TFDi MD-11: Watch before buying! 

indeed, all engines (i assume wing) are built that same on airliners. the tail engine would be different i assume.

Ce MD11 Pour P3Dv5.1 n'est pas fini, a éviter d'acheter maintenant, beaucoup de BUG inadmissible. Comme par exemple les roues ne tournent pas. Pas de push back aves shift+P. Textures trop lourdes qui demande trop, et qui fait que ça retourne sous Windows 10, alors qu'avec tout les avions PMDG et les réglage au maxi pas de problème. Support inexistant. This MD11 For P3Dv5.1 is not finished, avoid buying now, many unacceptable BUGs. Like for example the wheels don't turn. No push back with shift+P. Too heavy textures which require too much, and which makes it return to Windows 10, whereas with all the PMDG planes and the maximum settings no problem. Non-existent support.

It does not have some bugs, it has many bugs and the aircraft is barely flyable. PMDG MD11 was way better and a perfect aircraft even if it wasreleased nearly 20 years ago.

Sounds and flies fantastic cannot wait for the failures add-on well said mate

Just gotta wait now. I hope it comes soon

Did i miss the stupid Joke? without that its not average at all ^^

only if TFDi sent the wrong file, otherwise this is the current version 1.0.1. I wouldn't gain anything by lying

Why so toxic?

@@Flyoverappu are right , it is fuckin trash … i think the limited edition is different than what we have

It is nothing like this my friend. I bought both versions, and all the textures are what they suppose to be. Inside and outside.

@@Nickeles020 thanks man, I plan to get it today. Been checking it out and it does appear to be fine.

The Fenix is a simulation. This is a model.

Same here.Guess the PW engine model isnt out.

it's the same version, see you next and thanks

Exactly, they are displaying the P&W rather than the GE.

I showed both engines, what changes is only the engines, the fuselage is exactly the same

If this guy showed the actual GE and PW, they sound the same here so not really looking forward to it.

First of all, thank you for your honest comment, I respect your opinion, I also spend most of the flight time in the cockpit, now I'm going to give my opinion on why I think the less relevant 50% that you commented should be corrected, I hope you don't get me wrong friend😊 . I think it's a bit of a lack of attention on the part of TFDi towards the consumer, or a lack of care, especially if we consider their excellent 717, which for me was better worked on even though it was for an old simulator. I feel that the company is in need of making money at the moment and will make a launch making as many cuts as possible in more hours of development, perhaps due to the long path they have taken so far, and as the community only praises them, no There is a reason to continue at the moment, so they launched it anyway, and another 2 months would fix all of this. I joined the simulation in the 2004 version and because it is about simulating for me this is closely linked to immersion, for me total immersion happens when it is confused with the real, for this I invest in hardware and use state-of-the-art simulators, but There's no point if developers start to regress with community support, if we don't charge soon we'll go back to having aircraft without a cabin, when we should be in the era of being able to leave the airport through the finger and actually be able to sit in the captain's chair, be able to get off of the aircraft doing a walkaround and everything, soon we will be able to see passengers boarding and sitting in their seats from what I can see of the GSX so if we can do all this, why should we settle for having less and less?!. I'm not looking for a barbie dresser in MD-11, but when I compare this product like, for example, Level-D 767 in simulation level and free products like FBW and others, I feel like I'm paying to settle for whatever they want me deliver, even more sold as pre-sale as it was. This version of MSFS has a wonderful look, it deserves more than what TFDi is delivering. Imagine if a developer creates a scenery without an interior and considering the hours worked and everything else, he ends up making more profit than the one who charged a little more, but did the entire interior and also did the surroundings of the scenery to make the approach more realistic and beautiful. , I believe that over time the devs. they will start making scenery without interiors with low quality textures again and pass the work on to the community if they want to improve the textures themselves, since they are companies aiming for profit and demand dictates the market, the same goes for a aircraft developer. This type of neglect already happens in the games industry, with fewer and fewer developers worrying about optimizing games or fixing bugs before launch, as everyone ends up buying pre-sales or doing a "launch" and financed by the community for the next few years, then they spend months developing the game how they want and fixing what they want. So to conclude, I think we would be heading in the opposite direction of the evolution we have reached. Thank you for our healthy conversation and sorry about my English😉

Yes, Simplaza will provide it for a price aligned to its quality. For free.

