Really helpful! Was contemplating buying it since in Australia, the cheapest is like AU$1300. So I needed to make sure it's worth it. Love the samples provided. Most reviewers just showed the lens without a lot of raw samples. 😅 -Samuel from Infinitum
Exactly what I finally needed for my decision which 24-70 f/2.8 lens I should buy. This one! Thank you for your review as well as for the shots with this lens!
Thanks so much for this review. I have purchased this lens and the 80-200 g2 as well about a month ago. I love them both. I have a Nikon D7100 crop sensor and D800 full frame sensor camera and these work great on both. I prefer of the two, the 80-200, just personally, but have not for one second regretted going into this much debt for these quality lenses. I had left my 24-70 in New Mexico after I shot a wedding a couple weeks ago and came back to California only to realize someone had found it outside on the ground. My heart sank! Was it damaged? Did it start to get condensation on the inside with weather changes out in the elements? I rented a Nikon 24-70 for a prom shoot until I got mine back. Missed my Tamron SO much...go figure. Wasn't impressed by Nikon's model, nor double cost of Tamron, with shots I got. Lens was ok...but did not see the value to price ratio as with Tamron G2 model. I just got back via UPS yesterday...it is in perfect condition!! Love this commitment by Tamron to quality.
Hey thanks so much! Awesome story too! (especially because the happy ending) Tamron really has stepped it up in making quality reliable lenses with this series... there's really not a lot left to improve on. Really glad they're working out for you too and hope you continue to enjoy them! :-D
well i'm not worry about the lens being heavy but i want to buy the tamron g2 cause i'm not going to spend over a 1000 dollars on a camera lens. i really want to get the 18-35 from sigma and the 24mm 1.4 from sigma and the 70-200 from sigma and the 24-70 from tamron along with the 2 i already have i should be straight right scott
Thanks for the great review! My copy for my Nikon D750 just arrived today! I bought it used from MPB but it looks brand new and came with original packaging. Anyway, love your photos, especially the ones of nature, and your review style is great.
Hmm it doesn’t appear the onion ring was a real problem, at least in your review. However I have seen other reviews and it was quite apparent. Is this something I should worry about? Thanks
I wonder why that's different... however, I wouldn't worry either way. People look too closely at that sort of thing but not a single person would ever notice it in real life. If it gets the job done without any more major issues, I'm happy without pixel peeping and this definitely is a solid lens :)
Thanks so much! For me personally, the 35+85 because I love primes and shallow depth of field haha... but for an all around lens this is amazing. I have the Canon versions and when I'm able to plan or take my time on a shoot I always use 24/35/85 but when I'm in a crunch for time or not sure what I'll be shooting the Canon 24-105 f4 IS is on my camera all the time. I would have gone for the Tamron at the time but it wasn't working with the C200 (which I no longer have, oops! haha).
I love this lens and use it on both APC and full frame body. My main gripe on the lens, which is a minor one, is that the lens cap has poor retention when trying to lock it on with the hood on. I always keep the hood mounted on my lens and have had the cap fall off several times in my bag. Looking for an alternative cap with better bite. I wish I could find a tight fitting overcap that slipped over the pedal hood as that would work best for me. Thank you for the thorough review, even though I have this lens, it was nice to see your tests and thoughts on the cannon system.
Hey thank you so much for watching and commenting! :) I agree about the lens cap, yet I have the problem with pretty much all lens caps haha. I've had the lens cap on my Canon 70-200 2.8L II come loose in my bag and scratch the front element like crazy... had to have it repaired :( Glad you enjoy the lens though, I loved it as well!
Thanks for the video it's very informative for me but what is the strap I saw that is attached to the tripod food that was super cool and convenient? I would like to get me one please help. Thanks Roy J. Philadelphia Pa.
I've heard that the g1 and g2 have almost identical image quality and that most differences are quality of life things like build quality, vr effectiveness, and af speed Would you happen to know if that is accurate
Dustin Abbot claimed that the G2 has better Vibration Compensation than the first version. If you get a good deal on the V1, then having 2.8 is still a deal maker.
Thank you for making this video. I was going crazy for a bit on deciding if I should get this lens for my nikon. I was concern about the F/2.8 apature because people are saying its soft wide open but looking at your samples its more than good enough.
