There is an artistic notion inherited from the romantic era that assumes the more prolific a composer is, the less important or valuable the work as a whole is. This is of course completely false, but is a widely assumed idea, and so when people see large catalogues, many will think "how good can they be if there are so many works?"
@@geshtin Yes its completely ridiculous, because from that logic then we would have to dismiss almost all composers from the baroque and classical eras for example, because they were so prolific and didn't concern themselves with writting "masterpieces" as romantics did.
Ah yes, those famously second rate composers JS Bach and Mozart. :D :D Sometimes classical music fans are a bit silly. You know who is another who wrote sooooo much music and everything I've heard is still great: Martinu.
