Take a look! What ancient Greeks, Egyptians, and Scythians really looked like 

That would be FASCINATING. Good suggestion!

Time to peel some dead guys

i think those kinds of experiments have already been done by criminalists, the skulls of the victims were found, reconstructed and then shown to the relatives of the victim. In most cases the relatives easily recognised the person that was killed, so i guess this method works like a charm

🤺☦🇷🇺Scythians (Ashkenaz = haplogroup R1a-m420 subclades) were NOT of the Iranian/Aryan race (Madai = haplogroups R1a-z93, R2 subclades), but were the ancestors of us Slavs. Yes, as Japhetic peoples (European race) we are related, as brother races, but we are still very distinct races

​@@EasternOrthodox101I believe slavs absorbed most scythians, so modern slavic people would have a high incidence of scythian dna, but scythians wouldn't have been slavic. Of course, I'm too far north probably to claim this.. Я из Карелии))

Αυτό έγραψα και σε έναν άλλο ότι θα ήταν ο άσχημος της εποχής του 😜

seems to be too light for a greek

@@user-tm6ip8zy1o Greeks are light.

Greeks are a light - skinned people that tan in the summer. We do however have mostly dark hair and eyes, and most of the men have rich hair in their hands, feet etc.

@@valhalla6991 🤺☦🇷🇺Scythians (Ashkenaz = haplogroup R1a-m420 subclades) were NOT of the Iranian/Aryan race (Madai = haplogroups R1a-z93, R2 subclades), but were the ancestors of us Slavs. Yes, as Japhetic peoples (European race) we are related, as brother races, but we are still very distinct races

How could you make friends with a Sarmatian or Scythian? They'd aim their bow at you and pick you off before you could get close 😄

Not sure how friendly these guys would be

Friendship is when the exchange of value is similar and actually benefit eachother..Fear eachother, thus respect eachother. But trust eachother because you share the same acknowledgement and principles. Strengthen eachother! Nowadays so called friends are parasites and real friends are rare. You can better say you could have been "Acquaintances" because you don't know if the value you would exchange is similar.

@@chichfm5108 Sarmatians were not related to Scythians

🤺☦🇷🇺Scythians (Ashkenaz = haplogroup R1a-m420 subclades) were NOT of the Iranian/Aryan race (Madai = haplogroups R1a-z93, R2 subclades), but were the ancestors of us Slavs. Yes, as Japhetic peoples (European race) we are related, as brother races, but we are still very distinct races

In other words, Slavs

@Gond.LeszGond genetically Hungarians are mostly R1a1 so basically Slavs, they just dont want to admit that.

@Gond.LeszGond no thanks, but you go ahead. Whatever makes you happy my friend.

Well another Scythian appeared to have Asiatic features. Perhaps "Scythian" is an Exonym (A word used by outsiders to identify culture) used to group a very diverse and, most likely, not united group of people together for simplicity. Scythians, most likely, was not a single culture, but many different tribes and cultures that populated the Eurasian steppe.

​@Gond.LeszGondhahahaha

He looked just like my High School history teacher. He was also a basketball player.

🤺☦🇷🇺Scythians (Ashkenaz = haplogroup R1a-m420 subclades) were NOT of the Iranian/Aryan race (Madai = haplogroups R1a-z93, R2 subclades), but were the ancestors of us Slavs. Yes, as Japhetic peoples (European race) we are related, as brother races, but we are still very distinct races

@@EasternOrthodox101 They were descendants of Proto-Indo-Europeans and continuum to Yamnaya horse cultures.

@@ReasonAboveEverything Proto-indo Europeans? Yamnaya?? Those modern terms don't exist in reality and they don't mean s*** either🤷‍♂️

​@@EasternOrthodox101They didn't exist? Maybe scythians just came from holes in the ground.. Not coming from any earlier group?

children, learn to match is an old and long-used method of reconstructing the appearance of the skull developed by Gerasimov almost 100 years ago, then it was done sculpturally, the advantage of AI is that it is not influenced by politics. The same Gerasimov, on the instructions of the Bolsheviks, gave Asian features to Prince Andrei Bogolyubsky - the Bolsheviks believed that the Polovtsians had an Asian appearance, and Bogolyubsky's mother was a Polovtsian - and Tamerlane, although at the opening of the tomb they found that Tamerlane was fair-haired, at the recent reburial of A.Bogolyubsky they did a computer reconstruction - it gave a typical European, but the head he, because of problems with the cervical vertebra, held exactly as Gerasimov depicted.

