The 1560 Geneva Bible in Black Genuine Leather 

Yeah I bought my leather version from Christian Bookstore and they even personalised the cover with my name and baptism location in gold for a small fee. Thanks for your detailed reviews Grant.

It’s not available anymore

@@williamjhunter5714 do you have a website?

It’s no longer available, is there somewhere else that sells the soft leather version? All I seem to find is hardcover.

@@TexanRayne I got a hard back for my birthday from eBay

@Eremias Ranwolf I fail to see how my comment would lead anyone to believe i have misconceptions.

@Eremias Ranwolf From your comment it is apparent that we have different views about the scriptures, so we are coming from different places. Safe to say however that I already understand what you are trying to tell me. Cheers.

@@nojustno1216 Yes and reading your words I know where you’re going too. It is into the land of Bible rejecting apostasy where you’re your own authority and pick what you “prefer” It’s called faith. Were you there at the resurrection? *yawn*

I've done the research, Geneva Bible is more accurate.

@@yeshualionofjudah7107 Incorrect.

You're welcome. If you decide to get it, I hope you enjoy your copy as much as I do mine. I think Hendrickson did a very good job with this one.

Consider: Counterfeit Bibled Geneva, NKJV and false KJB bibles. Yes they do print false ones.

@@judyswiderski2682 can you list a counterfeit that you know of?

@@RGrantJones They did a good job, I got the hardback of this.

Have you managed to find an adequate app ?

Counterfeit bibles Geneva. NKJV and false KJB.

JUDY SWIDERSKI , IF THIS IS SO ---- WHAT IS THE BIBLE --- THE WRITTEN * WORD OF * GOD TO BUY ???!!! ---- MILLIONS OF PEOPLE USE THE KJV. & SOME USE THE GENEVA BIBLE. ---- OF COURSE MANY ALSO USE THE ESV , G.NEWS , N.A.S.V. ETC. ----- TAKE NOTE !! JUDY ----- MANY * CHRIST CENTRED PREACHERS & TEACHERS USE THE K.J.V. ---- ARE YOU A ROMAN CATHOLIC ???!! ---- IF YOU ARE YOU HAVEN'T BEEN ENCOURAGED TO READ & STUDY HIS * WORD UNINSPIRED BY THE * HOLY SPIRIT ----- FOR HE * CHRIST IS THE * WORD OF * GOD THE * FATHER IN THE FLESH / HUMAN ---- HE WHO KNEW NO SIN , BECAME SIN FOR US SINNERS !! ----- THUS BELIEVE IN THE * LORD YESHUA / JESUS * CHRIST & YOU SHALL BE SAVED !! ACTS 16 VS.27 ------ 32 , ACTS 4 V.12 , JOHN 3 , 6 V.44 , 14 V.6 , READ / SEE -- THE GOSPEL OF JOHN. ------ AS HE THE * LORD YESHUA / JESUS STATED ---- UNLESS YOU BELIEVE THAT * I AM HE -- YOU WILL ALL LIKEWISE PERISH / DIE IN YOUR SINS !! ----- HE ALSO STATED --- BEFORE ABRAHAM WAS ( BORN ) * I AM. ---- HE IS ONE WITH THE * FATHER --- AS HE ALSO STATED --- YOU HAVE SEEN ME , YOU HAVE SEEN THE * FATHER --- * I & MY * FATHER ARE ONE. AMEN. ----- * CHRIST FOR ALL !! ------ JOHN UK. ------ -----

P.S. AN ERROR IN SPELLING ---- SHOULD READ ------ INSPIRED BY THE * HOLY SPIRIT. ---- * CHRIST FOR ALL !! ---- JOHN UK. ----

@@judyswiderski2682 shill!

Gerald Parker, Agree totally. It was great they did an update of the 1599, but I'd like to see modern Type with the 1560 Geneva Bible.

I believe you're correct. Thanks for the encouraging comment!

Thanks, Stacy. I enjoy making these videos, and it's good to know that others appreciate them.

Thank you for those very kind words, Chris Muller. I hope you enjoy this Bible. The notes in the side column are sometimes hard to read, but I've found they can usually be decrypted with effort.

Counterfeit Bibles Geneva, NKJV and false KJB. Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid.

Thanks for those kind words. Glad it was useful to you. You might want to watch this one also: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NkpctqtlK3s.html .

