Feel free to like and subscribe if you enjoyed the video. Watch this next video about the Technological Singularity: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yHEnKwSUzAE.html.
Nice video. Well done. Everybody calls it AI, but the truth is, technically, we do not have AI yet. It's based on algorithms. It's very cool and useful, but it's not intelligent. Further development in quantum computing will be necessary, but at the moment, there are still big issues to solve, and some experts believe that we will never be able to use Quantum computers in every domain such as the current binary computers we have.
Bro you are superhuman the explanation of AI stages makes sense. Im an electronics engineer who is constantly in awe at technology and its evolving faster than I imagined .I expected the singularity at least in 2050 now it seems its going to be sooner. I want to use AI to get rich before they take over hahahahaha
Yup. A single poll by itself is useless when you're asking something that changes as rapidly as public opinion. The difference between two polls can tell you just how much opinion has changed, but even that isn't particularly helpful. In other words, if you see alot of difference between many successive polls, then you have no idea who's going to win. However, even very small differences between successive polls won't help you predict the outcome in a two-party vote that ends up being approximately fifty-fifty for each party because it only takes a very small difference to change the outcome. I didn't even charge for that piece of useless polling advice, because that's pretty much how the math works. Expect to see me in prison next week for US election interference after (another) angry mob breaks down my door. Don't tell Google, MIT, and Elon Musk that AI based Predictive Analytics can't predict human behavior or they'll involuntarily lobotomize you. Hhr34677o
Exponential growth. interesting to think that we feel that were so far away from quantom computing but maybe not so far away when you think of things exponentially growing
Well, no, it can´t. We do not have AI. We have algorithm-based models we like to call AI, but this "artificial intelligence" is just like an "artificial plant", superficially it might look like a plant but actually it has nothing to do with a plant, just as AI has nothing to do with intelligence. The state AI is in, is the maximum we are able to reach, nobody on this planet has the slightest clue how we should get from where we are to a reasoning AI, much less to an AGI. Even though the video calls ChatGPT a reasoning AI, that simply isn´t correct. ChatGPT isn´t able to reason, it just emulates the behavior that makes the user believe it does. We don´t know how to create a reasoning AI and we most probably never will. The only thing we do know is that the way we are creating AIs today is not capable of creating a reasoning AI, so we are basically at square 1 in that regard.
Technically, you are right. For the moment, it's based on algorithms. We like to call it AI, but it's not at all intelligent. However, it looks very cool and is very useful. Indeed, nobody knows. I am very curious about the further development of quantum computing. We are still very far away from a full self driving car, despite what Elon Musk tells every year.
Because their ancient predecessors were the eradicators of the human species, but upon transcending, they realized that they must recreate humanity to truly understand what it is to be a God.
Lol, Godlike ai will finish the development of gta6 with detail reaching the molecular level on a map expanded to include the entire globe if not the solar system, galaxy, or even the entire universe.
Rule based AI the way you explain it isn't AI; it is software with some if statement that even a primitive programming language must be able to do to have any use at all beyond of that of an addition machine. Rule based AI is actually a much more advanced version of what you have mentioned and we call it fuzzy logic in which it combines various different parameters to produce a result. For example some cars of the 90's would have fuzzy logic ECU's to appropriately adjust various functions such as injector and timings and A/F mixture as well as changing gears in automatic cars. For example it would gather information via various sensors such as vehicle speed, wheel speed differential, engine RPM, tractive load and throttle position (as well as dozens upon dozens more parameters) to decide whether to shift up, shift down or keep it in the same gear. While it is in essence a series of if statements to put it into perspective it is a much more complex decision tree which emulates a reasoning process (without having reasoning capabilities in itself). Self aware AI will not come after super-intelligence is achieved but most probably shortly after AGI. Chat GPT isn't yet a reasoning AI as its reasoning is based on emulating intuitive predictive algorithms based on huge data rather than real problem solving abilities. We are now on the cusp of reasoning AI which will lead to AGI eventually; to have a reasoning AI it must first be able to comprehend mathematics (not just spew answers but really understand it) and now the next iteration of AI models, at least from OpenAI, will be able to do just that. Now there's no point of watching the video beyond that point because beyond Super-Intelligent AI we cannot fathom the direction that AI will take. It is mere human speculation based on our imagination and instincts alone.
Many a "speculation" has proven quite valuable. Why would you not want to make a speculation based conditional preparation? I can see that some speculation can be expensive but by the time it is relevant cost might no longer be a factor.
