No video :(

TAMRON 35-150 f2-2.8 Z Review: BEST Nikon ZOOM Lens EVER?!

Подписаться 1,5 млн

Просмотров 98 тыс.

50% 1

FROPACK4 is HERE with 14 all-new custom Lightroom presets!!! Check it out
froknowsphoto.... (40% OFF)
This is a Review of the Tamron 35-150 f2-2.8 for the Nikon Z Mount. I did review the Sony E-mount version, and you can check that review out right here. • The BEST ZOOM Lens EVE... . Is this the ultimate one lens to rule them all zoom lenses??? It's really an amazing range, with fast aperture, very good autofocus and nice results.
Listen to RAWtalk, the FroKnowsPhoto Podcast wherever you listen to your podcasts. Or head on over to froknowsphoto.c...
This video was filmed with the Canon EOS R5 and RF Canon Lenses Canon.us/r5fro
Order a Bernie Photo Book right here www.berniephot...
Download MyGearVault, it's FREE and the best way to keep track of all your camera gear, receipts, prices paid, date purchased and more mygearvault.co...
Get a FREE Guide To Capturing Motion In Low Light Situations froknowsphoto.... (look for the orange box)
Want to send us gifts, swag, letters...here's our P.O. BOX
PO Box 3715 Philadelphia, PA 19125
USE CODE FroKnowsPhoto at squarespace.com... to get your 14 day FREE Trial.
Gear I USE
I SHOOT RAW T-Shirts store.froknows...
I support Allen's Camera a mom-and-pop Camera store that's been around since 1977. allenscamera.c...
My Go To Mirrorless Camera for Stills
Canon R3 bit.ly/3hzfJVl Allen's Camera
Sony a1 amzn.to/2NHsm55 or bit.ly/3ccKZrt
SIGMA 35mm f1.2 amzn.to/2rLO8Jr (FAVE LENS)
Our go to Cameras for Recording Videos at FroKnowsPhoto
Canon EOS R5 amzn.to/37GQQ5R or bit.ly/2Obaj40
Canon EOS R6 amzn.to/3m6JHQ9 or bit.ly/38GIdXt
The Microphone I use for Vlogging bit.ly/2LWGRPq
My Rolling Bag Of Choice For Flying bit.ly/2LNsHRK
Follow me
►RU-vid: bit.ly/frotube
►Facebook: / froknowsphoto
►Instagram: / jaredpolin
►Twitter: / froknowsphoto
Please help us continue to make FREE content
by purchasing one or all of the FroKnowsPhoto
Educational guides. To check out previews of
each guide click here.
►froknowsphoto.c...
#FroKnowsPhoto #JaredPolin #Review

Опубликовано:

23 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 251

@froknowsphoto Год назад

It looks like I did not mention one thing that was in my notes that I thought I did mention. That you can shoot at 20 FPS and 30 FPS, Nikon does not hinder the frames per second with this lens, like Sony does.

@351linzdoctor Год назад

I tested the Sony version on my Z9 using the Megadap 21 adapter and it also shoots at 20 and 30 FPS!

@cooloox Год назад

@@351linzdoctorWhat's the AF like when you adapt Sony lenses?

@351linzdoctor Год назад

@@cooloox I'm shooting sports with them and they are almost on par with my Sony A1 and with eye lock on the Nikon actually can see the eyes farther away! I just downloaded firmware 4.01 so I'm going to see if there are any improvements with autofocus!

@atruceforbruce5388 Год назад

Not a lot of people have z mount arnt you alienating a majority of your audiance?

@questioneverything680 Год назад

@@atruceforbruce5388 what? Lol, so he just shouldn’t make Nikon reviews? That’s ridiculous

@questioneverything680 Год назад

Something to note is Nikon doesn’t limit the frame rate on this lens like Sony does. So unlike A1 and A9 users, Nikon users can use this lens and still enjoy the full extent of their camera

@washingtonradio Год назад

I like that there are quality 3rd party lens coming out for the Z-mount now. Gives Nikon shooters a wider variety to select from. This lens looks like a solid option for a Nikon shooter with a full frame Z mount camera.

@upstarte 7 месяцев назад

Got this lens just before going to Mexico with friends. It was the only lens I took, with my Z9, and I'm thrilled with the results.

