Tartarian Buildings? -- Low Tech Podcast, No. 69 

You are correct. Let me tell you a secret I discovered about yt. I'm a retired nurse so on lots of medical videos. They hit those the hardest. When your intuition tells you, click on that avatar next to their name. Next screen click on View Channel down on right bottom. Next screen will say This channel has no content. Either a paid troll or shill or AI. Either way, a liar.

Oh yeah. It's like when you look something up on Google and are bombarded with fact checkers. That should tell you to trust the opposite of what govt owned fact liars are claiming.

Wait until you are put in timeout for 24 hours. Or Quora deletes your comment because you said all of the history we were taught is a lie.

Yup.

@@VickiTakacs. That's on a mobile, on a PC you can just click the name or pic, I think people forget this is a website before an app. For the rest of it, I mean, that's literally you, I click on your stuff and you have 100+ subs but no content.

There are many sketchy employees in the media. Many of them don't even call themselves employees, in spite of working on You Tube or internet videos etc, TV or radio.

The same way they do with flat earth, free energy or any other anti truth they want to spout

yup just learned about tartaria a few days ago. i cant believe ive never heard of it before as i am constantly looking at different conspiracies and new information and have been doing this since 2010. just looked up “tartaria buildings” and this is the first one. this happens ALL the time with the theories on conspiratorial topics. it wasnt always this way. ever since google bought youtube, you cant find this kind of stuff easy. it gets buried.

That is how you know you've found a truth. RU-vid IS GOVT. On Google you will get hit with fact checker after fact checker.

Look up video of Sky train in Germany. Still operating today. See moving sidewalk from then also. Lights back then from free, atmosphere and GLOWED. SEE fairs.

Me too....this guy's a farkwit :D

😂😂

No doubt

Tartaria could be a old language that means, “fill in later” 😂 or “redraw I screwed it up” 😂 might be why it’s written all over the map 😂might me “redo” lol or “need proper spelling of country name” 😂 tartaria could be a cuss word for i screwed up again... amd their conspiracy theory is a map makers rant about a screw up or inability to spell uskanstamdan. I feel him cause I can’t even get close enough to spell the country for u to figure out what country I’m trying to spell after 15 minutes of struggling without google for u to figure out what country im talking about just like the people back then wouldn’t have google 😂😂😂 so I think Tartaria means “ I can’t spell it $@!?!” 😂 good luck figuring out the country I tried to spell 😂 TARTARIA!!! Ugh!! 😂

You could understand why this might have been the case but you won't

guy's clearly fast asleep

I've been a master brick layer for 36 years

Those buildings aren't made by us. Those buildings are self healing. They dont crack. I wonder how the previous civilizations build it

The official history is the cover story, and it makes No sense and has no consistency. I'm glad we're not settling on "experts are baffled" - we're not.

Cats and dogs, huh?

As one of the people that do call them "worse than flat earthers" I should explain why I think that. Its not about "doubting history" its about ignoring it (the same way Flatties ignore physics). If someone bases his view on history on false dilemmas, ignores the obvious or well proven answer to questions, and make up new ones that are not based in reality and disproven by most of the available evidence...than that is not just doubting. Ironically the people in the mudflood community are the WORST when it comes to critizise their own sources or just put them in context. They are the ones who look at a map and assume: This empire must be real because its on a map...which is hilarious if you know who draw those maps and why and how and what they actually knew about the region. Thats like watching a Mc.Donalds spot and assume that must be healthy food because this "documentary" said so. Historians on the other hand take what Nietzsche said always into account. Thats why they use the critical method...of asking a source serious questions..about every source and doesn't see things confirmed unless they can cross reference them with different sources. ALL sources lie to some degree or exaggerate or leave out or are blatantly uniformed...but its the historians job to squeeze out the bit of reliable information every source can give us...which has to be done with careful consideration and knowledge of the time the sources talk about and their relation to others. Thats why we don't get a chronic of a king read it and be like: "Oh..seems that guy was a flawless hero who kicked ass in every battle and ruled just and super succesful". A lot of sources basically read like campaign adds. But we CAN extract information and gather our own. For example we know the battle of Kadesh mostly from Egyptian sources..and yet we con't think the Egyptians won a glorious victory...as Ramses told everyone. We know that the city wasn't taken by them and we know a bit about the losses of both armies, as well as the negotiation that follows, plus we have examined the battlefield etc.etc...and so historians rather call it a tie. History is not a lie. We have a pretty good idea on what happened...(at least since the medieval times, and in some time periods with lots of documents like the roman period)...but history is mostly about the questions what caused what, or what was responsible for that or what had an effect on what or wether or not something was justified and what factors lead to something, what was a person about, what was the significance of an event..and THATS where historians all disagree and have different theories and ideas and preferences..and of course a lot of perspectives of historians are heavily biased. That doesn'T make them liars or the stories they tell unreliable..but they have to be taken with a grain of salt...if it comes to those questions. And of course history is a science where we constantly get new data so often we have to re-date something or assume that an event didn'T happened or happened differently or had a different outcome or cause.

