from you either. That’s illegal.

No, class action is just a group of people. That's the only difference

@larsongramckow7495 & a single "injured" couldn't stand up wherreas a class action of injured could have the standing ¿?

Clinton 🤬

How about November 22, 1963, and earlier?

Right when rap was getting popular

@@miophx8283🎯

Yesssss. Ban more 50 year rights so Alex Jones can make fun of more parents of dead children. 🤤

They did. They issued a ruling. Just bc you don't agree with their ruling, doesn't mean that they didn't show up, put on the black dress, ( /s) and issue a decision. You sound like Trump, thinking that SCOTUS'S job entails issuing rulings that you agree with. Sorry, that just isn't reality. Where can I get some of that sweet, sweet, delulu you're laboring under?🤣

@@heathernks8 I hope an illegal gets you.

Too many fake conservatives. Trump was fooled

keep crying. snowflake

I may be wrong, but I think what the SC is saying here is that they do not want a state AG filing this lawsuit. What they want is the actual people who were censored filing the lawsuit. They want the actual victims in court.

​@@mikefisc9989 that is exactly correct. A plaintiff has to show they've been damaged, and if none of the AGs has been censored by social media via a government request then they haven't been damaged.

@@TheDpDrifter but we have a representative government.

Good luck Mr lawyer 😂😂😂😂😂

No they can't

Read 230

@@cady__since the congress granted “230”. Then the congress needs to revoke it. Problem solved. Can’t wait until November. All of this nonsense will e over.MAGA.

Of course states have no standing. Which state was hurt and how?

​@@daysrcdays Every citizen of every State has standing. People can now be silenced by social media that is being forced by the gov't to control speech.

We are too lowly for the elite on the USSC to bother with. EVERY legal American has the Inalienable Right to demand the USSC protect the 1st Amendment, which by the way, has ZERO exclusions for Free Speech.

Serious threats against your spouse and children might make you do things you don't want to. Think about how the Democrats and their media are constantly complaining about the Conservative justices.

You haven't been paying much attention to conservatives.

@@TheOriginalJphyper I HAVE and we are NOT calling for censorship because nothing is better than letting those who hate the USA and hate Free Speech, expose themselves for who and what they are. Much better than calling for censorship and letting those bent on our destruction to hide in the shadows.

You didn't actually pay attention huh??

​@@MaggiesNightdid you kiddo? The white house is involved. It's not just the social media company anymore.

Nope! They decide according to the Constitution and the Law. If you don't like it, do something about it. Just do it legally.

@@FlipDahlenburg 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Enjoy your drinks.

She is a woman, and Trump once again makes a BAD decision

she's definitely one of those people who's afraid to go against the herd.

who ever thought they were?

He works for them, he is no different than the rest.

@@kate_martinez795 agreed, just like with China he won’t jeopardize the existence of his companies

@@kate_martinez795 He is VASTLY different from the rest especially those who would slander him for making Twitter/X a more, albeit not perfect, "Free Speech" platform. The MSM, liberals, LOATH free speech as it exposes their destructive and deadly ideology. There are still some San Francisco area type subjects which remain verboten on all social media regardless of how accurate they may be.

Don't you get it? No one "has standing " in other words the Court refuses to make a decision on it.

@@Cherish1056 nobody has standing is different from the plaintiffs don’t have standing

You are a fake news junkie.

None of that is relevant to this video. If you want to complain about the president, do it on a video _about_ the president.

@@TheOriginalJphyper Go back inside your tent and maybe clean it out while you're in there. PLEASE dispose of your needles, urine jugs, bags of feces etc properly. You need to keep fellow encampment dwellers safe.

This ruling came from TRUMP's 6-3 Supreme Court.

@@Timponwalzdancingindrag What do you think I am, Californian?

💯💯💯

You all say that, yet can't explain what it means...

Mommy 👶👶👶👶😭😭😭

Be careful what you say on here they are watching

Good one

Maybe more whining will save your country. MAGA!

Very true which is why Elon has become public enemy #1 for the MSM, Big Tech, and the political left.

Maybe more whining will save your country. MAGA!

Nobody can tell me anyone on the USSC is worthy of that seat on the bench. These are supposed to be the best and brightest and most honest yet the nation rightfully so, gets tied up in knots worrying about who occupies the WH or holds the majority in the Senate when an appointment is made. If these were good people why should this matter? Any decision other than 9-0 or 8-1 or at worse 7-2 indicates nothing but treasonous judicial bias and a court unconstitutionally attempting to legislate from the bench. People, our founding documents are hundreds of years old and very short in comparison to today's legal BS and they even came with an "Owners Manual" known as the Federalist Papers. It takes the total dishonestly of a lawyer to not figure out what the Founders intended. If something must be changed in the Constitution or Bill of Rights the ONLY LEGAL means is a Constitutional Amendment not a USSC ruling or case law.

But illegal invaders do! So much so that we are being forced to pay for their housing, food, clothing, medical care.

So which Americans do not have standing in your opinion, when it comes to INALIENABLE Rights of every American enumerated in our Bill of Rights? Strange at a time when the government is IGNORING the MANDATE and DEMAND placed on government to "Protect our Borders" and even forcing us real Americans, without standing obviously, to pay for housing, food, clothing, medical care of illegal invaders.

Maybe more whining will save your country. MAGA!

Justice is supposed to be BLIND...facts do not care about anyone's feelings for a reason. Because they are accountable to no political party...

If they were honest people, aka not lawyers, and 100% loyal to the Constitution and Bill of Rights, it would never matter one iota who was in the WH or held the majority in the Senate when an appointment was made. Can any honest person disagree with that statement?

Yeah right 🙄

​@@_Fake_Rolex because schooling is for liberals

@@_Fake_Rolex auto correct probably

@@_Fake_Rolex thanks johnnie

@@Royale_with_Cheeze new attitude john?

We the People are too lowly for the USSC to waste their time with. We the Government, We the Corporations, We the Unions, We the Organizations are far more important.

Government AND private companies should be proud to support free speech and be ashamed to prevent it.

Fair and just by the standards Russians are used to at any rate.

Your against the law .....why .

Maybe more whining will save your country. MAGA!

MAKING AMERICA GREAT AGAIN 👏🏼👏🏼😁

Lopez is an idiot

Of course MAGA, or you want a fallen America? You probably not American if you oppose MAGA

If he appointed 3 out of 9 judges then 66% of the court ISNT MAGA got to LOVE that leftist math though huh must be what they're teaching in schools these days LOL

Thanks for exposing your dislike of Americans who want to "Make America Great Again" as it speaks volumes about who and what you are.

And that hurts your feelings? You poor, left-wing cry baby. Maybe demented Joey can sniff your hair and make it all better. Sheeesh.... LMFAO!

right wing tears. Wait till trump loses and gets locked up.

You obviously did not or refused to read/listen to the results of the Twitter Files which fully exposed the government extortion of social media and now we are finding out all the Fauci CLAIMED conspiracy theories are FACTS. There can be no dispute among honest people that the government used extensive pressure on social media.

They already did, with Trump in their coup d'etat and outright lie of Trump/Russia Collusion.

Because SCOTUS is obviously trying to get citizens to become violent against social media/government. SCOTUS is daring to populace to do WHAT MUST BE DONE!!!

In Congress, July 4, 1776 The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation. We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government.

I agree with your post but you missed the fine print. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted. Amendment IX UNLESS YOU ARE TRUMP or his supporter The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Amendment X UNLESS YOU ARE TRUMP or his supporter The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. UNLESS You are a Trump Supporter.