@@greatnoblelord "on the instructions of the Bolsheviks, gave Asian features to Prince Andrei Bogolyubsky" such things u should prove. since bolsheviks insisted on Horde's Yoke over slavic people probably Gerasimov made portrait against their instructions

Lol "problematic" the most overused and least understood word of the easily offended.

@@user-lr1xu1rm9v деточка, у тебя явный когнитивный диссонанс. И причем тут твое ордынское иго? Кстати, по достоверным описаниям - Сборнику летописей Рашид ад Дина исторические монголы были златокудры и синеоки Археология подтверждает, что первые азиаты в Южно-Русских степях появляются с приходом калмыков - халмгов -тех же ойратов(джунгар) - халхов и даригангов, что населяют современные монголии, в вики, пусть и нехотя, но признается, что ойраты заселили монголии только в 18в. В этом и причина того, что Каракорум и Сарай найти не могут - найдут, обрадуются, а потом делают реконструкцию по методу Герасимова и получают европейские лица - жаль я потерял ссылку есть двух томный академический труд , пусть и компилятивный - "История Татарского народа - там как раз такой казус. Так чем Герасимов противостоял твоим большевичкам( ты же простолюдинчик, так, что большевичок, что бы ты про себя не воображал, а вот я имею полное право на свою авку)

​@@greatnoblelord Рашид ад Дин говорил что чингисиды синеоки насчет златых кудрей впервые слышу. фантазёр.

Yeap... at an archaeological site in Egypt to recreate a digital image Anthropological analysis identified the skeletal remains as being of a man of African ancestry, aged between 17 to 29 years old at the time of his death.

their reconstruction is solely based on pictures that they took..

The notes on the video also mentioned affinities with Khoisan. Perhaps this reconstruction should have included some features more commonly associated with Khoisan as well.

If I remember correctly they had seen the people's in Mexico before they died our and even tested their remains and found that they were related to Australian Aboriginals. They made many theories as to why the simples to me is that the continents must have been much closer than we thought for periods of time.

@@cartoonhanks1708 - Africans have the most diverse DNA in the world. That's how we know we all came African origins. That would include the Aboriginals. Therefore if the "remains" you're talking about showed them related to Australian Aboriginals those Aboriginals were firstly Africans and their DNA is the result of a small band of Africans.

It’s so we can see the facial shape

He looks like Harrison Ford to me!

Are you from Crete? Where are you from?

Much of the proto-Greek dna has travelled the world since then, so it's entirely possible.

🤺☦🇷🇺Scythians (Ashkenaz = haplogroup R1a-m420 subclades) were NOT of the Iranian/Aryan race (Madai = haplogroups R1a-z93, R2 subclades), but were the ancestors of us Slavs. Yes, as Japhetic peoples (European race) we are related, as brother races, but we are still very distinct races

Here's to those whose names we'll never know 🍻

Scythian is more Iranian than anything else;however, in some way, we are all connected.

Scythians carried R1a

Ancestors of Scythians came from Corded ware Culture near with Yamnaya populations. this is why they have high European than iranians

There are many migrations before these cultural merges into euroasia. If you want to see in different direction about Scythian history, start with compare that Scythian guy and Atatürk in terms of phenotype. These west eurosian people(r1a) came to west asia before their cousins(mostly r1b) merged with iranic people at Caucasus. And after the Aryan invasion they(r1a) migrated to middle asia. it must be check End of the Sintashta, Sintashta Culture and the roots of the Scythians in hakasia.

@@jhombyrkotaksorgankazakh

*representative and yes, they actually would be, immigration was not a thing back then, so they would have all had these same ethnic features.

@@martychisnall Immigration absolutely was a thing back then, though it was more migration. There were people conquering people, people moving into regions, and mixing. It absolutely was a thing. It is the reason why Europeans can process milk/cheese today.

Uh oh. Someone feels triggered by manly masculine men and wants to see the betas, too so they can feel less ashamed. Also no IMMIGRATION was not a thing back then. Are you insane???? These people fought other tribes off viciously and relentlessly. How silly.

