Testing The Exposure Limits Of Kodak Ektar 100

Подписаться 131 тыс.

Просмотров 113 тыс.

50% 1

For the second installment of the Colour Negative Film exposure tests, we're looking at Kodak's Ektar 100. In this episode, I run a roll of Ektar 100 through the Pentax 67ii and see how it deals with different exposure scenarios. I have to say, I was surprised by the results from this one.
Full-res images can be downloaded here: www.dropbox.co...
►Follow me on Instagram: / kyle__mcdougall
►Order my new book ‘An American Mile’: bit.ly/3Og6Z45
►*DISCLAIMER*
Some of the links below are affiliate links, where I earn a small commission if you click on the link and purchase an item. The money I earn helps me make this type of content consistently.
GEAR USED IN THIS VID:
Pentax 67ii: ebay.us/GaK9Kp
Pentax 75mm f/4.5: ebay.us/R9dIM4
Kodak Ektar 100: amzn.to/2OxwqCY
My '35mm Film Photography Course' on Skillshare (FREE with this link): skl.sh/2JrGhFs
My 'Medium Format Film Photography Course' on Skillshare (FREE with this link): skl.sh/3r7KLta
Where I source music for my videos (One FREE month with this link): fm.pxf.io/c/19...
Videos on this channel are filmed using the Fuji X-H2s: bhpho.to/3UEjFVs
►FILM PHOTOGRAPHY GEAR (*these are affiliate links):
My go-to medium format camera: ebay.us/GaK9Kp
My favourite 35mm film camera: ebay.us/82WyVI
My favourite 35mm film lens: ebay.us/u0V817
My favourite medium format travel camera: ebay.us/FVcfWk
My go-to light meter: ebay.us/QIFXF0
My favourite film stock: ebay.us/orbudp
My favourite 645 medium format film camera: ebay.us/ydY4HK
→Instagram: bit.ly/2GuYV21
→Website: kmcdougall.com

Опубликовано:

28 сен 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 252

@RosieOutdoors 5 лет назад

I really like the overexposure - I think I prefer the +1 and +2 to the normal exposure.

@pedrolamego5653 6 лет назад

Wow, I'm going to start overexposing Ektar by 3-4 stops!

@jayzn1931 3 года назад

How did it turn out? :D

@matthewbufton131 5 лет назад

I really love the flat effect of underexposing, will keep in mind.

@martebar 6 лет назад

Great knowledge, thanks for taking the time of doing this! Although, aren't these stocks considered more professional than popular? I would love to see this kind of tests on more "lowgrade" film like Agfa Vista, Kodak Ultramax, or even Lomography to see if cheaper film are less resistant to over/under exposure. Great work!

@frickseerose6146 5 лет назад

Agfa vista is dead😓

@ManuelGuzmanPhotography 6 лет назад

I've always been nervous about missing the exposure with this stock. Thanks for the insight!

@AlexOnStreets 3 года назад

Very useful. Big thanks.

@nikodeman55 6 лет назад

What a wonderful channel! This content has been absolutely excellent, I cannot wait to see what comes next! Thank you for the work you do!

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Hey, thank you, I really appreciate you watching!

@MrChristopherwren 4 года назад

I'm considering buying the Ektar myself lately. I have the digital background and exposure is quite different in film photography. Thank you.

@billthornhill8408 6 лет назад

Great video. Really looking forward to the Fuji 400h video :)

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Thanks for watching, Bill!

@jimitav 6 лет назад

Once again, very nice video. For my eyes (and screen), I think Ektar is usable up to +2 stops and no under exposure at all. I think it makes sense, as I believe in general, more contrasty and saturated emulsions have less margin.

@johnbarben 6 лет назад

I just bought my first roll of Ektar - that’s been really useful thanks

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Glad you enjoyed.

@acidsnow5915 6 лет назад

this was super interesting loved watching this! hope to see more soon :)

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Thank you!

@JasonKonopinski 6 лет назад

Man, I love these tests! Subbed.

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Thank you!

