sir, i have problem with (income expense) method when i solve this below method. Statements: All the windows are doors. No door is a wall. Conclusions: Some windows are walls. No wall is a door. A. Only (1) conclusion follows B. Only (2) conclusion follows C. Either (1) or (2) follows D. Neither (1) nor (2) follows E. Both (1) and (2) follow answer: when iam using ie method is (E).but when iam using vendiagram method is (B) can any one explain this please??
@CareerRide No apple is an orange. All bananas are oranges. (a) All apples are oranges (b) Some apples are oranges (c) No apple is a banana (d) None of the above Ans: according to income expenditure method BOTH A & C are correct But ans of this question on every website OPTIONS A How it possible Plz sirrr explain me
I discovered this channel last year during May for the MAT exams and did your classes and got 90 percentile within 15 days. Now I am using it for placement preparation.
if statement: no cats are dog then by income-expenditure method conclusion: some cats are dog is True but with ven diagram the conclusion is False. please justify anyone. @@CareerRideOfficial
You are so great, especially today because where utube channels do extensive advertisement more than teaching, it is actually very difficult to find teachers who actually teach....Thankyou!!
This is an appreciation message:- today was my MPSET paper, bht dino se logical reasoning mene khud se try kia bht videoes dekhe mjhse ek question nhi bna but kl raat ye video dekhi methods sikhi nd aaj ye confirm he ki logical reasoning k saare quest.shi krk aai hu..... Thank you so much sir sch me ek accha teacher student ki problems fraction of second me solve kr deta he.....thnku so so much for this lecture
At first I thought, using income and expenditure method makes the problem complex... But trust me...it really helps to reduce the complexities and can be solved in sec... Thank you for making such a wonderful content🥰
@@sejalshinde533 Income: 1) tricks=100, gimmicks=50 2) mimic=100, gimmick=100 Expenditure: 1) Trick= 100, gimmick= 100 2) gimmick=50, tricks=100 1st conclusion is wrong as expenditure of gimmick is more than income 2nd statement is true as income=expenditure
I always used to skip this topic while writing RBI/SBI mock examinations but now I can score 5/5 in this topic. Thank you for the crystal clear explanation. Hope this helps me in upcoming examinations.
How do you apply mock test? How much per test? Any suggestions? Btw, if you don't mind have you selected in any of the job you've mention? (Just curious)
STATEMENTS All chilies are garlics. Some garlics are onions. All onions are potatoes. No potato is ginger. CONCLUSIONS 1; Some chilies are potatoes 2; No onion is ginger. Sir as per your income expenditure method the answer i got was only conclusion 1 is correct but the correct answer is ,only conclusion 2 follows , if you could please clarify on this
@@abhaigopinath6338Some chillies won't be potato as the sentence is not definitely true... it's a possibility that some chillies can be potato...but here in conclusion possibility is not given... it's a direct sentence and so this conclusion is wrong!! The second one...No Potato is Ginger which means No Ginger is Potato... Onion comes under Potato...All onions are Potatoes...so if potato can't be ginger how can onion be ginger....so the second conclusion is correct!
I wanna say, it was amazing & supremely great....I thought I didn't have any capacity to understand logical reasoning,,,,I lost hope when I used to study alone with the help of book but this teacher helped me to build my confidence up, thank you sir#
OK! Got to say this for sure. Today was my Infosys test and I knew syllogism would be there. I could say for sure you could attend EVERY SINGLE SYLLOGISM questions after watching this video. A bit confusion was for the questions which had sentences not starting with those words ALL, NOT, SOME AND SOME NOT. In that case I was unable to solve the questions instead I was assuming the words before the sentence. Anyways, thanks a ton ❤️
I search for english explaination,since hindi is difficult for me to understand. And found this! your teachings are great😇, you make the topic easy to understand. And I really like your English explaination.
I just gave a mock test of Syllogism and got most of them wrong. Being into alas, I wanted to get my topic clear and found this Technique. Now I can solve all the types of it. thanks a Lot sir!🙌🙌💯💯🔥
One of the finest teacher I have seen, ur teaching skill and techniques are awesome i feel very confident. I am damn sure that I will definitely get full marks on this topic. Thank you so much sir🤝
This one is the first video i found differentiating between possibility questions and normal questions. Thanks for explaining the basics. It was really helpful.
Sir, possibilities are very difficult to understanding.am trying to getting more and more problems relating to possibilities for understanding this venn diagram. But IE method is very useful from the first solution..thank u sir
I think it syllogism are difficult but after u explaining all are clear Actually i covered all of your logical and aptitude lessons of carrier ride by using your courese i believe that i will be score in this logical test near about 80-90 % . So thank u sir ❤😊😊🙏🙏
Thank you so much career ride team...for the 1st time my syllogism topic got cleared with your very detailed explanation..plz keep up d gud work..god bless..once again a lot lot lot of thanks👍👏
Thank you very much sir .....I have been struggling with syllogism since a long time ....but now using income and exp trick my accuracy is almost 100 %
Thank you a lot .....very very thanks.....many videos being watched but not getting clear concepts what I got here....very crystal clear...i m very grateful to you forever for this very beautiful teachings....may God precipitate right knowledge upon you...