I think you missed the point..

​@@martychisnallimmigration does exist since the dawn of humanity... Homo sapiens left africa less than 70 000 years back only... So what you are saying is false

In the case of myceneans a very sharp dagger. Probably the rest as well. We don't know the norm , maybe the norm was beards i guess. But many Greek statues show men without beards. Just saying.

They actually had razors dedicated for the purpose of shaving. They are numerous in grave goods. But, I'm sure these are all clean shaven to show the face shape better.

At 00:40 the Nazlet Khater are ancient Egyptians from Upper Egypt.

@@MrAmhara 'Sub-Saharan populations' are not Egyptians, and the AI model they created obviously has features that are found in those Sub-Saharan populations and have nothing to do with how the ancient Egyptians looked.

@@sammyt3514 that guy didn't look black but more Australian/Pacific Islander or Native American even not negro/negroid black African.

@@MrAmhara Egyptian are not sub Saharan

But they still are African.​@@Afyj662

Lol

A lot of blacks these days also like to claim the real Jews were black people. And then they call us racist for disagreeing. Black supremacists are real.

Total bs story, there is not scythian language to make comparison. They were not iranic. Linguistically, genetically, culturally never proven

​@@blacksea-caspiansea9504 turkfied b*stard

"Pashtuns and Afghans are interchangeable". Let Afghan be a nationality sir, I am afraid half of your population is non-Afghan and 2/3 of all Afghans live in Pakistan.

bactria in 200bc was a greek kingdom

@@horror11 Nope

True, although I believe due to the survival of the fittest/evolution etc. on average, we are all far more attractive than our ancestors would have been. That’s why when looking at paintings of old timey scenes and people, most of them generally aren’t attractive. Not sure if there’s any real proof of what I said, but I heard this years ago and it made total sense to me

@@soldierside365 I'm sure the average height has increased due to selective breeding (except for certain places where it's not as attractive)

@@ryandavis4448 definitely. I’d say diet as well.

@@soldierside365I would dispute that-- “attractiveness” is completely randomly generated.. and very attractive parents often breed very unattractive children. Also, standards of attractiveness change.

@@historyandhorseplaying7374 good point, I clearly forgot the subjective and cultural element, using modern western standards as the comparison.

ha ha ha ha ha ha stupid hollywood

Dna evidence provided this evidence a long time ago look up androvono dna they come directly from German cored ware the aryans and sythians

Scythians were an Iranian group like the Sarmatians according to what I’ve read. Thoughts?

@@doctorjekyll6125 Iranian is a language not dna, the Iranian language didn’t start in iran, look up indo European migration

@@allahandro8367 actually Indo-European languages were started in northwest of modern day Iran Also we've Iranic genetics as we have Iranic languages

@@Iranian_Historian you clearly didn’t accurately read any of the southern arc papers because it literally says that Iranian languages didn’t enter iran till 1000 bce, the southern arc is eastern turkey not iran and proto indo European is not the Iranian language idiot, Anatolian is the only language that didn’t spread from the steppes actually read the papers clown.and literally all evidence says Iranian language was spoken by androvono who clearly is Northern European stop lying, that’s all Iranians do, you took the evidence so out of context it’s embarrassing, show me evidence of your claim or that Iranian languages exist before sintashta / androvono, show me a single paper that says sintashta are related to modern Iranian or prove indo Iranian exist before sintashta, none of the samples in iran even carried r1a, Iranian genetics and the Iranian language is not the same thing not even close, funny how both sides of the steppe, Greeks and Chinese consistently say they look Northern European as the Sythians dna also is mostly androvono with little to no bmac dna the real location of where your genetics come from with are not indo European or Iranian speakers

Yes amongst the Poles are the descendents of the Sarmatians and amongst the Turks are the Scythians. We are very distant cousins so to speak. Turkish heraldry is called Tamga by the way. And also alot of the Sarmatian material culture like their dresses, armor, hair styles and most importantly the beard style point show obvious commonlities to Turksh material cultural originated from the Scythians.

​@@enginkara1755 😂😂😂

@@enginkara1755 mal

@@Caucasioni_ they are not turk

Gentically not proven

True nowadays we don't need that extra bone structure and density .. men have gotten weaker because we no longer have to hunt,run ,and fight invading hordes..

you forgot that these people also have the shortest lifespan and their overgrowth body isnt functional for combat and general survival.