@marcossantana1164 6 лет назад

another great video. I was hyped to see the exposure limits on ektar, well I was more interested in seeing how far on the overexposure it could go. To my taste and going by your images, +4 is safe when needed, but +2 and +3 gave perfect results. About the underexposure limit, I mainly shoot portraits, ektar underexposed gives pinkish/redish skin tones to people, not flattering. I'm looking forward to your next exposure limit video of Fuji400h, and as others have mentioned, 35mm tests would be appreciated and also good to see if 35 behaves much differently than 120 on that aspect :-)

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Thanks Marcos. I agree, +2 and +3 are fine in my books. I'm very curious about 400h as well. I haven't shot too much of that film, and I'm curious to see how it will respond.

@Flyingdorkanimation 5 лет назад

Thanks Kyle, these videos are exceptionally helpful.

@thegreasygeezer1974 6 лет назад

Great video! This is super helpful.

@Dscar1 6 лет назад

This is super useful. Thanks.

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Thanks Dave!

@deongedeon 3 года назад

I know I'm late to the party, and maybe you don't do these videos anymore but if you can, can you let us know where did you meter for and the exposure compensation, thank you!

@filminrussia7095 6 лет назад

Your mobile home looks so cosy. Can you make a review on it? 😂

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Haha! You're out of luck as we're selling it!

@alessiazampano2594 6 лет назад

I really like these tests.. could you make one about the CineStill films?

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

I'll keep that in mind for a future episode. I'd be really curious to see how 50D holds up.

@diegorosado4480 6 лет назад

could you upload again,like in the portra video, the high res images? Great channel, and great content.

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

You bet Diego. I’ll have the link in the description later this evening. On the road right now so internet is a bit limited.

@rzabavin 6 лет назад

2 weeks later....link please

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Link is now in the description.

@rzabavin 6 лет назад

thanks

@f1fort3 6 лет назад

great content! but one thing keeps annoying me is that your microphone seems to be too close inside your house.

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Glad you're enjoying the content. Curious what is it about the audio that is bothering you?

@f1fort3 6 лет назад

watching again I think that the problem is the acustics inside your home, not the microphone, sorry 😂😂😂

@patrickqueenan7332 3 года назад

How are you such a legend?

@KyleMcDougall 3 года назад

😁 Good to see you here dude.

@marekkovac7058 5 лет назад

Very informative video thanks! How did you correct exposure? push/pull or after scaning adjusted in computer?

@KyleMcDougall 5 лет назад

Thank you. Exposure was adjusted during the scan.

@marekkovac7058 5 лет назад

@@KyleMcDougall thanks! :)

@dhruvemital 6 лет назад

As much as I like the fact that you’re testing and putting this up, I hate the fact that it is a waste of great film. You could have used this for a few cityscape type photos which would have done the job too. Great job though.

@richard.l5563 4 года назад

apertures, nds are more accurate than shutter

@mlprouser 5 лет назад

how you developing the film?

@christopherhowell3209 5 лет назад

What are you exposing for ...shadows?

@KyleMcDougall 5 лет назад

This was center weighted average with the internal meter.

@Miguel-kh9pc 6 лет назад

How does the Frontier compare to the Noritsu for both 120, and 35mm film?

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Both are very capable. I always choose to go with the Frontier when I get my scans done at a lab and have the option. I like the look better. From my understanding, the Nortisu is a bit more flexible than the Frontier when it comes to contrast control. Your best bet is to send your film somewhere like The Find Lab and have them scan the same roll on both the Nortisu and Frontier, and then check out the results.

@Fritzgiallo 5 лет назад

@@KyleMcDougall Do you make any corrections on the scan, or just leave it for "auto" or default Lab scan?

@raduroachu7229 6 лет назад

Im new to film so i need help umderstanding. I would be shooting this at 100 iso, and when he refers to shooting over or under f stops, its referring to the apeture being more "open" or "closed"? I use a pentax a3 so i can shoot manual and choose the f stop however it does not have a light meter for recommened exposure.

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

What exactly are you trying to understand better? Would love to help you out.

@sbarronmd 5 лет назад

This is a public service. Thanks

@dirtywater5336 6 лет назад

It's great to see an actual real film test using the same scene at different exposures. Too often I see people comparing a film with completely different scenes with different lighting. You can't review a film's exposure like that! Being a Landscape photographer, I shoot a lot of Ektar so this is all great information to know

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Thanks! Glad you found the test useful!