Counterfeit Bibles Geneva, NKJV and false KJB. Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid

You're welcome, Cheryl! Thank you for commenting!

It has some good features, the thick paper in particular. The archaic typeface can be a bit tricky to read. But I like this Bible quite a lot. I may get it rebound one of these days.

I have other books with the archaic typeface, otherwise I would be bewildered by it. You did a great job of describing its features, at any rate.

Thank you for that kind comment!

I think the edition he promoted is similar to this one -- ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NkpctqtlK3s.html&t= . Thanks for the encouraging comment!

Mr. Jones may well be correct on the quality but consider: Counterfeit Bibles Geneva, NKJV and false KJBs. ..Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid.

I try to focus on what I find interesting, and that usually isn't the box! Thanks for taking the time to comment.

Counterfeit Bible Geneva, NKJV and false KJB. Also, Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid.

@@judyswiderski2682 shill

Thanks, gypsy. It really is a nice Bible. I feel a bit like I'm a time traveler when I use it. I'm looking forward to your next review.

Thanks, sarachikorita. I find these little details fascinating. I'm not sure why.

The Cameo in this video is red letter also. That's the same book I used to compare to the Thompson Chain KJV's red in my quick, critical review of that Bible a few months back. The Cameo's red print isn't that bad. It's the best I've seen in recent history. But an even deeper burgundy would have been better -- and, you're right, black would have been best.

Counterfeit Bibles Geneva, NKJV and false KJB Also Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid.

Counterfeit Bibles Geneva, NKJV and false KJB. Also. Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid.

@@judyswiderski2682 even the 1599 Geneva is counterfeit?

​@@judyswiderski2682 Don't mind this user, shes a shill. Commenting on every video saying that this is a false Bible. Looks like the shills are out in full force trying to make people not read this particular version of the Bible. I wonder why..

Ναζωραῖος no kidding but it was the state sanctioned version of the bible they took out a lot of commentary compared to the peoples bible, the geneva bible

The Douay-Rheims bible is the most accurate bible translation.

I've grown to appreciate hardback Bibles more in recent months. They can be stored upright, and so are easier to access. Also, they take up less room on a desktop when not in use.

Sure. But before I start, remember that this is just an estimation technique: It assumes that the density of paper used in most Bibles is fairly constant. (1) Tally the page counts for the various sections (introduction, Old Testament, New Testament, any blank pages, etc.). (2) Measure the thickness of the text block in mm. (3) Divide the text block width by the page count. The resulting value is usually somewhere in the range 0.01 to 0.03 mm/page. (4) Convert that value to a thickness per sheet by multiplying by 2000. The 2 comes in because there are 2 pages per sheet. The 1000 is needed because there are 1000 micrometers per mm. (5) Multiply by 0.914. Where does 0.914 come from? It's an estimate of the paper density derived from measuring the text block thickness divided by the sheet count for ten Bibles of known paper weight. If you think about it, thickness per sheet multiplied by paper density gives you mass per square area per sheet, which is paper weight. If the sheet thickness is 35 x 10E-6 meters (35 micrometers), and I multiply by a paper density of 0.914 x 10E6 grams per cubic meter, the 10E-6 and the 10E6 cancel, and we're left with paper weight (35 x 0.914 grams per square meter). But using that value (0.914) gives an estimate that's a bit too high for Cambridge Bibles with "high opacity" (read "low density") paper. So if I suspect the paper is "high opacity", I use the lower factor (~0.84). I've thought about making a video to go through this in detail, but I suspect it would be about as popular as my "How to Measure Line Height" video -- in other words, not very popular. Thanks for the question!

R. Grant Jones R. Grant Jones, thank you so much for your response. I am grateful for your thoroughness in your generous answer and amazed by your intelligence (yet again) displayed in your method. This is so very helpful as I will try this out on all of my bibles. A video on this would be absolutely incredible. I for one would certainly watch as I did your “How to measure Line Height” video. Thanks to your video, I was able to do the line height in all my bibles and learnt a lot about point sizes when considered new bibles. So I for one am so grateful for your generosity, thoroughness, and shining intelligence, with a helpful spirit to boot! So thank you ever so kindly, Blessings,

I do like this Bible quite a lot. If you get one, the binding might seem stiff at first. But if you break it in a few times using the librarian-approved method, it will relax.

Lol Oh what’s the library Approved method?