If they so good, why they ain't here

​@@Shoegazebasedgenre0. total bs

@@entirehorz8327 hey at least he has some true in his nickname

People were often shorter in many cultures, however some ethnicities were taller than people today through parts of their histories. Spartans were allegedly somewhat taller than was typical of iron age Greeks. Mycaenean (Achaian) Greeks were believed to be taller still.

@@roderickreilly9666 yes. But still, a Spartan at 1.70 height would be a 1.90 today. Haha

No shi, they didn’t had as much knowledge about nutrition and were always busy in wars most of time. They had more important things to do like survive lol

@@thebundleart : NOT necessarily. Did you know that Americans at the time of the revolution were, on average, as tall as Americans today, and taller than their European cousins? Ironically, as waves of European immigrants arrived later, the average height went down for a while. Late colonial, early independence Americans were better fed than Europeans.

Nordic bronze age people of northern Europe had a higher average height than Scandinavians of today.

Thanks for democracy, brother!

may be cause some french of sarmatian roots

​@@user-lr1xu1rm9vno French have Sarmatian Roots. Depardieu looks like his Gallic Ancestors.

@@BumblebeeTuna8 there are lot of sarmatian toponims (geographical names) in France, also names like Alen. with advanced cavalry skills sarmatians took place of military elite all over Europe incuding Britain.

@@user-lr1xu1rm9v no there isn't, Alen is of Celtic/Gallic Origin and there's no Sarmatian Trace in France whatsoever, the Ossetians and the Cossacks are the Descendants of Sarmatians. The Sarmatians were also Horse Archers which never existed amongst the French Cavalry or other Western European Cavalries so you clearly don't know what you're talking about.

@@BumblebeeTuna8 do u have emotional damage with steppe nomads? "The Notitia mentions in the beginning of 5th century twenty-four praefects of Sarmatians whereof seventeen in Italy and six in Gaul. In Gallic Velay was a praefect of Sarmatians and Alans, in Poitiers of Sarmatians and Taifals. In England was a praefect at Ribchester (Lancashire). ... King Sambida accepted in 440 a settlement in the valley of the Rhone at Valence. In Valence (Fr.) in the Rhône valley are graves found from the 4th century with skulls as seen in the Ukraine in steppe peoples such as Sarmatians and also Goths ... In 442 The Roman commander in Gaul Fl. Aetius asked the Alanian king Goar, probably a son of the previous Goar, to come to Orleans and to keep the rebellious native population under control. Goar got there a country at the Loire with the capital Orleans. His followers took the estates between Orleans and Paris. Many places that now bear names of Alanian color. "(c)TRACES of ALANS and SARMATIANS in EUROPE

😂😂😂All hail our Greek Macedonian queen CLEOBLACKTRA!!!! And our finest warrior , black Achilles 😂😂

​@@BoogieBubbleYou mean Blachilles?

При чем греки и русские??

@@user-dm3mt5tj2e а как ты приплел греков,если он про скифов и сарматов

Turanian mutts

@@user-dm3mt5tj2e What do the Greeks have to do with the Sarmatians/Scythians?

What did you expect? That's where they lived.

The people on the video dont look Iranian.

Keep the Aryan propoganda.

They want to show us the facial features my dude. It is not that deep. And yes men used sharp knives to shave if they wanted. If it is the norm i have no clue.

They're NOT. Lack of school.

mummy, why that man have a big nose

People back then where shorter. I have been in medieval castles around europe and if you see their beds it is like they where for children. Don't compare with humans today. A man that was 1.75 back then is like 2m+ in todays standards.

Так ещё и упитанные, толстоватый слой лицевых мышц наложили, не скупились...