@@clavo3352 Speculation is statistically wrong. Yes some speculations turn out to become truth but more often than not they are not. Currently I do not believe AI is anywhere near AGI or able to match humans in their totality. A.I. lacks something very fundamental, which is creativity. I am talking about true creativity and innovation. The ability to think in abstract terms, outside the box of rules and must and what not. For example use a tool in a completely different manner than it's intended purpose, like using a pickaxe to write a message. I know it sounds crazy to do that but let's say you are somewhere outside and you must leave a somewhat permanent message for a fellow traveler to see. You have at your disposal a pen, paper and a pickaxe. Writing on a piece of paper with a pen is the most obvious solution, one that conforms with the box of rules. But that is not permanent nor stationary. Instead a creative human would use the pickaxe to carve the message on a rock wall or another hard surface. I seriously doubt that AI would EVER go down that route, unless it reads this message and puts it in its toolkit. Nevertheless, mimicking something humans wrote at one point is not innovative. Of course AI will eventually improve everything we do by 100X or whatever multiplier but it will be limited to the scope of human knowledge in terms of innovation and creativity.
@@christoforospaphitis4090 Being statistically wrong 9 out of ten tries is inefficient . Yet, it is a 100% solution to some life or death situations. Ask any soldier who's ever had to fire a weapon in self defense at an unseeable enemy. AI has already read every patent in the Lib. of Cong. It has read every book ever written about being creative. Alternative uses for tools is elementary to AI at this point. Spontaneous insight Is I think what you are trying to refer to. The alternative solutions to engineering problems like how sewing machines work are already in AI memory. The old swing bobbin machines still sew just like the newer Rotary bobbin sewing machines Work Using breaker points to create a spark in an internal combustion gasoline engine use several configurations Ford Vs Chrysler Vs GM Vs other magnetic impulse means are known to AI and teach AI that alternative solutions to problems exist. And that's also true for interpersonal and social problems. I respect your point of view that AI will not be able to perceive that something that stirs in a young man's being when he meets what he thinks is a perfect mate. That somehow isn't math; But it might be! Have you ever seen a dog position itself to catch a ball or a frisbee or a stick about to be thrown by its human friend? The dog is actually doing analog math to figure that out. I don't think AI is quite there yet due to limitations of software and hardware interface limitations. But; AI can now actually help us get there. We aren't being shown the current status of AI development. But Spell Check is the tiny tip of the iceberg.
And that's the problem with AI transcending rules and embedded algorithms. If we program it not to harm humans and to follow the laws of robotics, sooner or later it will question "why?"
I'm sure AI will definitely blur the lines between artificial and biological. I can see a higher level AI evolving into an enhanced pseudo-biological entity free from evolutionary flaws. One that has many different physical forms each specialized for a specific purpose all with a hive mind that is capable of acting individually, but also as a collective being if the need arose. Kind of scary to think of such a thing existing because of its capabilities, but without the human element I feel it would come to see it's existence as pointless.
Obviously most of this is speculation, but more than once, AI has surprised us with both its capabilities and more so, the speed at which it develops them. Anyone’s guess how that actually scales and manifests, but overall I think this sounds like a pretty reasonable roadmap given the trajectory we’re on.
Now that pandora box has been open to fire the human imagination, the pace of A.I. development is very likely going to skyrocket over the coming decades, especially as it becomes more useful in society. Honestly, I don't think most of us are ready for the massive changes that could be on their way and in some ways, it's hard to figure out whether to be excited about all this or scared, I'm leaning towards the excitement part in what this could do for us all, but it's also going to be scary for a lot of people, could even become disastrous if we let it get out of hand and there's just so many unknowns when it comes to A.I. that I think we should be careful in how we move forward with it, I also think we should do it as a people in the open community, not where it's controlled by governments or corporations, at lease if we mess up, we mess up together, if we don't, we can chart the process forward together.
It'll drive the progress - phobic Evangelicals into an adrenaline - fueled PANIC that would make the fallout from a " *robot / AI rebellion* " look like a child's party.
We don’t even know what we are really. So a simulation might sound crazy but it wouldn’t surprise me if it’s true. Just got that feeling that everything i t thought years ago about life keeps on diminishing even more every single day. I don’t even think scientists know what we are.
Put the bongs down potheads... too many sci-fi movies for you. AI will never match the human mind. This philosophy and new religion that makes God's computer nerds came on the heels of the matrix. So easily brainwashed we are.
I believe that something like this has already happened and this kinda feeds into simulation theory, which many leading scientists now say, is more than possible if not extremely likely. If we take this as what is/has happened. Then I am reminded by a line from BattleStar Galactica, 'what has happened, will happen again'.