@mattdayphoto 6 лет назад

Keep it up, man!

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Thanks, dude! 🙌

@audioupgrades 6 лет назад

As a regular Ektar user, I'd say the "normal" is actually under-exposed in this test.

@ME-gs6yn 2 года назад

Can I ask what would you meter for to get the correct exposure on Ektar? I love the look people get out of this film but found that I have been struggling with it slightly

@audioupgrades 2 года назад

@@ME-gs6yn For 35mm I mainly use Minolta Dynax cameras which have very accurate exposure metering, eg Dynax 7 or XD 7. For medium format (or unreliable 35mm cameras) I mainly use a hand-held exposure meter, a Minolta Light Meter IV.

@ME-gs6yn 2 года назад

@@audioupgrades Thank you for replying! I really appreciate this feedback. I think after reading this I’ve realised it’s time to upgrade my light meter

@audioupgrades 2 года назад

@@ME-gs6yn Sounds like a good idea. I recommend the vintage Minolta light meters.

@nicolaslevy7464 Год назад

With the caveat that “any picture you’re happy with was exposed properly”, I agree with you. This lack of shadow detail is not what one expects from a Kodak professional film. Most people meter for the highlights like Kyle did, and then over expose by two stops to put that value in zone 7. So the shot that Kyle calls “overexposed by two stops” is actually the “correct exposure that you learn in photo school”. That being said I’m surprised to see how well Ektar behaves underexposed. When I heard Kyle say that his base exposure was 1/125 f16 I had to pause the video to double check that he was reviewing a iso100 film. 😅 I expected a much worse look from the “base exposure”.

@lostcontinenttube 6 лет назад

Hey man, I love those videos! Did you consider making similar ones but with 35mm film? That's be sick!

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Thanks man! I’ll keep it in mind for future episodes. Maybe I’ll try out a 35mm Portra 400 roll and see what the difference is.

@AustinBeeman 6 лет назад

Kyle McDougall - I’d second that.

@certainlyjoel 5 лет назад

@@KyleMcDougall Would be so appreciated man, no one else is going that. From what I know of.

@Al0011235813 5 лет назад

As I suspected-the film gives you more dynamic range when overexposed a bit. Really nice to see it in action. I’m surprised by how dark the shadows are in the normal exposure; if I meter my digital camera at ~18% gray, the highlights would usually get blown out in this kind of scene, but I could easily bring up the shadows to HDR-like levels.

@Nguyen12121 6 лет назад

Portra 800 next please!

@MiracleWinchester 4 года назад

When I first watched this last year, I could not understand what the "green cast" line meant. Now in 2020, after shooting film and watching hours of film content, I could actually see what you meant. It's blowing my mind now!

@randomstuff-cu4of 4 года назад

I'm no film photographer or even photographer at all (I've only recently gotten a broken Konica hexar for free and I'm trying to fix it but I don't think my diy pressure plate is any good it will need a new back cover to be used right) but the tint shift is the first thing I noticed on the one stop underexposed.

@ErikJensenDetroit 4 года назад

I shot a roll of Ektar 100 35mm overexposed by 2 stops in my Canon EOS 3 earlier this year, and I loved it so much that I don't think I'll use it any other way. The roll I shot reminded me of Velvia, but was less expensive to develop and a bit cheaper to purchase. Also there's the fact that Ektar has a bit more latitude than Velvia, which makes me less nervous about shooting it in my cameras that don't have meters, like my Yashica C.

@CalumetVideo 3 года назад

Ektar 100 is my film for landscape photography. It’s pretty forgiving.

@Irontalyn 5 лет назад

I would love to see the same test with consumer color films. Superia, color plus, and gold.

@ebouwman034 4 года назад

Irontalyn I agree. Lomo color film is supposed to be Gold, so I’d like to see that done. I don’t expect it to stand up anywhere near as well, but it would be a cool test.

@Ty4ons 5 лет назад

Now I really get why some people call it an ISO 50 film I've been struggling with poor shadows in my Ektar pictures, I take a lot of high contrast landscapes. I'm definitely going to try overexposing a lot when the light is tricky, not just one stop like I used to.