@@yahnaza - You put the Bible on its spine on a flat surface, like a table or desk. Then holding the text block upright, you press the covers down to the sides. Then you take a few pages from the right or left side of the block and press them down. Repeat until all of the block has been pressed down. lifehacker.com/break-in-a-hardcover-book-without-ruining-the-spine-1509842301

Thanks for commenting, Nathan. That's all good information. I was likely misled into thinking the J wasn't present in English before 1633 by this sentence in a Wikipedia article: "The first English language book to make a clear distinction between ⟨i⟩ and ⟨j⟩ was published in 1633." But, of course, as you point out that *doesn't* mean that Js weren't used earlier.

R. Grant Jones you're welcome. I once thought things like that about the letter j. Then I saw it used in wycliffe and Canterbury. the reason why I had the confusion was because there are websites that claim to have old versions (retype?) in Roman font but most of the old spelling is there with exception of the "long s" that looks like an f. In these, tyndale thru 1611 kjv have no Js but wycliffe has "Jhesus" for Jesus. Another thing,These digital readings don't completely agree with their facsimile counterparts and occasionally a random verse is skipped.

@@anonymousperson6462 Counterfeit Bibles Geneva NKJV and false KJBs. Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid .

Plus. The Forbidden Book video RU-vid. Thus has some American history.

@@judyswiderski2682 if it weren't for Geneva or the Matthew, you might not have a kjv. Yeah, it's either that, or your kjv would likely read quite differently. Why? Well, because +80% of your over half of your kjv came from those bibles.

Thank you for the encouragement, Paul!

It is not a 'calvinist' bible: it is a Holy Bible, translated into English out of the original tongues.

@@njiomonansichristianfreder6374 The annotations in the Geneva Bible are distinctly Calvinist. It’s a Calvinist bible. One good thing about the Geneva Bible, at least it has the canonical books such as; Tobit, Wisdom, Baruch, Maccabees, etc.

No, sorry. I think it's out of print at the moment. You could try used book sellers, like eBay.

I think it's currently out of print, but a hardback is still available: www.christianbook.com/geneva-1560-edition-hardcover-protestant-reformation/9781598562125/pd/562125?event=ESRCG .

@@RGrantJones thank you. GOD BLESS YOU

Counterfeit Bibles: Geneva, NKJV and false KJB. Also, Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid .The Forbidden Book video RU-vid. It has some Americsn history. Church history: Lamp in the Dark video RU-vid.

@@judyswiderski2682 do which Bible is the best choice? I have been watching lamp in the darkness recently, do you know that there are other parts of it, like for example bridges to Babilon

@@irkairenka8552 Those are both excellent. Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid is very good. The unchanged KJB saved many souls for over 400 years.Hearts were changed. I used the NKJV for many years. Then I read the ESV and loved the wording. But when I opened to John 7 one day, I decided to read it. I was shocked. The ESV quoted Jesus lying to his brothers! He said he was not going to the feast. Not going, not me. Jesus actually said I am not going up yet to the feast. No not now, not yet. They both wait and then go. Which one lied? You may want to look up: Look What's Missing even in Revelation. God places a curse on them that change His word. Also Deadly Translation NKJV. Book: Look What's Missing by David Daniels chick Publication. My confidence in Jesus has greatly increased since I began reading the preserved word of God. Psalm12:6,7 . Many times you can put in the name of a bible followed by the word false to get info. Has this answered your question?

@MH RM The one that promised preservation. Psslm 12:6-7. "The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep then O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation forever." Please note. It does not say that other things will not be written about it to 'historically' prove it false. In fact the translators seemed to indicate that the perfection was in the salvation message. It does not quote Jesus in a Lie! In John 78 Jesus goes not tell His brothers, I am not going to the feast. Which means he is not going to the feast. Instead Jesus actually said, I am not going up yet to the feast. Which means, not right now. It promises preservation as stated. PSALM12:6,7. Ot did not leave out hundreds of words to cast doubt and confusion. Literally hundreds. Book: Look What's Missing by David Daniels Chick.com. It is not taken from the manuscripts that replaced the Antioch Textus Receptus. That was replaced by the 'older' manuscripts called the Codex B or Vaticanus from the Vatican basement. The other is Sianiticus. They do not agree with each other and the latter has about 30 changes per page. These changes were mainly made by a 15th century scribe. 15th Century!!! See; Look What's Missing even in Revelation. See: Deadly Translation NKJV. Ttuth is, you believe God can and did leave us a standard, or you do not.

