@@СтепанТодышев no the sherman would have. And the tank was not 80 years standing, at most 50 years cause soviets really kept that tank going till they couldn't.
@@SergyMilitaryRankingsyep it did, the soviets won the war by quantity not quality. It had basically no armour against German tanks and the sheer quantity of these tanks produced made them look over powered.
@@TheTanveerGaming that is a goofy myth that makes it sound like you think enemy at the gates is a documentary. The armour on the T-34 was amazing. It literally forced the Germans to improve their guns as the 75mn didn't cut it and they took design elements to make the Panzer V.
@@SergyMilitaryRankings yes it did, they had afwul transmition that broke down, the engine needed a lot of oxygen to run, the tracks weared of real quick, the transmition broke down when trying to switch on higher gears sometimes, and it coudnt bring a lot of spare parts with it due to it being cramped, which didnt help when something broke down
You cant say the the fake was cooler because it came from the real one so that means that the real one was cooler and thats why u cant say that the fake one was cooler and thats why it is cooler and the spelling of cooler is c-o-o-l-e-r ( I wasted some seconds of your life hehehe)