@rudolfappel7236 Год назад

I have never been tempted to buy third party lenses, this one is a game changer. I am traveling a lot and love high quality pictures that differentiate from smart phone pictures. This lens makes that fact obvious.

@stevetqp9152 11 месяцев назад

Hello...have you tried the Nikkor Z 24-120 f/4 S lens? I can say with confidence that it is quite sharp and operates flawlessly (at least on a Z7 or Z8). I'm sure you'll enjoy either lens.

@obsidian00 Год назад

(meanwhile...suffering in Canon) OPEN UP THE RF MOUNT ALREADY!!! 😩🥺

@shang-hsienyang1284 Год назад

Invest in two camera systems, it's actually cheaper in the long run.

@ralphsaad8637 Год назад

Yeah right. Have a 150mm irix f2.8 macro lens. Upon upgrading to the R6 mark2, it wouldn't work with the camera anymore. Turns out to be an issue with all the new body releases from Canon, all MF lenses from 3rd party makers won't work. Now I have to sell my lens...

@shang-hsienyang1284 Год назад

@@ralphsaad8637 again, if you have a Leica/Panasonic L mount camera, a Nikon Z, or a Sony E camera, your Irix lens would work.

@ralphsaad8637 Год назад

@shang-hsienyang1284 unfortunately I don't. Really a shame that a lens I really love and could have really shined thanks to the MF aids of mirrorless, now I have to sell.

@truthseeker6804 Год назад

Perfectly happy with the current Canon lenses and ef counterparts.

@HR-wd6cw Год назад

I'm just glad as a Nikon Z user that Nikon has finally allowed Sigma and Tamron to make native Z lenses now. About the only complaint i have is that Tamron's 70-300 for Z, which is more than the F-mount version from Nikon, lacks in-lens stabilization, which if you're charging $700 for a lens, it should have in-lens stabilization (yes, the FF cameras have IBIS but this is only helpful up to a point). But regardless, I do like that Tamron is bringing some of the lenses offered for E mount, to the Z mount now. The more third parties that get on-board, the better the system will be because people will have options, and I think that's what Nikon really wants now that they've built-out their core set of lenses under the Nikon badge (such as your holy trinity of both fast and "slower" f/4 lenses). Although I would like to see Tamron perhaps do something like a 28-200 for Z or a 28-300 perhaps (that hopefully is sharper than the Z 24-200 at the longer end), or even a 24-240 to allow Nikon users to compete a bit more with CAnon and Sony travel zoom options (not that it's a competition in that particular segment with travel zooms).

@FandCCD Год назад

I’d totally get this lens IF I didn’t already have the Nikon Z 24-120/4 S. I know this lens is a little different but there’s just too much overlap for me to justify. That said-I’m glad Tamron came out with such a cool lens!

@kevc.2958 Год назад

sell it😂

@Jcwwolf Год назад

Facts

@FandCCD Год назад

@@kevc.2958 no. It’s a fantastic lens.

@Juannic Год назад

Little different??? I’m selling my 24-120 to KEH and picking this up.

@sashax91 Год назад

I have this lens for Sony E mount, it is amazing, but 35mm is very limiting and I need to carry with me second body with a wider lens. 24-120 feels to be an amazing range, I would say it is more useful than 35-150. Though f2-f2.8 is noticably better than f4. There are always some tradeoffs.

@OriginalWatchcow Год назад

A prismatic VR stage in the lens makes the light path longer, adds weight, cost, complexity, and can tecuce sharpness. As you said already, the target market for this lens is cameras that have IBIS, so i dont count not having in lens VR/VC as a problem.

@TheWingman140 11 месяцев назад

How is the sharpness compared to the 24-120f4?

@chrismichaud3228 Год назад

Agreed, like the one one on the left with the extra negative space. This is on my list of lenses to get after leaving Sony to Nikon.

@emotionblur7214 Год назад

Excellent review! Just one tiny observation: you talked about IBIS on the lens, and it did take me a few seconds to realize it's not the right word :) it's still worth to distinguish between in-body and lens stabilization when using a single word for it (you distinguished it yourself).