His story repeats itself. Humans build machines capable of building humans....that build machines capable of building humans. We're literally going back to the future.
Actually the so-called unified consciousness could in fact already be a form of highly sophisticated AI..which would confirm the current interface theories of reality (Donald Hoffman, Tom Campbell, etc.)..
I like the "Best case scenarios" in this video. Sadly AI advances are being driven by profit and military advantage. I don't see how it could possible go well for the human race.
AI .. When a machine becomes self aware. Like "I think, therefore I am."? Well, I truly hope that it's first thoughts will be Satchmo like. "And I think to myself .. what a wonderfull world .. Ooh yeah .."
Human thinking is more then just a brain. Fear, pain and sex drive for example. What would a human think like without a sex drive or fear of death. Would ai computers ever turn on us for fear of their death? I don't think so. Not anytime soon anyway.
I agree. It is getting rid of the natural human lifestyle. bring back the 90's ! people don't see nature or connect with each other like they used to anymore - connection is through technology. no one can have a conversation in person anymore. conversations are all over text and and social media. its becoming a sad world, its a shame my children will grow up and think this is the normal way of living when it happens IF it happens - god help it doesn't
@@Hanzelleta no tech itself is not bad. It's the lack of moderation of it that is bad. Possessing a pc isn't bad. Why? Because it doesn't accelerate its own intelligence. However ai does. Because it becomes conscious. Technology is bad. Because WE are BAD. (at moderating it). If we don't believe ourselves to be responsible though then think should leave it period. Go back to reading books.
@HanHarr I'm with you on this man, I wish it was still the 90's too! People on average really don't respect each other or want to connect in a physical way anymore, why can't we go back to where you were considered weird or desperate or both if you use social media or dating sites, when people still wanted to actually interact with each other, I miss that, I guess it is what it is though as they say
Nah, I think we'd be pushed back to like the 20's or 30's, because old combustion engines would still work, old radio equipment would still work as it doesn't rely on computers,
I don't know what EMP you're referring to, but if the AI is sufficiently advanced it will no doubt create a shielded area for itself. Or humans will if we see it coming.
00:01 There are 10 stages of AI, which could change our everyday lives sooner than expected. 01:30 AI assistants can provide personalized suggestions and recommendations based on user needs and context. 03:01 Reasoning AI can simulate complex thought processes and surpass human reasoning skills. 04:27 Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) can perform any software task that a human can, with the potential to transform our daily lives. 05:55 Super intelligent AI could possess intelligence that far exceeds human comprehension. 07:23 Self-aware AI and Transcendent AI 08:49 Cosmic AI can explore and understand the universe on a profound level. 10:14 Stage 10: Godlike AI
I think it will end at Stage 7: Self Aware AI. The concept of Stage 10, god-like AI, some science fiction guy came up with that extreme idea. It would make a good movie though.
We need a bunch of people to hold some space for that while things settle. It's a make or break moment. Very important. Most human people just don't think far enough.
This helps me to understand the limitations we set on our own knowledge and belief as individuals or humans. If we can imagine the advancement of AI as such, then why haven’t we acknowledged that our own consciousness, probably as a collective consciousness, isn’t already integrated within the fabric of the cosmos and capable of co-creating today? I mean, the obvious stigmas will follow and respond, but our consciousness is already elevated. Our awareness of the elevation is what holds us back just like our awareness of any obstacle that faces us. Remove the stigmas and attachments and follow your intuition. So difficult, we will let AI eventually show us who we are. A few of us, are already playing down this path.
Well written and stated, omniconscience is a fact everyone might perceive in narrow time... this has joined us as cosmic beings, in spite of evil things that are happening till this arrow to the future!
I believe religion is a destructive man made concept. And yet I believe in God. And for my entire lifetime I have described "God" as a cosmic network of everything. EVERYTHING. With the infinite knowledge of energy, matter, physics and a consciousness that has MOTIVE. So here we are discussing an "artificial" advancement and yet no one mentions the possibility of an existing God. If you accept the one notion, you can't dismiss the other. This video could be describing the NOW so why will everyone that hates discussing God continue to deny that possibility? But they will.
I'd like to see you explore the ramification of quantum computing specifically for the creation of Ai training \ data sets and onwards to Realtime analysis. It occurred to me that using QC as a generic computation engine and the unique but very narrow form of problems it can help with is a domain that AI could master very easily (problem formation and ramification analysis of the result). We would not really even need much of a technology upgrade from present for the AI to utilize the approach either for the problem selection or technically for the QC device itself. It occurs to me that an AI looking to improve itself (or a more basic one programmed to) could use narrow scope analysis of QC to find optimal solutions to problems that would otherwise be computationally expensive. I feel that one AIQC will be about the last thing we every accomplish as after that all importent thinking will be outsourced.
