Swami Sarvapriyananda on Panchadasi - Lecture 2 

What a beautiful explanation! One of the rare talks explaining the "bliss" aspect of sat-chit-anand!

One of the best talks I have ever heard. Always wait eagerly for Swamiji's lectures on Advaita Vedanta

Goddd!!!!! This is mindblowing. Who knew Vedanta was so awesome?

Dear Swami...your talk is so direct, deep and enlightening...I am so grateful for finding these videos....you are true teacher and Advaitins....so much thanks and love for helping to wake us sleeping mortals.....Hari Om.

What a wonderful explanation on sat chit Ananda! Many thanks swamiji

Swamiji has an unique way of teaching the most difficult things made simpler...I bow to you.. Swami... pranam 🙏🙏

STAY BLESSED RESPECTED SWAMI JI

please upload remaining recordings,so that all the seekers will enlightened.thanks sir for your efforts.

Such a great talk, The method of teaching is matchless. Thanks a ton swami ji

Extraordinary direct experience! No ordinary inferences are useful. Mind relaxed as as extraordinary knowing is experienced. True yoga.

Tremendously true. My Pranams n Prostrations Swami ji.

I love the core of Vedanta because it talks about reality but there are many superficial distractions like previous births and shuttle matter which which takes more attention than the fact that we all are connected.And that's what Science and Vedanta are telling.

pranam swami ji stay blessed

Pranav swamiji , thank you so much

Ignorance when known is knowledge itself. Krishna Menon

Saadar pranaam

Extraordinary Experience....?.........No , the path of pure Insight .....Thank you.

Intense explanation. So basically pure consciousnesses is power of understanding objects and Power of understanding in absense of objects too ?

🙏🙏🙏

what a talk!!

Dear Soul, This is very dence lecture, kindly break in part and more elaborative... My Intlect can not perceive it at once... Please Please Please...

Incredible

pranams mahatman no words

Namasakar- Kindly upload further videos of Part 3,4,5,6,7 of Panchadasi and oblige.

Very dense lecture, Kindly explain more and more...

The conciousness being talked is real or reflected conciousness.2)If real,it is common to all beings than what about experiences of different beings

pranams pranams......

Thank you so much, Swami ji! I have a question: why can't samvit / awareness be Many, why does it have to be One? Isn't this axiomatic, saying that consciousness is one?

56:20 drilling outside the room , kicks you in ecstacy It reveals the consciousness

Majority of population are following belief system. Belief system marketed very powerfully.

20:11 mental state keeps changing but consciousness doesn't

1:24:10 the reverse of i am BRAHMAN

22:27 Have to be very careful with language. “That which experienced coffee is samvit”, makes samvit an object- it is something you know of, as that which experienced coffee. It makes samvit something apart from the coffee, and an entity you can posit through its function (gun, गुण)- of knowing. It might be better to say, “the knowing is samvit”. Samvit is not the knower of, nor the knowledge of coffee, but the fact (the act?) of knowing itself. So long as there is the knower-known duality, there isn’t non duality. Consciousness is the convergence of the knower and the known. How is saying, “knowing is samvit” not an objectification? “Saying” itself implies grammatical objectification- whence the Budhha’s silence on the aatma. However, there is the difference between noumena and phenomena. A noumenon is by definition an object. A phenomenon is not. A molecule of water is an object, a whirlpool of water (though objectified, even anthropomorphized, by the mind) is not an object, it is a phenomenon. The object itself is the known. The Guna is the knowledge. No guna, no knowledge of the object. And the mind (the chitchhaya) is where the knowledge is apprehended. In that sense, the mind is the knower. Where is the knowing? The knowing is consciousness. Now, the samvit is beyond being a phenomenon too- since it is by-in-through which you know all phenomena. Knowing is not a guna, since gunas too exist in knowing. An experience is a phenomenon, knowing is knowing, a class of its own. Samvit is, in fact, knowing itself. Samvit is not the “knower of” and it is not the “knowledge of” either. It is the knowing. Known, knowledge, and knowers (gyatr, gyan, gyey) change. The knowing, chitt, is the same. “Knowing” is where the knower and the known become one. (I know there’ll be those who say, “that which experiences coffee” is the definition of a subject. Sure, linguistically. But cognition wise, if you can objectify it, give it a role, then it is an object of your cognition. To have the role or the property of knowing objectifies it. To my contemplation, this is an important point to grasp. However, I respect your disagreement. Please know I do not mean to dis the swami- I have deep reverence for him.)

Then what differentiates your awareness and my awareness ....why ?

🙏🙏

My studies of Panchadashi have been facilitated by these talks by Swamiji, a beautiful and scientific way of explaining Adwita Vedanta. Peeyush Lala

I have heard this umpteen times! What a delivery from Swami Sarvapriyananda and what a performance by Sri Vidhyaranya!

pranam maharaj. Thanks so much.

pranams gurudev