Take The Wall Down - Why We Should Live In A Borderless Society - Triggered 

Can freedom solve border security?

Deaths aside, the bystander effect is real, as when I grew up, currently 21 in college, people have solutions, but people are antisocial to the point where you need connections of people to see through goals in all facets of life.

The wall is important but so to are the consequences of those already living here and other foreign policies were doing to other countries.

To have a borderless society, you can't have social security and welfare payments.

A couple points i stress with migration: -migration is a natural inalienable right, as are the rights to move and travel. For the same reasons birds and deer and fish, etc can migrate, humans can migrate. -migration control is UNCONSTITUTIONAL. many wall/migration restriction supporters are constitution thumping folk who scream about the importance of respecting the constitution when it comes to welfare or healthcare or gun control, but ignore the constitution when it comes to migration. Because there is no discussion about migration control in the constitution. Therefore all federal migration law is a violation of the 10th amendment. -the government does not own the borders. That's how kingdoms work. Political borders simply designate the territorial limits of a gov'ts jurisdiction. They do not limit the rights or powers of people. - the fact that other nations are willing to violate rights does not justify the USA gov't in doing so. - if people that are afraid of how migrants are going to change the culture, and spend time and effort promoting migration restrictions spent 1/10th as much energy helping migrants assimilate and contribute to American culture, the problems they're afraid of would disappear very quickly. - if migration points were easy and straight forward, like Ellis Island style migration, people legitimately coming for opportunity would go through these avenues, and then people who were crossing the border to commit crimes would avoid these areas. Therefore border security would be much easier- people crossing in other places would likely be criminals. The way the system is now is so bad because it makes things far more complicated and expensive.

Living in AZ and Mexico one item that is missed is US gun laws. Specially the amount and type of guns going south to Mexico. USA provides a means to procure arms to Mexico. Without the amount of guns going south one aspect of destabilizing regions in Mexico is averted. It is difficult to legally buy guns in Mexico hence the illegal arms migration. In Mexico we resent the 200,000+ guns that illegally travel south yearly. The idea that allowing Mexicans to have guns makes protecting property safer is naive, when certain groups have sicarios that I would have no chance against with just an AK. Look up autodefensa groups and how they've taken up arms just to be annihilated.