If you learn one thing from China it is National Security as the first priority. That is why they are still building coal fired power stations. Sweden has seen the riots in France and cost of living increases as being terminal to national security. This aside from renewables destroying our countryside and having China reaching within is unacceptable.
@@infidel202the ALP sold us out decades ago, Albo is simply following the UN/WEF agenda. Hawke & Beasley both told Australians what they were upto, unfortunately the majority of Australians have ignored it. Hawke and Beasley drummed up a republic, then Turnbull now Albanese with no private property rights. To quote Kim Beasley in federal parliament “the United Nations has given the federal government a mandate of ownership for housing, property, farms and business to government control once the republic has been proclaimed”. To quote Bob Hawke “the Fabian Society acknowledges the principal tenet of Marxism, the abolition of private property, in this case to own land”.
@@sallycent6598 he still chews his crayons Way not fit for purpose as a minister Absolutely no understanding of the energy market and he is in danger of leaving us in the dark !!!
Chris bowen is a, "proven disaster area" in this case its the, "transition" (not, "all at once straight away!!") to renewables! If they, "continue to let this 🤡" get his way, the Labor Party will be, "turfed in 1" cheers 🍻
Mad yes, point of now return now. The socialist Third Reich fell and so will this socialist Fourth Reich. Just as soon as a critical mass of us are awakened from Woke.
I still want to know what is 'renewable' about germanium, thalium, lithium, cobalt, etc...utilized for non-recyclable single use processing to make solar panels and batteries? Even the fiberglass blades of giant windmills don't get recycled, use till they destroy themselves (which they do pretty often) and junk them. What is 'renewable' about this technology? The best batteries in the world are junked after less than ten years of constant charge/discharge cycling, the solar panels lose half their already crappy energy conversion efficiency around the same time, then you just throw them away and make more. What is 'renewable' about that? Those elements aren't made in the natural cycles of the Earth, they were created in late stage supernova fusion and we won't be getting more of that stuff, so why is this 'renewable'?
The renewable part refers to how often they will need to be scrapped and replaced with the same non-recyclable materials. So... renewable building contracts?
When most of a country believes a mentally ill highschool drop out being a climate expert something is extremely wrong ! Unfortunately other countries are doing the same thing but the people don't know that this isn't about climate is about people control ! Being against farming is a perfect example ! Once they control the food say goodbye to freedom !
Gretard Thunberg’s face always reminds me of her indifference to the suffering of those working the Congolese cobalt mines in order to promote the horror known as electro-mobility.
WE NEED ABUNDANT POWER SUPPLIES WITH MASSIVE SPARE CAPCITY FOR OUR NATIONAL FUTURE PROPSERITY NUCLEAR IS THE ONLY ANSWER FISSIION THEN FUSION WE HAVE THE RESOURCES TO FEED THE REACTOR BUT WE NEED TO PROCESS FUEL RODS AND THEN WE ARE THEN ENERGY INDEPENDENT AS A NATION AND HAVE NET ZERO EMSSIONS AND CAN TRADE WITH ANY OTHER MODERN ECONOMY BASED ON OUR DECARBONISED ECONOMY !!!!
@@info88w11 i think your caps lok is stuck mate! , seriously tho, yes to nuclear, but molten salt, it runs at atmospheric pressure , can consume todays nuclear waste , convert natural uranium into plutonium fuel, turn thorium into fuel also while running doubling as the radiation sheild , runs at high temprature for industrial heat for desalination/ synthetic liquid fuel production [ to replace fossil fuels] , a reactor that is walk away safe, makes its own fuel while in operation and is consuming waste from previous reactors and waste from mining [ thorium] , there is even thorium in power station ash, on the moon, on mars, on asteroids and probably anywhere we go using this amazing tech to go to the stars! the "burn up " rate for standard nuclear is pathetic at 1 to 2 % where the burn up rate for molten salt is 60% or at least 30 times more efficient , better as tech improves with online processing , it has my vote, support and confidence
my post returned error until i removed the word "voice" and used confidence instead , WTF? sensoring posts with the word "voice" in it? its getting imposible to have a rational debate without misspelling words to get past the gatekeepers! vote no to the voice and yes to pauline!
