@@franekj4184 I think the old soviet style of warfare of throwing people, equipment, and ordnance at an objective carried over to the Russian military.
@@mskamilorA T-90M was completely immobilised yesterday by 2 bradleys using only the 25mm bushmaster autocannons. It was hilarious. All the optics got knocked out and the turret rotation system broke so the turret just spun around. The T-90M reversed into a tree, then got stuck or broke and the crew bailed.
@@bobigorg1665 How many Russian tanks have been obliterated oh that's right. A LOT. The leopard either hit mines or had atgm destroy them. The t90 got owned my a 25mm. Yet, weirdly in the game. The Abrams DU m829 struggles to kill the t90. Weird huh. It's almost like it's bias or something
@@stalinistpotato4329 They did more than destory the optics. The set it on fire, either detonated era or smoke launchers, and made the turret get stuck slewing in circles.
@alexanderkoutromanos2700 That just seems like cope since leopards do occasionally lose their turrets, they don't make an Olympic sport out of cosmonaut production like the T-Series..
@@Livewyr7they do lose their turrets since they are a lighter than western tanks at least you die instantly you don't get burned alive like on western tanks
@@Livewyr7 there are hundreds of T-90s an active service on the front lines compared to a dozen or two of leopards of all kinds. Of course the latter would suffer less losses
You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round "Like a record, baby, right 'round, 'round, 'round You spin me right 'round, baby, right 'round Like a record, baby, right 'round, 'round, 'round" -T90M
@@ROS_ESPRIT "so in the video he didn’t retreat" what would you call running into a tree with its turret spinning without control? A tactical repositioning? Lmao
yea just shows how flawed modern russian tanks are, just because they look scary dose not mean they are in any way competitiv. Any modern Western MBT is superrior. No Leo has yet been killed by a simple BMP with a 30mm Gun LMAO @@bobigorg1665
Never retreat. Because you can’t. And if you didn’t disable that enemy with your first shot you’re basically screwed with a seven second reload. But hey at least normally when 9/10 rounds go through the ammo carousel it does nothing
I have the tank and love it, those flaws are its only flaws, it's extremely tanky, the optics are great, the round is fantastic, and it's quiet and the spall liner makes it survive another magnitude of bullshit
Well you kinda can, by just.......well turning around the tank and somehow finesse your way back somehow. Just hope you got prep time and put a bunch ERA on the Rear.
The icing on the cake is not the fact that a Bradley destroyed a T-90M without TOW, but that the gunner of the Bradley played War Thunder to know the weak spots...
It can retreat except when it's driving forward, leaving it's rear exposed but it was enough for Chardleys to shred it to the point of it's turret starts spinning around. Great timing Gaijin !
T-90M in WT: Practically impossible to penetrate by it's NATO counterparts with 120mm sabot rounds T-90M IRL: Forced to retreat from 25mm fire (destroyed by it) I understand the need for balancing in your game, but you have shown double standards in refusing to increase the armor capabilities of certain vehicles such as the Abrams, Leclerc, Merkava, etc. So what is stopping us from accusing you of being biased?
@@Maverick966 it was hit in the turret, probably causing shrapnel or the hydraulics to mess up (bad soviet metal quality), then it hit a tree trying to drive off, got stuck and was finished by a drone
t90m never retreats just like in real life! it gets blown up easily before those 4km/h can try saving it. however in war thunder its clear that its akin to a god and fire nor direct ammo hits seem to defeat it.
sounds like you cant read, i said direct shots into the ammo rack. i think i know what that looks like just as much as you do on the russian tanks and when my shell goes through that and it disappears, or doesn't detonate the ammo i think id have a right to be annoyed. and the t80s sure whatever, yeah they are faster but also much easier to kill and even then sometimes doesnt get ammoracked or have a fuel explosion.@@romanboi3115
A tank is just as good as the crew, remember that moment where a russian t80bv which is light years behind the t90 destroyed an entire convoy, yeah if crew good tank good if crew incompetent tank bad
Most of leopards 2 in RL can't even reach frontline because of how often they break down, ahh also suggest add soft ground to simulate how well over 60 tons NATO tank just can't move in RL😂.