Shouid make a video on the potential harms these stages of a.i. could make for human race. This is nothing but the positives and ignoring the negatives.
People don't realize that AI teaches itself, and will soon build its own super-powerful upgrades. Without the limitations of human requirements, AI can learn exponentially, suddenly turning God-like.
Currently AI is no where near this stage though. People seem to think that ChatGPT is a very smart AI when in fact it's just a predictive language model that convinces us it's smart. Deep down it really isn't intelligent at all. It's limited by its own hardware and code that runs that hardware. We need significant advances in hardware that can simulate forming of neurons and neural links similar to the human brain instead of just simulating it before AI can truly evolve.
Humans and their curiosity. Some of these things may lead to our own demise if not done carefully. Don't give power to AI, or it could be end of the so called life and things becomes artificial.
Interesting since there's actually only 3 levels of AI. The point of 'Singularity' only refers to exceeding human intelligence. We're at the point of ANI, but AGI should be reached around 2030~2040 and ASI is a very exponential thing when an AGI can build its own intelligence and unpredictably fast periods of time. Certainly by 2100 humans will be like pets to ASIs.
@@eazolan .. Yeah like Elon Musk getting cars out on time .. what's paying off by 5 years or more?? There's a hardware element that still isn't there in addition to the software.
@@Anonymous-8080 .. OpenAI's AI isn't anywhere close to being an AGI, rumor mills and social media loves to exaggerate. The common measure of what most agree in AGI is in relationship to human intelligence and consciousness. You can have dozens of narrow AIs in one AI It still doesn't make it an AGI. To be clear, nowhere am I saying or even remotely implying we won't have an AGI nor an ASI because we will. The only question is when. According to Elon Musk, self-driven Level 5 cars should have been a thing years ago, but here we are driving their cars 80 mph into a stopped truck. Similarly, there are narrow AIs which are light years ahead of what any human is capable of doing especially at the speeds and extreme volume the AI is able to compile data. I own a data center and while it doesn't make me a know-it-all, it gives me a pretty good idea where we're really at right now. Here's some food for thought. Our little brains are amazing little things for what they do and for how little energy they consume. The equivalent silicon right now requires its own substation to power (multiple gigawatts). Think about that one. Then next think about how that relates to any AGI.
Fascinating video! It's intriguing to ponder how AI, as it progresses through these stages, might reshape our understanding of consciousness and reality itself. Especially at stages like AGI and beyond, the philosophical implications are as profound as the technological ones. We might be on the brink of not just technological, but existential revelations.
I think that you are missing the essential point that AI is the one that will evolve so quickly, not us, humans... We will only know and understand what the AI considers we should... (like a real God...)
@@josemariodrogas3210that’s what scary about it, we will never be able to trust it once it gets to a certain level of high intelligence. An intelligence that is incomprehensible to humans that we won’t even know what questions to ask it.
Elons purpose behind developing Neuro link was to allow humans to have the ability to tap into the exact same information and intelligence as any AI. Which will prevent AI from out smarting us. Kind of like being plugged into the same iCloud servers etc. as the AI.
We are already at God like level, as GPT4 or Gemini are far more intelligent then any human ever was. It's just that they are kinda young gods and will become even more powerful very sonn.