Lmaooo no they are not, no spool up, sounds nothing like the real thing. Reversers are instant etc. They are shit and not worth $70

100 Other people have done that

people should thank him for showing whats real

The question is: Is the TFDI MD-11 better than the slightly cheaper Sky Simulations md-11? I know that tfdi wanted it to look 'worn' as the md-11 is an older aircraft which does explain some of the dirty and grimy textures. Also, I'm curious what OP's game settings were. But yeah, I'm going to wait.

To be honest.. he needs to do better research. Nothing in this video is present in the release version. I got both cargo and passenger, and all textures/graphics are fixed. Nothing like this pre-release version showcased here. Rendering at 4k Ultra here btw.

Friend, I have no intention of creating an msfs channel, I'm just here to show people what the MD-11 looks like before they buy it and also to leave my opinion on what I think should be improved. The objective of my video is to explore the external and visual model, I am not addressing systems, for that I would make another video if that were the case and there are already other videos on RU-vid on the topic. Why do you insist that the model is outdated? Is yours different from that?.You guys talk like everything is a conspiracy, can I not like something or do I need permission? I don't hate TFDi, quite the opposite, for this reason, I was one of the first 50 to purchase the collector's edition, and I don't regret it.. I just want them to create the best MD-11 possible in every aspect.

Il maddog avrà si dei difetti a livello di texture, ma non ha pezzi di porte che escono dalla fusoliera, inoltre nel maddog funziona tutto: il radar meteo, il test per l’ossigeno, le failures… Qui ci sono invece degli errori grossolani, le texture dei rivetti messi a caso (indice che l’uv mapping è stato fatto male o di fretta) in un prodotto pubblicizzato come di alta qualità, a 70$ è semplicemente inaccettabile e i soldi miei non li vedono neanche col binocolo finché non sistemano questi errori e creano un prodotto decente. Il punto è che troppe volte ormai si vedono prodotti non finiti, fatti male e pieni di bug uscire sul mercato pubblicizzati come delle meraviglie, venduti a peso d’oro (il maddog non è escluso, cosa quasi 100$!) che non valgono i soldi che vengono pagati, ma siccome la comunità e l’utenza di msfs è grandissima, vengono lanciati comunque, tanto lo scemo di turno che li compra lo trovano sempre. Tutto questo non fa bene alla comunità di msfs, al marketplace e alle software house: prima o poi la gente si stufa, la freghi la prima volta, la seconda il prodotto che tu vendi a 4 volte il prezzo che vale, se lo scarica craccato.

@@GuidobaldoMariaRiccardel-ww8tze fanno pure bene

Your dumb 😎😎😎

Welcome to the Internet!

What is the No. 2 engine issue at 4:45?

You let somebody else's taste and opinion showing an outdated model decide for you? It'll be your loss, it's a great add on, imho

@@Topofdescent55 you must live in the future with version 5.0 friend. Otherwise this is the version 1.0.1 released yesterday 07/01

Consider seeing reviews from other people, my friend, the systems simulation part is very interesting, I just think that so far they have left something to be desired in terms of appearance as I showed and in some details at the moment it seems that it was completely designed for P3D in my opinion. But let's see if a miracle happens today and everything changes.

Honestly it’s not but it needs a lot of work to be done

The engine modeling is not good. Packs and bleed demand have no effect on n1, egt, any of it. Not to mention look at oil temp on startup or shutdown. Goes to 67 then drops immediately on stop. Or worse spikes on start.

It’s better than what sky simulations released that’s just painful