The 2 Easiest Ways To Improve Your Site's Accessibility 

That's really great idea though.

It already exists (still experimental though): prefers-contrast

@@Yougi Not sure this answers the question for colour blindness. Different types would require different values although you could just go the monochrome way in every case (which should be the last resort fall-back X ) ).

@@Yougi they made it for people who use windows high contrast mode. From w3c draft document "The prefers-contrast media feature is used to detect if the user has requested the system increase or decrease the amount of contrast between adjacent colors. For example, many users have difficulty reading text that has a small difference in contrast to the text background and would prefer a larger contrast." So it's not for color blind people and should not be used as either.

How is that rude? Are people on the Internet now sensitive to everything?

I can't even figure out what the problem is. What were you offended by?

@@khodis2002 Twas a joke in reference to the videos title card my friend, don't overthink it.

Just like the video and you can find in later “liked videos” playlist.

Same for me too

same thing happens on my side

Actually I see it only if the element fails in the light house audit and if I close the dev tools it's lost forever. But ig CSS overview (experimental) shows it all the time. Cmd Shift P on dev tools and type css overview

@@tharunrajoptimus5229 Yup, I got it now.

This is Chrome dev tools

There are ~300 million color blind people on the earth...

Internet should be inclusive

Yes it's our (UX designer-s/frontend developers) job. There are ~300 million color blind people on the earth. Also our job to do the right typography, ergonomy, and every other accessibility feature for the endusers.

Internet should be inclusive

Should we also remove handicap parking, braille, sign language, and subtitles as well then.

This is a dumb opinion