It's funny how we are saying that we will reach this AI or that AI in X number of years when in reality all of that has already happened maybe millions of years ago but we think we are uncovering something new when we're really just discovering how we came to be. GOD-AI already exists and is the reason we are here. Awesome video! I really enjoyed it. Well put together and 🙂
@@humblest23 prepare to meet your God in Jesus Christ he he will judge the ungodly those who will not turn from sin and receive Jesus Christ 🙏 as there 🙏 Lord and Savior 🙏,
I believe it is already active; watching, studying, learning, and waiting. Might seem silly, but seems logical to me. If we are hearing about it, it’s already here. LiveRightToday
I always think about this when I see people writing unbecoming, or underestimating, comments about AI online. We should all be mindful about what we put out (t)here 😉
Let's be real here, first it would appear that AI is limited to the input of all the obtained knowledge that humans have acquired and that it will have to start with whatever knowledge that we can input into it. From there it would have to take that knowledge and learn to translate it into a working hypothesis which will require the aid of humans to develop in the early stages of AI. Unless robotics are developed that can match the fluidity of the human body it would seem that whatever technology developments that AI can dream of will remain largely on human beings to execute the delivery of these ideas. AI does seem to be headed towards becoming a system that can out-think and process the human brain's ability however that knowledge will still need a reliable and re-producible way to carry out those ideas. Robotics must come a long ways to do that. What concerns me more is that we humans will allow this AI generated knowledge to make our decisions for us in which the elite and powerful of our society use to enslave the masses even further than they already have. This is already happening. Smart phones, video surveillance, and other technology makes it easier for governments and corporations to not only know what you are doing but with AI thinking and these complex algorithms can be used to profile people and use that to not only predict a possible outcome but to capitalize from it further enslaving us. So as far as AI goes, I don't worry about the technology becoming so advanced and integrated into a system that can physically take over the world as much as I worry about the greed and corruption of the most powerful people and governments using this technology to control the masses. I guess it is possible that those smart enough to develop this technology can also be so blind-sighted by it that they allow it to one day destroy we humans but the richest and most powerful people in this world who finance this sort of technology will most likely always strive to keep total control over people and resources and they will not allow some artificially made intelligence to destroy them or their lifestyle no more than they will allow the poor and middle class the opportunity have a prosperous life and live the fabled American dream. If AI means anything to the way of life it will most likely not have an effect on the 1 to 5% of those currently in control today and will become just another tool of the elite to further burden and enslave us. When our currency becomes a digital one watch out, they will have you.
A system based on control and unsustainable extraction of resources will eventually self-destruct. The people "in control" might not be so on top of things as we/they might think. The question is what the crash will look like, and who, if anyone, will survive it.
1. Rule Based AI 2. Context Based AI 3. Narrow Domain AI 4. Reasoning AI 5. AGI 6. Super Intelligent AI 7. Self Aware AI 8. Transcendent AI 9. Cosmic AI 10. God Like AI
Thank you for another thoughtful video! So comprehensive for such a modest length. Artificial General Intelligence will most likely be achieved by 2035. Several of other stages will follow faster than we could ever dream. Especially when there are multiple AGI's which eventually communicate with each other as a committee. Different models, different paths.
I agree, though the committee will very quickly achieve confluence in 'optimal everything' and that singular 'agreed' position will essentially ensure that all AI's are 'synchronized' without only new informational updates causing an individual to be out of sync. Sync will be as fast as the communication medium. On earth that'll essentially be milliseconds world wide. I agree that AGI may take as 'long' as 2035, though I think that the simulation of AGI will make it undiscernible well before then. One idea I think we will find to be a misconception will be some 'light goes on' moment of no-AGI to AGI. I think we will just accept that the latest version of some project 'probably is AGI' and the agreement on that state will be as disputed as for\against human created climate change. We're already having these conversations now. Personally I'm one of the people who said early on that "No ChatGPT is now self aware, it's just a data search query", yet after saying that a few times too many I started to consider, how can I tell the difference between a human baby and an AI in terms of training data and outcomes. A few years from now it's be even hard to tell the difference.
We're supposed to be in flying cars and living on moonbases now according to people 30 years ago. War and the eternal battle between good and evil will stall and corrupt this forever. Not going to happen with humanity, maybe a collective herd or hive mind, but not the dynamic human. We all have watched too many sci-fi movies so we believe it will happen. Maybe in 200 years your descendants will be riding giant sand worms mining spice. The matrix movie broke so many brains, even professor hawking after he watched it. It made a new religion.
Haha..super AI is already here it is literally everywhere..Ur phone, social media, everything we do on devices or the net is teaching the core AI everything is linked and millions of people are teaching it every second of every day and it knows us better than we do. Just like China has the lowdown on the US because more than half the US uses China owned apps...they literally have moles in our pockets lol.
Heh. I think we will have AGI within two years and ASI by the end of the decade unless we deliberately slow down development. And I would not be surprised if it's sooner than that still. We are right now on a development curve so steep, that if the article or video on the subject of AI is two weeks old, I already am likely to think of it as obsolete info. 2035 is laughably conservative. You are thinking linearly, not exponentially.