I’m pretty sure Sweden has abandoned net zero as in net zero release of CO2 and focuses on net zero in using fossil fuels. Which is achievable. Oil is still going to be needed though as a base material in industrial production for example.
Also the various methods of producing steel, concrete, etc...will be ruinously taxing upon an electric infrastructure that can in no way even deal with current demands if automobiles are all supposed to be electric too. It won't work, electricity production needs to dramatically INCREASE to make everything electric and the way to do that in the long run is with steam turbines period. Whether you're doing nuclear, clean fossil fuel plants (which are very good these days), or innovations with cryophorus heat collection and pressure driven rankin cycles (using solar HEAT collection and storage with inverted air-conditioning heat-pipe technology instead of the doomed photovoltaic nonsense), turbines are robust, reliable, maintainable, energy dense, small footprint. That's the way to generate electricity, there is no better method or even competitive one where you don't have a huge waterfall or damm to use hydroelectric impellers. The 'renewable' methods are flimsy, toxic crap to throw away and replace every 10 years, throw away consumerist short sighted tripe. It's a stoopid way to go. The politicians are ignorant people falling for scams to waste money on these technologies, they will not last, they will not serve to do anything but raise prices and cause shortages of the myriad fossil fuel byproducts shot through modern industrial economies.
And the solar panels and batteries are junk in ten years, and the giant windmill blades destroy themselves by friction of their tips traveling 180+mph continuously by simple dust and pollen in the wind. It's all crap technology and not 'renewable' at all. Yeah, what do we do when kilotons of toxic battery chemicals are leeching into the groundwater around all the dumps of the depleted lithium batteries? Get tumors and die is the answer, but I guess we'll just ship it all over to China.
This is the real point. You already don't have water or mineral exploitation rights to your own property, and now these 'renewable' technologies will be completely outside any individual's reach to make for themselves. They've destroyed the grass-roots electrification movements all over the globe that WERE starting to be implemented by ingenious land owners building wind and steam powered generators on their property, destroyed that completely, and now they're going to regulate and control every aspect of power from the mines to the meters and you just get to work and pay period, or they'll come and shoot you. That's the plan.
Have been posting working towards proper nuclear energy and everyone goes crazy. Reason for certain govts is they cant con us like they are doing right now with this 'expensive' green energy (big money in their pockets at the cost of us taxpayers) where how it comes to be is never explained. When Sweden starts thinking/acting like this (yay) then you know what the actual story is and green energy is not doable for us at this time in history.
Of course they are as has its neighbour to the east Finland, in fact Finland, has five nuclear reactors and around 5.5 million people, here nuclear power covers 40% of electricity production. Australia, one of the worlds largest suppliers of uranium from BHPs Olympic Dam in SA, has no commercial electricity production from nuclear with a population of 26.5m people. Australia has only one reactor, used for the production of medical isotopes - located in Sydney. So. begs the question why doesn't Australia have nuclear based electricity production............
It's a bad joke considering the solar panels and batteries last a decade then you junk them and the giant fiberglass windmill blades destroy themselves hitting dust and pollen in the air or shake themselves apart in storms. Renewable money for the people who are going to have exclusive profit replacing the crap technology.
It's cheap 30 years later, BUT it will be there 30 years later, unlike the 'renewables' which you will be replacing every 10 years if you're lucky enough to get that much use out of them.
The political world in Australia seems to be awash with persons with economics degrees. How come this woman Judith Sloan claims to be an economist yet talks like none of them? Indeed seems to make the most glorious sense!