@troulimoes 5 лет назад

Omg it is finally clear to me what a 'stop' means in terms of over- and underexposing. Thanks man, awesome video

@ajaxmuse 4 года назад

Can you explain it to me please. If you don't mind

@jethrobucoy7887 4 года назад

@@ajaxmuse sorry if this is a late reply but a stop just means exposure; if someone said 1 stop over its 1 stop over exposed, if it's 1 stop under it's 1 stop underexposed.

@PuntosPlace 3 года назад

I'd say I like more the overexposed images than the correct exposure

@kevinbrowne3089 4 месяца назад

My take is that if I want punchy and saturated colors, shoot box. If I want a bit warmer, 2 stops over! All with the same development! Super flexible.

@fpm1979 4 года назад

I wonder how Ektar 100 would behave if you told the lab to pull it by one or two stops.

@sarova2000 3 года назад

So when you overexpose your film, the lab doesn’t have to do anything special, like when pushing film?

@KyleMcDougall 3 года назад

Nope. Don’t need to mention anything.

@marcuscook5145 2 месяца назад

I'm going to try this 2 stops overexposed and with some contrast added back in post. Should make for some super detailed shadows.

@maximerica 6 лет назад

Didn't know that underexposing color film would make the shadows muddy ! Now I understand why some of my images were unusable ! thanks a lot. Great video

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Glad you found it helpful!

@marcuscook5145 2 месяца назад

Film is the opposite of digital in that the shadows lose detail way before the highlights do and it turns into a grainy mess. I try to meter for the shadows with color film since the highlights are really hard to blow out and then for black and white, meter for the midtones.

@behindeachfilmgrain 6 лет назад

You had me at 1/60th of second! Hahaha! Love the results and seeing that you shot these at F16 is an eye-opener! I am usually at the fastest aperture and at the fastest shutter speed to get the look I want but I may want try your speeds to see what my Mamiya RB67 Pro S will yield! Great Job as per usual Kyle.

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Thanks! Glad you found the test useful!

@Brandongorrie 5 лет назад

I'm shooting a girl with Ektar soon and we are OVERexposing my dude 🤘🏻 it's a skate/70s Dogtown style shoot. Can't wait

@strawberrycrxme 5 месяцев назад

Is there a lens like that for the Mamiya RZ67? It looks incredibly wide in your photos

@eccentricsmithy2746 3 года назад

Camera on the tripod, hasn't moved, focus hasn't changed, only changing shutter speed.....but needs to look thru the view finder in every shot for no apparent reason.

@Jimbojam Год назад

You said you were going to talk about it in terms of scanning effects, but I didn't hear reference to that. ?

@anzaeria 2 года назад

Great test and comparison images. With regards to the +1, +2 and +3 overexposed frames, did you notice a decrease or increase in grain?

@komaarts7677 4 года назад

It´s because of the shitty frontier scanner, it can´t handle the normal exposed negatives, for frontier or noritsu you always need to over-expose your negatives, get the imacon

@venanciomiki 4 года назад

As a digital shooter, is quite amusing how much overexposing does film supports

@yumbaconstrips 5 лет назад

Watching those exposure film test vids, I'm noticing the color shifts. And you comment whether it's useable or not. I shoot black and white but I'm starting to get into color now. those color shifts each individual film has is what gives it its unique characteristic. I understand tastes and effects are all subjective, but are determining a usable pic to have the widest range and depth of color, the most detail, flatness, the ease of usability in post processing etc? A hypothetical: we have a client that is asking to use film over digital because they like the color shift effect like instagram filters, do we go for the usable pic for post processing or because we know the effects of under and over, we decide what better suits our clients needs? Sorry for this long response just wanted to hear what you had to say!

@shotbyzaystudio 3 года назад

If I’m shooting it at night, do I overexpose by setting iso at 200?

@jamwoncityboy 2 года назад

coming from a long time ektar user +4 honestly looks like a “normal” ektar image

@zameerhussain7711 2 года назад

Today I accidentally put my 35mm Ektar 100 rather then portra 400 and left my EOS 55E at ISO400 setting. Feeling pretty anxious. My model is waiting for me to process them, any feedback appreciated.