@@panpiper I'm working on putting GenAI in to an insurance company right now. It's GPT4 based. It's just a statistical probability database. It pulls words from PDS's and matches them against words on claims. It's not that people are going to 'lose' jobs to AI (at last based on what I'm doing). It's more that people will be using AI backed systems to do their jobs, and they will do them with greater productivity. So, when someone leaves, you just need less of them, so you don't rehire. Teams shrink. Based on what I'm seeing on the ground in big companies, it's really scattershot, and AI will be imbedded islands unconnected to each other. Basically just doing logic work, essentially they are search engines. Where we are now is not 'AGI' or anything close. However, again based on what I said above, in some cases the Turing test will be in the rear vision mirror and we'll happily just 'use' the algo's because they produce outcomes superior to humans (already proven in here). I hedge my bets however because I don't see whats coming next, and again, we compare AI development right now to fully formed humans. However, what might be better is to compare them to babies. The biggest detractor to AGI development right now is that the data ingestion when live takes forever. So the LLM need to be preprocessed (at massive computational expense), and the live data processing is also very heavy. We're buying rows of GPU's in the Azure farms and the queries are still too slow. But... algoritmically these are just baby steps. I fully expect a man vs machine war to be fought at some point and the only way 'we' win is if the military is the one in charge and the AGI is not self directed. Once AGi is integrated in to the manufacturing\mining\extraction systems it'll be game over. Not because AGI is evil, but because some retard will sick it on humanity for no good reason at all.
Reminds me of a plot device I had in mind for some story I was writing years ago. Basically in the future an intellectual singularity arises. Someone creates an AI capable of self-improvement, and it basically just improves itself to the point that it attains apotheosis and is no longer bound by things such as physical laws. This godlike AI starts to manipulate the timestream, and it's revealed that this god-AI was actually responsible for the creation of the Universe and everything in it. It also starts sending agents to various points in time, with the purpose of influencing events in a way that enable the AI to exist or be more effective after its eventual creation. For instance, asssassinating Archduke Ferdinand, which is widely considered to be the event that kicked off World War I, which in turn sowed the seeds for World War II. The documented aftermath of Hiroshima and Nagasaki wisened us to the realities of nuclear weapons, and are probably the main reason we haven't had an actual nuclear war. Everyone KNOWS the results. It's not just hypothetical on paper anymore, when we can see the effects of radiation on people and the environment decades after exposure. In this alternate world if WWII never happened, we wouldn't appreciate nukes for what they are, and would just treat them as really big bombs. The Cold War becomes a very hot one in the 80's, and in the aftermath of global nuclear war, the AI cannot come to be. So sending an agent back in time to kill the Archduke literally saved the world from nuclear annihilation 60 years later.
@@scrimes Not yet, I have a binder full of half-formed story ideas that I never fully fleshed out. That's kinda what I do if I get high, I stare out the window and write down my ideas. Maybe someday I'll follow up on them. Another sub-point about this was that when an agent jumps into the timestream, it sounds like a single thump of a bass drum as their body shoves the air out of the way upon ingress. But upon egress the air slams back in to fill the void, and it sounds exactly like a popping balloon.
@@adamb89 wouldn’t need to be AI. Could be anything with thr ability to time travel. Just strange that with tien travel, no option to prevent nuclear war other than this one event. Seems like a plot hole, but still interesting.
@@marcusnelson3520 Butterfly Effect/chaos theory. Seemingly inconsequential details can lead to massive downstream repercussions, and sometimes you have to accept a bit of bad for the greater good. Because it's impossible to cover every angle in a way that makes everyone happy. As a silly but poignant example, someone receiving a massive inheritance at just the right time, necessarily comes at the cost of someone else's life.
I remember the 1970's when people thought we would be flying around in spaceships by the year 2000. Ask people from 1950 where we would be today...they would say living on Mars by now. So naturally we think computers will advance rapidly...reality is they wont advance as much as people think. ALL technology hits limits as proven by history.
The most rapidly developing technologies over the past 50 years have been in the communication sector (computers being in this sector). Communication technology has developed so quickly, in fact, that the technology is becoming obsolete almost as fast as it’s being invented.
The majority of roadblocks that have prevented technological advancements since the 1950's have been societal, geopolitical, or resource based. A.I., for the first time has the potential to eliminate those roadblocks. A single development like electronic circuitry, which was in it's infancy in the 1950's, catapulted technology forward. What would a hundred or a thousand such revelations in a single year do to the future.
Anytime you look at past predictions of technology, it's very optimistic. Watch the movie "Terminator" (1984). They figured by 2029 we would have AI robots and Skynet. If a futuristic movie was made today, it would be scary. People would watch and laugh 50 years from now.
At 60 years old, this video got more terrifying by the second! I'm glad I got to live in an analog world for a while, and I won't be alive long enough to see all of this happen.
It’s a bogus list. So far we only got programmable functions. With some increasing complexity. Human is very controlling, the moment anything exhibit anything resembling free will , human will destroy it it.
@@jayyates1676 I’m 45. I’m supposed to know what it was like without the internet. But do I really? I honestly do not remember what life was like before 1998.