Помылся в бане, чего такого

@@user-pf9wi2do4f рано еще до средневековых стереотипов

Kshatriya Aryas founded all nations in Northern hemisphere. R1a1aY/R1a1Y is the conqueror. See how many groups from Aryavart en$laved west, white & north tribals 👉2k BCs Mittani-Hatti-Hari upto Anatolia. In 1k BCs upto Greece, Rome, there're RgVedic Elina, Dyus (Zeus), Mitra. 👉 900BC RgVedic Parsu conquered Persia. In 550BC upto Greece, Balkan, Ezypt. 👉Since 750BCs whites, C.Asian, G.Steppe tribals are conquered by CimmeArya, Saka, Sauromata, Alani, Raslani, Kushan, Wushun, Xiangnu. 👉750BCs CimmeArya, Saka upto Balkan, Ukraine, Russia. 👉300-100BCs Sauromata, Alani won Ukraine, British-Irish isles, there's RgVedic Danu. 👉 300BC-300CE Khotan, TochaArya conquered Truk, Mongol, Tatar tribals (Tarim basin) from Gangetic plains. 👉250BC Parthian conquered Persia, Mada, M.East, Anatolia. 👉Mittani descent Roman conquered whites in 100BC. 👉200CE-500 Goth, Norse conquered whites directly from Gangetic plains. 👉350CE Xiangnu, Khotan descents Hun won 1/2 Europe. 👉400CE Alanis upto Spain raiding Greece, Italy. 👉200CE during Indo-Roman trade Aryavart's Aryas landed in Arabia. 8th c. latest+ Irani Arya led Moors-Arabs conquered whites in Spain. 👉Khotan, TochaArya led Turk, Mongol tribals conquered whites in 9th-13th c.subject's language. R1a1a/R1a1is in all later conquerors of Mediterranean, Europe, China, Tibet, C.Asia, SE.Asia, Arabia, Judea, Middle East. Roman & even 10th c. IBN Fadlan met all races, found the f!lth!est in Europe. Can such trib@ls be progenitors of Europe's kings? Conquered Greece, Italy? Colonised all continents??? Apply common sense. Tribals don't give birth to conquerors. Rulers aren't subject's race even though they speak subject's language. Read more 👉 Aryavart's Kshatriya Aryas have founded all nations in M.East, Iran, Mediterranean, Judea, North Africa, C.Asia, G.Steppe, China, Tibet, SE Asia, Europe, Arabia. R1a1a/R1a1 (Kshatriya marker) is the conqueror, didn't exist in Steppe-Europe before 800 BC., it's in all later conquerors of above said territories. Indra worshipping Mittanis are the 1st to subdue great Mesopotamians. Think why Europe, Arab, Turk, Mongol tribals couldn't invade civilizaions before 7th/10th/13th c. In 2k BCs Aryavart won upto Anatolia, Mittani-Hatti-Hari's RgVedic deities are recorded in Ezypt. Only Aryavart, Mesopotamia, Ezypt nations then. In 1k BCs. Mada, Lydia, CimmeArya, Persia, Greece, Rome, Saka, Parthia, Sauromata, Alani, TochaArya, Khotan, Kushan, Wushun, Xiangnu are Aryavart's splits & stretch. In 1k BCs Iran-Anatolia was named "Aryanem Vajea"(Aryas' stretch) = stretch of "Aryavart (Aryas' home). Only Vedic texts claimed "Aryas' Home". After 5th c. CE. CimmeArya, Saka, Sauromata, Alani+ latest Kshatryas (Norse, Goth from the Ganges) founded earliest nations in Europe conquering whites (Yamnya Celt R1b, Sintashta Venedi R1a). In 1k BCs Kushan, Wushun, Xiangnu conquered E.Steppe+Tibet+China while MHH conquered Greece, Rome. Since 1k BCs Kshatriyas from Aryavart have founded nations in China & SE.Asia enroute Burma-Yunnan, took chariot, Dishitan (Indra), the great flood mythology, Aryas arrived Burma in 10th c BC (ref.GE. Gerini). Only Vedics can bring IE language, chariot, Mitra, Zeus (Dyus), astronomy, astrology, funerary cremation in Greece, Italy. Kshatriyas living in west have turned white breeding with white women, like brown Jews have turned blonde. ++++++ Latest WAVES of Aryas from ARYAVART 👉B/w 300BC-100CE from the Ganges Khotan, TochaArya Kshatriyas conquered Turk, Mongol, Tatar, Tibet tribals of Tarim basin+Tibet. K-Ts, bore pure Sanskrit names, wrote in Brahmi, 800CE onward became kings/lords of TMTT conquered C.Asia, Iran, M.East, Arab, Ezypt, Greece, Balcan, Europe, Tibet, China. K-T's literature is oldest in whole of Northern hemisphere including Europe & Tibet. 👉1st c CE Aryavart's Aryas landed in Arabia during Indo-Roman trade, brought navigation, bred with tribal women. Becoming lords of Arab tribals conquered M.East, Iran, Anatolia, N.Africa, Spain, Cicily. Think why Arab couldn't dare attacking I-R ships, attack Mesopotamia before 7th c if they're martial race. Think why Arab couldn't make voyage before. 👉Norse, Goths are Kshatriyas, directly from the Ganges, penetrated Europe not before 4th c. Evidences: Gupta age Vishnu idol in Volga Russia. Europe's 1st literature "Norse" of 10th c is 2k years younger than Aryavart's regional literature. Vimanas in Europe's castles, churches are certainly not Greco-Roman. Timber built Kiev, Novogorod are replication of Mauryan-Gupta age cities. Timber architecture of Scandinavia still survives in the Himalayas. Funerary cremation of N-G. Aesir-Vanir from later Sanskrit Asur-Deva story. Edda from Veda. Goths are declared Arya. Baltic languages akin to modern North Indian. Scandinavia named after lord Shiva's son Scanda or emperor Scanda Gupta. Scanda+Nauv, Nauv= Ship in Sanskrit.

