Тёмный
No video :(

Teach Your Eye to Eat Clojure Mario Aquino 

Zhang Jian
Подписаться 858
Просмотров 3,5 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

29 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 12   
@tankerwife2001
@tankerwife2001 9 месяцев назад
Great talk but i can't help but notice that this guy has the Captain Disillusion fit
@cellularmitosis2
@cellularmitosis2 4 года назад
Thanks for posting these!
@beeshepard
@beeshepard 3 года назад
Great intro to Clojure, thanks!
@eugenemosh3658
@eugenemosh3658 2 года назад
Thank you!
@rastislavsvoboda4363
@rastislavsvoboda4363 Год назад
at 25:00, it is the same word, no problem, because 'map' as noun is datastructure, and 'map' as verb is function
@diegonayalazo
@diegonayalazo 2 года назад
Thanks for sharing?
@EvenStarLoveAnanda
@EvenStarLoveAnanda 3 года назад
16:54 Those are not Rational numbers, those are fractional numbers. A ratio is different from a fraction. In a ratio you can use decimals, as in the ratio between Milometers and Miles. 1 - 1.61 reads One to One point six one. In this case we are interested in the difference between the two numbers. In the case of fractions we are interested in how many pieces we have broken one into and how many of those pieces we have? like 3/4 or 1/3
@andrewlecouteurbisson7217
@andrewlecouteurbisson7217 3 года назад
A Rational number is the ratio of two integers, a member of Q.
@EvenStarLoveAnanda
@EvenStarLoveAnanda 3 года назад
@@andrewlecouteurbisson7217 Correct, that is what I was saying. and a fractional number is different as I was explaining.
@jasbrg
@jasbrg 3 года назад
@@EvenStarLoveAnanda you're talking about representation, but fractions and rationals collapse when you're working with mathematical rigor so they're also the same thing
@EvenStarLoveAnanda
@EvenStarLoveAnanda 3 года назад
'A pitcher, pitches a curve ball to the batter." If we can read code like this, then why can't we write code like this? We need to adapt natural languages for coding, so everyone can write programs for their own computers. This is the future. We need to create Verbal and Visual programming languages. And don't fear for your jobs, coders. Just because everyone can write, that does not mean everyone can be a poet.
Далее
Programming with Values in Clojure  Alan Dipert
46:26
Просмотров 1,7 тыс.
Macros are Hard  David McNeil
44:58
Просмотров 357
Bilasizmi?
00:12
Просмотров 397 тыс.
Chelsea gym be like.. 😅⚽️
00:20
Просмотров 14 млн
One  to Rule them All  Aaron Bedra
1:00:31
Просмотров 216
Why Prismatic Goes Faster With Clojure  Bradford Cross
51:18
Macros Why, When, and How  Gary Fredericks
38:36
Understanding Core Clojure Functions  Jonathan Graham
45:36
Bilasizmi?
00:12
Просмотров 397 тыс.