@MH RM Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid. Very old but helpful video: The Forbidden book video RU-vid. Adullum Documentary Films Bridge to Babylon.

It may be out of print. The last time I checked, it was still available in hardback.

@@RGrantJones alright, thanks.

They signal the presence of a marginal reference. For instance, there's an asterisk next to "heathen" in Ps 2.1. In the margin nearby Acts 4.25 is printed. If you go to Acts 4.25, you find an asterisk at the beginning of "Why did the Gentiles rage ...", with a marginal note directing you back to Ps 2.1.

@@RGrantJones Thank you so much! That makes complete sense. This will certainly make my studies progress with more understanding. Deep gratitude!

@@RGrantJones May I be so bold as to ask another question about the text? In the Header of information that is at the beginning of John Chapter 1, there is an unfamiliar symbol. It comes after the word "humanitie" on the first line and looks almost like an "&" but different. I would be so grateful if you could enlighten me again, Dear Teacher.

@@chrismuller6563 - it is an ampersand, just shaped a bit differently. That heading maps the divinity of Christ to verse 1, his humanity to verse 14, and his office to verse 17.

Christ, Mr Jones has explained things well. But this should not be your main bible: Counterfeit bibles Geneva, NKJV and false KJBs. Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid. The Forbidden Book video RU-vid. It has some American history.

The 1599 edition has longer, more detailed notes. The translation is a bit different in places in the New Testament as well. Also, some printings of the 1599 edition omitted the Apocrypha section, and modern reproductions of the 1599 edition usually do so.

@@RGrantJones I'm thinking you mean the 1560 has more notes? Unfortunately, Hendrickson doesn't seem to sell the leather version anymore. I found one on a site that sells KJV bibles but it's pricey.

Yes, I find the Geneva Bible a little easier to understand than the KJV. Thanks for commenting!

Thank you

I discuss some of the differences in this video, ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-NkpctqtlK3s.html . A man named Laurence Tomson revised the translation in the 1570s, and many editions of the 1599 Geneva Bible include his changes. In that video, at about the 24:37 point, I show the translation changes I found in Romans. Many alterations to the notes were made also, usually by expanding them. I show an example of changes to notes in that same video at the 20:12 point.

The same text block is available in hardback, I believe. You might be interested in the facsimile editions available at greatsite.com. greatsite.com/shop/facsimile-reproductions/1560-geneva-bible-first-edition/

I don't remember how, when, or where I found that font, but it must have been almost twenty years ago. It's called JSL Ancient. Thanks for the question!

R. Grant Jones thank you!

In 2 Sam 21.19, the 1560 Geneva Bible says that Elhanah slew Goliath, but the note in the column explains that Goliath's brother Lahmi is meant. 1 Chron 20.5 explains that Elhanah slew Lahmi, the brother of Goliath. So what you've written seems accurate. (I notice that the KJV inserts "the brother of" in italics in 2 Sam 21.19.)

The Translator, The KJB does not have parenthesis around 2 Samuel 21:19 in any part. Counterfeit Bibles Geneva NKJV and false KJBs. Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid. The Forbidden Book video RU-vid. This has some Americsn history.

@@judyswiderski2682 You need help. KJV onliest are so ignorant.

@@seraphim_eternal Thank you for all the facts that support your statement. Without them it would be just another ignorant statement

@@judyswiderski2682 Lol. You would not have the KJV Bible without the Geneva Bible. KJV onliest make no logical sense.

Yes, I think it's true -- only it was a bit later than the Middle Ages. I understand that by the late 16th century Bibles had become inexpensive enough for working people to own them.

@@RGrantJones Wow, that is amazing. I think Geneva Bible looks like a study bible.

@@hassanmirza2392 - yes, it may be the first study Bible. It's certainly the earliest one I'm aware of.

@@RGrantJones It looks very expensive for its time, how was everyone able to afford it. Apart from that, what is the scriptural stability of this Bible compared to an NRSV or ESV Bible of today. btw, I finished reading half of Apocrypha, it is a very interesting religious read but has legends and anti-Abrahamic theology stuff too. It does not mention God much, nor invoke the name of the prophet.