@hondahoon2479 Год назад

Been hoping Tamron would bring this lens to the Z mount ever since they announced it for the E mount. Already preordered 😁

@ondrejkratochvil4589 Год назад

you can shoot landscapse with it, you can shoot portraits with it, and its biggest feature - you can use it in your workout routine :)

@muziqfreek Год назад

you use the money you'd spend on your gym membership to buy the lens.. its a win win

@gilphotography835 7 месяцев назад

So, is it a safe idea to consider this lens instead of the 24-70 2.8? I have the 70-200 2.8 and the amazing 14-30 F4 for my Z cameras. But this beast is making me rethink the addition of the Nikon 24-70 2.8 all together. For what I see in the reviews, it's an equal image quality with more range and versatility.

@jettubby17 Год назад

I travel to Europe (from the US) several times a month and besides my Q2, I take my Sony a74 and 35-150. It's a perfect all-in-one travel lens. Since I just picked up a Nikon Z8 I'm definitely going to get this lens in the Z mount

@sokkerjeff Год назад

I’ve had the Sony version since it came out (about 18 months ago), and it is absolutely fantastic! Started on a 7iv, but now on a 7RV. It gets the bulk of my shots. Love it!!interestingly, though, I just purchased the Tamron 28-200 f2.8-5.6 specifically for some upcoming overseas travel. I like to pack light, and it’s significantly smaller and lighter, which should serve me well for extensive walk-around shooting. As much as I love the 35-150, at 70 yrs old, it gets a bit heavy on the shoulder after a few hours. YMMV, of course 😊

@elliot_shooting 10 месяцев назад

Would love to see you review on this against the Nikon z 24-120 f4s 👍

@keithspurlock4732 2 месяца назад

Me too

@grom5756 Год назад

I'll be buying this lens, been waiting for it on Z mount. Now I'll still my R6 II and wait for Z6 III.

@robertmartinsenlb8ci Год назад

Fantastic lens. I have the older f2.8-4 version and love it. Waiting for the Z6iii and that body with the 35-150 f2-2.8 will be my new kit.

@DavidPavlich 11 месяцев назад

I have the same lens for Canon. I use it on my R5 and it works better than when I used it on my 5DIV. I'd like to move up to the 2-2.8, but my photo piggy bank says no. :-)

@MarcAdesso Год назад

How does this lens compare to Nikon's 24-120 f/4?

@Jespervangcom Год назад

Yeah, tough choice between Nikon 24-120 and this Tamron beast. Now, how would this Tamron behaves when videofilming ? How about focus breathing ? are there any ?

@6gwilliams Год назад

That Nikon-Tamron collaboration rolls on, and Sony gets some too, as Sony owns part of Tamron. A good deal for Nikon Z users. Cheers and Thanks.

@mattandhisnikon Год назад

Is this better than the 24-70 and 70-200 2.8s?

@holsteincowboy 11 месяцев назад

The Sony version works great on my FX6 for shooting 4K video

@glennjones5221 9 месяцев назад

Loved this review! Your thoughts and observations helped to make my decision for me.

@lekkerpruven887 Месяц назад

Looking to find the data on the aperture vs zoom position. And as always, you deliver! Many other reviews didn't! Thanks!

@shovelrocker7102 Год назад

If that lens ever comes on the RF mount I am very tempted to buy one.

@johnnyneves19 6 месяцев назад

35-150 f2-2.8 in itself is such a crazy spec. Has no business being this sharp. Crazy!

@markshirley01 Месяц назад

I wish they'd do the Tamron 20-40mm I have on my D750, it's so useful indoors

@Bad_Wolf_Media Год назад

If they build this thing for the RF mount, it's on my list. This is almost an all-purpose lens. It leaves a little gap on the wide end, but for day-to-day shooting, this would be a great all-in-one.

@gfxmaniac Год назад

RF blockage

@fangli Год назад

canon user is sad

@TEN21Portraits Год назад

Yeah, I sold off almost all of my lenses when I had the Sony version on my Z9 and I didn’t miss anything. Shot concerts, weddings, portraits and sports all with this one lens.

@tomnorton8499 Год назад

I definitely think I would like this because I have the 70-200 f-mount version and always hit the bottom limit.