@@saumensingh9482 Nice hindu religious nuts fairy tale. No scientific research is backing your story.

@@saumensingh9482 "Aryans from India conquered Greece"? In which movie?

@@kostas68 RgVedic Elina clan founded Greece while Vedic Mittanis have conquered Italy. Mittanis were the first to subdue great Mesopotamians in 2k BCs. Mittani-Hatti-Hari invoked deities are purely RgVedic Indra Mitra Nasatya Varuna Hari. None are contemporary of MHH. Aryas from Aryavart conquered upto Anatolia in 2k BCs. rulers of middle East called their conquered lands extension of Aryas (Aryanem Vajea)=extension of Aryavart. There were no Iran, Mede, Greco-Roman, Saka, TochaArya nations, Arya descendants founded all of them in 1k BCs. Europe's nations were founded after 5th c. again by Arya descents where white trib@ls are living. Aryas also have conquered SE Asia, China Tibet. Indra (Sakra/Dishitan), Shiva is all over China Japan Korea SE Asia.

@@kostas68 The word "Arya" exists in every culture of west. In Greece they're "Arian". Other than Aryas which race do you think founded nations in Mediterranean & Europe? Or do you've confusion there are Aryas other than Vedics?

Harrisin ford is Scythian

Такое ощущение, что все мужики являются братьями Зоркого Сокола и Чингачгука...

Предки Индейцев Американских вышли из Южной Сибири/Алтая как и предки Савроматов и Скифов. Так что схожесть логична.

Είχα ακριβώς την ίδια απορία

Maybe

Θέλουν να δείξουν τα χαρακτηριστικά του προσώπου καλύτερα ρε φίλε.

clearly blonde and blue eyes are not coming from Aryans, is coming from indigenous European that defeated by Aryans and integrated with Aryans . Iran literally means the lands of Aryan and they are the only nation that used the term Aryan to describe their race . north Indian ( white Indian ) also had the word Aryan but for them was just a word meaning nobles

@@mansari7310 my comment was about scythians not Aryans , but that was very interesting. Thank you!

well Scythians are Aryan/Iranian too so ...

(I don't know why you tube delete half of my comment i sending it again ) all the actual evidence shows that Aryans were fair skin with brown hair and eyes. and Greek historian from ancient times describing Iranian/Aryans fair with brown hair and eyes and they specifically mention their race as Aryan in addition to Greeks desecration about them. there is Pasargadae that Darius the great describing himself a Persian from Aryan Race . the genetic research on remaining of Yamani grave too showed the same result brown hair and eyes . clearly blonde and blue eyes are not coming from Aryans, is coming from indigenous European that defeated by Aryans and integrated with Aryans . Iran literally means the lands of Aryan and they are the only nation that used the term Aryan to describe their race . north Indian ( white Indian ) also had the word Aryan but for them was just a word meaning nobles

@@mansari7310 Other than tattoos, what did the Scythians look like? Some of the women have fair hair and blue eyes but the men are strongly built and have red or dark hair