A better video from a better channel: TARTARIA Explained ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-wBxA9BJFlqk.html

@@dergutehut3961 You need to do a lot more research. Very brainwashed and programmed. Explain why we can see so much farther than they say is possible. That is not physics. You believe a ridiculous lie. Back in 1900 according to books, real books, everyone knew the earth was FLAT just like everyone knew shots were poison. All they tell you and taught you WAS LIES. All.

Used to access free energy which everybody can have and use yet we pay for it

they are either 1. lightning rods 2. decoration 3. decorative lightning rods 4. not that old

@@ar_xiv do you really believe that? Have you looked into any of the overwhelming evidence? Tartaria, old Asia, before ww1 or 2? All the bells hitler took to "melt down" the CIA papers about Russia.... That's just on the face with no theory's of conspiracy....

If wasn't even thought twice about that these things created energy. It wasn't considered something technical. Yet it eludes our entire civilization.

@rycka88 Resonator made of gold. Copper wires leading to mercury. Toroidal field generated by resonator and then fed into mercury to create electrical energy used to connect from the roof to th fireplace device which heats up the backplate of those ornate fireplaces. A bit like the pyramid in terms of being a massive circuit.

It would be foolish and ignorant to claim our civilization built a single old word building.

We never have 'debate'. It's aways 'follow the science' and be shamed if you don't comply unthinkingly isn't it ? It's never been a society that debated things before they were imposed. Never.

@@seanp8220you said it bro

Well said about a debate!

don't talk to him or any of the Nerd Woke Order nerds.

Humanity at its best for whom? Lynchings (public) were prevalant.

Only China Basin, by the ball park. They scuttled a lot of ships there in the gold rush and made an artificial reef, then eventually started putting some earth on it and eventually built. Not crazy.

It is ALL cities not just San Francisco. All was mudfloods and tons still buried. You can see windows and doors buried, top heavy buildings. All over the world. It was Seattle and so many other cities here. You need to look at old photos.

If you'd only knew why...

​@@VickiTakacs.Idk man probably just SF

Yep - I hope he was paid well.

Iv been in these buildings.. you are not thinking… it’s impossible to just make the bricks… the walls are 5 feet thick of solid bricks.. huge stone foundations…

think of deniers as the brush we need to start a raging fire.

youre on point

Brilliant

Wtf are you going on about stfu

Yeah, but, it's not crazy to think it was done. Especially if someone wanted more room and didn't have space on either side to use. At least some structures may have had a someone say "oh the smith's have a basement and the smythes and the smittys! I want a basement!

They used slave labour

Just speaking German doesn't make someone German... And yeah, read an archaeological textbook from 1900 and you'll see that ideas haven't changed at all... Minds are changed with evidence and generational shifts. Thanks for watching.

Who bombed Dresden

@@LowTechInstitute total horse pucks.

@@bennyskim Allies. US, Britain.

Why engage sarcasm directly? Bring facts. That will convince people, not snide remarks and ad hominem attacks.

Muh dinosaurs

It is pretty far fetched. It’s a long long run around to link this one together… doesn’t make sense. Their facts are smashed together.. hard.. then smashed again. Then saying, see it fits!who thought this up?

There is one who is pathetic ...

@@Ninjasnail1926 far fetched is our reality. You live in a Sci Fi movie where microchips made out of sand control computers/robots etc. You also come from a fantasy movie.

CIA document reveals truth of Tartarian Empire ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Ka0XRIj5OB0.html

Look at the epitaph on Wherner Von Braun's tombstone. He is telling you globe earth is a lie. Look up where globe earth uses 666.

Tartaria and Tartary are two different countries/lands

I am from germany The dome of cologone was constructed and advanced over centuries. In our days they have to refurbish regulary part of the building. They have experts for contruction materials trying 2 get closest to how they originaly made it. So part of the dome regulary reconstructed.

For something to be a viable theory, there must be some credible evidence to back it up. There is none with the Tartaria/mudflood myth

In addition to @darrylhenry5839 's point, it is thought that there is a conspiracy of the governments and mainstream society to suppress this idea. That's the conspiracy part of the "theory." Thanks for watching.

I think it is all just semantics. In truth, both are simply "theories", but a "conspiracy" theory is a sub-type, which implies a hidden hand pulling the strings in a given scenario.