@@rufimcaelum7972 You really want to call Abrams and Leopards unrealiable on a video which features a russian tank which has an engine that is known to shake itself to death? lol
It was ambushed by at least two Bradleys and a drone; it ate a TOW missile that damaged its optics -- leaving it vulnerable to the drone. The crew survived and bailed
@@p_filippouz Even if the TOW2B was modelled properly in game, the ERA plates on top of the turret have over 100mms of flat armor (which is unrealistic) so no.
@@Retly_Ai We don't have Javelin in WT and 760 mm meanwhile the Khornet pens 1000mm Javelin is less versatile than the Khornet and the crazy Russians also put the Khornet on variousous ATGM launching light vehicles such as buggies and armoured cars that could come to War Thunder Of course if only all ATGM launcher vehicle gets scouting!
@sturmmorser_on_blitzit's referencing the recent events of 2 Bradley that engaged a t90, taking out the optics and damaging the turret drive, the t90 crew crashed into a tree trying to reverse and then bailed out, the t90 was later struck by a kamikaze drone.
@@digitalronin7787 "Yet the crew of that T-90 survived and withstand an ambush?" yeah, and now they're in much better conditions, being promoted from a tank crew to POWs, lmao. No amount of sugarcoating or copium can change the fact that Bradley managed to bully a tank into submission, in close range and without its TOW missile.
@@digitalronin7787 > "the crew of that T-90 survived and withstand an ambush" > no they didn't > "lol it's a war, casualties and pows are normal" Impressive mental gymnastics, very good. Changing your point midflight like this, bravo. Also, if you wanna see coping - go down into the comments and find like 5 russian cocksuckers doing their best to sugarcoat their loss.
@@ДмитроПрищепа-д3я put any tank on its place and they may perform the same. getting shooted by 2 25mm cannons is not as easy as it seems in War thunder, it breaks the external components Taking down the Visibility and also can damage the turret ring and the cannon.
Same for NATO tanks, any MBT in real life is vulnerable to 25-30mm autocannon rounds to the turret ring, gun mantlet, tracks and sights mounted externally.
@@Maverick966 NATO tanks are sometimes made to be immune to Russian 30mm, this literally isn’t true lmao, the abrams is, and with its added armor I believe from combat ranges the Bradley is too
@@LewisB3217 All externally mounted equipment can be disabled in all MBTs, even the gun barrel, it is exactly the reason why the M1A2 Abrams, Leopard 2, T-90M and all modern MBTs have an auxiliary gun sight similar to WW2 and Cold War sights mounted alongside the gun, not connected with the fire control system, without such systems the tank is disabled but the crew can survive, which was the case for T-90M
@@Maverick966 entirely irrelevant to what I said, you said NATO tanks would be destoryed by 25-30mm, that’s wrong, because NATO tanks are generally made to be immune to Russian autocannon fire, has nothing to do with external equipment, though that does show you how less advanced Russian junk is, the Bradley is immune to 30mm in the frontal arc with its added armor, the abrams is made to be immune frontally, and even on the sides with ARAT2 era it’s immune to 30mm
Given the average observed skill level of the people who'd be using the T-90M, it IS the perfect tank. Eating two ATGMs and a belt of auto-cannon rounds and NOT exploding isn't "biased" at all! And the -4km reverse speed isn't a flaw; it's a safety feature! Any faster and you could damage or immobilize the tank if you backed into something like a tree.... so reverse with confidence my friends!
they didnt get harmed. i think you guys dont watch the actual media just see like 2 seconds of it and take what your mind thinks is truth. yean it disabled the tank, however none of the Shells penetrated deep enough to kill the crew
Are they modeled to be easily destroyed by 2 Bradly IFVs? Because we know its easy enough to do as Ukraine has demonstrated. Russian ERA and armor needs reworked to be more realistic.
@@Erusean_pilot Los mas probable es que a los primeros 15 disparos le hayan jodido la mira del artillero y por la hagitacion del momento disparo sin pensarlo
I mean they showed video of Paladin and video of urban Leopard the same time some Paladins got destroyed by drones and about those Leopard when infantry destroyed 3 Leopards near Rabotyne.
@@Just_A_Random_Deskboth german and russias most advanced tanks got destroyed by 500$ drones it’s not copium he’s just pointing out they’re not indestructible
