22 giugno 2018 - Terence Tao, professore alla University of California di Los Angeles e Medaglia Fields 2006, parla delle sue ricerche sull'ipotesi di Riemann, uno dei più importanti problemi aperti della matematica.
The suggestion that the functional equation alone is inadequate for proving the Riemann hypothesis is gold if it's correct. It's Terry Tao, so there is a good chance that the advice is correct.
Someone like this guy, lecturing a class without any shame of appearance with those hideous sandals.. how can you care for others when you have no dignitiy left.
Brilliant! I love that the structure of the presentation shows the general problem solving mentality that the researchers have gone through to achieve these results. Not just generalizing the problem but also how they generalized is so interesting.
Binocular parallel coexistence assessment along line-of-sight z-axis condensing-collapse of i-reflection +/- logarithmic spin potential => Polar-Cartesian self-defining infinitesimal coordination-identification positioning system.., Physics-Math Observation. The mention of evaporation-condensation modulation cause-effect immediately brings to mind the oscillation of a pendulum and precession, how one swing plane shifts to another, and how this relates to the Unit Circle modulo distribution of prime-cofactor frequency density-intensity.., and how all together you can identify the s-p wave-packaging in Earthquake propagation, linear-transverse oscillation etc. Euler's Entanglement Fusion-Fission Function "says" the Universe is logarithmic and presents the picture-plane of Superspin Modulation of axial-tangential superimposed frequency-amplitudes aligned in i-reflection linear-transverse precession wave modulation containment superposition.., so of course +/i-inflation is 3D-T 0-1-2-ness evaporation-condensation modulation cause-effect at instantaneous all frequency oscillation Fluxion-Integral interference of the now-connection resonant re-cognition. Ie "You just look at it" and the Multiverse Conception of phase-locked coherence-cohesion holographic time-timing presence of QM-TIME Completeness Actuality, is "obvious", but it will take a lot of Mathematical Conjecture to get the picture right and correct. The proposition that "trivial zeros" are gaseous-hyperfluid, ..on the axial-tangential line-of-sight superposition identification zero-infinity point sequence is solid, ..and in between (Tangency Space) is wave resonance liquid.., seems very like physical manifestation, by Disproof inclusion-exclusion Methodology, of the Fusion-Fission Function IMHO. Ordinary High School maths people will connect the Gaussian diagram to the Unit Circle modulo bubble-modes of chemistry. (Obvious) This has the characteristics of confinement by Absolute zero-infinity, WYSIWYG pulse-evolution differentiates here-now-forever.. A review of Professor Cedric Villani's work of the Heat Equation, phase-locked coherence-cohesion sync-duration resonances of Logarithmic Time Duration Timing and this lecture will allow students a much better understanding of perspectives. "Solid at time zero", is absolutely precision-point closed-collapsed omnidirectional-dimensional cause-effect positioning logic of QM-TIME Completeness Observation. Very informative and satisfying Mathematics, thank you Professor Tao.
The idea is to look at a specific two-variable function H(t,s), chosen so that the single-variable function obtained by fixing t to 0, H(0,s), is a close relative of Riemann zeta function. Investigate how zeros of H(t,s) behave *when t changes*. (The trick is that such investigation is possible when you do have t. Before "extending" the function from having one variable to having two, this obviously wasn't possible. Neat!) This may allow to prove some useful properties of H(0,s), which in turn may lead to the proof of Riemann hypothesis.
I might be wrong, but this could work: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-PvUrbpsXZLU.html P.S. A piece of advice: make video 1.5 times faster, I speak very slowly)
@@sunkhirous are u familiar with riemann hypothesis? Can u teach me I want to solve it. I took calculus in high school. But it's been a long time. what math u need it know to solve it. Please tell me