I have a typology that helps explain this. A scientific theory is a validly-formed hypothesis that is not refuted by available scientific evidence. The heart of a successful criminal conspiracy prosecution is a conspiracy hypothesis borne out by legal evidence. The conspiracy hypotheses such as the mudflood, nebulous NWO, Bush doing 9/11, etc. are, at best, not borne out by any kind of evidence, not legal and not scientific. (NSA spying on us was a conspiracy hypothesis, and one that attracted crackpots, until it got leaked and became a proven theory - but rational explanations of it didn't make you sound crazy because governments do those things.) What most call conspiracy theories are, at best, conspiracy hypotheses, and at worst, not even hypotheses (just thinly veiled excuses). One part of sorting these things is a concept of asking "so what is gained by this, and by who?" Often you find that these things don't even have a beneficiary, so it's irrelevant (for the purpose of conspiracy studies, where the hypothesis is supposed to be one of a combination for nefarious purposes) if they're true or false.

I don't know about that guy who built palaces by himself..but it is far easier to lift heavy loads than one could think if you understand the bases of mechanical physics...a thing most of our forefathers did. Some had cranes or pulleys, or ramps or used water ways, or even hydraulic helpers. We might not know exactly how each building was constructed but we have no reason to believe the people needed the help of supernatural beings or highly advanced technology.

@@dergutehut3961 You are not really SEEING Anything.

Explain what that has to do with anything

Bro it’s easy trough Time we always Go up in Levels of dirt Building always on top of other thing. That’s why ancient Roman thing we find is always when Doing excavation. Also if you didn’t live in America but Europe you would See were this Kind of building come from. They are not impressive at all

London Blitz also a lie. Fakenukes bitchute. Old photos.

everything you're saying is like normal believable stuff except the fact that there was no "tartarian empire." There were *other* empires that really did exist like that Austrian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, etc that were broken up... if the tartarian empire was "mentioned" in old encyclopedias but never documented, is it not so hard to believe that maybe it was a misnomer all along? but you're probably a flat earther or something anyway so I don't know why I even waste my time

@@ar_xiv 2 things: 1) There are old maps naming/showing Tartaria. 2) this video shows a CIA document mentioning it and its history being rewritten. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3rHbr4i5ZHE.html

funny how anyone could j scroll to c this but so many choose to deny n trust our evil gov instead.

Yes I have a Tartar neighbour. Scoffs at all this BS about it. There's docs and lots of info about The Tartarian people. Nothing mysterious after a year of research...

No, just no. Your father was given partial truths. You must look at other things they've lied about like the sculptor Bernini or even Da Vinci.

Yes..that happens if crartsmen from one country go to another country...unless they suffer Amnesia on the way over they usually can still built like they did in their home-country. So if one continent...lets call it Europe...gains territory in almost all the other continents we can expect that the building style of that particular continent can be found everywhere and that it got influences from everyhwere. So...what do we see...oh..yeah..exactly that. Also...its a bit sad that you can't imagine people being in contact without telecommunication. Maybe you ask your grandparents about a thing they call: "letters" or your parents about a thing they call "books"...if you have those you can communicate knowledge all over the world. Even in Roman times you could order a book written by a guy in Alexandria in London and you could have it in 2 weeks...so don't underestimate how connected the world was in the 18-20th century.

Is it that hard to believe that building techniques spread across europe and the new world? you people don't understand anything I stg

Entheogens

Yes. Like when you give a child blocks to play with.

They are. Archaeology has had major revolutions of understanding since it started. Many times. Every time, though, new and persuasive hard evidence was needed. It isn't the archaeologists' job to disprove Tartaria, but rather the job of the Tartarian proponents to show hard evidence that this happened. What writing system did Tartaria use, for example? Show texts that talk about this empire contemporaneously both within and outside the empire. Demonstrate geological evidence for the mud flood as well as documentary evidence of the same. If that happened, it would be in the social memory as well as documents. Use a comparative architectural study to show that the building methods of structures across this "empire" were in fact from a unified system (i.e., similar construction methods, components, tropes, etc. that cannot be attributed to cherry picking; it must be systemic). Comparisons of pictures alone is not hard evidence. If it exists, bring the new, tangible evidence, not novel interpretations of old evidence.

Graham Hancock begs to differ...

I sense a strong sarcasm here

@@LowTechInstitute Tartaria overpowered many other countries and regions. Various people of different languages. Same as empires during the past few hundred years, most would have kept their own languages.

@LowTechInstitute ok if you’d be kind, show how open minded you are by responding professionally as an archaeologist, to my comment re building a basement being much harder than building up or out for the required extra space. You imply this is the archaeological fact. Is it not the case that archaeologists often disagree with one another? Please correct me if in fact they are all in perfect harmony and come to agreement about every historical idea relating to the dig. Look I’m simply searching for truth and it’s professional especially in the field of archaeology to question these things and seek better understanding.