@@hassanmirza2392 - I'm not sure what you're asking when you mention stability. The Geneva Bible text and notes were revised between 1560 and 1599 -- the notes much more than the text --, but not since then as far as I know. The Geneva Bible influenced the KJV, and they read similarly. But sometimes I find the Geneva easier to understand.

No, it isn't. This is a 1560 Geneva. Between 1560 and 1599, the Geneva Bible was revised by Laurence Tomson. It's not hard to find differences between the 1560 and the 1599 if you read them side-by-side. The Hendrickson 1560 Geneva is bound in flexible leather.

True. Thanks for commenting, Judy!

Counterfeit Bibles Geneva, NKJV and false KJBs. Yes there are false also. Tares among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid. The Forbidden Book video RU-vid. This has some American history. Church history: Lamp in the Dark video RU-vid.

I think the leather-bound edition is out of print. A hardback is still available for purchase: www.christianbook.com/geneva-1560-edition-hardcover-protestant-reformation/9781598562125/pd/562125?event=ESRCG .

Paul Treslove I noticed that as well but the pronunciation of the two ‘the”s is different. Wonder if it had anything to do with that...?

Counterfeit Bibles: Geneva. NKJV and false KJB Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid .The Forbidden Book video RU-vid.

Thanks for commenting, Susan. You'll find it at Daniel chapter 14.

Looks like you got your Mary's confused. King James I of England is the same person as King James VI of Scotland and his mother was Mary, Queen of Scots, who was a cousin of both Queen Mary I of England and Queen Elizabeth I of England. Both of the mentioned English queen's were childless, yet, the Scottish Queen Mary had a little boy (James) when Queen Elizabeth I executed the Scottish Mary. Whilst King James VI was a boy King, Scotland was under a Regency till he came of age. Years later, when Queen Elizabeth I of England died childless, King James VI of Scotland was the closest living relative, thus becoming King James I of England. I'm a fan of history and a monarchist.

All I'm sure of is this: the box says it's genuine leather. Thanks for the question!

@@RGrantJones My KJV Bible looks similar, and it said genuine also. However, when I look up bonded in google images, it looks like bonded leather and not genuine.

@@glennjohn3919 - It isn't great leather, whatever it is. I have one bonded leather Bible I bought in the late 80s that's held up well and is more flexible than some more recent genuine leather covers.

@@RGrantJones Yeah it's unfortunate. I think if you want awesome leather, the smaller publishers are the best.

Counterfeit Bibles Geneva. NKJV false KJBs. Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid.

Holy King James did not detest The Genva Bible. Neither The Holy Scriptures state that, nor the marginal notes. People just like to speculate and propagate untruths, especially against The Authorized Holy King James 1611 which reigned, reigns and shall reign supreme until The End.

@@njiomonansichristianfreder6374 Are you a Freemason? King James I and the Geneva Bible Example of the blackletter version (1608) In 1604, the year after he claimed the throne of England, King James I hosted and presided over a conference pertaining to matters religious, the Hampton Court Conference. While the Geneva Bible was the preferred Bible of Anglican and Puritan Protestants during the Elizabethan Age, King James I disliked the Geneva Bible and made his views clearly known at the conference: "I think that of all [English Bibles], that of Geneva is the worst." Apparently, his distaste for the Geneva Bible was not necessarily caused just by the translation of the text into English, but mostly the annotations in the margins. He felt strongly many of the annotations were "very partial, untrue, seditious, and savoring too much of dangerous and traitorous conceits..." In all likelihood, he saw the Geneva's interpretations of biblical passages as anti-clerical "republicanism", which could imply church hierarchy was unnecessary. Other passages appeared particularly seditious: notably references to monarchs as "tyrants". It followed that the need for a king as head of church and state could be questioned also. James had been dealing with similar issues with the Presbyterian-Calvinist religious leaders back in Scotland, and he wanted none of the same controversies in England. Also, if annotations were in print, readers might believe these interpretations correct and fixed, making it more difficult to change his subjects' minds about the meanings of particular passages. Title page of a Geneva Bible Apparently dated 1599 but probably printed circa 1616 to 1625. So when towards the end of the conference two Puritans suggested that a new translation of the Bible be produced to better unify the Anglican Church in England and Scotland, James embraced the idea. He could not only be rid of those inconvenient annotations, but he could have greater influence on the translation of the Bible as a whole. He commissioned and chartered a new translation of the Bible which would eventually become the most famous version of the Bible in the history of the English language. Officially known as the Authorized Version to be read in churches, the new Bible would come to bear his name as the so-called King James Bible or King James Version (KJV) elsewhere or casually. The first and early editions of the King James Bible from 1611 and the first few decades thereafter lack annotations, unlike nearly all editions of the Geneva Bible up until that time. Initially, the King James Version did not sell well and competed with the Geneva Bible. Shortly after the first edition of the KJV, King James banned the printing of new editions of the Geneva Bible to further entrench his version. However, Robert Barker continued to print Geneva Bibles even after the ban, placing the spurious date of 1599 on new copies of Genevas which were actually printed circa 1616 to 1625. Despite popular misconception, the Puritan Separatists or Pilgrim Fathers aboard the Mayflower in 1620 brought to North America copies of the Geneva Bible. Source: Wikipedia, Geneva_Bible