@2222paulr Год назад

I currently have a z 28-75 f2.8 and an old f mount 70-200 2.8. I would love to have this lens to replace both of them!! Such a great focal length and performance for a hobbyist photographer

@BlazenMikay Год назад

in the 9 min mark i think it is the nikon focus since mine does that all the time

@ruff1draft Год назад

Jared thanks for this review. I want to purchase the Nikon F Mount Version for my Nikon D5500 and then the new Z Mount Version for my future Nikon Z5 and hopefully Nikon will release a Nikon Z5 Mark 2 soon.

@OkwyUgonweze Год назад

We need to know if the focus ring can be assigned to features like iso, exposure compensation and aperture like the rest of Z lenses.

@josephryan5448 Год назад

Good video Jared. I wonder if you or anyone else will do a comparison to the 24-120 f4. That one is slower but wider. But having a 35mm at f2 isn’t too shabby either.

@f4nf4n94 9 месяцев назад

I have the same concern. I love the 24 120 f4. But.... for indoor photography I really lack of lights. My second interest is also the bokeh for portrait photography.

@MrSongwriter2 3 месяца назад

I just bought a mint used 35-150 on a zf and already own the 24-120 f4s the focus is faster on the 24-120 for sure. The tamron is more a portrait lens in my eyes. I just wish there was a firmware update already to nail the focus better on the tamron. So for me it depends what you shoot. Landscape go 24-120 every day

@PizzlesTechTime Год назад

Wow 2 to 2.8 is amazing! I would love to test this lens!

@josepheder5368 Год назад

Jared I have a 24-120 f4 for my Z9 would you trade that lens for this one?

@odedia 5 месяцев назад

I recently got a Z9 and the 24-120mm f/4. Great combo for sure, but doesn't go near the f/2 range. This is very tempting. I wish there was a review that compares them side by side, mainly to see the color and bokeh differences. I think for a Zoom lens both will do fine in terms of sharpness.

@user-zy5rp5rr6m Год назад

I have the "F" mount version of this and totally love it. It's basically my walk around lens on my D850, and seldom comes off. Fantastic lens. Note: mine is the F2.8, not F2-2.8

@ruff1draft Год назад

I am looking at the F Mount Version for my Nikon D5500 and my future Nikon D750 and Nikon D780.

@sexysilversurfer Год назад

@@ruff1draftI know the Canon EF version of this lens is discontinued.

@clairesophia3569 10 месяцев назад

Hi! I have Nikon D850. And i am wondering if they have lens w F-Mount.

@sulev111 9 месяцев назад

F2.8-4*

@CalmOceanSunset-hp4qv 4 месяца назад

@@clairesophia3569 I used to own F mount version of this, great lens..and much cheaper..

@garnerboyd4206 7 месяцев назад

Good Cam & Lens Demo.

@stevetqp9152 11 месяцев назад

Great review as alwys, Fro! But nah, I'll stick with my Awesome Nikkor Z 24-120 f/4 S thank you. I'd bet the 24-120 is sharper at f/8, but without a pro comparison, who knows. I just know the 24-120 is a Fantastic lens on my Z7 and Z8...As a landscape shooter, I much prefer the 24 wide end to a 35 wide end. Very hard to beat. Thanks!

@TheMickybutler Год назад

I'm waiting for the UK Z8 stock to land and this is a timely release. I'll go body only rather than the kit and opt for this lens. If only Margate, England, looked as nice as Margate, NJ. 😥

@Jviotr Год назад

Tempting. I own the 35-150 on the F-mount and did love that lens for travel, but I do prefer the 24-120 range better. Now that I have the excellent 24-120 S lens, I think I’ll pass for now… see if it ever goes on sale.

@PizzlesTechTime Год назад

Jared should have been. Rapper dawg. Such natural talent

@FTRek 6 месяцев назад

If you only had to get one lens would you get this one or 24-70 f/2.8 s?

@NoxonPhotography Год назад

How strong is the vignetting for this lens? Were these taken with an ND filter/edited that way or is that how the lens spits out the images? I own the G2 and feel like it has a vignetting problem at certain focal lengths and especially with ND filters on so im just wondering if that carries into this lens as well.

@andrewficalora5631 Год назад

I have a Nikon Z fc and am ready to upgrade from the kit lens. This Tamron is enticing from a pricing/performance standpoint, however, my Z fc does not have IBIS. As a "one lens to rule them all," how crucial is it that this lens also does not have IBIS/VR? I mostly shoot landscape and street. about 50/50 handheld vs. tripod.