Looks about like KY state capitol!

Thank you.

Not trying to be snarky here but genuinely how can we all come from one of three ancestoral trees? If that is the case then where do people of different races come from? Like was there not a black, white, and Asian version of Adam and Eve?

​@@BizarreAndrogynous ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZD1FfD8d3Jg.htmlsi=9Vgg7NSmVUp_QrLS

The flood was caused by frequency based technology. most likely all biblical stories were based on technology

utterly irrelevant

Look at atmospheric or Corona motors. They can be powered by high voltage which is naturally occurring in our atmosphere ie tall buildings with spikes

@@urbanmagik Thank you for the information. This is great! I'm looking forward to researching this.

Also they re figured out how to utilize bricks as batteries.

I was about to listen to the whole thing, but the overconfident way he said "No, it didn't" made me immediately reconsider, lmao. 😅

Correct. In the process of being built... by mere nontartarian mortals in the mid- to late 1800s. Thanks for watching.

Cities grow up over time as people bring in and deposit soil, pavement, and other debris. I don't know exactly what videos or photos you're mentioning, so I can't comment specifically, but check out this Wikipedia entry on tells to see how cities grow vertically over time: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tell_(archaeology) Thanks for watching.

@J1Nflo Pick up a book on Palladio, the Italian Renaissance architect. Read it. Learn.

​@@LowTechInstituteevery city shows this. Every single one. Half or entirely buried stories. You really want to believe what the "authorities" tell you, don't you. Your in your 20's, I'd say. You have no idea whats been hidden just in the decades prior to your arrival. Have some skepticism. Some of us have been looking at this for a long time.

That question can be easily answered these hubris pieces of garbage not so humbly believe they know everything about everything.

And then he mentions wikipedia? As if everything they say can be taken to the bank I mean really

So I guess you believe that these huge ornate buildings were constructed in a year or two, correct? Because if you really look into them, almost all were said to be constructed within these crazy time frames. Only phony architect names are given, never ever the name of the Construction Companies or any of the builders. Not many construction photos either, so documentation was apparently never their strong suit.

@@dominotruth it's called the industrial revolution pal, we figured out a lot of stuff pretty quick

@@ar_xiv really? With dirt roads, horse & buggies, and no power tools? It’s taken 18 months for my neighbors simple siding house to get built, and over a year for most simple brick rectangular apartment complexes. And the above mentioned structures are not complicated. They don’t require complex materials and the supplies and labor are way easier to come by, yet they take so long. The 1st Industrial Revolution was between 1760-1840. In 1867 Wilhelm Emil Fein opened a workshop in Germany for precision mechanics and electrical engineering, and Rober Bosch did the same in 1886. But it wasn’t until 1895 that the first power tool wasn’t created by Wilhelm Emil Fein (and that doesn’t mean it was immediately available for folks in American to buy and use). In 1895 Fein invented the world’s first portable electric hand drill and in 1908 he developed the motorized hand sander for woodworking. If the building were built during the 1st Industrial Revolution, that means they were all supposedly done with hand tools in a year or two? All these uneducated folks just happened to ALL be master craftsmen? They were probably simple builders and farmers who could suddenly build masterpieces in such short time frames? Have you ever looked up the population sizes of these cities at the time these great building were supposedly built? Things just don’t add up. Also, why would such small populations with simple people need such lavish structures?

@@dominotruth maybe instead of coming to really stupid conclusions from ignorance you can actually try to learn something about the world

@@ar_xiv you’re the one writing one sentence comments. You obviously haven’t researched anything yourself, because if you had, you wouldn’t have just thrown out an answer like the Industrial Revolution. You using the Industrial Revolution as your example shows you know nothing about history and what really happened in that time period. So who is really an ignorant fool? That would be you.

John Levi, Mind Unveiled, Martin Liedtke.

So the idea that the earth is literally flat and not spherical like the visible moon is more detached from reality than the idea that a culture existed when we have evidence of their flag (it's yellow with a gryphon on it), they had their own spoken language, and famous figures throughout history identified as them? You lose all credibility with a statement like this

@@bennyskim what historical figures? everything you're saying comes from a long line of misunderstandings apparently amplified to this day.

The only thing flat-earthers fear is sphere itself... Don't groan

Я знаю.

@@catherinegrimes2308 А если знаете, то зачем самое Глобальное государство за всю историю человечества - Татарию, затартарили ?

Evidently there was.

All you need is a few hundred people day in and day out to build large structures

History = His Story. Think.

Bernini - Martin Liedtke.