Relax, the politicians are led by the current PM, who during his campaign for election to the highest political office described himself as a former economic adviser to Prime Minister Bob Hawke. That this ridiculous and patently dishonest claim was immediately exposed for the blatant lie it was is clearly immaterial to the otherwise ruthlessly probity obsessed MSM. Remember 'rules for thee but not for me' the consistent theme of the Albanese government ever since 'it's Scott Morrison's fault' stopped working to explain away their inability to deliver upon a single one of their core election promises. Albanese's government is the biggest shell game grift in the entire history of Australian politics.
The Energy ,Net Zero, The Voice and Cost of Living, will be the Legacy Albo, leaves around our neck.. It will ruin, us to the stage where we will be a 3rd class nation
I've been looking at cold steam rankin. Reversed technology like air-conditioners utilizing pressure differential to lower the boiling point of working fluids and heat input to generate electricity. Built on a large scale and utilizing heat collectors feeding heat storage, that seems to be an actual practically achievable 'renewable' energy source. The heat storage could be built to hold several days worth of electricity generation capacity to offset intermittency issues and could be backed up by simple gravity generators using water or even just physical weights. The solar panels and batteries are made with rare elements that aren't part of the Earth's natural cycle, the conversion efficiency is crap, and the amount of storage capacity necessary to overcome intermittency is enormous. They aren't 'renewable' in their composition at all, once we REALLY start using up these elements, I don't think we'll be better off than trying a better actual 'renewable' solution in the first place.
Net zero does not mean actual zero, that would be gross zero. Example: the net weight of an actual item could be 1 kilo, but the gross weight of an item could be 2 kilos because it includes packaging, paperwork etc.
Well done Sweden, one country that sees the limitations of renewable energy. It is certainly not the final solution, never has been and never will be. Nuclear has moved on and there are quicker and cheaper options available now, it is tried and tested.
Nuclear is a long, long way away from any sort of renaissance. IEA projections for 2023 have global net wind and solar capacity additions of 390 GW and nuclear 0 GW, with new plant capacity just keeping pace with closures. Global nuclear generation last year was 2610 TWh, less than 10% of total global power generation and below the 2721 TWh generated way back in 2006
Sweden is ‘walking back’ from renewables toward nuclear 1214pm 16.7.23 the only advert i have seen on you tube which stoked my interest - the camera lucida. i recall some dude in pub ranting about the optics used to allow masters to paint their subject matter in glorious perspective... i might even get myself a copy of Hockney's book - the chap those dudes garnered the idea from in the first instance... wow. the neo lucida!!! it looks cool... hey sweden hey australia go get yerself a neo lucida!!!!
The bank hath benefits of interest from all money it creates out of nothing, and whom has the issuing power directly or indirectly decides all future policies by the Governments therefore the destiny of the people. Are undeniable facts that the hand that gives is above the hand that takes and the sole objective of private corporation is gain. If the people in this world keep going in allowing the bank the power to create and control their currencies, the banks will deprive the people fro all properties until their children wake-up homeless on the land their fathers conquered. The ultimate power to create and control all sorts of money needs to be restored to the people, then lodged with their elected Governments and finally put in circulation free from all debt and any obligations of interests. Wars, terrorism, bankruptcy are all effects caused by the privatization of money compound with interest. The whole monetary system need to be replaced by a new one capable of making the previous obsolete and it was needed to be done 200 years ago. Quote: "If Congress has the power under the Constitution to create paper money it was given to use it themselves not to be delegated to individuals and corporations." - Andrew Jackson
The US has 91 nuclear reactors generating about four times the national electricity consumption of all of Australia and there was only ever one three mile island incident...in the 70s...in which no one died. Anti-nuclear activism is mostly ignorant.
The world is on fire because of lies and God said don't make me come down there, long suffering will have enough of your evil ways. Repent and seek the Lord while you have time.
@@grantbuttenshaw About Sweden "walking back" from renewables. Them firing up their old reactors is not permanent. It's a quick fix for Net Zero until they have an fully functioning infrastructure for renewable energy. Look it up.
@@trickyboy1517 they are looking to build 2 more reactor and have changed the laws in Sweden to enable this. The rest of Europe bar Germany is doing the same.