@KyleMcDougall 2 года назад

I’d say at two stops of under exposure you’re going to see some thin shadow areas on the negative and as a result, probably some muddy/flat areas on the scan. All depends how accurate your metering was though.

@elleboreellebore4590 5 лет назад

Great testing method. Simple and informative, as are the comments. Thank you.

@FGKaye 5 лет назад

SO: usable exposures are -2 = +4, which averages out to +1 stop On other words to MAXimize your exposure range, or to aign the film's center point with a meter's Zone V averaging metering, OVERexpose by 1 STOP !

@cs512tr 3 года назад

this film seems to have great exposure latitude, great video. and this sounds like its still safer to overexpose than under if you're not a pro like me

@autumnruns 3 года назад

I always err on the side of overexposure, especially with Portra. I prefer my Portra photos that way. With Ektar I tend to keep it right around ), or err on the side of +1 but try not to go much higher.

@thehumanchris 3 года назад

Really really appreciate these types of vids Kyle, thanks a bunch!! Super helpful and informative!

@voyagersquaremuzika 6 лет назад

Great man! Would you like to test some of the cheap 35mm films? Like Kodak ColorPlus 200 or Gold 200 or some cheap Fuji films!

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Definitely a possibility in the future. I'd be curious as well!

@ethanyaang 6 лет назад

Hey Kyle! What's that track at 1:10? Such a good vibe.

@charithmettananda7129 6 лет назад

Here's a question by a rookie. Does portrait 400 mean I have to stick to iso400, ektar100 means I have to stick to iso100, etc.

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

You definitely don't have to stick to the box speed of the film, but it's what is recommended by the manufacturer for best results. As you can see in this video though, negative film can handle a wide range of overexposure fairly well. So, you could shoot Ektar 100 at 50 ISO (+1 stop), or even at 25 ISO (+2 stop). I always over-expose by at least 1 stop. My go to film is usually Portra 400, so that means that I usually rate it at ISO 200 to give me one stop of over-exposure.

@shatunsram3749 4 года назад

+1 stops looks better then normal exposure

@sespela 6 лет назад

Yes! Looking forward to seeing the fujifilm test! Great video, very interesting.👍🏻

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Thanks! Fuji vid is being shot this week.

@k1773ns 4 года назад

Does anyone know if I could shoot ektar under exposed in like overcast conditions? Ektar is great with the blue bright sky but what about with clouds? 🤔 is it even worth it to shoot? Hmm

@k1773ns 4 года назад

Oops I meant over exposed.

@KyleMcDougall 4 года назад

I actually prefer shooting Ektar in overcast, especially in foggy conditions.

@conox555 5 лет назад

Nice

@wolfgangmenzel2921 4 года назад

A helpfull video, thank you. But to evaluate the information, there ist one question important to be answered: What do you mean by "normal exposure"? - How did you calculate it? Was it by light-meatering? Or by object-meatering? In that case it seems, that there would an correction be affordable, because the brightness of the subject is more than average: is that correction already included? For an revealing answer thanks in advance.

@KyleMcDougall 4 года назад

Hi there, my 'normal' exposure was using the camera's internal light meter set to center weighted average.

@wolfgangmenzel2921 4 года назад

@@KyleMcDougall I see, thank You.

@turdboman 5 лет назад

So these were shot at different exposures but all processed the same as 100 asa c41 ??

@KyleMcDougall 5 лет назад

You got it.

@larsgibbon3327 6 лет назад

Very interesting video. Are you able to do a similar test with B&W 120 film?

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Hey Lars, I’ve had a few requests, and may do some B&W in the future.

@TomMasonPhoto 6 лет назад

Top work Kyle, really enjoyed this one, As someone getting back into film shooting after professional digital work, its really good information and great to hear your thoughts! Looking forward to running some Ektar though my F3 and F6!

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Thanks, Tom. Glad you enjoyed the vids! Have fun!

@gstefanos2792 5 лет назад

Assuming the under/overexposed shots were taken in different rolls, pushing or pulling the rolls by an equal number of stops would have given us the correctly exposed image?

@stevek8829 4 года назад

Over and under developing c-41 chemistry is not widely practiced.