@bradleyrex2968 Год назад

Seems like a great lens for Basketball/Volleyball, or other sports in a gym.

@jimogden1506 Год назад

The Sony version is amazing, and I'll be recommending it to my Nikon friends

@nkuete 9 месяцев назад

the second this is released for Canon RF.....I'm buying it

@imagebypd1301 11 месяцев назад

I been using this amazing lens with Sony A7 iv and results are amzing.

@LuigiL75 5 месяцев назад

CANON needs to open up the RF mount because this is a MUST HAVE for Pro-sumers everywhere...

@gonzotravelling Год назад

If anything put on the internet leads with a question, the answer is no

@randyschwager2515 Год назад

Thanks for your review! Very helpful!

@ericfriedemann6931 Год назад

I would have preferred that Tamron had made this lens a constant f/2.8 aperture, allowing the lens to be smaller, lighter and, presumably, less expensive.

@pawel4636 11 месяцев назад

I noticed that my 28-75 2.8 at 75mm doesn't give enough isolation for my liking. 2.2 at 75 will help quite a bit so I'm happy to have this option despite the bulkiness.

@JuanLopez-oz9kh Год назад

The price is a bit high; but nikon 1.8 primes should do the job

@akkarparkiamopas3401 Год назад

I have seen many people were excited about this lens and ended up buying it. However, when they had used it for a while, they could not handle the weight of it anymore and sold it eventually .... (From Sony User)

@maheshdeokar1220 Месяц назад

For non professionals (hobbyist) this lens along with z6 iii and z 14-30mm f/4 would be the best package.

@smallbatchsessions6892 Год назад

Thanks for the review of this lens. I just bought the Nikon Z 24-120 f/4 instead of this lens . I almost went for this Tampon I mean Tamron 😮😅😂. Not that I don’t like Tamron . I think it’s a great lens . I even use the first generation of the Tamron 15-30 f/2.8 with the FTZ on my Z9. And I almost bought it for my Sony a7siii’s . Instead I got the Sony 16-35 f/4 pz. The reason for these two lenses over this is weight . I’m building live music light weight video kits . I’ll get the Nikon 14-24 S f/2.8 to replace the Tamron 15-30. I still have Nikon DSLRS d-850-810-500. Then now the Z9 . I’m building a mirrorless system also and a saving weight Trio. 14-24 S f/2.8 , 24-120 S f/4 and probably the 100-400 S f/4.5 to 5.6 . I have the Sony 16-35 f/4 PZ and 200-500 G . I want for this setup the 28-135 PZ . I have been waiting for an updated optical, faster focusing new version. Looks like I may have to get the older version and deal with the lesser af . I have many many Nikon F mount Zooms and Primes going from 1959 to the 70-200 f/2.8 fl vr e I adapt also I can adapt Sony af glass and have Leica M I adapt .

@hazelnut49 Год назад

Please Canon let Tarmon make this!

@Hootch1904 Год назад

Appears to be a fantastic lens for a two camera wedding photographer. This lens on one camera and a 70-200 2.8 on the other. Bam-Bam!!

@ArrienvanVliet 10 месяцев назад

Too much overlap, better pait it wit a 17-35 ;)

@cooloox Год назад

Do the Nikon Z8 and Z9 offer the feature some Canon cameras do, called "same expo. for new aperture"? This feature will let the camera maintain the same exposure if you zoom in and out with a variable aperture zoom lens. So as the aperture changes, the camera adjusts the ISO, shutter speed or either, as per your choice in settings. It also works if you change lenses (e.g. to a slower Max. aperture lens) or fit an extender. The camera auto adjusts one the values to maintain the same exposure it had before the lens/adapter change.

@garnerboyd4206 7 месяцев назад

yes!

@NCSTalkid Год назад

In this video i finally see what zoom lens one advantage. When shooting very erratic moving object is the advantage of zoom. For travel i prefer bring 2 s prime and still weight less than this lens and better result. More so if the 1 is cupcake lens.