Thanks a lot Sir for wonderful tips...Sir but in Q-14, another option DEC is also correct. Also please explain the logic behind some of the empirical rules given by you 🙏
I found a problem on a web site: 1) All tigers are Lions 2) Some Lions are Leopards with conclusions: 3) Some Tigers are Leopards and 4) No Tigers are Leopards. If we allocate the income/expenses scheme, 1) 100 Ti; 50 Li 2) 50 Li; 50 Le 3) 50 Ti; 50 Le 4) 100 Ti; 100 Le. To evaluate (3) we consider (1) and (2) together and try to eliminate Li, which both have 50, so, based on the algorithm you propose, this should result in (3) being false. However, if you think logically, (3) is true, and also the answer on that web page stated (3) was true. Your formula has some serious problems. It could work in some particular cases, but it doesn't seem to be generally valid. You should revise your algorithm, or place a disclaimer stating that it is not generally valid, so people wouldn't base their knowledge or interview results on something like that.
3 is false, even using venn diagrams. The website was the incorrect one. Some Tigers may be Leopards, but we can't guarantee that some Tigers are Leopards from the given statements. Doing by Venn Diagram, draw a circle for lions. Inside it, draw a circle for tigers. So all tigers are lions. 1) is satisfied. Now, draw a circle for leopards that intersects lions, but not tigers. So some lions are Leopards and 2) is satisfied. By this diagram, conclusion 3) of some tigers are Leopards is false. It's a *possibility* if you draw the venn diagrams a different way, but the conclusion doesn't say possibility.
Thanku so much sir, for making syllogism so easy.... I was searching such teacher that make study easy... I saw so much videos on another channels... But no one was perfect .... You are best teacher....
Who is this Master blaster behind the screen because I never watched someone explaining this clear with so much of patience. Thank you so much sir 😊. I hope we can see you one day
Sir in the Question no. 14. The solution given is no. B i.e BEA. But the option C is also correct where Both the eagle scores 100 in common and but Income expenditure statement where "income >= expenses" this rule matches the no. C statement too.
Sir i understood the income -expense method but i am unable to understand the venn diagram method .will you please try some another way to make us understand the venn diagram method.
How can we use the income expenditure method for this? Statements: 1] Some poens are rich 2] X is rich Conclusions: 1] X is a peon 2] X has large family
i-e method usually gives wrong conclusion.ex- statement-1-all grapes are green .2-some green are hard. conclusion-1-some green are grapes.2-some hard are grapes.3-no grapes are hard
Thankyou so much sir for this wonderful video. The concepts and pattern you are telling us is very much relatable so we enjoyed logical section a lot and the topic is covered in only one video that's amazing for me . Once again thanks sir👍
at 47:56 when you said ""If conclusion is True for all the possible venn diagrams then mark it as Wrong however if its true for some and false for others then mark is Correct" I got confused but then after little research I got my answer. So sharing answer with everyone if you faced same confusion. The advice you received regarding syllogism problems and Venn diagrams is meant to help you understand the concept of validity and invalidity when evaluating syllogistic conclusions using Venn diagrams. This approach is based on the idea that if a conclusion holds true in all possible Venn diagrams, it might be too strong and therefore incorrect. Conversely, if a conclusion is true in some diagrams but false in others, it's more likely to be accurate and valid. Here's why this approach makes sense: 1. **All Possible Venn Diagrams:** In syllogism problems, conclusions are drawn based on categorical statements (premises) involving sets or categories. Venn diagrams represent the relationships between these sets. If a conclusion is true in all possible Venn diagrams, it could indicate that the conclusion is overly broad or making assumptions that are too strong. In real-world scenarios, it's rare for a conclusion to be universally true for all cases. 2. **Some True and Some False:** When a conclusion is true in some Venn diagrams but false in others, it suggests that the conclusion is making a statement that holds true for certain cases but not for others. This aligns more closely with the nuanced nature of real-world logical reasoning. The goal of syllogistic reasoning is to determine what can be logically inferred from given premises, and this often involves identifying conclusions that are valid in specific scenarios. By adopting this approach, you are promoting a more nuanced and accurate understanding of the relationships between sets in syllogistic reasoning. It encourages you to consider the shades of meaning and the conditions under which a conclusion is true rather than assuming a conclusion is correct simply because it's universally applicable across all diagrams. Remember that syllogistic reasoning involves careful analysis of premises and conclusions, and applying techniques like Venn diagrams can be very helpful. This approach you've been advised to use can act as a valuable guideline to ensure that your conclusions are well-founded and appropriately nuanced.
Sir your teaching methodology is just out of the box and it's just amazing. You really make us feel like the question is very easy and we can definitely solve it. It gives us confidence. Thank you so so much sir🙏
Sir can we always use Income & Expenditure method, when it is related to normal sums? If that's the case I follow up your method and take common word where there is atleast 1 hundred but some of the solutions does not match. If you can kindly hlep me I'll be very grateful...
Sir apne mera kam bahot asan kar diya muze ye sylolism bahot hard lagata tha par ab nhi lagega apki icome wali method best hai par sir ven diagram me thoda confusion hota hai sir
I have learn new thing that IE.. It is so much help to find easily., but it is not help to find answers when the conclusion is come either or neither option. So, kindly help me to relese the video regard this..
Statements: Some squares are circles. No circle is a triangle. No line is a square. Conclusions: I. Some triangles are not squares. II. Some lines are circles. Sir please explain this question by income expense method