How does this compare in sharpness at 70mm f/2.8 compared to the Nikon? My Tamron G1 version is super soft at this focal length and I'm trying to avoid getting that again.
I haven't tried them side by side but I found this lens to be very satisfyingly sharp all around, so I don't think you'd have any major trouble. It's a very solid lens :)
I'd say the Tamron is probably the better choice... you've got IS, an f2.8 aperture and a well made lens overall. Been using it again for the past couple months actually and really enjoying it.
Both great, but very different lenses. It's honestly hard to say without knowing your shooting style and preferences, but image quality wise you can't go wrong either way. The 24-70 is a great all in one lens, and the 35 will give you a little something extra special in a lot of cases because of the 1.4 aperture, plus be better in low light because of that... but it can't zoom so you're stuck with 35mm.
@@GalstyanHayk It will definitely depend on your shooting style but the 16-35 f4L IS and 24-105 f4L IS II are both incredibly lenses for photo and video. I don't shoot so wide usually, so I don't use the 16-35 much, but it could be useful when shooting in 4K on the 5div because of the crop. If you're shooting on a tripod or monopod, the Sigma 18-35 f1.8 is also a great wide zoom lens with a wide aperture, but no IS (so handholding is tough). It will only work in 4K mode though, because it's not a full frame lens. You could also go with primes if you don't mind changing lenses and want wider apertures. It would get more expensive though because you'd need multiple lenses. For me, the 24-105 is my main workhorse, for both photo and video. If I can plan the shoot more and want to be more "artsy," I go with the 85mm f1.4L IS most of the time. For wide shots, I like the Laowa 12mm f2.8 Zero-D, especially with the 4K crop on the 5D. Lots to choose from but it will likely come down to your personal style. (p.s. the Tamron could be a good choice too but I usually like having a little more reach than 70mm)
I'd have to say the 85mm... I love the focal length, gets a nice compression without needing a crazy working distance, the wider aperture will also allow you to blur the background quite a lot more when you want it.
I think it's hard to say for sure, I haven't been able to try them side by side in a controlled way... I don't think there's a significant enough difference from what I've seen, but of course Canon's IS is typically very good. Tamron is great as well but I don't think they're as focused on making their lenses video-friendly. I didn't notice anything stand out in a bad way with Tamron when I used it though.
yeah they really do need to come out with a 2.8/IS standard zoom, everyone else has them now and Tamron's is fantastic... they must be losing out on a good chunk of business from that.
I haven't been able to compare them side by side but basically there are small improvements- maybe camera compatibility, very much so build quality and possibly better VC, optically I think it will be tricky to spot differences unless you're pixel peeping.
It's because of the communication between the camera and lens... there's no control of the aperture or anything and I heard Tamron has no plans to address that issue in firmware unfortunately. Not sure how it would work with other EF mount cinema cameras like the Ursa Mini, that would be interesting to see.
@@ScottDumas Yeah I realized that as soon as I posted the question. I should've known as I just got rid of a C100. I am really just after the focal length to compensate for the crop, with VC as a bonus.
Hi! That was just water in a spray bottle to show how easy it is to wipe off something like rain when the lens gets wet. I just used a microfiber cloth to wipe it dry :)
I have found that the first version coupled with the Canon 2x III converter, and an EF12 II extension tube between them works well with my 5D4 for macros. I have been considering upgrading to the G2 version, but I'm wondering if the same incompatibility with the C200 you mentioned might hint that there would be an issue with my macro setup as well. I don't suppose you have and could test this combo to see if it works? Thank you!
Unfortunately I don't have those to test myself, but it seems that the incompatibility with the C200 is because Tamron views it as a stills only lens and doesn't test for/design for compatibility with Canon's cinema line. If that's true, I don't imagine it would affect its compatibility with the converter and extension tubes. Couldn't be sure though, maybe test it out in a store if they'll let you? Sorry I couldn't be of more help! Thanks for watching :)
I need some advise about tamron tap in console... For my 24-70 g2 nikon version i have 0.38 and 1m for 24,35,50 and 70mm which i fine tune really nice but i am not sure what is a good distance between camera and target to calibrate infinity...tnx for ur help
For calibrating at infinity I'd say just focus on something that's far enough away that the focus window on your lens sits at or around the infinity mark, and you should be okay :)
Scott Dumas tnx a lot...i thoth the same but i read someone said to focus on moon or some landscape object fsr away so that confused me...i thoth to try around 5 meters...anyway tnx for ur help like always...keep doing great job...ur chanel and reviews are great and HONEST ... 😊
Milos Antic thanks so much! I might suggest something a bit further than 5 meters, but definitely doesn’t need to be the moon haha. A distant building or something is probably just right :)
In sharpness I'm honestly not sure, but in a lot of other ways it is better, as an overall package. I didn't get to test them side by side but I wouldn't be surprised if the sharpness/overall IQ was better in the G2.