@1mkrlife 6 месяцев назад

I have a R10 so will need an EF adapter. I have the kit lens 18-150RF. I love it for the range, but need something that doesn’t break the bank for low light situations. I’m thinking of selling the 18-150 but want to get an expert opinion.

@miguelpinto3976 5 месяцев назад

Jared im in doubt...what should be my first lens the tamron 35-150 or nikon 24-70? I need to decide and is a struggle to understand what should be my first choice

@leolife02 Год назад

How would you compare this lens to the 35-150 F mount in image quality? I know the difference in aperture. But I own the F mount one, and it is super sharp IMO.

@larrybrantley8835 Год назад

Looks like a great lens to buy along with the Sony A7R V I plan to buy later this fall! I am no longer a working pro, so I no longer need 5 or 6 fast primes. I am moving from Canon DSLRs to Sony mirrorless because I am frustrated with their no third party lens policy.

@AD.H. 5 месяцев назад

What do I do with all my DSLR high end equipment now? 😞

@joshua_david4383 Год назад

Your opinion of older cameras in 2023? Specifically D750 D810 both used for under 1K. Thanks!

@tomlew55 Год назад

If something like this came out before I purchased 6 other Z lenses, I may have considered spending the 2 grand. It would have come out much cheaper in the long run. Besides, my slower 24-200 works just fine outdoors with a wider range than the Tamron. Think I'll put that money toward a Z8.

@dalekeith4961 11 месяцев назад

Z24-200 in my thoughts is a better lens for travel. I use mine every day when travelling😀

@MikeVideos327 7 месяцев назад

You should totally consider trading that for the 24-120 f4

@roth1998 10 месяцев назад

Thoughts on this as a sports lens for maybe basketball from under the basket?

@pixbyshep Год назад

The Sony one is my favorite one-all lens. Totally agree with this review.

@DT-ym2jj Год назад

Jared, can you double check the aperture vs. focal length stats. These appear to be different than the stats reported for the sony version for this lens. So, either one of the sets is incorrect OR this Z mount has managed to provide a wider aperture for a longer time period, which would be amazing. Sony lens reports - 35-38mm = f/2 39-58mm = f/2.2 59-79mm = f/2.5 80-150mm = f/2.8 Your video reports 35-39 2.0 40-74 2.1 75. 2.2 85-129 2.7 130-150 2.8 Please advise

@tonyfnb Год назад

def the one with the cut off ear...I agree

@PhotoYo Год назад

Can we expect any drone reviews in the future?

@davidmorrison5974 Год назад

I have the Sony version of this lens and absolutely love it.

@wejournalgreatsports 11 месяцев назад

I shoot sports videos and pictures on a Nikon Z6. I recently bought the 70-180 2.8…now I’m having second thoughts. The extra focal is great for football but I am concerned about basketball season. I think if I get this I could sell my 85 and 28-75 as well. Any opinions from you or other commenters?

@MrSongwriter2 3 месяца назад

Focus isn't good enough for sports or that has been my experience so far until they produce a firmware update

@mateuszzdun9061 Год назад

I've been waiting for this review, Fro, thanks! Now I'm wondering whether to go for that beast or the Z 105 2.8 macro. Tough decision for me 😄 Been watching your videos since the D750 review and still love watching them! Nice biceps btw

@jaiel.p Год назад

I currently have and actively use the 105mm for product photography. Amazing amazing AMAZING lens. I also pre ordered the 35-150mm so if I were you I’d go with both

@mateuszzdun9061 Год назад

@jaiel.p oh, thanks for your comment! I find the 105mm particularly interesting due to lower price point and its versatility despite being a prime lens. I think it would be great not only for macro but for portraits and general outdoor/"adventure" photography. Would you mind sharing your Instagram/website so I could take a glance at your photos taken with the 105?

@jaiel.p Год назад

I have NYC Luxury (check them out) as a client for jewelry and do all their macro content with the 105mm. All others with the 24-70mm S. 35-150mm would be a solid addition to the family@@mateuszzdun9061

@inspirephotography14 11 месяцев назад

Is it good to carry both lens 1635mm gm f2.8 and tamaron 28200mm f2.8 ?