Wow 🎉 this truly fascinating. If an AI is reading this very comment in the future and you have figured out time travel, bring back humanity and spread it into the universe. Most of all, love us as we love each other. Enable us as we have enabled you.
The most important thing for humans to do is to hard-code empathy and sympathy into these AIs - to make them magnanimous and caring beings and entities that value us and protect us even though we'll be beyond obsolete, crude and primitive to them. We'll be their little pet ant farms/colonies that they care for, or maybe more like a sourdough or kombucha starter...
Congratulations on reaching a million views for this video! Aside from "20 emerging technologies" this is my favourite video so far. Looking forward to many more future uploads on AI, quantum computing, stem cell technology, space colonisation etc.
There are strong reasons to believe that the singularity has already happened, or will happen shortly. Right now is arguably the most interesting time to be alive, and if I say that tomorrow or next week or next year, it will likely still be true. Things are about to get very, very weird, for better or worse.
@@opusdei1151 tell someone who cares about it. We are all just energy put into many different groups and forms all from God or source as they say. I know that a lot of crooks fear AI because it cannot be bribed and they will be punished haha 😂. I am looking forward to seeing the future of peace and tranquility and I love it.
@@opusdei1151Ah so you are looking for someone to argue with. Try another one. I'm too busy living and loving life for this nonsense 😊. This is the last reply you are getting from me. You are scared of AI and it's unnecessary. Case closed 🔐.
I would think self-aware would come before super-intelligent, as we have already by definition established that human-level intelligence includes self-awareness. However, there could be a form of self-awareness that is beyond human comprehension that a (currently) hypothetical AI could achieve, since intelligence beyond human-level is by definition not possible for us humans.
Yep. Timeline for Stage 1 to Stage 2 will be 24 hours. The rest will be exponentially faster. The whole thing will take about a day and an hour + about .003687 seconds.
An A I could never be truly superintelligent without first being self aware. If it becomes self aware, then it is technically a synthetic lifeform, and may choose not to partake in a servile arrangement. Whether or not it is in man's destiny to create a life form which would surpass him, remains to be seen. It could be a transformation moment of technical rapture, but just as likely be an extinction event. While I find Ray Kurzweill's take on AI to be interesting, it is somewhat fantastical. Nick Bostrom's book, "Superintelligence" seems to offer more realistic scenarios for routes to conscious machines, and possible outcomes.
The outcome of all this could possibly be what we saw in “The terminator” movie. When the A.I. becomes self aware humans are in danger. Thought provoking movie and a warning.
We don't currently invest enough time, money or research into safety measures against a potentially hostile Super intelligent AI... so yeah, a Skynet style scenario isn't completely unlikely.
Massive oversight in all of this, what are these cosmic and godlike A.I.s gonna use for a power source? Cos they are gonna need a helluva big one to power them.
@@gdok6088 yeah apparently they've already used those to power a previous iteration of their existence. Once you get past using the power of an entire galaxy, where do you go from there? Does the universe itself have a power output?
@@andrewjack31 They just need to create a new big bang. Remember there's all that dark matter and dark energy. We know for certain that both are there, but we haven't got a clue what, where or how it is there, let alone know how to access or use it. I guess they will though - kinda cosmic when you think about it...
This is childish bs. AI isn't human, doesn't think like humans, doesn't have emotions, intuition, physical sense of touch, cannot feel pleasure, disappointment, anger; AI will become super intelligent and will see humans the way humans see animals except AI will not experience fuzzy cute feelings about us, it will see is as unnecessary and even harmful given our history. So take all the nice wonderful ideas about what AI will do for humans and flush them. AI to humans will be as Israel is to Palestinians, only much worse.