@anzaeria 2 года назад

I would think that they were all shot on the same roll of film.

@WillGoodlet 5 лет назад

Great job! Really helpful thank you

@Trinity11222 4 года назад

Love this video . When he was under exposing through changing the shutter speed did he also change the aperture ?

@paulinamolinari4099 3 года назад

I think just shutter speed but I wonder if he also changed the ISO on the camera

@joachimlindback 3 года назад

Excellent info

@giuseppe1rapper 4 года назад

Not too good with english, he tested every exposure with a different roll? What change with develop?

@KyleMcDougall 4 года назад

All the images are on the same roll.

@giuseppe1rapper 4 года назад

@@KyleMcDougall amazing! Thank you!

@Willixlonger 6 лет назад

I'm a bit new on film photography so I'm sorry if this is a silly question but...does this video means that if I get my exposure wrong I can still get usable shots? In digital, if I overexpose 2 stops I need some post-production. If I miss my exposure, will my film pictures come as yours from the lab or should I say something to them? Thanks!

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Not a silly question at all. Yes, you can still get usable images if you overexpose. Most labs will "correct the density" of each frame during scanning. You can basically think about this in the same way as the process of you shooting digital, overexposing, and then pulling the exposure down to normal in post-production. Basically, the lab is doing it for you. The only difference is that film holds up a lot better with overexposure than digital does. With digital, you may only be able to overexpose/correct by 2 stops before you actually start losing detail that you can't get back. With most negative film you're good even at four stops of overexposure. Hope this helps!

@Willixlonger 6 лет назад

@@KyleMcDougall thanks for answering that fast! It's really helpful, thank you. I will still try my best at metering but it's nice to know that you can fail a bit

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

No problem. And yes, it's important to try and understand/practice proper metering, but don't be afraid to overexpose. I almost always overexpose by at least one stop.

@Zabarotropitili 3 года назад

This 120 Kodak ektar film looks a great one, but 35mm version that i used is quite tricky to get correctly exposed. Shots in the same roll can look quite different using the same camera.

@lawrencewong5003 Год назад

Hi, I really dig this series. It's extremely helpful for a beginner to understand a variety of films (hope I could get all of them one day lol). Though I have to ask, did you develop them as the box speed or you push/pull them during development? Thanks.

@wallafilm 5 лет назад

Great video, very helpful. Can you talk a bit about your scanning process? How are you adjusting the levels of the scans to match each exposure? Are you using an auto-balance feature of your scanning software, or are you scanning as a RAW un-adjusted and making corrections in Photoshop? Sorry if I missed your explaining that somewhere.

@Halum11 5 лет назад

hi kyle, nice video. when you underexpose the ektar 100 do you also develop it longer and vice versa for overexposure? or is it developed at box speed rating despite the under and overexposure..I just want to know this so I can judge your results.

@sonomute 6 лет назад

Thanks for the video. I'm new to all this, so could you tell me, would it be OK to push-process this film stock? If i get it right i'd have to treat it as higher sensitivity film for that which means i would be underexposing it and then compensating while developing? My goal is to be able to shoot in low(er) light conditions without spending more for higher iso film :) Thanks!

@dasp125 5 лет назад

What zone was your highlights with detail placed for your normal exposure? Normal exposure doesn’t mean much without knowing the dynamic range of the scene and where you placed the highlights and shadows.

@sunnysideofthecar 5 лет назад

Do you think that the results will be similar with 35mm format? Also I would like to see the same test with a cheaper film like fuji 200 or kodak color plus.

@v-g-z3689 6 лет назад

Very good Video! 6 stops over gives it a very vintage look, I think i will try that out :)

@Reversefilms 4 года назад

I have to say, the normal exposure looked somewhat underexposed to me to start with.

@JordanSmithFilms 4 года назад

These are very helpful. Thanks for doing them.

@FotografieFlorianKrammel 6 лет назад

Hey my Friend, one of the best channels about film photography I've ever seen! Love your stuff. Please keep going on! I started a very similar channel this year. Hope to maybe meet you somedays in the US.

@KyleMcDougall 6 лет назад

Thanks for the kind words! Really appreciate it!