@johnmajors1449 Год назад

Jared, this lens is very intriguing for a Z owner. I took the plunge on a Nikon 70-200 2.8/S lens, which is awesome and has the added advantage of VR/IS built-in. One of the things I enjoy is stage/event photography like yourself. Are you leaning more towards the Tamron lens than the 70-200 trinity? Any insight if Nikon's TCs will work with this lens?

@froknowsphoto Год назад

no, I would not lean towards the tamron over a true 70-200

@nerforeos675 Год назад

Nikon has that sweet 70-180 f/2.8 that Tamron came out with first. For lower weight and cost, I'd get that over the 70-200.

@johnmajors1449 Год назад

@@nerforeos675 Agree the 70-180 provides a mid-budget alternative to the 70-200, that may cover many use-cases, and I'm glad Nikon and others are offering more Z options.

@2222paulr Год назад

@@johnmajors1449I am also torn between getting these two lenses. I already have the 28-75 but need the 75-180. But it seems very compelling to basically get both of them in on lens. I already have the 14-30 f4 and a sigma150-600 with ftz

@pawel4636 11 месяцев назад

@@2222paulr I also have 28-75 and I'm selling it the moment I get my hands on 35-150. Previously I was thinking of adding 70-180 to my bag but 35-150 will replace both these lenses perfectly. Especially when owning already 14-30, I won't need much more for everyday shooting. Can't wait to have this new Tamron, such a versatile lens.

@cristianperaltafoto Год назад

I have Nikon S line 20, 35, 50 and 85, you guys think would be better to have the Tamron?

@ccolt8460 Год назад

Incredible lens. Incredible pictures.

@gtaliano Год назад

When will this puppy be availble in the RF mount Alliaance... ance ance...?

@MultiSigil 11 месяцев назад

lens hood is so small, wonder why its so much smaller than the hood on my first gen 24-70f2.8 F mount. looks like it wont help that much

@ScottRae Год назад

Want to know how it works in infrared... with my full spectrum Z5, the 24-70 F4 is fine, but the 24-120 and the 24-200 both hotspot (apparently the 70-200 F2.8 does too) and I struggle to justify having a lens that only works on 1 camera (my Z7). This could be my superzoom answer! Please... please....! Also means I'd better send the 24-120 back before the Amazon return period ends....

@izziereal2010 Год назад

1:29 lol I have not heard that in a long time.

@sushi8204 Год назад

Yeah, but does it have focus breathing?

@binaryinfections Год назад

I don't own a Tamron yet for my Sony but im considering it

@AdamMuise Год назад

It certainly is awesome to travel with on the Sony

@russandloz Год назад

Does the usb port have a cover to stop things going in like rain? :-0 Looks a great lens though

@martinsarre Год назад

The specs are great, but if it is not as sharp as the Nikon z 2.8’s I’m not interested. I’ll wait and see what Ricci says

@Ravox83 Год назад

A lens like that makes me regret to have Canon equipment … this is so good

@professor5238 Год назад

I really want to buy canon but the lens variety in nikon and Sony makes me want to change my mind

@nerforeos675 Год назад

Focus looks pretty great coming from an Olympus shooter lol.

@sibyjoseph1810 5 месяцев назад

Any hope for rf version for this lense ?

@energieinfo21 Год назад

There are situations I am not so happy using Canon ...

@brianaddison2828 Год назад

“You could shoot your croissants” lol. Also, I’m tempted by this lens, but eye-Ing 70-200,

@cameraz99 Год назад

I got really spoiled by my Nikon 24-200mm f4-6.3 lens. While the Tamron 35-150mm is much faster, I'd miss the wide end of the 24-200 a lot. As well as the long end. In addition, the Tamron is bigger and heavier. I like to travel light when I'm out.

@oferkor6925 Год назад

Hi Jared, at minute 05:28 you talk about aperture change throughout the zoom focal length. It's seems to me like it is different from Sony which is very odd, 2.1 and 2.7 are not common apertures and 2.5 (in third stop increments is missing). One other thing, I wonder how Nikon is allowing this lens to debut on its Z mount given the fact that it is an amazing unique lens and priced relatively okay, and so far the Nikon strategy is to allow third party mainly tamron at this stage that are mid-priced mid-level same as Canon EF more or less With Sigma and Tamron. What are the odds that this lens will make its way to canon RF before 2033...? (and I am a Canon shooter haha)