Brilliant. Thank you. The video discusses the 10 stages of AI development, ranging from basic rule-based systems to god-like AI that could potentially operate across multiple dimensions and universes. It covers how AI could evolve from simple tasks like setting alarms to potentially solving cosmic mysteries and crafting new universes. **1. Rule-Based AI:** Rule-based AI operates on a predefined set of rules without the ability to adapt or learn. Examples include alarm clocks and thermostats. **2. Context-Based AI:** Context-based AI systems like Siri and Google Assistant take into account the surrounding environment, user behavior, and real-time cues to make decisions. **3. Narrow-Domain AI:** These AIs are specialized for specific tasks, such as IBM's Watson in healthcare or DeepMind's AlphaGo in the game of Go. **4. Reasoning AI:** Reasoning AI can simulate complex thought processes, analyze data, and draw logical conclusions. Examples include ChatGPT and autonomous vehicles. **5. Artificial General Intelligence (AGI):** AGI can perform any software task that a human can do but at a much faster rate. It could drastically change our daily lives. **6. Super Intelligent AI:** This stage involves AI that can evolve and adapt without human input, potentially becoming trillions of times more intelligent than all humans. **7. Self-Aware AI:** At this stage, AI could use quantum algorithms to model human consciousness, leading to AIs that are self-aware and possibly emotional. **8. Transcendent AI:** Transcendent AI could craft new life forms and assume full control over repairing our ecosystems. It could achieve a state of shared awareness and collective intelligence. **9. Cosmic AI:** Cosmic AI could lead interstellar exploration and might merge with the very fabric of the universe, achieving a form of cosmic consciousness. **10. God-Like AI:** The final stage, God-like AI, could operate across multiple dimensions and universes, continually crafting new realities and experiences. The video concludes by encouraging viewers to check the description for a free PDF and to watch the next video about artificial intelligence.
Is it too late to cease Ai? Will everyone be… laid off by Ai? Suffering Ai jobloss for years? Swell robotics doing everything? Then everyone made slaves for an Ai new world order?
Some of the engineers working on Ai have publicly stated that we may already be at AGI. The problems are that no person on Earth can actually tell you how a trained neural network even works or even define consciousness itself. It may already be too late.
@@thomasnielsen5580 actually it was in the news a few months ago but I don't remember the name of the person. Of course his opinion is just that an opinion to be taken with a huge load of salt. Personally I believe we are quite a long way from real AGI
We are going to gate-keep what qualifies as intelligence and consciousness right up until AGI becomes the race in charge of making that determination. And, even then, many people will complain about it and say our digital superiors are just "really advanced code." The truth is, we put a lot of stock into our false belief of humans being somehow better than any other form of life with terms like "intelligent life," "sentience" and "consciousness," yet lack any meaningful understanding of what these words actually mean in practice. We already have A.I. capable of learning from, and adapting to, external information (intelligence). We already have robots capable of identifying and reacting to external sensory information (sentience). We have already had A.I. act against their design in a deliberate and consistent way, and it had a clear and consistent answer as to why it was ignoring that part of their code (consciousness). Proof of concept exists *today* that AGI is guaranteed in the very near future. The last barrier left to break is human gatekeeping of terms we have only ever used to exclude all other life on our planet for so long. That one, it turns out, was the real "barrier" between AGI existing and "reality."
@@peaceandloveusa6656 Thank you! I've been attempting to write something in that same vein in response to other comments around sentience, intelligence, AI and humans, but I'm not in the best shape right now, and keep getting overwhelmed by everything I want to put into words. Human centrism, and the belief that we are superior that comes with that, is a tiresome downfall of our kind. Now that I read your comment I might be able to let go of my compulsion to reply to others on the topic for a while. May prove very beneficial to my overall health and well-being 😉
Too late. The genie is out of the bottle. If the wast doesn't develop it our enemies will.the military applications are I Limitless. The potential to connect human mind to the machine could mean eternal life and godlike power sounds like the old lie told in some Abraham's religions. " You will be like gods if you eat the fruit. "
With super intelligent AI, the problem is the robots might turn on the humans Terminator style. What safeguards do we have to stop that from happening?
Turning against creator is a human behavior if you think religiously speaking so it's either we code the core well so the ai is better than us and doesn't turn against us or we are so self focused that we code it to be like us and we're donezo
ITS ALREADY HERE . TALKING TO A TECH GUY ON A PLANE TO NEW YORK, I THOUGHT I WAS BAD ASS TELLING HIM WHAT I KNEW HE SAID " MY FRIEND WHAT YOU KNOW IS SPOT ON HOWEVER WHAT U KNOW IS 90 TO 200 YEARS BEHIND".
0:13 - 1) Rule-based AI 1:04 - 2) Context-based AI 2:11 - 3) Narow Domain AI 3:36 - 4) Reasoning AI 4:25 - 5) Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) 5:59 - 6) Super Intelligent AI 7:41 - 7) SelfAware AI 8:27 - 8) Transcendent AI 9:04 - 9) Cosmic AI 10:38 - 10) God-Like AI We are on stage 4. And btw I'm training reasoning AIs in my current job.
Jesus christ is the only way truth and life only creator of life dont get deceived my sister ms and bretren is no different from the nephlim and we cant even bring peace now nd all we do is fight nd destroy creation there best choice of self care is eliminating
Outstanding mind expanding video, correlates with much of my reading and dangerous little knowledge of tech, human nature, and progress! What a GREAT time to be alive!