@@njiomonansichristianfreder6374 King James jailed Christians who rejected his Masonic Bible and his Masonic Church of England. 1601: James became a Freemason of the Lodge of Scoon. 1603: James became king of England. James persecuted Puritans and Separatists (Pilgrims) who refused to conform to the new Church of England. 1604: Mason King James appointed Richard Bancroft, later George Abbot, as Archbishop of Canterbury. King James authorized the translation of the Bible to honor himself through future generations. 1606: King James denied Puritans' request to start their own biblical church and forbade them from leaving England. 1607: King James' sheriff and bailliffs arrested and jailed the Separatists who boarded a ship for Holland, including the 17-year old William Bradford. 1608: King James' armed officers arrested and jailed those on shore trying to leave England for Holland. 1608- 1620: King James persecuted the Pilgrims in Holland. William Brewster had to go into hiding.

@@HansS11160 I wasn't born yesterday so, before I annihilate you with reliably authoritative and truth-full sources unequivocally voiding your fabricated and untruthful assertions, and since you are the one who initiated spewed false accusations: You must provide, for the records and for all to righteously judge, the sources attached to each assertion that you made, for each year. Otherwise you shall be, by default, a false accuser and a liar. Sola scriptura. "And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them."Jésus-Christ i.e. God i.e Adonaï{Authorized Holy King James 1611}

@@HansS11160 🚨I abhor freemasonry and freemasons, along with all liars and false accusers, so, to answer to your question: no, I am not a freemason, never was, am not, and never shall be. Provide the sources for the assertions that you made, for all the records and for all to righteously judge. Otherwise, you shall be, in default and by default, a false accuser and a liar no better than the freemason that you appear to despise. When you do, I will precisely, accurately and truthfully reply providing irrefutable sources and references for all to judge righteously. Sola scriptura. "Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?"Jésus-ChrisT i.e God i.e. Adonaï{Authorized Holy King James 1611}

Yes. I wish I didn't. Thanks for commenting!

Why? Language changes, even Israel changed, people at Jesus's time can't speak hebrew so you mean they need to learn hebrew (which takes 2-10 years) to read scripture? Absurd!

I think that's the list price. It's about $70 at Christian Book Distributors: www.christianbook.com/the-geneva-bible-genuine-leather-black/9781598562132/pd/562132 . Thanks for viewing and commenting. Merry Christmas!

There are plenty of ways for you to read Sacred Scripture. Long as you allow the Wisdom within to transform you, it really doesn't matter what version you use. However, if you have the means, I suggest buying a fancy Bible as a longterm spiritual investment for not only you but your descendants. Let your grandchildren know that "this" (Bible) is their story and their legacy, a precept reinforced by the book's quality. Nonetheless, if you're unsure of God's will for you concerning this matter, just pray on it.

asmr

Amen! Counterfeit Bibles Geneva NKJV and false KJBs. Tares Among the Wheat Sequal video RU-vid. The Forbidden Book video RU-vid. This has some American history.

Voilà 💯🎯

It's a false bible, because heretics have no authority to make their own bible. The bible is a catholic book, they are the ones who get to decide who where and how it gets printed to ensure no corruptions.

@@ACF1901 shillbag

@@cheese9812 The U.S. is looking to be more like the Whore of Babylon, Washington is on Seven Hills.

@@ACF1901 then why are you saying that the geneva bible is a catholic bible? its not.

@@cheese9812 I didn't.