thanks for the great video, can i ask something, is this lens great for video? i mean is this USD makes little or some noise when you rec. video? i mean USD does work silent like STM on canon or not? please answer my question, ;)
Hi! It's not completely silent but it's reasonably quiet. I don't have the lens anymore to check or show you an example of that, but you probably wouldn't have much of a problem using an on camera shotgun mic unless the AF is going crazy hunting for something.
I have had the previous Tamron 24-70mm 2.8 and I chose it because of Matt Grangers video review of its bokeh compared to the cheaper Sigma version!probably getting the Tamron 70-200mm 2.8 G2 version after I get the Nikon D500!
the cheap Nikkor version is almost twice the price of the G2 version!the Tamron zoom lenses trumphs the Sigma versions but not in the ART section!I now use the 30mm 1.4 ART on the D7200 but I will surely buy the 50mm ART lens again since the bokeh is outstanding!I also think that 2019 is where I buy a high end dx format Canon camera like the 80D or a 7DII !
I'm definitely a fan of the art lenses as well, although a ton of people have issues with the AF, especially after a few months or a year pass :( I had the 35mm art before and loved it for the time I had it though. The 80D and 7DII are both great cameras! I think you'll love either one :)
I'd say this would be the better choice, I loved this lens and I only decided against getting it for myself because I wanted to use it on the Canon C200 as well as my 5D (The Tamron G2 lenses don't work with the C200). You get both the 2.8 aperture and VC with this lens, and great image quality as well so there's really not much to lose. :)
Thanks so much! :) I'd say this is a strong choice over the Canon unless you really want a native lens. I love the Canon 24-105 f4 IS II too, if you want a little more reach but don't mind an f4 lens. Both great choices I think :-D Saitama seems like a nice place by the way, but I've never been, how do you like it there?
Been here 12 years. Home, sweet home. Mellow and quiet, great place for my kids to grow up. A lot of rivers and parks as well. Really enjoy just walking around the neighborhood for photo inspiration!
Sounds familiar! Lots of the same in Kochi :) It's been about 9 years for me, and like you said it's a really great place for the kids in particular (and photo inspiration)
Scott Dumas Kouchi! My long time friend lives there! My family and I have been there twice. It’s BEAUTIFUL out there! All my best to you and your family 🤙🏾.
@7:25 "While I had this lens It 'PRETTY MUCH' stayed on my camera '100%' of the time. Errrr.... well did it or didn't it? lol. Sounds like you're not sure? Your statement is 'pretty much' totally almost kind of definitely maybe ambiguous! 😜😂🤣😂 Gave me a giggle tho, thanks for that! Just picking this lens up for myself today, after a little mishap put my Sigma 24-70 out of action, so fingers crossed! Thanks for the review bro! #thumbsup!
It pretty much basically probably definitely 100% stayed on almost all the time ;) ;) Anyway, I think you'll love it! I've only had limited experience with the Sigma but I think this Tamron will put a smile on your face :) Cheers!
@@ScottDumas haha. Yeah I was a bit disappointed with the Sigma. I own nearly all the Sigma Art Primes (20, 35, 50, 85 and 105) and the 14-24mm 2.8 Art and they're all amazing, but their telephoto and semi telephoto zooms are a step down I think.
Dirk Keulder sorry about that, it’s a hard balance between dragging out the video with silent lulls or making it super long and keeping it concise so it will hold people’s attention to the end. To make up for that balance I offer the files to be downloadable for slow and careful inspection... I know it’s not the best solution for everyone but it felt like the best way to strike that balance. Hopefully it was still semi helpful for you! Thanks for watching either way :)
